Search Climate Insights Directory

The document identifies the Belizean tourism industry as highly vulnerable to climate change, particularly due to its reliance on coastal and reef assets. It proposes a comprehensive set of technical, managerial, policy, and educational adaptation strategies, emphasizing the need to mainstream these options into national frameworks like the National Climate Change Policy and Integrated Coastal Zone Management to ensure long-term economic robustness.

The document outlines the high cost of natural disasters in the Caribbean, noting $33bn in damages from 2000-2009. It identifies sea-level rise, coastal erosion, and changing rainfall patterns as primary threats to the tourism and agriculture sectors, while suggesting micro-insurance, irrigation, and spatial planning as adaptation strategies.

The document assesses future climate projections for Belize City using a Weather Generator tool, finding that while June, July, and August may see decreased rainfall and increased temperatures, October and November are projected to experience higher intensity and more variable rainfall. These changes, combined with the city's flat elevation and poor drainage infrastructure, increase the risk of severe flooding and associated health hazards. The study emphasizes the need for updated building codes, better land-use planning, and integrated climate change considerations in infrastructure design to mitigate these risks.

The Climate and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN) is an alliance of six organizations providing research, advisory services, and knowledge sharing to help developing countries integrate climate resilience and low-carbon growth into their national policies. The network focuses on four strategic themes: climate-compatible development strategies, improving access to climate finance, disaster risk management, and supporting Least Developed Country (LDC) negotiators. CDKN operates across Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean, implementing projects such as national climate strategies in Rwanda, disaster-resilient reconstruction in Pakistan, and urban adaptation planning in Colombia and Ecuador.

The report evaluates the risk of permanent inundation and frequent flooding in Bangladesh by 2100. Using high-resolution elevation data and two emission scenarios (RCP 2.6 and RCP 8.5), it finds that under high emissions, over 1,000 km2 of land and 8.6 lakh people could be permanently submerged. The Chittagong division is identified as having the highest population exposure risk. The analysis notes that results may be lower bounds due to elevation model errors and does not account for future shoreline defenses or population changes.

Plan 4C is a strategic framework designed to make Cartagena de Indias the first coastal city in Colombia to implement a long-term vision for climate compatible development by 2040. The plan addresses the city's high vulnerability to sea level rise, coastal erosion, and extreme weather, which threaten its critical port, industrial, and tourism sectors, as well as its UNESCO World Heritage status. It proposes five core strategies: creating climate compatible ports and industries, committing the tourism sector to climate action, protecting historic heritage, adapting neighborhoods, and implementing ecosystem-based adaptation. To support these, the plan identifies 36 projects and three cross-cutting axes focused on information, education, and planning. The total estimated cost for adaptation, including complementary city projects, is approximately COL$1.5 trillion. Implementation is to be managed by the Cartagena Climate Action Center (CACC) and supported by the Inter-Institutional Commission on Climate Change (CICCC).

The document describes CCORAL, a Caribbean-specific tool used to screen policies, legislation, plans, budgets, and projects for climate risks. It outlines a three-step process involving basic screening questions, a detailed vulnerability workbook, and risk management analyses. The briefing specifically details how CCORAL applies to the water sector, including water policies, legislation, supply plans, financial budgeting, and infrastructure projects, noting that the tool is designed for use by both climate specialists and non-specialists.

The document details a three-day outreach program in Dhaka, Bangladesh, aimed at disseminating the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). It covers a press conference, a formal launch event for policymakers, and a session for young leaders. Key discussions focused on the specific vulnerabilities of Bangladesh—particularly sea-level rise and extreme weather—and the need to integrate AR5 science into national development planning, such as the 7th Five Year Plan. The events highlighted Bangladesh's leadership in adaptation through the BCCSAP and BCCTF, while noting a critical gap in peer-reviewed scientific publications from the country.

The Raising Risk Awareness (RRA) project focused on applying extreme event attribution to understand the role of climate change in specific weather events in Ethiopia, India, and Kenya, while using the Surging Seas tool to assess coastal flooding risk in Bangladesh. The project sought to bridge the gap between science, communication, and policy to improve disaster risk management in developing countries.

The document uses a fictional scenario in Krishna Nagar, a low-income coastal neighbourhood in India, to demonstrate the process of climate vulnerability assessment and the subsequent creation of resilience plans. It highlights the challenges of community consultation and proposes a multi-sectoral approach to adaptation, including the establishment of disaster risk reduction networks, the use of green infrastructure like mangroves, and the improvement of early warning systems through partnerships with technical universities and mobile operators.

The paper examines how multilevel governance can facilitate climate change adaptation in Jamaica's coastal-marine environments. Using a case study approach and Social Network Analysis (SNA), the authors identify the roles of various state and non-state actors. Preliminary findings highlight the importance of bridging organizations, such as the Department of Fisheries (DoFish), and the potential of the newly established Climate Change Focal Point Network to strengthen horizontal coordination among government agencies. The study argues for the need to strengthen vertical ties between national and local levels and to leverage public-private partnerships to enhance adaptive capacity.

The document outlines the severe climate risks facing Southern Africa, noting that warming in the region's interior is occurring at approximately twice the global average rate. It projects reductions in agricultural production and freshwater availability, an increase in the frequency and intensity of heat waves and severe storms, and a higher risk of long-duration droughts. The text highlights that these risks are significantly exacerbated in 'low mitigation futures' where global warming exceeds 3 °C, compared to scenarios limiting warming to 1.5 °C or 2 °C. Specific vulnerabilities include food insecurity, which affected 6.5 million South Africans in 2019, and the threat of extinction for thousands of species.

The Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning (DAFF) issued a formal objection on 18 October 2018 to the proposed extension of the Tormin Mine and its infrastructure expansion. The Department cites the applicant's history of unlawful expansions and non-compliance with existing environmental authorisations as primary reasons for adopting a 'risk-averse and cautious approach' and objecting to the development.

The document provides a detailed comparative analysis of six EIA regimes, examining how they determine which activities require assessment, who conducts and pays for the studies, the timing of the process, scoping requirements, the types of impacts considered, the evaluation of alternatives, mitigation measures, review processes, final decision-making, post-decision monitoring, and the extent of public participation.

The Human Rights Committee (CCPR) is increasingly linking climate change to human rights obligations under the ICCPR, particularly the right to life. In 2018, General Comment No. 36 established that climate change and environmental degradation are serious threats to the right to life, creating a due diligence obligation for States to take reasonable positive measures against foreseeable threats. In 2019, the CCPR began issuing climate-related recommendations to States, including Cabo Verde, and addressing climate issues in lists of issues for the United States and Dominica. In the case of Teitiota v New Zealand, the Committee acknowledged that climate change impacts could trigger non-refoulement obligations if they violate the right to life, though the specific petition was rejected. Additionally, a pending case involves Torres Strait Islanders against Australia, alleging that failure to mitigate emissions and adapt to climate change violates their rights to life and culture.

The document outlines how climate-driven events like sea level rise, temperature increases, and extreme weather lead to human consequences such as dislocation, disease, and infrastructure damage, which in turn violate rights to life, health, water, and housing.

The report details the environmental and social harms of offshore oil and gas, from seismic exploration and production to transportation and decommissioning, asserting that these activities exacerbate the triple planetary crises of climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss.

The document analyzes the 1992 Framework Convention on Climate Change, detailing the scientific consensus on global warming and the diplomatic tensions between industrialized and developing nations during its creation. It highlights the lack of binding emissions targets and the complexities of the financial mechanism and technology transfer.

The document is a bibliography listing reports, academic papers, and legal documents used to analyze climate change impacts in the Maldives. It categorizes sources into sections covering physical and human impacts—including sea level rise, coral bleaching, and health risks—as well as the implications for human rights and the responsibilities of the international community.

The document argues that the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights is a viable forum for indigenous Arctic peoples to seek redress for global warming impacts, such as melting sea ice and thawing permafrost, which threaten their rights to life, health, property, and culture. While the Commission cannot force emissions reductions or compensation, a formal finding of human rights violations would provide a legal basis for accountability and increase global pressure on major emitters like the United States.