Search Climate Insights Directory

Ohio is experiencing an increase in the frequency and severity of extreme precipitation, flooding, heat, and drought, with natural disaster costs reaching $2 to $5 billion in the first half of 2026. These hazards are compounded by aging infrastructure, including high-hazard dams and levees, and a legacy of industrial pollution from Superfund sites. The state's energy grid is under strain from extreme heat and surging demand from over 200 data centers, while state policy continues to favor fossil fuels and obstruct renewable energy development. Key military assets, such as Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, face significant flood and wildfire risks. While Ohio lacks a comprehensive statewide climate governance framework, some progress has been made through municipal adaptation plans and significant support from federal agencies like NOAA, FEMA, and the EPA.

The document evaluates the early climate record of Prime Minister Andy Burnham, noting a slow initial response to the record heatwaves of summer 2026 and subsequent mixed signals. While the government has committed to net zero by 2050, invested £30 million in community energy, and planned a 'Wildfire Summit', it faces criticism over potential approvals for the Jackdaw and Rosebank oil fields, a new Heathrow runway, and possible dilution of the ZEV Mandate. The author argues that ambitious climate action is supported by the British public, including the 'Rooted Patriots' demographic, and urges the government to prioritize bold action over cautious tinkering.

The document highlights findings from the 2026 federal assessment of Canada's changing climate, warning that Canada will be nearly 3 C warmer over the next two decades regardless of future emissions. It emphasizes that while some warming is unavoidable, failing to cut global emissions could lead to 5 C of warming by 2100, causing the near-total disappearance of glaciers and severe permafrost thaw. The author calls for immediate investment in infrastructure adaptation—noting that every dollar spent now avoids up to $15 in losses—and a swifter national transition to clean power to avoid uncontrollable devastation.

The We Mean Business Coalition supports President von der Leyen's focus on electrification and faster permitting for energy projects, while emphasizing the need for grid connections to enable investment. The Coalition also calls for improved climate risk planning, resilience investment, and the closure of the insurance protection gap to mitigate disaster losses, welcoming the proposed EU-wide heatwave plan.

The Canadian Climate Institute asserts that climate policy and economic growth are not mutually exclusive, arguing that Canada's long-term prosperity depends on a robust energy transition plan. The document highlights the global growth of clean energy technologies, noting that the US and China are leading in this sector. It advocates for investments in clean electricity networks, critical minerals, and a clean innovation strategy in the 2026 federal budget to prevent long-term GDP reduction caused by climate change.

The Canadian Climate Institute asserts that climate policy should not be viewed as a trade-off against economic growth, but as a necessity for it. The author argues that Canada must leverage its competitive advantages in critical minerals and clean electricity to capture a share of the global clean energy market, which reached nearly US$1.2 trillion in 2025. The document emphasizes that the costs of climate-related damage—including infrastructure repairs and health costs—are rising faster than the costs of solutions, and warns that climate change could reduce Canada's long-term annual economic growth rate by almost half. It calls for the 2026 federal budget to translate the proposed National Electricity Strategy into action and prioritize best-in-class clean technologies for all major infrastructure investments.

The We Mean Business Coalition emphasizes that while global temperatures are likely to exceed 1.5°C, the severity and duration of this overshoot depend on immediate actions by governments and businesses. The Coalition advocates for a priority focus on clean electricity, electrification of transport, buildings, and industry, the reduction of methane and superpollutants, nature restoration, and the strengthening of adaptation and resilience to keep the pathway back to 1.5°C open ahead of COP31.

The document outlines a comprehensive strategy for state, local, and tribal governments to combat information threats associated with extreme weather. It categorizes threats into environmental, geopolitical, and hate-based vectors, and advocates for a shift from reactive crisis communications to proactive 'trust architecture' built through grassroots partnerships. The guide provides a risk matrix for triaging threats based on immediacy, severity, and prevalence, and offers technical advice on 'pre-bunking' and Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) to ensure high-trust information remains visible in AI-driven search environments.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) developed an evolved methodology to track 'attacks on science'—defined as political interference in federal science—starting in January 2025. The system combines automated R scripts for RSS feed collection and keyword filtering with human content analysis to categorize attacks by type, topic, and stage of completion. The methodology aims to systematically capture a comprehensive breadth of attacks in perpetuity, including those that are only threatened, to document their chilling effects on the federal scientific enterprise.

The 2026 floods in Upper Assam, which affected over 500,000 people and caused at least 99 deaths, were driven by high exposure and structural vulnerability rather than climate-driven rainfall increases. Analysis shows the rainfall events had return periods of less than two years and that human-induced warming of 1.4°C did not materially alter their likelihood or intensity. The study highlights that unplanned urbanization, deforestation, and colonial land policies have increased vulnerability, while reliance on rigid embankments has proven insufficient for adaptation.

The document outlines the severe health risks associated with wildfire smoke, particularly fine particulate matter (PM2.5), which is linked to respiratory crises, cardiovascular events, and premature deaths. It highlights that these impacts are exacerbated by social inequalities and affect vulnerable groups such as children, the elderly, and pregnant women. Beyond immediate smoke, the guide warns of long-term mental health issues and toxic contamination of soil and water by lead and asbestos. It encourages journalists to connect these events to fossil fuel use and to utilize specific air quality monitoring tools and expert sources.

The document highlights the escalating risk of wildfires in the UK due to climate change, noting the 'total devastation' of 150 hectares in Suffolk and the strain on emergency services. It reports public demand for government investment in renewable energy and climate resilience, while calling for a clear policy direction from the Prime Minister regarding North Sea drilling and nature restoration.

The author contends that climate change amplifies existing inequalities, making it critical for Canadian adaptation plans to move beyond infrastructure and focus on people. By integrating accessibility and reconciliation into the design of emergency responses and infrastructure, the author argues that governments can create a safer environment for all citizens, particularly the elderly, people with disabilities, and Indigenous communities.

The author contends that climate change amplifies existing societal inequities, meaning adaptation plans that assume a uniform experience of disaster are ineffective. By centering accessibility and reconciliation—specifically for people with disabilities, older adults, and Indigenous Peoples—governments can create more resilient infrastructure and emergency systems that benefit the entire population. The text highlights British Columbia's legislative framework as a starting point for integrating these commitments into climate preparedness.

The report finds that Americans with disabilities are more likely to perceive global warming as harming their own health than those without disabilities, though a majority of both groups may still underestimate these risks. It also highlights a significant trust gap, with disabled Americans showing lower trust in federal agencies and climate scientists, while maintaining similar trust in primary care doctors and first responders.

The report argues that communication is a critical climate solution that must be integrated into the budgeting and design of all local government programs. It outlines six key strategies for effective communication: investing in dedicated funding, conducting audience research, prioritizing climate justice and equity, leveraging social norms and storytelling to reduce psychological distance, utilizing trusted community messengers, and employing diverse communication channels. The document emphasizes that local governments are uniquely positioned to drive action because a majority of Americans want their local officials to address climate change.

The paper examines the 'adaptation implementation gap' and the role of stakeholder engagement in bridging it. Using a mixed-method approach involving European practitioners, it finds that while operational enablers are recognized, structural institutional and social barriers—such as governance and resource constraints—limit engagement to narrow, passive approaches. The author argues that advancing engagement requires addressing these systemic constraints by strengthening local capacity, embedding mandates across sectors, and empowering citizens through economic resources and trust.

The author contends that treating the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the implementation of heat adaptation measures as a zero-sum game is a dangerous fallacy. While some argue that adaptation (such as air conditioning) should be prioritized over mitigation, and others express concern that cooling technologies exacerbate heat, the document asserts that both are essential. It highlights that failing to reduce emissions increases the future burden of adaptation, while failing to adapt leads to immediate loss of life, citing the 2021 heat dome in British Columbia. The proposed solution is the rapid expansion of a clean, affordable, and flexible electrical grid to power modern cooling technologies like heat pumps, combined with long-term urban planning such as improved insulation and increased tree canopy.

The author contends that treating the need for immediate heat adaptation and the long-term goal of reducing emissions as a trade-off is a 'dangerous false choice.' While some argue that focusing on emissions neglects immediate safety, and others suggest air conditioning worsens heatwaves, the document asserts that both are necessary. It argues that the solution lies in decarbonizing the electricity grid to provide clean, affordable power for cooling, while simultaneously improving home insulation and urban shading to reduce energy demand.

The Canadian Climate Institute warns that Canada's current adaptation efforts are insufficient to meet the rising costs of extreme weather, which include a record $9.1 billion in insurance claims in 2024. The author contends that the National Adaptation Strategy lacks a systematic basis for resource allocation and that critical programs are at risk of expiration or budget cuts. The document advocates for a shift toward targeting the highest risks—such as flooding, wildfire, and extreme heat—and improving coordination with local governments and Indigenous-led adaptation to avoid future economic losses.