Search Climate Insights Directory

The Climate Risk Assessment Guide – Central Asia establishes a framework to downscale climate impact understanding to support sub-national risk management. It integrates climate change assessment with disaster risk assessment, focusing on six types of capital: human, natural, social, financial, physical, and political. The methodology combines an impact-based assessment (using monetary damage and Delphi-based livelihood scoring) with a perception-based assessment to identify gaps between expert data and local views. The guide emphasizes the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for data management and provides a structured process for creating climate risk profiles to prioritize management actions.

The report introduces a framework for assessing climate resilience in food systems, moving from the household level up to national policy. It presents two analytical tools: 'Roulette 1' for food security analysis and 'Roulette 2' for resilience analysis. The framework emphasizes that resilience is an emergent property of system interactions and suggests specific indicators for food utilization, access, availability, and supporting infrastructure. The tools are designed to be applied through participatory processes, such as the CRiSTAL-SAN tool, to help policymakers and local practitioners identify vulnerabilities and develop long-term adaptation strategies in Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua.

The document outlines an eight-step process for integrating scientific climate data into adaptation planning, emphasizing that adaptation is a socio-institutional learning process rather than a purely technical exercise. It demonstrates this workflow through a case study in the Philippi suburb of Cape Town, where climate data is used to evaluate the trade-offs between maintaining vegetable production and rezoning land for low-cost housing. The guide highlights the importance of using both historical observations and future projections (RCP 4.5 and 8.5) to inform decisions on flood risk and heat stress.

The document examines how six annual conferences on community-based adaptation (CBA) have fostered a 'community of practice' characterized by 'high creativity collaboration'. It details the growth of the network in terms of participant diversity and thematic expansion, while arguing that future evaluations must move beyond simple inputs and outputs toward a 'realist' approach to understand how, why, and when such communities improve climate adaptation practices.

The report evaluates Cambodia's efforts to mainstream climate resilience into development planning. It highlights strong political will, evidenced by the establishment of the National Climate Change Committee (NCCC) and the development of the Cambodia Climate Change Strategic Plan (CCCSP). However, it identifies significant gaps in information services, noting that hydrometeorological networks are fragmented and vulnerability assessments often produce contradictory results. Financially, climate-related expenditure is heavily dependent on external sources, with 86% of funding coming from outside the country between 2009 and 2011. While numerous projects have been implemented under the National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA), the report notes a recent shift toward programme-based approaches and community-level interventions.

The assessment identifies that vulnerability in the Virunga landscape is driven by high population density, land mismanagement, and social marginalisation. While gorilla-based tourism has boosted regional economic development, benefits are unevenly distributed, and the Batwa community remains particularly vulnerable due to extreme poverty and restricted land access. Soil erosion is attributed more to poor agricultural practices on steep slopes than to rainfall alone. The document suggests that improving adaptive capacity requires agroforestry, restoration of marginal lands, and sustainable fuelwood management.

The report examines the vulnerability of Peru's agricultural sector to climate variability and change, focusing on the Junín and Piura regions. It identifies key threats such as El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO), droughts, floods, and frosts, and analyzes their impacts on priority crops like maize, potatoes, and mangoes. The document evaluates Peru's institutional capacity for risk management, noting a disconnect between disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation frameworks. It recommends improving agricultural practices, water management, and data collection, while calling for a comprehensive national program to integrate climate risk management into development planning.

The document identifies a significant disconnect between climate adaptation research and its application in policy and practice within the Nordic region. It argues that traditional systemic approaches ignore 'agency' and the operational realities of stakeholders. To address this, the authors introduce an actor-oriented framework—implemented through the NORD-STAR project—that integrates modelling, visualisation, and policy analysis across thematic areas like land-use, energy transitions, and finance. Crucially, the framework expands the definition of adaptation to include responses to the consequences of climate policy, not just climate impacts.

The CRiSTAL Forests User's Manual describes a desktop application used to identify and prioritize climate risks to forests, ecosystem services, and livelihoods. The tool employs a participatory approach, combining community consultations with scientific data to help project managers revise existing activities or design new ones that support climate adaptation. It specifically focuses on the role of forest ecosystem services—provisioning, regulating, and cultural—in creating vulnerabilities and supporting adaptive capacity. The manual outlines a structured process involving two main modules: understanding the local livelihoods and climate context, and evaluating the implications for project design, including optional assessments for greenhouse gas mitigation and REDD+ participation.

The manual describes the CRiSTAL tool, which integrates climate risk assessment with a sustainable livelihoods framework to help project planners design adaptation strategies. It outlines a three-phase process: understanding the livelihood and climate context, evaluating project implications, and facilitating monitoring and evaluation. The tool emphasizes participatory methods, such as community consultations and focus groups, to identify vulnerable resources and prioritize adaptation activities based on specific evaluation criteria.

The Agriculture, Vulnerability and Adaptation (AVA) Project in Colombia's Upper Cauca River Basin utilizes a four-dimensional model to assess climate vulnerability, integrating biophysical, political-institutional, economic-productive, and socio-cultural factors to overcome the limitations of one-dimensional models.

The Agriculture, Vulnerability and Adaptation (AVA) project in Colombia's Upper Cauca River Basin is developing a comprehensive vulnerability assessment model to help the agricultural sector adapt to climate change. Moving beyond traditional biophysical models, the AVA approach integrates four dimensions: biophysical, political-institutional, economic-productive, and sociocultural. This interdisciplinary and participatory method involves stakeholders—including farmers, researchers, and government authorities—to identify key indicators and collect data, ensuring the results are relevant to local needs and less sensitive to the uncertainties of climate modeling. The project aims to create a universally accessible tool for adaptation planning that can be scaled to regional or national levels.

The CRiSTAL User's Manual describes a desktop application and methodology for screening development projects to ensure they support climate adaptation. The tool uses a livelihoods-based approach, combining scientific climate data with participatory community consultations to identify climate risks and design adaptation strategies. It guides users through three phases: understanding the livelihoods and climate context, evaluating project implications, and supporting monitoring and evaluation (M&E).

The Adaptation Fund lacks a formal, transparent methodology for defining and measuring 'particular vulnerability,' leading to an ad hoc allocation process. An analysis of 48 proposals (25 approved) shows that funding has reached a wide range of socio-economic conditions and HDI levels, with no clear pattern correlating approvals to national vulnerability indices. While the fund prioritizes concrete adaptation measures in agriculture and water, the absence of standardized vulnerability criteria undermines the ability to systematically compare project merits or ensure that the most vulnerable populations are prioritized.

The paper examines how climate change vulnerability is distributed across social groups in the UK, highlighting that those who emit the least are often the most vulnerable and most likely to be negatively impacted by both mitigation and adaptation policies. It critiques 'top-down' impacts-based assessments for ignoring social complexity and proposes a shift toward 'bottom-up' vulnerability assessments and governance based on fairness to protect marginalized populations.

The Stockholm Environment Institute's Climate Impact Equity Lens (CIEL) tool reveals that while aggregate economic models often suggest modest climate damages, these averages hide a wide disparity in outcomes. By comparing individual climate damages against the savings gained from not reducing emissions, CIEL demonstrates that the most vulnerable people—particularly in poor countries—are already facing net losses. While many currently benefit from the status quo, the tool projects that by 2100, the majority of the global population will suffer net losses, and by 2150, almost everyone across all regions will be net losers, except potentially in China.

The report examines a sample of nine climate risk screening and assessment tools used by bilateral/multilateral donors and international NGOs. It categorizes adaptation tools into process guidance, data provision, and knowledge-sharing types, noting a dichotomy between top-down, impacts-driven donor approaches and bottom-up, vulnerability-driven NGO approaches. Key findings highlight a 'usage gap' where practitioners prefer synthesis documents over complex data tools, and a difficulty in moving from risk assessment to concrete adaptation action. The authors recommend continued training, better integration between data and process tools, and the development of a common risk management framework and terminology to reduce duplication and confusion in the development community.

The document argues that religious beliefs can both increase and decrease vulnerability to climate change and disaster risks. Using a case study from El Salvador, it demonstrates that faith influences how people perceive hazards like floods and droughts and determines whether they adopt preventive measures. The author notes that while religion can improve the lives of the poor, certain interpretations of disasters may hinder sustainable development, highlighting a gap in policy guidance for integrating belief systems into adaptation and risk reduction programmes.

The document introduces the 'Smart Garage' concept—the convergence of electrified vehicles, smart grids, and building energy systems—and provides a framework for a stakeholder charrette to overcome implementation barriers. RMI's financial modeling suggests that while basic convenience charging (V0G) is costly, integrated scenarios like Vehicle-to-Building (V2B) and Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) can be profitable, with V2B estimated at a net present value of $34B. The briefing identifies critical technical and business barriers, such as battery costs and lack of standardization, and outlines 'hot topics' for debate, including control of charging and the role of government subsidies.

The IAI is seeking to fill two vacancies on its Science Advisory Council in 2010, replacing Rana Fine and Maria Carmen Lemos. The nominations will target four priority areas: Climate Science (specifically climate modeling), Ecosystems and climate (specifically biodiversity), Policy and Human Dimensions of global change (including vulnerability assessment, mitigation, adaptation, and science-policy interaction), and Integration and modeling (focusing on resilience and social-ecological systems modeling). Candidates are evaluated based on basic criteria of scientific excellence, geopolitical balance across the Americas and the Caribbean, and gender balance, as well as second-tier considerations including interdisciplinary research ability, representation of science in the Americas, and the ability to bridge the science-policy divide.