Search Climate Insights Directory

The document uses a departmental input-output model to project that Colombia could lose up to 448,000 jobs by 2035 due to decreased coal, oil, and gas production. It highlights a significant disparity in impact: 'Vulnerable' departments (Arauca, Casanare, Cesar, La Guajira, and Meta) face severe production drops (32%-38%) and job losses that cannot be offset by renewable energy projects alone. While 'Large Economies' and 'Limited Affectation' departments also face job losses due to interdepartmental linkages, they possess higher potential for compensation through structural changes in agro-industry and nature tourism. The brief argues that a 'just transition' requires a structural economic shift, specifically proposing the creation of food manufacturing clusters and local-content requirements for renewable energy imports to maximize domestic employment.

The document analyzes four scenarios for the decommissioning of coal and gas plants in Colombia, finding that while average energy balances remain positive, significant deficits in 'firm energy' (guaranteed supply during critical periods like droughts) would emerge. The most severe deficit of 37.9% by 2038 is projected under both synchronous and sequential phase-out scenarios. To mitigate these risks, the report argues for additional renewable capacity beyond current plans, improved transmission infrastructure, and the implementation of battery energy storage systems (BESS).

The document analyzes how the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated structural inequalities in Latin America, specifically affecting women's labor participation and health, the vulnerability of indigenous populations regarding food security and healthcare, and the slow integration of green jobs into economic recovery plans. It provides detailed case studies for Mexico, Chile, and Colombia, highlighting gaps in public spending and the need for intersectional policies, improved data collection, and a transition toward a sustainable, low-carbon economy that ensures decent work and social justice.

Transforma's anti-corruption policy mandates a 'zero tolerance' approach to corruption for all its representatives, including board members, staff, and contractors. The policy requires compliance with Colombian laws, specifically Law 1474 of 2011 and Law 1712 of 2014, and prohibits bribery, facilitation payments, and the use of organizational assets for illicit purposes. It establishes a formal reporting mechanism via a dedicated email address and a structured investigation process led by the Board of Directors and a Transparency Officer. Additionally, the organization prohibits financing political campaigns and states that it does not engage in lobbying as part of its corporate purpose, focusing instead on providing technical knowledge for socio-economic and climate action initiatives.

The policy defines conflicts of interest as situations where independent judgment is limited by personal, financial, or political interests. It mandates proactive disclosure of such conflicts to the Transparency Officer or management and prohibits the use of the organization as a platform for external promotion or personal gain. Specific restrictions are placed on hiring processes, asset acquisition, and the acceptance of gifts, with a formal resolution process involving the Executive Direction or the Board of Directors depending on the seniority of the personnel involved.

This document outlines the Gender Equity and Inclusion Policy of Transforma, an organization committed to overcoming discrimination and promoting equal rights and opportunities regardless of gender. The policy establishes a framework for integrating equity into organizational processes, including hiring, performance evaluation, and leadership, while aligning with international human rights and gender equality standards.

The document details Transforma's performance evaluation policy, which applies to project associates, coordinators, and administrative support staff. It defines a five-point scoring system ranging from 'Insatisfactorio' (1) to 'Excelente' (5) and mandates a process involving supervisor evaluations and associate self-assessments. Evaluations are conducted at the end of service contracts, with specific meeting timelines set for new consultants (3 months after entry) and annual reviews. The policy allows associates to request a second evaluation within 15 business days if they disagree with the results. The outcomes are used to guide training plans, hiring processes, and fee adjustments.

The policy outlines a zero-tolerance approach to exploitation, sexual abuse, and abuse of authority, defining these terms and establishing both informal and formal grievance mechanisms. It specifies that such misconduct is grounds for immediate contract termination and prohibits sexual activity with children under 18, regardless of local laws. The document details a formal process managed by a Transparency Officer, including preliminary reviews, investigations, and protections against retaliation for whistleblowers.

This document outlines the environmental protection policy of Transforma, establishing the organization's commitment to sustainable development, the conservation and restoration of life on Earth, and the mitigation of negative environmental impacts across its projects.

The document outlines Transforma's Occupational Health and Safety Policy, based on Colombia's Decree 1072 of 2015. It mandates pre-occupational and periodic medical exams tailored to job roles (office, field, drivers, food handlers), requires the use of personal protective equipment provided by Transforma, and specifies vaccination requirements for certain risks. It also defines work accidents and occupational diseases, establishes protocols for public safety hazards, and requires proof of social security and ARL payments from contractors.

The policy defines transparency as a democratic value and mandates that Transforma make most of its operational information public, including annual financial statements and project reports. It establishes a system of 'active transparency' through public knowledge spaces and 'passive transparency' via formal information request channels. While the general rule is open access—with products shared under Creative Commons licenses—confidentiality is maintained for specific partner agreements or directive decisions. The policy applies to all staff and contractors and is supported by communication channels such as WhatsApp, email, and the organization's website.

The policy outlines a framework for monitoring and auditing project progress and measuring long-term impact through objective evaluations. It mandates the use of explicit theories of change and SMART indicators for all projects, requiring periodic reporting to the management team and mandatory training for staff to ensure compliance with monitoring obligations.

The report argues that Colombia's NDC 3.0 must move from implicit to explicit fossil fuel phase-out (FFPO) goals, aligning national targets with the COP28 Global Stocktake. It provides quantitative modeling for renewable energy capacity, energy storage, and the retirement of coal and gas plants, while emphasizing the need for social protection and economic diversification for affected communities.

The document argues that Colombian national development banks, specifically Finagro and Findeter, have a significant opportunity to incorporate climate risk and stranded asset analysis into their existing financial management frameworks. While current regulations from the Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia (SFC) require asset valuation and risk management, they do not explicitly mandate the inclusion of climate variables. The report highlights that in the Global South, stranded assets can extend beyond the energy sector to include agriculture, road infrastructure, and construction. Case studies of Finagro and Findeter reveal that while both comply with SFC standards and report low credit risk, they do not publicly detail how climate-related risks or potential stranded assets are identified or managed, creating a gap in their long-term financial sustainability planning.

The document examines the risk of 'stranded assets'—assets that lose economic value before the end of their useful life—driven by climate regulations and the global transition to low-carbon economies. It highlights that Latin America, despite low emissions, holds significant fossil fuel reserves that may become unexploitable to meet the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C target. For Colombia, the risk is acute due to a high economic dependence on oil, gas, and coal exports. The report provides a qualitative framework for investors to identify these risks and points toward renewable energy, specifically solar photovoltaics and wind, as profitable alternatives.

The research evaluates climate governance across 12 intergovernmental fora, including the G7, G20, ASEAN, and AU, using a framework of five functions: Guidance and Signal, Rules to Guide Collective Action, Transparency and Accountability, Means of Implementation, and Knowledge and Learning. The analysis of 1,412 references reveals that while most fora have adopted long-term decarbonization visions and medium-term targets, the strength of these signals varies. Informal groups, particularly the G7 and G20, provide the most significant contributions. Key strengths include commitments to the Paris Agreement and joint R&D, while critical weaknesses are found in transparency and accountability mechanisms, as well as a lack of actionable policy coordination. Some signals, such as the promotion of gas as a transition fuel or the image of coal, are noted as potentially contradictory to Paris Agreement goals.

The document identifies critical bottlenecks in Colombia's energy transition, specifically in transmission infrastructure and licensing, which cause project delays of three to six years. It argues that while capital is available, there is a shortage of bankable, large-scale projects. To bridge a projected annual investment gap of 27.7 billion COP (approximately 7.5 billion USD) in clean energy for 2026-2030, the report recommends utilizing blended finance, asset securitization, and a dedicated economic transition fund to support regions dependent on fossil fuels, where 448,000 jobs are at risk by 2035.

The document explains the mechanics of carbon credits, distinguishing between regulated markets under the Paris Agreement and voluntary markets. It highlights that while Latin America and the Caribbean accounted for 22% of global carbon credit sales in 2021, the region lacks the robust regulation needed to prevent environmental and social risks. The guide warns against over-reliance on the forestry sector, the risk of 'greenwashing' in voluntary markets, and the potential for 'double counting' of emission reductions. It recommends establishing transparent national registries, ensuring fair benefit-sharing with local communities, and prioritizing structural decarbonization over simple offsetting.

The document outlines a strategy to minimize conflict in renewable energy deployment by identifying 'energy soils'—areas with high technical potential and low social or environmental sensitivity. It proposes a participatory process involving local energy planning, community engagement, and the establishment of energy communities to ensure social acceptance and shared benefits.

The document serves as a journalistic guide to the just energy transition in Colombia. It distinguishes between the country's clean electrical matrix and its fossil-fuel-dependent energy matrix, highlighting the potential for non-conventional renewable energy sources (FNCER) and the strategic importance of transition minerals like copper and lithium. It argues that a just transition must protect social and environmental rights and suggests that decarbonization offers greater employment opportunities than continuing with natural gas. The guide also addresses the environmental risks of mining and the specific case of Vaca Muerta in Argentina as a cautionary example of non-conventional hydrocarbon extraction.