Search Climate Insights Directory

The Legal Resources Centre (LRC), representing a coalition of civil society, labour, and community organisations, submitted a series of formal requests to the South African Parliament and Presidency between March 2014 and February 2015. The LRC challenged the constitutionality of the Mining and Petroleum Resources Development Amendment Bill (MPRDAB) and the Restitution of Land Rights Amendment Bill, arguing that the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) and provincial legislatures failed to facilitate reasonable public participation. The documents detail specific concerns regarding the removal of community participation rights in mining, the discretionary nature of water use licenses, and the influence of industry lobbying over legislative changes.

The Mining and Environmental Justice Community Network of South Africa (MEJCON-SA) and Mining Affected Communities United in Action (MACUA) have lodged an appeal to the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment to set aside an environmental authorisation (EA) granted by the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE) on 09 May 2025 to Tetra4 (Pty) Ltd. The EA allows Tetra4 to extend its production right to incorporate 18 additional wells across 80 farm portions in the Free State Province. The appellants argue that Tetra4 used a Basic Assessment Report (BAR) process under section 102 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) to circumvent a previous ministerial order from 01 August 2024, which had set aside a larger 'Cluster 2' expansion due to inadequate climate and groundwater assessments.

This Appeal Response Report, submitted by the Centre for Environmental Rights on behalf of MEJCON-SA and MACUA, argues that the Environmental Authorisation (EA) for Tetra4's Cluster 2 gas production expansion should be set aside. The appellants contend that the project's Final Environmental Impact Assessment Report (FEIAR) contains fatal flaws regarding groundwater impact analysis, climate change assessments, and public participation processes. Furthermore, they argue the project is neither necessary nor desirable due to the risk of stranded assets and the availability of cheaper renewable energy alternatives, and that South Africa lacks the regulatory capacity to monitor and enforce compliance in the gas sector.

This fact sheet by the Centre for Environmental Rights details the environmental and socio-economic risks associated with marine phosphate mining in South Africa. It focuses on three prospecting rights granted to Green Flash Trading 251, Green Flash Trading 257, and Diamond Fields International, arguing that such activities would cause irreversible damage to marine ecosystems, threaten the fishing industry, and occur within a deficient legal and governance framework.

This document is a technical annex of an air emissions license for a refinery operated by Chevron, dated 31 March 2014. It specifies the inventory of storage tanks, emission limits for various combustion and cracking units, required air pollution control technologies, and strict monitoring and reporting obligations to the Licensing Authority and the City of Cape Town.

Circular 8/2013 provides updated procedures for appeals under the Land Use Planning Ordinance, 1985 (LUPO) in the Western Cape, following a High Court judgment that declared section 44 of the LUPO unconstitutional. The circular outlines how the Minister will now handle appeals—through dismissal, setting aside, or substitution—and details the administrative requirements for municipalities processing these appeals.

This document is a compilation of legal summons, news articles, emails, and personal essays centered on a long-running conflict between the Amadiba community on South Africa's Wild Coast and the Australian mining company Mineral Commodities Limited (MRC). The materials detail allegations of human rights abuses, fraudulent attempts to secure mining rights for titanium deposits at Xolobeni, and the 2016 assassination of anti-mining activist Sikhosiphi 'Bazooka' Rhadebe.

This document is an Atmospheric Emission Licence (WCCT006) issued by the City of Cape Town to the Chevron Refinery in Cape Town. Issued on 31 March 2014 and valid until 31 March 2079, the licence authorizes various listed activities related to petroleum refining, including liquid and gas combustion, catalytic cracking, sulphur recovery, and the storage and handling of petroleum products. It details the refinery's operational processes, raw material capacities, and general conditions for compliance with the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act, 2004.

This document is a technical annex of an air emissions license issued on 31 March 2014, detailing the emission limits, monitoring requirements, and operational conditions for a refinery operated by Chevron. It specifies pollutant thresholds for various combustion installations and storage facilities, mandates ambient air quality monitoring at specific stations, and establishes reporting protocols for non-compliance and emergency incidents.

This report details a passive sampling campaign for BTEX compounds (benzene, toluene, ethyl-benzene, and xylene) conducted at the Chevron Cape Town Refinery from June 2010 to June 2011. The study monitored air quality across 12 locations to assess compliance with national and international ambient air quality standards.

This document is an affidavit by Mark Adrian Botha, an independent environmental services professional, submitted to the High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria) in Case No: 50779/17. Botha provides his professional qualifications and confirms the accuracy of specific allegations made in a founding affidavit by Thelma Thandekile Nkosi.

The Legal Resources Centre (LRC) submitted a statement to the Portfolio Committee on Water and Environmental Affairs on 7-8 May 2013, opposing proposed amendments to the Section 21 listed activities of the Air Quality Act (Act 39 of 2004). The LRC argues that the 2012 amendment process lacked administrative fairness and transparency compared to the 2009 process, resulting in reduced standards for major polluters and extended compliance timeframes.

This supporting affidavit, deposed by Disha Govender on behalf of the Ndifuna Ukwazi Trust (NU), seeks the admission of NU as the fifth amicus curiae in a High Court case (A155/19). The document outlines NU's mission to advance urban land justice and human rights in South Africa, specifically through a multipronged approach combining litigation, research, and community advocacy. It argues that the legal model used by public interest law centres—acting in their own interest, the public interest, and on behalf of clients—is essential for accessing justice and realizing constitutional rights, and that any ruling against this model would adversely impact NU's work.

This document consists of a practice note and legal submissions filed by the National Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs to the Constitutional Court of South Africa. The submissions argue that holders of mining rights or permits granted under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) are not exempt from obtaining separate environmental authorisations under the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) for listed activities.

A legal notice filed in the High Court of South Africa (Mpumalanga Division) stating that the First Respondent, the Information Officer of the Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency (MTPA), intends to abide by the court's decision in Case No: 487/2017.

Nicole Loser, an attorney at the Centre for Environmental Rights, submitted a confirmatory affidavit in May 2019 to the High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria). She confirms the truth of the contents of a supplementary founding affidavit by Phillipine Lekalakala as they pertain to her and the CER, specifically confirming telephone calls mentioned in the original document.

A legal notice filed by the Centre for Environmental Rights on April 18, 2017, announcing the withdrawal of Case No: 487/2017 from the High Court of South Africa (Mpumalanga Division, Nelspruit).

A legal notice filed in the High Court of South Africa, Western Cape Division, stating that the Applicant has withdrawn its application against several respondents, including the Centre for Environmental Rights and Earthlife Africa Johannesburg, because the matter has been settled.

This executive summary, authored by Professor Bob Scholes and Professor Francois Engelbrecht, details the climate vulnerabilities and projected impacts for Southern Africa during the 21st century. It emphasizes that the region is warming at twice the global average rate and warns that agricultural production, freshwater availability, and human health are at significant risk, particularly under low-mitigation scenarios.

This supporting expert affidavit, submitted by Associate Professor Merle Sowman, argues that the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the proposed extension of the Tormin Mine by Mineral Sands Resources (Pty) Ltd (MSR) failed to adequately assess cumulative environmental and socio-economic impacts. Sowman contends that assessing applications on an ad hoc basis ignores the broader scale of MSR's regional mining plans and calls for a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) to prevent irreversible damage to critical biodiversity areas and sensitive coastal ecosystems.