Search Climate Insights Directory

FSDAi invested in the International Housing Solutions (IHS) Kenya Affordable Green Housing Fund to finance EDGE-certified homes for low- and middle-income households, targeting 4,000 homes by 2030. To drive systemic change, FSDAi mandated an Open Source Policy and funded the Centre for Affordable Housing Finance in Africa (CAHF) to lead an Open Access Initiative (OAI). This initiative collects and disseminates market intelligence on construction costs and project delivery to attract institutional capital and guide policymakers. The OAI has also enabled the tracking of six Kenyan State Department for Housing and Urban Development projects and the creation of the Nairobi Metropolitan Area Dashboard.

The report identifies a conservative USD 4.4 trillion pipeline of creditworthy sustainable bonds from 12 climate-leader countries through 2035. It argues that global megatrends—such as electrification, urbanisation, and the rise of AI—will further accelerate this pipeline beyond current projections. The document also outlines policy levers, including taxonomies and monetary policy, that governments can use to channel capital into mitigation and resilience projects.

The document outlines green bonds as fixed-income instruments for environmental projects, noting that energy and buildings each account for approximately 30% of recent allocations. It identifies institutional investors as the core demand source and highlights the role of Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) in providing cumulative issuances, such as the World Bank's over USD 200bn. The text details the issuance process, noting a typical 'greenium' of 2–5 bps and a timeline of 6–12 months for sovereign framework preparation.

The briefing outlines how regional financing ecosystems—comprising regional banks, community lenders, economic development organizations, and governments—can unlock capital for clean energy by structuring local projects into investable portfolios. It highlights that a one-size-fits-all approach is ineffective, citing specific high-feasibility opportunities in Minnesota (green steel and transmission) and New Orleans (green buildings and hydrogen). By coordinating diverse financial actors and using public or philanthropic funds to absorb first-loss risk, these ecosystems can address persistent barriers such as lack of predevelopment capital and underwriting friction to ensure inclusive economic benefits from the energy transition.

The document argues that Ukraine's post-war recovery, with estimated long-term needs exceeding USD 524 billion, offers a unique opportunity to implement a 'build forward better' approach. It recommends the creation of a unified national green recovery strategy aligned with EU standards, the strengthening of local government capacity, and the coordination of ESG safeguards by international financial institutions. Additionally, it suggests enhancing the Digital Restoration Ecosystem for Accountable Management (DREAM) platform with environmental indicators and emissions calculators to track climate performance.

Southwestern Pennsylvania is positioned to diversify its economy by establishing cleantech clusters, specifically in battery manufacturing, solar components, and green buildings, by utilizing its legacy in steel, glass, and robotics. While the region has existing strengths and some active companies, it requires better coordination through a dedicated cleantech cluster initiative and targeted workforce development in specialized engineering roles to compete with other regions and attract investment.

The GCF Accreditation Panel recommends the accreditation of Banco Promerica de Costa Rica as a national direct access entity for 'small' projects with a 'medium risk' (intermediation 2) environmental and social category. The bank is approved for basic fiduciary standards and specialized standards for on-lending and blending. While the bank demonstrates strong gender policies and a track record in electric mobility and green building, the recommendation is subject to several conditions. These include establishing an institutional-level environmental and social grievance redress mechanism, publishing its ethics line on its website, adopting a GCF-consistent information disclosure policy, and updating procurement procedures to include public tender and award notifications.

The study finds that while Kenya recognizes the link between climate change and public health, the two sectors operate independently in terms of policy formulation, planning, and budgeting. Barriers to integration include a siloed institutional approach, limited funding, and a perception of the health sector as a casualty rather than an adopter of climate policies. To overcome these, the authors suggest launching a Kenya Climate Change and Health Strategy, incorporating health issues into Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), and adopting holistic frameworks like the One Health model.

The paper examines the 'co-impacts'—both intended and unintended, positive and negative—of urban climate policies. It argues that current literature and city plans overemphasize positive co-benefits (such as improved air quality and health) while neglecting adverse effects and equity considerations. The authors propose a 'people, planet, and profit' framework to categorize these impacts across various urban strategies, including building retrofits, circular economy initiatives, and transport shifts, to help cities avoid policy backlash and ensure a just transition.

India's tracked green finance for mitigation reached INR 3,712 billion (USD 50 billion) per annum in FY 2021/22, a 20% increase from 2019/20. However, this represents only approximately 30% of the annual finance needed to meet the country's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC). Mitigation finance is primarily domestic (83%), with clean energy receiving the largest share (47%). Adaptation finance saw a nearly threefold increase to INR 1,092 billion (USD 15 billion) per year, dominated by government budgetary expenditure (98%) and focused on disaster risk management. The report highlights significant investment gaps, particularly in electric vehicles and on-farm agricultural adaptation, and recommends the development of a green finance taxonomy and enhanced private sector mobilization.

The report details a comprehensive methodology for mapping green finance in India, defining the scope of 'green finance' to include climate finance and environmental objectives like biodiversity and resource conservation. It establishes a framework for categorizing financial flows by source (domestic/international, public/private), instrument (grants, debt, equity), and sector (clean energy, energy efficiency, clean transportation, and climate adaptation). The methodology employs a variety of data sources, including government budgets, OECD CRS, and project-level databases, while applying specific assumptions such as a 70:30 debt-to-equity gearing ratio and the use of Rio Markers for international public finance. A significant portion of the document is dedicated to the granular classification of on-farm agricultural adaptation activities, categorizing government schemes into 'absolute', 'lower bound', and 'upper bound' based on their adaptation relevance.

The guide establishes a standardized framework for tracking climate mitigation, adaptation, and biodiversity finance. It provides detailed lists of eligible activities for mitigation, a three-step validation process for adaptation, and specific criteria for biodiversity finance. The document emphasizes the use of ex-ante GHG emission reduction assessments and offers methodologies for quantifying finance through incremental or proportional approaches to ensure transparency and avoid double-counting.

Climate finance in Africa grew by 48% between 2019/20 and 2021/22, reaching USD 43.7 billion, yet this remains only 23% of the annual funding required to meet 2030 NDC goals. Public finance dominates the landscape, providing 82% of total flows, while private finance is heavily concentrated in energy systems and a small number of countries. The report highlights a critical 'trilemma' where climate-vulnerable countries are often simultaneously debt-distressed and conflict-affected, further hindering their access to grants and affordable capital. Key recommendations include reforming domestic fiscal policies to remove fossil fuel subsidies, scaling the use of guarantees to de-risk private investment, and leveraging domestic institutional assets, such as pension funds, to reduce reliance on international debt.

The report argues that achieving a net-zero building sector is critical for China's carbon neutrality, as the sector accounted for 32 percent of the country's CO2 emissions in 2022. It outlines four primary areas for decarbonization: operational emissions, embodied carbon, new growth models through technology and market mechanisms, and equity and inclusion in affordable and rural housing. The document emphasizes that the next 5–10 years are critical for accelerating the adoption of carbon-neutral technologies to decouple emissions from the continued growth of building floor space and energy demand.

The methodology employs Functional Urban Areas (FUAs) to define urban scope and tracks primary capital flows for mitigation and adaptation. It combines project-level data from sources like the OECD-DAC and BNEF with capital expenditure estimations for transport, buildings, and energy systems. Needs assessments are derived from top-down global models, adjusted by regional urban population shares and sector-specific inclusion criteria.

In 2023, China maintained its position as the world's largest green bond market, though issuance volume saw a slight decrease. The market is characterized by a strong focus on renewable energy and low-carbon transport, with increasing alignment with international standards like the CBI definitions and the Common Ground Taxonomy. While social and sustainable bonds saw a rebound in volume, they face challenges regarding information disclosure and the use of proceeds for general operations. Sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs) remain globally leading in volume, but few issuers utilize greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. Policy progress includes the introduction of the 'Green Bond Principles' and the emergence of local transition finance guidelines in cities like Shanghai and Chongqing.

The report identifies financial barriers as the most severe challenge to green building implementation in Indonesia, citing a lack of dedicated financing instruments and high interest rates. While national regulations like GR 16/2021 have introduced green building standards, they are limited to very large buildings and exclude the residential sector, which accounts for 83% of building energy demand. A case study in Semarang demonstrates that combining building material retrofits with high-efficiency air conditioning can reduce cooling energy use by 32% to 44%, potentially saving USD 3.19 million annually. However, meeting green building mandates in Semarang over the next decade is estimated to require USD 223.7 million in investment.

The report outlines a methodological framework for evaluating infrastructure in the Shymkent–Tashkent–Khujand economic corridor, comparing 'business-as-usual' scenarios with sustainable alternatives for transport and buildings. It proposes shifting from road-based freight to electrified rail and adopting green building standards to reduce CO2 emissions, lower operational costs, and improve health and employment outcomes. The assessment utilizes the SAVi methodology to integrate externalities, such as the social cost of carbon and health impacts, into a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis.

Lodha is implementing a systems-leadership approach to decarbonize India's rapidly growing built environment, aiming for carbon neutrality by 2035. Central to this strategy is the Palava project near Mumbai, which serves as a 'smart city learning lab' to test sustainable urban design and energy-efficient construction. Through the Lodha Net Zero Urban Accelerator, the company seeks to scale these learnings and influence industry standards and government policy.

The Impact Financing Facility for Climate-Focused Social Enterprises is a first-loss default guarantee (FLDG) mechanism designed to bridge the USD 250 billion credit gap for MSMEs in India. Led by Villgro, the facility targets climate-focused social enterprises and their end-users who lack formal credit histories, providing them with collateral-free commercial debt twinned with technical assistance. A pilot conducted between 2021-23 with six enterprises demonstrated the instrument's viability with no defaults. The facility focuses on sectors including green energy, sustainable mobility, and waste management, with a specific emphasis on gender and circularity. It aims to graduate beneficiaries to independent commercial lending while achieving environmental targets, such as a 50,000 tCO2e reduction in emissions by 2028.