Search Climate Insights Directory

The report examines the vulnerability of Asia's High Mountains (AHM) to climate change, highlighting risks from glacial melt, extreme weather, and water scarcity. It details the varying responses of mountain ranges—such as the retreat of most glaciers in the Hindu Kush-Himalaya versus stability in the Karakorum—and analyzes the resulting threats to human health, agriculture, and infrastructure. The document evaluates current adaptation strategies, including livelihood diversification and community-based water management, while identifying critical data gaps in permafrost and groundwater storage. It concludes with recommendations for regional cooperation in disaster risk management and the synchronization of national and local climate policies.

The document argues that a gap exists between climate adaptation research and action because traditional framing ignores agency and separates adaptation from mitigation. It proposes an actor-oriented approach to overcome five identified bottlenecks, applying modelling, visualization, and policy analysis to land-use change, energy transitions, and insurance and finance.

The research demonstrates that participatory scenario development serves as a critical tool for capacity-building and awareness-raising in developing countries, complementing traditional vulnerability assessments by integrating socioeconomic trends with climate projections. Through case studies in Ghana, Honduras, and Tajikistan, the authors show that PSD can validate and complement donor-driven initiatives and national strategies. The paper emphasizes the need to combine qualitative stakeholder knowledge with quantitative data—such as downscaled global scenarios and crop modeling—to avoid 'myopic traps' and ensure adaptation options are compatible with broader development goals like poverty reduction and food security.

The policy brief argues that market discount rates are unsuitable for evaluating long-term environmental impacts and proposes the 'equivalency principle' to determine social discount rates. This principle assumes that undeveloped and developed land of identical attributes should provide equal utility to future generations. Using a case study of a proposed seaport in Pasaia, Basque Country, the authors demonstrate that applying this principle results in lower, site-specific discount rates (between 0.96% and 3%) that would lead to the rejection of the project, whereas a market rate of 11% would justify it in some scenarios.

The document analyzes the slowdown of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, noting that while overall rates dropped by 83% from 2004 to 2012, progress has stalled. It argues that previous command-and-control measures were more effective for large landowners than for smallholders or those in remote areas. The brief recommends shifting toward incentive-based policies, adopting higher-resolution monitoring technology, and tailoring interventions to specific actor types to achieve Brazil's 2020 deforestation goals.

The document analyzes the effectiveness of Brazil's anti-deforestation policies in the Amazon, noting that while an 83% reduction in annual deforestation was achieved between 2004 and 2012, progress has since stagnated. It argues that previous 'command and control' measures primarily targeted large landowners and critical frontiers, leaving smallholders and remote areas less addressed. The authors recommend shifting toward incentive-based policies for small farmers, adopting high-resolution radar monitoring to detect smaller clearings, and focusing on forest degradation rather than just total forest cover.

The PEDRA research group focuses on the human dimensions of environmental and socio-economic risks in Asia, employing systems-oriented approaches to promote inclusive governance and resilient development. Its current work includes nine diverse projects addressing climate change adaptation in peri-urban Southeast Asia, gender inequalities in environmental conditions, disaster risk reduction in WASH systems, and the governance of the Bali Cultural Landscape.

The document argues that conventional formal institution building is insufficient for sustainable development and calls for new collaborations between governments, civil society, and the private sector. It emphasizes the need to link livelihoods in low-income regions with consumption patterns in affluent regions and to integrate disaster risk reduction (DRR) into development planning to build resilience. SEI highlights various projects, including palm oil governance in Southeast Asia, Arctic resilience, and sanitation in East Africa, to illustrate the need for 'hybrid accountability' and 'institutional bricolage' in governance.

The document investigates the expansion of the oil palm industry in Palawan, operated primarily by Palawan Palm & Vegetable Oil Mills, Inc. (PPVOMI) and Agumil Philippines, Inc. (AGPI). It finds that while promoted as an economic opportunity, the industry has led to significant grievances, including contractual deception of smallholder cooperatives, land dispossession of indigenous peoples, and illegal encroachment into protected forestlands. The study highlights a failure in institutional oversight, noting that environmental clearances were often obtained after project initiation and that the legal framework fails to distribute liability fairly, leaving smallholders with most of the financial risk. It concludes with ten recommendations to strengthen corporate accountability, including contract revision, stricter government 'gatekeeping', and the promotion of RSPO certification.

The document defends the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), stating it has reduced petroleum dependence by displacing gasoline with over 59 billion gallons of renewable ethanol and 2.7 billion gallons of biodiesel between 2008 and 2012. While acknowledging issues like land use change and GHG emissions from nitrogen fertilizer, it argues these are better addressed through the Farm Bill than RFS reform. The author highlights the growth of next-generation biofuels, noting 160 commercial-scale advanced biofuel projects representing nearly $5 billion in private investment since 2007, and warns that changing the statute now would halt this progress and prolong petroleum dependence.

The document argues that without major intervention, transportation carbon emissions will double by 2050. It identifies a combination of reduced passenger car demand, improved vehicle efficiency, increased electric vehicle adoption, and a decarbonized electricity grid (via renewables, nuclear, or CCS) as the necessary path to significant reductions. A case study based on a Spanish city with 360,000 inhabitants demonstrates that while modal shifts and fuel switches (like CNG or biodiesel) offer modest gains, the most aggressive reductions occur when these are paired with a transition to nuclear or CCS-equipped power generation.

The research paper evaluates strategies to decarbonise urban transportation, focusing on modal shifts, fuel switching, and electricity decarbonisation. Using a Spanish urban area as a model, it finds that aggressive measures—including a 50% reduction in car demand, improved fuel economy, and a shift to nuclear or CCS-equipped power—are necessary to significantly lower emissions and health burdens from particulate matter.

The document argues that the global agro-food system is increasingly inefficient due to a disconnection between crop production and livestock, driven by rising demands for animal protein and high rates of food waste. It highlights that international trade of food and feed has increased eightfold over the last 50 years, leading to significant nitrogen pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Using Spain as a primary example, the authors demonstrate how a shift from a Mediterranean diet to one rich in animal proteins has increased nitrogen pollution and created 'emission leakage,' where emissions associated with imported feed in non-Annex B countries exceed those from domestic production. The briefing suggests that reducing animal protein intake, decreasing food waste, and reconnecting crops with livestock are essential for global food security and environmental safety.

The initiative focuses on the arid Americas, specifically addressing water scarcity driven by climate change and human demands. It emphasizes the strategic importance of groundwater and the need for shared methodologies to assess aquifer depletion and agricultural water use, which accounts for 70% to 90% of water consumption in the region.

The policy brief contends that the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) has failed to deliver its promised benefits, instead increasing greenhouse gas emissions, food prices, and habitat destruction through the scale-up of corn ethanol. It criticizes the EPA for allowing 'advanced biofuels' like sugarcane ethanol and soy biodiesel to fill shortfalls in cellulosic biofuel production, which the authors claim drives indirect demand for more corn ethanol or palm oil. The document advocates for legislative or regulatory actions to prevent new increases in corn used for biofuels, specifically opposing the classification of corn-starch butanol as an advanced biofuel.

The report develops a methodology to translate global planetary boundaries into national per capita and absolute targets. It finds that developed countries, including Sweden, frequently transgress these boundaries, particularly when consumption-based footprints are measured. The study also quantifies Sweden's 'legal competence deficit' regarding its national environmental objectives, noting that for climate impact, Sweden has no direct legal control over over 99% of the emissions threatening its goals. Finally, it analyzes the gap between planetary boundaries and international environmental agreements, concluding that while policy frameworks often exist, there is a significant implementation gap.

EESI advocates for the continued implementation of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), asserting that it is essential for displacing petroleum-based fuels and fostering the growth of advanced and cellulosic biofuels. The document argues that conventional ethanol provides the necessary infrastructure and economic foundation for the emerging cellulosic industry. EESI contends that factors other than the RFS—such as the 2012 Midwest drought, global meat demand, and commodity market speculation—are the primary drivers of corn and soybean price volatility. The organization highlights the RFS's role in rural economic development, job creation, and the reduction of toxic aromatic emissions in urban areas, while supporting the EPA's 2012 decision to deny a waiver request for the standard.

The document argues that the EPA can avoid the 'blend wall'—the limit of ethanol that can be readily added to gasoline—by making corresponding reductions to advanced biofuel and total renewable fuel volume requirements when cellulosic biofuel production falls short. It warns that allowing other advanced biofuels to backfill the cellulosic void would increase ethanol use by 40% by 2021, strain global agricultural markets, and increase GHG emissions. The author suggests that if the EPA does not act, Congress should amend the Clean Air Act to mandate these reductions.

The report examines the re-emergence of malaria in the western Kenyan highlands, driven by a combination of rising temperatures, rainfall patterns, and socio-economic factors. It finds that the population's vulnerability is very high due to low immunity, high poverty, and limited adaptive capacity at the local level. The document recommends strengthening the health system, improving early-warning systems for epidemics, and enhancing cross-sectoral collaboration between health, climate, and disaster management agencies.

The document identifies a significant disconnect between climate adaptation research and its application in policy and practice within the Nordic region. It argues that traditional systemic approaches ignore 'agency' and the operational realities of stakeholders. To address this, the authors introduce an actor-oriented framework—implemented through the NORD-STAR project—that integrates modelling, visualisation, and policy analysis across thematic areas like land-use, energy transitions, and finance. Crucially, the framework expands the definition of adaptation to include responses to the consequences of climate policy, not just climate impacts.