Search Climate Insights Directory

The report analyzes the implementation of the Effort Sharing Decision (ESD), which targets non-ETS sectors responsible for nearly 60% of EU emissions. While 15 Member States are projected to over-achieve their 2020 targets, others face significant gaps, particularly in road transport and buildings. The document highlights that while the overall EU 2020 target is likely to be met, several countries rely on flexibility mechanisms or planned additional measures rather than existing policies to close their emission gaps.

The report estimates that current climate variability costs Nepal 1.5% to 2% of its annual GDP, with future climate change potentially adding another 2% to 3% by mid-century. Analysis of three key sectors reveals significant risks: agricultural losses are projected at US$140 million per year by the 2070s, hydroelectricity may require an additional US$2.6 billion in investment by 2050 due to decreased dry season flows in some models, and water-induced disasters could cost an additional US$100–200 million annually by mid-century. To address these risks, the study estimates a total investment requirement of US$2.4 billion by 2030 across these sectors.

The Kenyan agricultural sector, which accounts for over a fifth of the GDP, is highly sensitive to climate change, facing risks from unpredictable rainfall, droughts, and pests. While the sector is a significant emitter of greenhouse gases—primarily from livestock—the document emphasizes that adaptation to ensure food security and export earnings is the priority. It suggests climate-smart practices such as agroforestry and conservation tillage to build resilience and reduce emissions, while noting that the carbon market currently offers limited financial benefits due to high monitoring costs.

The document outlines the necessity for businesses in Kenya to 'climate-proof' their operations by assessing risks and implementing adaptation measures. It highlights that climate change impacts—such as temperature increases and rainfall changes—affect all economic sectors, with droughts and flooding estimated to cost Kenya approximately 2.0 per cent of GDP annually. The briefing provides a sector-specific matrix of risks and opportunities and shares examples of Kenyan companies already adapting through supply chain diversification and innovative insurance products. It advocates for the use of risk assessment tools and calls for government leadership in demonstrating climate resilience.

The document examines how climate change threatens Kenya's trade sector, particularly agriculture and tourism, through infrastructure damage and supply chain disruptions. It discusses the potential for 'green protectionism' via carbon labeling and border carbon adjustments, while suggesting that Kenya could gain a competitive advantage by branding its low-carbon niche products.

The document discusses the transition from Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals, highlighting the need for new metrics and capacity to cover social, environmental, and economic dimensions. It identifies a gap between the production of indicators and their actual use in decision-making, suggesting that monitoring should be integrated into all stages of the policy cycle. The author outlines various international initiatives—including work by the UN Statistical Commission and the Open Working Group—aimed at strengthening the evidence base for SDGs. Finally, it provides guidance for governments to align national and subnational monitoring systems with global goals to improve governance and accountability.

The document examines how climate change affects bioenergy supply, demand, and logistics, specifically within the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). It argues that while the Nordic region may benefit from increased biomass productivity and reduced heating demand, its reliance on international bioenergy trade exposes it to global climate risks. The paper explores synergies between mitigation and adaptation, such as the use of perennial grasses and agroforestry, and warns of conflicts, including the potential for bioenergy demand to drive indirect land use change (ILUC) and soil erosion in other regions.

The report synthesizes the results of applying the ADAPTool in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Nova Scotia. It examines 27 policies across agriculture, forestry, water, and parks management to determine their ability to support adaptation measures and their general adaptability to future changes.

The IISD provides a series of technical recommendations to strengthen the Land Policy Initiative's guiding principles for large-scale land-based investments in Africa. Key suggestions include requiring independent third-party verification of financial feasibility studies, integrating social and environmental impact assessments into risk management plans, and prioritizing domestic courts over international arbitration for dispute resolution. The IISD also emphasizes the need for comprehensive legislation covering water management, labor laws, and tax incentives, alongside clearer definitions of the rights and obligations of states, investors, and local communities.

The research demonstrates that participatory scenario development serves as a critical tool for capacity-building and awareness-raising in developing countries, complementing traditional vulnerability assessments by integrating socioeconomic trends with climate projections. Through case studies in Ghana, Honduras, and Tajikistan, the authors show that PSD can validate and complement donor-driven initiatives and national strategies. The paper emphasizes the need to combine qualitative stakeholder knowledge with quantitative data—such as downscaled global scenarios and crop modeling—to avoid 'myopic traps' and ensure adaptation options are compatible with broader development goals like poverty reduction and food security.

The document examines Brazil's shift from traditional state-led foreign policy to a 'public policy' approach, characterized by a plurality of actors including domestic ministries and subnational entities. It details Brazil's South–South co-operation (SSC) strategies, which emphasize horizontal relationships and solidarity over traditional donor-recipient models. The analysis highlights the strategic importance of Africa, noting significant growth in trade, technical co-operation through the Brazilian Cooperation Agency (ABC), and the role of state-owned enterprises like Vale and Petrobras. It argues that these strategies are part of Brazil's broader pursuit of political autonomy and global power status through coalitions like BRICS and IBSA.

The report details shifts in how Americans in the Northeast, Midwest, South, and West experienced extreme weather between Fall 2012 and November 2013. It highlights a general consensus on the vulnerability of agriculture and electricity systems, with a majority of citizens advocating for government prioritization of water supplies, transportation, and public health. Additionally, 56% of Americans believe global warming is impacting U.S. weather.

The document outlines that Africa is experiencing significant warming and increased extreme weather, which threatens food security, health, and economic growth. It argues that while Africa has contributed little to historic emissions, it is highly vulnerable and must integrate adaptation and mitigation into long-term development planning. Key opportunities for the region include adopting decentralized renewable energy, implementing conservation agriculture, and planning low-carbon urban growth to avoid fossil fuel lock-in.

The study finds that current climate variability already costs Nepal 1.5–2% of its annual GDP, with future climate change projected to add another 2–3% of current GDP per year by mid-century. The most significant drivers of these costs are water-induced disasters, particularly floods. Sectoral analysis indicates that while agriculture faces net losses of approximately 0.8% of current GDP per year by the 2070s, the hydroelectricity sector faces high uncertainty, with projections ranging from increased investment costs of US$2.6 billion due to decreased dry season flows to potential savings of US$170 million if flows increase. To address these risks, the study recommends an iterative adaptation pathway, estimating a need for US$2.4 billion in additional investment by 2030 to mainstream resilience.

The study finds that current climate variability already costs Nepal 1.5–2% of its annual GDP, with future climate change projected to add another 2–3% of current GDP per year by mid-century. Key risks include significant agricultural losses in the Terai region, highly uncertain impacts on hydroelectricity investment costs depending on river flow projections, and a 20–100% increase in the intensity and frequency of high river flows. To address these, the report recommends an iterative adaptation pathway, estimating a need for US$2.4 billion in additional investment by 2030 to mainstream resilience.

The document translates the global findings of the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report into a regional context for South Asia, detailing observed warming, projected risks to food and water security, and the potential for low-carbon development. It emphasizes that while further warming is inevitable, integrated adaptation and mitigation can protect development gains and offer economic opportunities.

The research paper details a participatory approach using stakeholder mapping and 'barrier cards' to identify obstacles to climate adaptation in Jamaica. Findings across the agriculture, fisheries, and tourism sectors reveal a disconnect between national-level planning and local-level implementation, with funding and political leadership identified as primary barriers. The paper argues that involving local stakeholders in devising practical, surmountable solutions can build climate resilience and reconcile national policies with local actions.

The paper describes a participatory approach using stakeholder mapping and 'barrier cards' to bridge the gap between national climate policies and local implementation in Mauritius. Findings reveal a strong predominance of national government in adaptation planning, with local actors often excluded from information and action flows. In the agriculture sector, the primary barrier is a lack of climate vulnerability data, while the fisheries sector faces institutional barriers related to a lack of accountability. The authors argue that prioritizing 'surmountable' barriers—those addressable with existing national capacities—is the most effective way to build climate resilience.

The paper describes a participatory approach using stakeholder mapping and 'barrier cards' to identify obstacles to climate adaptation in Seychelles. Findings reveal a disconnect between national planning and local implementation, with a critical lack of climate vulnerability data hindering the fisheries and tourism sectors. In agriculture, the primary barrier is the sector's low perceived economic priority. The authors recommend establishing a national adaptation office and improving data collection to bridge the gap between national policy and local action.

The document details a participatory approach using stakeholder mapping and 'barrier cards' to identify obstacles to climate adaptation in St Lucia. Findings reveal a top-down governance structure where national ministries hold primary influence and funding, while local actors remain largely excluded from planning and implementation. Key barriers identified include poor national land use planning and conflicting stakeholder values, both driven by a lack of long-term political vision. The paper argues for the development of a comprehensive national land use management plan and the mainstreaming of climate considerations into local policies to build resilience.