Search Climate Insights Directory

The report examines how States use registration and approval requirements in investment treaties to control which investments are eligible for protection and international arbitration. It analyzes treaty practices in Southeast Asia and Africa, reviews key arbitral awards, and provides drafting recommendations to ensure these requirements are legally effective and not dismissed as mere formalities.

The guide examines how states use 'registration' or 'approval' requirements in investment treaties to restrict which investments are eligible for protection and arbitration. It analyzes treaty examples from ASEAN and COMESA, as well as arbitral awards (Yaung Chi Oo, Gruslin, and Desert Line), to demonstrate that while these criteria are legitimate strategic tools for quality control, their effectiveness depends on precise drafting and clear procedural frameworks. The document recommends that states explicitly state these requirements as indispensable conditions and provide transparent, detailed procedures for compliance.

The report examines Viet Nam's investment incentive framework for renewable energy, analyzing financial, fiscal, and market-based supports. While the government has established a policy framework including tax exemptions and price subsidies, stakeholder interviews suggest these incentives have a limited effect on investment decisions due to low electricity off-take prices, regulatory opacity, and a lack of trust in government guarantees. The study highlights a contrast between the modest success of small hydropower and the struggles of wind and biogas projects to achieve financial viability.

The document explores the nexus between services trade liberalization and food security in ASEAN, focusing specifically on financial and logistics services. It argues that while liberalization alone is insufficient to overcome structural barriers—such as the reluctance of banks to lend to smallholder farmers or poor infrastructure in least-developed member states—strategic reforms in these sectors could reduce food costs, improve supply chain efficiency, and enhance rural financial access. The authors highlight a correlation between poor logistics infrastructure and high food insecurity in countries like Indonesia, Cambodia, and the Philippines, and suggest that food security should be more prominently integrated into regional logistics and financial policy debates.

The report examines how Indonesia can optimize its role in global value chains (GVCs) to move toward higher value-adding activities. It identifies key internal governance factors, such as market diversification and standards compliance, and external factors, including labour market stability, connectivity, and contract enforceability. The author argues that GVC participation does not automatically lead to economic or social upgrading and requires a coherent strategy involving R&D, innovation systems, and the reduction of regulatory inconsistencies to ensure sustainable growth.

The authors developed a nested, multi-scale scenario logic to analyze the interaction between global/national trends and local farmer livelihoods regarding smallholder tree plantations. Applied in workshops across two localities each in Indonesia and Vietnam, the method helped structure the process and highlight contextual differences, with the authors suggesting its potential utility for climate adaptation studies.

The report details a workshop in Bali, Indonesia, focused on reforming fossil-fuel subsidies in Southeast Asia. It presents a policy framework based on three pillars: getting energy prices right, managing reform impacts, and building public support. The document includes case studies from the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, India, and Iran, highlighting the fiscal burdens of subsidies, the effectiveness of targeted cash transfers and 'lifeline' tariffs, and the political difficulties of price deregulation. It emphasizes that successful reform requires comprehensive communication strategies, impact assessments for vulnerable groups, and a transition toward market-based pricing to support green growth and energy efficiency.

The United States is the world's largest importer of coral reef-associated species, with a market share of approximately 63% of global imports. Analysis of trade data from 2000 to 2009 reveals a five-fold increase in coral product imports and a steady annual import of roughly 15 million marine tropical fish. The report highlights the prevalence of destructive collection methods, such as cyanide use, and the overexploitation of specific species like the Banggai cardinalfish, seahorses, and giant clams. It argues that the U.S. should leverage its purchasing power to establish sustainability standards and improve data specificity to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems.

The document argues that REDD+ safeguard information systems (SIS) do not necessarily require the creation of new mechanisms or indicators, as they can be built upon existing national and international reporting architectures. It highlights research conducted across eight existing systems and early actions in five specific countries to identify lessons for ensuring transparency, consistency, and accessibility in safeguard reporting.

The document addresses the tension between the pursuit of a green economy and the existing international trade system. It argues that while Rio+20 provided general guidance, it failed to establish what constitutes 'appropriate state behaviour' regarding green industrial policies, such as subsidies and local content requirements. The author highlights a rise in trade frictions—including disputes between the U.S., China, and the EU over solar and wind technology—and asserts that the WTO's Dispute Settlement Mechanism is ill-suited to resolve these issues because they stem from a lack of international consensus on policy propriety rather than simple rule breaches. The text advocates for the creation of an institutional space, such as through UNCTAD, to evaluate the effectiveness of green tools and their impacts on trading partners, particularly developing nations, to ensure a just transition.

The document uses a global-to-local modelling approach to project land use changes in Vietnam up to 2030. It finds that economic growth and urbanisation will lead to a significant loss of paddy rice land and protected forests, while climate-induced flooding poses a severe threat to the Red River and Mekong River Deltas. The study highlights critical policy trade-offs between reducing greenhouse gas emissions through reforestation and maintaining national food security targets.

The report analyzes the economic, environmental, and social impacts of fossil-fuel subsidies in APEC economies, estimating that consumption subsidies alone cost at least US$105 billion in 2010. It argues that such subsidies are often regressive, benefiting wealthier populations and increasing GHG emissions. The document proposes a three-phase reform framework—research, developing options, and implementation—and details case studies from Australia, Indonesia, Chile, Mexico, Thailand, China, and Russia to illustrate best practices in transparency, targeted social compensation (such as cash transfers), and gradual price deregulation.

The 2050 Criteria identifies primary environmental and social risks for ten major commodity sectors—including aquaculture, beef, cotton, dairy, palm oil, soy, sugar, timber, wild-caught seafood, and bioenergy—and establishes Key Performance Criteria (KPC) to help banks and investors identify responsible practices. The document argues that the global economy is consuming natural resources faster than they can be replenished, creating systemic risks for the financial sector. It promotes the use of credible third-party certifications, such as the RSPO for palm oil and FSC for forestry, as proxies for business performance and risk management. The report also highlights investment opportunities in sustainable technologies, such as methane capture systems in palm oil and dairy sectors, and the rehabilitation of degraded lands to meet growing global demand without further deforestation.

The document argues that while a 'Green Revolution' focused solely on increasing crop yields and land cultivation could make Africa a net food exporter and boost GDP, it would not significantly reduce undernutrition because most production would be exported. To improve human development, the authors propose a 'Green Revolution for Development' that couples production increases with policies to stimulate domestic food demand and access, alongside improvements in water and sanitation.

The document presents a business case for implementing sustainable public procurement in fragile states, highlighting its potential to mitigate risks, combat corruption, and build local industrial capacity. It identifies significant challenges, including weak institutional capacity and political opposition from vested interests, and proposes the use of readiness assessments to tailor procurement policies to individual national contexts.

The document outlines recommendations for designing REDD+ Safeguard Information Systems (SIS), emphasizing the need to harmonize reporting requirements across the UNFCCC and various funders to reduce complexity for developing countries. It suggests coordinating data collection with existing processes like the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Global Forest Resource Assessment (FRA) to avoid duplication. The authors advocate for country-driven, flexible systems supported by international guidance, financial aid, and capacity-building, while leveraging existing stakeholder groups to improve implementation.

The report analyzes the private sector's role in the REDD+ supply chain, identifying key players as investors, producers, brokers, advisors, auditors, and end-buyers. It highlights critical barriers such as policy uncertainty, land tenure disputes, and the need for robust social and environmental safeguards. The document proposes strategies to scale up private investment, including the integration of REDD+ into compliance carbon markets, the adoption of nested crediting frameworks, and the inclusion of extractive industries in conservation dialogues.

The report examines the development of safeguard information systems (SIS) for REDD+, focusing on how to leverage existing systems to meet UNFCCC Durban guidance. It analyzes eight existing frameworks—including UN-REDD SEPC, FCPF SESA, and the Convention on Biological Diversity—and provides case studies from Ethiopia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Tanzania, and Vietnam. The findings emphasize the need for harmonized reporting, multistakeholder participation, and country-driven processes to ensure transparency and avoid duplicative burdens on national focal points.

The document examines eight existing reporting processes and early actions in five countries to identify how they can support REDD+ safeguard reporting. It argues for a harmonized, country-driven approach that leverages existing data from biodiversity and forest governance systems to reduce burdens on developing nations.

The paper analyzes the WTO implications of Australia's Illegal Logging Prohibition Bill, which seeks to ban the import and domestic processing of illegally logged timber. It concludes that the bill is likely WTO-compatible provided it avoids discrimination between domestic and imported products and is implemented in a non-trade-restrictive manner. The author argues that GATT Article XX(g), relating to the conservation of exhaustible natural resources, provides the strongest legal defense for such measures. To minimize the risk of successful WTO challenges, the paper recommends that Australia align its due diligence requirements with international standards, such as the EU's FLEGT licenses, and provide capacity-building assistance to exporting nations.