Search Climate Insights Directory

The report details the IAI's efforts to maintain member country engagement, manage scientific research programs, and expand educational capacity in the Americas between July 2000 and June 2001.

The report evaluates the initial year of the CRN program, highlighting a strong scientific output and significant capacity building through graduate courses and workshops across the Americas. While many projects successfully leveraged millions in additional funding, the IAI identified critical administrative gaps, specifically the lack of a standard reporting format and difficulties in international fund transfers.

The IAI provides scholarships, fellowships, and workshops to build scientific capacity in the Americas, with a priority on Latin American researchers. Key initiatives include the IAI/UM Summer Institute on Interdisciplinary Science, a regional course on climate variability in Mesoamerica, and a partnership with Indiana University's ACT. The IAI is transitioning its Summer Institute model to a new call for proposals following a change in NSF funding and is exploring partnerships with the IACD, Inter-American Development Bank, and Brazil's CNPq.

The report details the IAI's institutional progress, including new agreements with Argentina and Venezuela, the hiring of a CRN Manager, and the status of the Initial Science Program (ISP). It highlights capacity-building through the IAI/UM Summer Institute and various international workshops on climate variability and agriculture. Finally, it presents a financial breakdown of voluntary contributions from member countries, noting significant outstanding balances from several nations.

The document is a participant list for the Sixth Meeting of the IAI Conference of the Parties (CoP) in Ottawa, Canada. It details representatives from member countries, including Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and the USA, as well as observers from Bolivia, Guyana, Honduras, Nicaragua, and various international organizations such as the WMO, OAS, and CARICOM. It also lists IAI staff and Canadian support personnel.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), representing COICA and the Amazon Coalition, requests the reexamination of U.S. Plant Patent No. 5,751 for the 'Da Vine' cultivar of Banisteriopsis caapi. The request argues that the patent is invalid because the plant's characteristics—specifically its rose-colored flowers—are typical of the species and documented in prior art from U.S. herbaria. Furthermore, the document asserts that the plant is found in an uncultivated state and that granting a patent over a sacred plant used in indigenous Amazonian religious and medicinal traditions violates public policy and international principles like the Convention on Biological Diversity.

The document examines how trademarks and geographical indications (GIs) can be used to reward sustainable production and protect traditional knowledge. Through case studies of kava, rooibos tea, quinoa, basmati rice, and neem, it assesses the viability of these legal tools in creating niche markets that benefit local custodians of biodiversity while preventing unauthorized commercial exploitation.

The Lima Workshop on Mining and Sustainable Development in the Americas brought together 76 representatives from 11 countries to establish a shared vision for the industry. The participants identified five strategic objectives—improved living conditions, sustainable technology and economic development, transparent policies, social consensus, and democratic participation—and formed working groups to implement them. The report details lessons learned from various multi-stakeholder dialogue cases across the region, emphasizing the need for transparency, early community engagement, and the building of negotiation capacity within local communities.

The Lima Workshop on Mining and Sustainable Development in the Americas brought together 76 representatives from 11 countries to address the environmental and social impacts of mining. Participants identified five strategic objectives for a vision of "Balanced, Harmonious and Sustainable Development": improved living conditions, sustainable technologies and economic development, transparent regulations and policies, internalized social consensus, and democratic participation of stakeholders. The workshop focused on the mechanics of multi-stakeholder processes, analyzing what facilitates successful consensus (such as third-party facilitators and early stakeholder involvement) and what hinders it (such as unrealistic expectations and short timelines). The event concluded with the formation of five working groups to develop concrete actions for each strategic objective, coordinated by the International Institute for Sustainable Development.

The document details the governance rules and current composition of the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) and presents a list of nominees for three vacancies to be filled during the June 1998 Conference of the Parties meeting in Arlington, USA. It specifies that the SAC is the principal scientific advisory organ of the Institute, consisting of ten members serving three-year terms. For the upcoming election, the SAC has recommended candidates across three specific areas of expertise: Economic Impacts of Global Environmental Change, Oceanography, and Integrated Assessment of Global Change & Training and Education.

Between October 1997 and January 1998, the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) and partners conducted three regional workshops in Lima, Peru; Montevideo, Uruguay; and Fortaleza, Brazil. These meetings aimed to use probabilistic seasonal forecast information to reduce socioeconomic disruption caused by the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO). The workshops involved climate scientists and stakeholders from sectors such as health, agriculture, and fisheries to create regional precipitation forecasts and design pilot application projects. Specific forecasts for the 1997-98 period predicted above-normal rainfall for coastal Ecuador and northern Peru, while predicting drier than normal conditions for most of northeast South America, including northern parts of Northeast Brazil.

The IAI Program Plan for 1998-1999 establishes goals to advance scientific programs, build regional capacity, and enhance the participation of scientists and countries in the Americas. The plan includes a budget of funded activities, such as graduate and postdoctoral training in Brazil and Mexico, and the development of climate forecasts. Future initiatives include CO2 monitoring in the Amazon Basin and the Pan-American Climate Information System (PACIS) for disaster preparedness.

The Fifth Meeting of the IAI Conference of the Parties (CoP) focused on updating the institute's scientific agenda, approving administrative budgets, and expanding financial resources. Key outcomes included the re-election of Director Armando Rabuffetti, the establishment of the Program to Expand Scientific Capacity in the Americas (PESCA), and the approval of a revised scientific agenda covering climate variability, ecosystem studies, atmospheric composition, and integrated assessments. The meeting also saw the election of a new Executive Committee and the signing of funding agreements with Argentina and Brazil.

The fourth meeting of the IAI Conference of the Parties (CoP) resulted in several administrative and strategic approvals, including the adoption of a modified Scientific Agenda, the Phase II Program, and the 1997/98 Basic Budget. The CoP established an indirect cost policy allowing up to 10% overhead and elected four new members to the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC). Additionally, the meeting coordinated future sessions, with the United States agreeing to host the fifth CoP and seventh Executive Council meeting in early 1998.

The CoP-II meeting focused on establishing the institutional infrastructure of the IAI, including the election of its first Director, Dr. Armando Rabuffetti, and the approval of a basic budget of US$570,000. Key outcomes included the adoption of the Host Country Agreement with Brazil, the approval of the Initial Scientific Program (ISP), and the establishment of a policy for the open exchange of scientific information. Member nations provided updates on national climate initiatives, and the meeting concluded with the election of three additional members to the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC).

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) testifies that environmental provisions in the NAFTA package are essential for Chilean accession to prevent trade distortions and establish a template for broader hemispheric integration. CIEL proposes a three-tiered 'readiness criteria' system: a 'Starting Line' requiring democratic rights, adherence to international agreements, environmental impact reviews, and basic institutional capacity; a five-year milestone for passing necessary legislation and establishing regulatory frameworks; and a ten-year milestone for effective enforcement of domestic environmental laws. The testimony emphasizes that the current Chilean environmental agency, CONAMA, is severely understaffed and relies too heavily on outside funding. To ensure compliance, CIEL suggests linking trade liberalization progress to environmental milestones through sanctions such as tariff freezes or snapbacks, and proposes an expanded funding mechanism, potentially funded by a tax on short-term international capital flows, to support environmental restoration and protection.

The Act of Montevideo establishes the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) as a regional network of research units. The IAI is designed to coordinate scientific and economic research on the extent, causes, and consequences of global change in the Americas, serving as an interface between science and policy. The agreement emphasizes that scientific interest should drive the implementation of research programs and the development of specialized facilities. To facilitate the transition to operational status, a Implementation Committee composed of representatives from signatory states was created to prepare basic materials until the first meeting of the Conference of the Parties. Signatory nations include Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, the United States, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela.

The Minutes of Montevideo document the May 1992 agreement by several American states to create the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI). The IAI is designed as a regional network of research entities to investigate the extent, causes, and consequences of global changes in the Americas and to bridge the gap between science and policy. The agreement establishes an Implementation Committee to prepare the Institute for operation and notes the intention to inform the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) of the Institute's creation.

The 1992 agreement establishes the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) to coordinate scientific research on global change in the Americas. The IAI is structured as a regional network with four primary organs: the Conference of the Parties (policy-making), the Executive Council (executive), the Scientific Advisory Committee (scientific advice), and the Directorate (administration). Its objectives include promoting interdisciplinary research on earth, ocean, and atmospheric sciences, improving research infrastructure, and providing scientific information to governments for public policy. The initial Scientific Agenda focuses on tropical ecosystems, climate change impacts on biodiversity, El Niño Southern Oscillation, and high latitude processes. Funding is based on voluntary contributions from Parties and Associates, with operational expenses supported by pledges in increments of US$ 5,000.

The 1992 agreement creates the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) to address insufficient scientific knowledge of the Earth system and the impacts of global change. The IAI is structured as a regional network of cooperating entities with a specific scientific agenda focusing on tropical ecosystems, biodiversity, and climate variability. It is governed by a Conference of the Parties, an Executive Council, a Scientific Advisory Committee, and an Executive Directorate. The agreement outlines the criteria for establishing Research Centers, the role of affiliated institutions and associates, and a funding model based on voluntary contributions from member states and external partners.