Search Climate Insights Directory

Signatories of the Blue Manifesto argue that the draft European Ocean Pact lacks the ambition and enforceability needed to address ocean degradation. They call for binding 2030 targets to protect 30% of EU seas, the phase-out of destructive fishing and offshore oil and gas drilling, the creation of a European Ocean Fund, and the inclusion of civil society in governance structures.

A survey of 10,751 adults in India conducted between December 2024 and February 2025 reveals that a majority of the population has personally experienced extreme weather events, such as severe heat waves (71%) and agricultural pests (60%), within the past year. These experiences correlate with high levels of worry regarding local impacts, particularly species extinction (61%) and agricultural pests (62%). While most respondents believe global warming significantly affects these events, 32% of the population reported they had never heard of global warming.

The document highlights how the plastics industry uses tactics like manufacturing doubt and securing privileged access to influence negotiations, noting that over 220 lobbyists attended the INC-5 session. It recommends embedding conflict of interest safeguards directly into the treaty text, including the preamble and science policy bodies, to protect public health and environmental goals from undue economic influence.

The document warns that the plastics and petrochemical industries are using tactics similar to those of the fossil fuel and tobacco industries to influence the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations. It highlights a significant increase in industry lobbyists at the INC-5 session, who outnumber delegations from the European Union, Pacific Islands, and Latin American countries. The brief recommends incorporating conflict-of-interest protections directly into the treaty's preamble, scientific bodies, and articles concerning financial mechanisms and technology transfer to ensure the agreement's effectiveness in protecting public health and the environment.

A coalition of environmental and animal welfare organizations argues that a House reconciliation bill would jeopardize the Rice’s whale by legislating that a 2020 Trump-era Biological Opinion (BiOp) is sufficient for oil and gas lease sales, despite the BiOp being struck down by a U.S. District Court in 2024. The authors claim the bill would allow oil and gas companies to bypass environmental reviews and further weaken existing mitigation measures, specifically those regarding seismic airgun surveys, risking the extinction of the 50-100 remaining Rice’s whales.

The report examines the environmental impacts of agricultural subsidies, noting that total global support ranges from $610 to $842 billion per year. It argues that while production-linked supports—such as market price support and input subsidies—are often the most harmful, impacts are highly context-specific. The authors propose several frameworks for identifying harmful subsidies, including the use of meta-analyses of farming practices and the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) model. To address these issues internationally, the report suggests options such as enhanced transparency, the use of 'rebuttable presumptions' to shift the burden of proof to subsidizing countries, and special and differential treatment for developing nations to balance environmental goals with food security and livelihoods.

The report highlights that agrifood systems in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) are major emission sources but receive only 8% of climate finance. It proposes blended finance as a mechanism to mitigate risks—such as lack of credit history and misaligned investment terms—to unlock private capital. The text notes that 59 blended finance transactions totaling $7 billion have occurred in the region, primarily in Brazil and Colombia, with a significant focus on agroforestry.

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) argues that the 'triple planetary crises of pollution, biodiversity loss and climate change' are causing measurable harm to human health in Canada, particularly among vulnerable populations. The organization calls on federal candidates to preserve environmental regulations like the Clean Electricity Regulations and the Oil and Gas Emissions Cap, strengthen the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), establish an Office of Environmental Justice, ban fossil fuel advertising, and enforce 'polluter pays' legislation. CAPE highlights that air pollution from fossil fuels is linked to 34,000 premature deaths in Canada annually and costs the economy $120 billion per year.

The report assesses climate risks in Belize, specifically around the Maya Forest Corridor and marine reserves, highlighting vulnerabilities to sea level rise and hurricanes. It emphasizes the need for gender-responsive and socially inclusive nature-based solutions to combat biodiversity loss and food insecurity.

The 25 most-visited national parks in the contiguous U.S. are projected to see a nearly five-fold increase in extremely hot days per year by 2050 under a 'warm wet' scenario, and up to a ten-fold increase under a 'hot dry' scenario. These trends, combined with record-breaking visitation, increase the risk of heat-related illnesses for visitors and threaten biodiversity and infrastructure. The National Park Service is implementing adaptation strategies, such as the Climate Change Response Strategy, to mitigate these risks.

The report highlights the role of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and iTaukei governance in Fiji as cost-effective, sustainable alternatives to grey infrastructure for climate adaptation. TEK provides time-tested strategies for disaster risk reduction, including early warning systems and risk prevention for floods, storms, and wildfires, leveraging the accumulated knowledge of the Indigenous iTaukei people to build community resilience.

The document examines the gap between legal frameworks and the actual implementation of environmental procedural rights in Southeast Asia. It identifies challenges such as ambiguous disclosure requirements, lack of enforcement in public participation during Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs), and barriers to judicial remedies. The brief highlights community-driven alternatives like counter-EIAs and the role of legal networks in strengthening the judiciary to protect vulnerable groups and environmental defenders.

The document examines the legal framework and compliance risks for soy and cattle in Brazil under the EUDR. It highlights systemic issues including land grabbing, illegal deforestation, and labour violations, while warning EU companies that official records and third-party certifications are often insufficient for due diligence.

The document examines the application of the EU Deforestation Regulation's (EUDR) legality requirement to the Indonesian palm oil sector. It highlights a complex, decentralized legal framework where national laws are often poorly enforced at sub-national levels. Key systemic risks include widespread failure to obtain mandatory Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certification, pervasive corruption in permitting, illegal plantation establishment in forest zones, and significant violations of Indigenous land rights and labour standards. The report concludes that EU companies cannot rely solely on official documentation or third-party certificates for due diligence due to these systemic irregularities.

The report details how climate change drives biodiversity loss through mechanisms like ocean acidification and species range shifts, while biodiversity loss weakens the planet's carbon sinks. It critically assesses 'false solutions'—including monoculture tree plantations, carbon offsetting, and geoengineering—arguing that these policies often cause further ecological damage and land grabbing. The document calls for a systemic shift toward agroecology, energy sufficiency, and the protection of Indigenous Peoples' land rights to address the polycrisis holistically.

The document analyzes how climate change accelerates biodiversity loss and how the loss of ecosystems further destabilizes the climate. It critiques 'false solutions' such as monoculture tree plantations, carbon offsets, and geoengineering, arguing they often cause more harm than good. The report calls for a systemic shift toward agroecology, community-led energy transitions, and the protection of Indigenous rights.

Southeast Asia is facing a potential surge in gas production, with 14 projects potentially reaching final investment decisions (FIDs) in 2025. If approved, these would add over 20 bcm/y of capacity, an 18% increase over current output. However, many projects have a history of delays, and the expansion threatens ecologically sensitive areas like the Coral Triangle and Mekong Delta. The report highlights contradictions between these extraction plans and the net-zero commitments of Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, and Brunei.

The report provides a comprehensive climate risk profile for Belize, detailing observed and projected climatic changes, their impacts on biodiversity and livelihoods, and vulnerability rankings for specific marine and terrestrial communities. It recommends a suite of nature-based solutions (NbS) and gender-responsive strategies to enhance climate resilience in protected areas.

The document identifies significant gaps in the implementation of procedural rights necessary to uphold the right to a healthy environment (RtHE) in Southeast Asia. It highlights how ambiguous disclosure requirements, lack of enforcement in environmental impact assessments (EIAs), and resource-constrained judicial bodies hinder environmental justice. The brief showcases emerging community-led assessments and judicial capacity-building efforts as potential solutions, while noting the ASEAN Declaration on the Right to a Safe, Clean, Healthy, and Sustainable Environment as a key regional entry point for improvement.

The document opposes the European Commission's simplification packages for the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other environmental rules, arguing that dismantling these rules will hinder farmers' ability to adapt to climate change. It highlights that heat stress and droughts have already reduced wheat and maize yields by over 60% in some southern European regions. The signatories demand that the CAP transition from hectare-based income support to incentive-based models, specifically calling for eco-schemes to receive 30% of direct payments by 2026-2027 and the implementation of sustainable peatland management. The statement emphasizes that administrative simplification should focus on digitalization and satellite data rather than suspending performance reports or weakening environmental standards.