Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues that national governments are essential for climate adaptation as they provide the finance, strategic oversight, legal authority, and institutional capacity required to drive action. To support local resilience, the text suggests integrating climate considerations into national planning, building institutional capacity through transparency and information sharing, and utilizing local champions and networks to bridge the gap between national policy and local realities. It highlights specific tools such as the Caribbean Climate Online Risk and Adaptation tool (CCORAL) and the ARIA toolkit used in Trinidad and Tobago and Saint Lucia.

The document outlines the critical role of Caribbean governments in driving climate resilience through the integration of climate risks into national planning, the building of institutional capacity, and the translation of national policies into local action via local actor networks.

The document describes the 'Achieving Development Resilient to Climate Change: A Sourcebook for the Caribbean Water Sector', which supports the implementation of the Regional Framework for Achieving Development Resilient to Climate Change and Implementation Plan. It is intended for water resources managers, utilities, and sector agencies to help them manage current climate risks and adapt to future changes through a four-phase decision-making cycle.

The document describes CCORAL, a Caribbean-specific tool used to screen policies, legislation, plans, budgets, and projects for climate risks. It outlines a three-step process involving basic screening questions, a detailed vulnerability workbook, and risk management analyses. The briefing specifically details how CCORAL applies to the water sector, including water policies, legislation, supply plans, financial budgeting, and infrastructure projects, noting that the tool is designed for use by both climate specialists and non-specialists.

The document highlights the critical need for climate-resilient investment in the Caribbean water sector to mitigate high economic losses from hazards like hurricanes and droughts. Between 2010 and 2012, USD 8.3 billion in ODA was disbursed to the Caribbean, with USD 172 million allocated to the water sector; of this, only USD 12 million was tagged as climate change relevant. In contrast, global climate funds provided USD 14 million to the water sector during the same period, showing a stronger focus on strategy development and technical studies compared to the infrastructure focus of traditional ODA. The brief identifies five key global climate funds that disbursed a total of USD 44 million to the Caribbean, with 32% targeted at water. It recommends that water sector planners use online platforms like Climate Finance Options to identify funding and suggests matching specialist climate finance with traditional sources to leverage larger investments.

The paper examines how multilevel governance can facilitate climate change adaptation in Jamaica's coastal-marine environments. Using a case study approach and Social Network Analysis (SNA), the authors identify the roles of various state and non-state actors. Preliminary findings highlight the importance of bridging organizations, such as the Department of Fisheries (DoFish), and the potential of the newly established Climate Change Focal Point Network to strengthen horizontal coordination among government agencies. The study argues for the need to strengthen vertical ties between national and local levels and to leverage public-private partnerships to enhance adaptive capacity.

The report details discussions from a COP19 workshop on climate-induced relocation, highlighting the extreme financial costs for communities in Alaska and the Pacific, the need for national relocation policies, and the tension between voluntary adaptation and forced loss and damage. It emphasizes the importance of community-led decision-making to protect cultural identity and calls for better integration of relocation into UNFCCC frameworks like NAPAs and the Loss and Damage mechanism.

The document argues that the EU's proposed intellectual property (IP) provisions in Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) with ACP countries are premature and potentially harmful to development. It highlights concerns that the proposals omit public interest safeguards, restrict farmers' rights through UPOV 1991, fail to address biopiracy regarding traditional knowledge, and impose enforcement standards that exceed TRIPS requirements and the administrative capacities of ACP nations.

The document outlines how the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) has begun integrating climate change into its human rights oversight, specifically regarding the rights of Indigenous Peoples and people of African descent. It details specific recommendations made to El Salvador, Mexico, Guyana, and the Netherlands, while noting that climate-related outputs remain a small fraction of the Committee's total work. The report also highlights the influence of UN Special Rapporteurs, the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent, and NGOs in pushing for a human rights-based approach to environmental racism and climate justice.

The briefing argues that the EU must move beyond simply cleaning up its own supply chains to create 'win-win' Forest Partnerships with developing countries. These partnerships should address root causes of deforestation—such as poverty and weak land tenure—while supporting Indigenous Peoples, small-scale producers, and nature-based solutions to meet Paris Agreement and CBD objectives. The authors recommend leveraging the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) for funding and using 'Forest Diplomacy' to encourage other major consuming regions to adopt similar measures.

The WHO-Civil Society Working Group to Advance Action on Climate Change and Health calls for the systemic integration of climate and health competencies into all health professional education, citing a global lack of such programs and institutional barriers. The letter advocates for updated curricula, increased funding for research, and multi-sectoral collaboration to build resilient, low-carbon health systems. It provides an appendix of existing global resources, including courses in the Caribbean, Latin America, Brazil, and Kiribati, as well as core competency frameworks developed by the Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education.

The document lists several climate and health educational initiatives, including certificate courses for health professionals in the Caribbean and Latin America, a Planetary Health MOOC from Brazil, and a 'Core Competencies' framework developed by the Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education (GCCHE).

The document outlines the severe health vulnerabilities of the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region due to climate change, emphasizing the disproportionate impact on marginalized groups. It calls for a transition to sustainable food and energy systems, the strengthening of primary healthcare, and the implementation of climate justice to protect the right to health.

The WHO and Civil Society Working Group on Health and Climate Change urges medical educators to incorporate climate and health competencies into curricula to prepare healthcare workers for the impacts of environmental changes. The letter highlights a global lack of formal climate education for doctors and proposes specific actions, including increased funding and resource sharing. It provides examples of existing courses in the Caribbean, Latin America, Brazil, and Kiribati, as well as global initiatives like the GCCHE core competencies.

An open letter from the Civil Society Working Group on Health and Climate Change calling for the integration of climate and health education into the curricula of all health professional training institutions to prepare the workforce for environmental and climate-related health risks.

The WHO-Civil Society Working Group on Climate and Health Action calls for the mandatory integration of climate and health education into all health professional training to prepare the workforce for increasing environmental health risks. The letter highlights a global lack of institutional support and student-led initiatives as current drivers of such education. It proposes four key actions: incorporating core competencies into curricula, supporting multi-sectoral collaboration, increasing funding for research and education, and sharing resources. The document also lists existing educational examples, including specialized courses for the Caribbean and Latin America, and a 'core competencies' framework developed by the Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education.

The WHO-Civil Society Working Group on Climate and Health Action calls for the systemic integration of climate and health competencies into medical and health professional curricula. The document argues that health professionals have an ethical duty to address climate-related health risks, noting that current training is often lacking or student-led. It proposes four key actions: integrating competencies into curricula and professional development, fostering multisectoral training, increasing funding for research and education, and sharing pedagogical resources. The letter includes an appendix of existing courses in the Caribbean, Latin America, Brazil, and Switzerland, as well as a core competencies framework developed by the Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education.

The WHO-Civil Society Working Group calls for the systemic integration of climate and health competencies into medical and health professional education to ensure practitioners can respond to climate-related health risks. The letter highlights a global lack of such programs and institutional barriers, while providing a list of existing regional and global courses as models for implementation.

The document outlines the critical intersection of climate change and public health in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), emphasizing the region's high vulnerability despite its modest global emissions contribution. It details how extreme weather, food insecurity, and the transition to clean energy impact health, particularly for marginalized groups like indigenous peoples and urban poor. The statement calls for the integration of health into National Determined Contributions (NDCs), the decarbonization of health systems and food production, and the implementation of the Belém Action Plan on Health. It advocates for climate justice, the protection of traditional knowledge, and increased financing for health-centered climate resilience.

The document examines the synergistic crisis of wildfires and anthropogenic climate change in Latin America, highlighting severe physical and mental health impacts. It identifies vulnerable populations, such as children, the elderly, and indigenous communities, and calls for a paradigm shift toward preventive, integrated policies. Key recommendations include sustainable land management, strengthening environmental health surveillance, and integrating indigenous knowledge into fire management strategies.