Search Climate Insights Directory

The document analyzes coastal resilience efforts in Bangladesh, Malabon City (Philippines), and Cartagena (Colombia), highlighting the 'implementation gap' between planning and action. It identifies key success factors, including political will, access to credible climate data, stakeholder coordination, and a mix of domestic and international funding. The paper advocates for a 'whole-of-government approach' and the use of legislative mandates to ensure climate adaptation is integrated into development planning.

The briefing argues that scaling PAYG energy access in Kenya and Tanzania requires a shift from exclusive reliance on international capital to the mobilization of local financial institutions. It suggests that DFIs and donors can bridge this gap using credit guarantees, lines of credit, and 'fund of funds' to reduce perceived risks for local banks. The document highlights that approximately 35 million people in Kenya and 36 million in Tanzania lack electricity, and an estimated one billion dollars is needed to scale PAYG services for broader impact. Drawing on the IDCOL program in Bangladesh, the authors recommend that local commercial banks engage through short-term trade finance and that national governments provide clear grid extension plans to encourage private investment.

The WRI Results Framework establishes a structured system to plan and evaluate programmatic progress across three primary human systems: food, land & water; energy; and cities. It sets specific global targets for 2030 and WRI intervention targets for 2027, focusing on outcomes such as reducing agricultural land demand by 100 Mha, increasing the share of zero-carbon electricity by 9% in target geographies, and improving urban climate resilience. The framework integrates Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and utilizes a tiered approach of global, intervention, and country-specific targets, supported by impact indicators for people, nature, and climate.

The document examines the transition of Bangladesh's disaster management from a reactive model to a proactive, risk-reduction framework through the Comprehensive Disaster Management Programme (CDMP). It details the vulnerabilities of Bangladesh to cyclones, floods, and climate change, and evaluates the institutional mechanisms and specific outputs of CDMP Phase I (2004-2009). Key achievements include the creation of the Climate Change Cell and the Disaster Management Information Centre, though the report notes challenges such as high civil service turnover and the need to mainstream risk reduction beyond a single ministry.

The ACT2025 Alliance Statement outlines a comprehensive 'Ambition, Solidarity, and Prosperity' package for COP26. It calls for major emitters to align NDCs with the 1.5°C goal, demands that developed countries meet and exceed the $100 billion annual climate finance pledge, and advocates for the operationalization of the Global Goal on Adaptation and the establishment of Loss and Damage as a permanent agenda item. The consortium emphasizes the need for a reformed financial system that prioritizes grants over loans and the adoption of a common five-year time frame for NDCs to ensure near-term accountability.

The document outlines how governments monitor climate finance to ensure alignment with climate goals. It highlights that as of 2022, approximately 50 countries—mostly developing nations—have processes to assess climate spending. A key tool discussed is climate budget tagging, used by about 23 countries as of 2023 to identify climate-relevant budget allocations. The guide details specific tagging approaches used in countries like Bangladesh, Cambodia, Colombia, Nepal, Peru, and the Philippines, and defines the essential components of an effective tagging program, including transparent methodology, appropriate tools, institutional commitment, and strategic frameworks.

The document outlines the achievements of the Global Commission on Adaptation, specifically the role of the World Resources Institute (WRI) in co-managing the initiative. It highlights the 'Adapt Now' report, which argues that climate adaptation is a human, environmental, and economic imperative, with benefit-cost ratios for investments ranging from 2:1 to 10:1. The report details a 'Year of Action' that mobilized over 170 partners across tracks including finance, agriculture, resilient cities, and nature-based solutions. Key outcomes include the mobilization of $790 million for small-scale food producers, the creation of the 'Principles for Locally Led Adaptation', and the launch of the '1,000 Cities Adapt Now' program. The document concludes by calling for scaled-up climate finance for developing countries and the integration of climate risks into national budgetary and policy decisions.

The document serves as a manual for journalists to avoid common errors when linking specific weather events to climate change. It details the methodology of 'event attribution studies'—which use climate models to compare the current world with a pre-industrial one—and provides specific guidance on reporting heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snowfall, droughts, and wildfires. The guide emphasizes that while climate change increases the probability and intensity of many extremes, it is rarely the sole cause, and local factors like land use and water management often play critical roles in turning a weather event into a disaster.

The document explains the science of extreme event attribution, which calculates how climate change alters the probability and intensity of specific weather events. It provides a detailed breakdown of how climate change influences heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, blizzards, droughts, and wildfires, while cautioning journalists against three common errors: ignoring climate change, attributing events without evidence, or treating climate change as the sole cause. It emphasizes that while global trends are clear for some phenomena (like heatwaves), others (like blizzards) remain highly uncertain.

The document explains how 'Extreme Event Attribution' research determines the extent to which climate change makes specific weather events more likely or intense. It warns journalists against three common errors: ignoring climate change, attributing events without evidence, or naming it as the sole cause. The guide provides detailed scientific contexts for heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snowfall, droughts, and wildfires, noting that while some links (like heatwaves) are globally certain, others (like droughts or snowfall) are more complex and region-specific.

The document explains 'extreme event attribution'—the scientific method used to determine if and how much climate change influenced a specific weather event. It warns journalists against three common mistakes: ignoring climate change, attributing events without evidence, or citing it as the sole cause. The guide provides detailed analysis for heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snow, droughts, and fires, noting that while heatwaves are unilaterally linked to global warming, other events like droughts and snowfall have more complex, region-specific relationships with climate change. It emphasizes that disasters result from both extreme weather and societal vulnerability.

The document explains the methodology of 'extreme event attribution' to help journalists avoid common errors, such as ignoring climate change or attributing an event to it as a sole cause. It details how scientists use climate models to compare the modern world with a pre-industrial one to determine if an event was more likely or intense due to global warming. The guide provides specific scientific consensus and limitations for heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snowfall, droughts, and wildfires, emphasizing that while some connections are robust (e.g., heatwaves), others are more complex and depend on regional data and human vulnerability.

The document explains the science of extreme event attribution, detailing how researchers use climate models and historical data to determine if climate change made a specific event more likely or intense. It provides specific guidance on reporting various phenomena—heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, snowfall, droughts, and wildfires—highlighting where scientific confidence is high and where uncertainties remain.

The document serves as a style guide for journalists to avoid common errors when attributing extreme weather to climate change. It explains the methodology of event attribution studies—comparing simulated worlds with and without human influence—and provides specific guidance on reporting heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snowfall, droughts, and wildfires. The guide emphasizes that while climate change increases the probability and intensity of many events, it is rarely the sole cause, and social vulnerability often determines whether a weather event becomes a disaster.

The document explains 'event attribution' science, which quantifies how climate change alters the probability and intensity of specific weather events. It provides a detailed breakdown of how climate change affects heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snowfall, droughts, and wildfires, while cautioning journalists against common errors such as treating climate change as the sole cause of a disaster or ignoring it entirely. It emphasizes that while some trends are globally consistent (e.g., heatwaves), others are regionally variable or complex (e.g., droughts and snowfall).

The document explains the methodology of extreme event attribution, which calculates how much climate change has altered the probability and intensity of specific weather events. It warns journalists against three common errors: ignoring climate change, attributing events without evidence, or citing it as the sole cause. The guide provides detailed analysis for heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, snowstorms, droughts, and wildfires, noting that while heatwaves are universally linked to global warming, other events like droughts and floods have more complex, region-specific relationships with climate change. It emphasizes that disasters are the result of both extreme weather and societal vulnerability, such as poor urban planning or water management.

The document explains 'extreme event attribution'—the scientific process of determining how climate change affects the likelihood and intensity of specific weather events. It provides a framework for journalists to avoid common reporting errors, such as ignoring climate change or attributing an event to it without evidence. The guide details the specific influence of global warming on heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snowfall, droughts, and wildfires, noting that while some links (like heatwaves) are globally certain, others (like droughts and floods) vary by region and are influenced by socio-economic vulnerabilities.

The document explains how 'attribution' studies determine if global warming increased the likelihood or intensity of a specific extreme weather event. It warns journalists against three common errors: ignoring climate change, claiming it caused an event without evidence, or treating it as the sole cause. The guide provides specific findings for heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snowfall, droughts, and wildfires, noting that while heatwaves are globally linked to warming, other phenomena like droughts and floods vary significantly by region.

The document serves as a journalistic guide to 'event attribution', the scientific method used to determine if and to what extent climate change influenced a specific extreme weather event. It warns against common reporting errors—such as ignoring climate change, claiming it as the sole cause without evidence, or over-caution in reporting heatwaves—and provides specific scientific guidance on heatwaves, floods, droughts, wildfires, tropical cyclones, and heavy snowfall.

The document explains the methodology of extreme event attribution, which determines how much human-induced climate change has influenced the probability or intensity of a specific weather event. It provides a detailed breakdown of different types of extreme events—heatwaves, floods, tropical storms, snowfall, droughts, and wildfires—outlining where scientific confidence in climate links is high and where it remains uncertain. The guide emphasizes that while climate change influences the likelihood and severity of events, local vulnerabilities and human management often determine whether an event becomes a disaster.