Search Climate Insights Directory

The document details the creation of the first comprehensive Heat Action Plan in South Asia, implemented by the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) in 2013. The plan focuses on an early warning system, public awareness, and healthcare capacity building to protect vulnerable populations from heat-related morbidity and mortality.

The document defines electric vehicles (EVs) as cars or trucks powered by electric motors using batteries or fuel cells, distinguishing them from conventional hybrids. It categorizes EVs into battery-electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids, and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, noting that EVs generally produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions than fossil-fuel vehicles. The guide highlights that battery-electric cars offer the lowest emissions and simplest maintenance, while plug-in hybrids provide a bridge for those with longer trips, and fuel cell vehicles offer fast refueling but suffer from limited infrastructure, particularly in the US.

The Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) utilizes a Robust Decision Support (RDS) approach that integrates water systems modelling, participatory techniques, and interactive data visualization via Tableau. This method addresses the challenge of communicating vast amounts of data from complex models, such as the Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) system, to non-scientists. By using multi-field graphics and interactive filters, stakeholders can evaluate system vulnerability across numerous scenarios and assess the trade-offs of different management strategies, such as dam construction, to identify robust solutions for an uncertain future.

The guide outlines a process for civil society organizations to monitor adaptation finance, from analyzing national contexts and compiling international data to mapping funding flows and designing local tracking tools. It emphasizes the use of evidence-based advocacy to ensure funds reach the most vulnerable populations.

The report details an action research programme in Gorakhpur, India, aimed at incorporating climate change projections and vulnerability analysis into local disaster management planning. It highlights the use of 'Shared Learning Dialogues' and the Climate Resilience Framework to bridge gaps between national policy and local implementation, resulting in a climate-sensitive DDMP and state-level government orders to integrate disaster risk reduction into annual development plans.

The pilot analysis of nine mining policies in Saskatchewan using the ADAPTool identified 44 vulnerabilities and 66 corresponding adaptation actions. While most policies showed moderate support for self-organization and decentralization, the analysis found a lack of deliberate foresight methods and a need for more frequent, formal review processes and better reporting of results.

The report applies the ADAPTool to Saskatchewan's 25-year Water Security Plan, finding that while the plan provides indirect support for adaptation, 133 of 198 adaptation actions lack direct program support. It notes that five of the seven reviewed policies are vulnerable to climate change and concludes that the ADAPTool is not well suited for plans that have not yet been implemented.

The report details a pilot study using the ADAPTool to assess 15 mining-related policies across Manitoba and Saskatchewan. The analysis focused on climate change stressors—specifically drought, excessive moisture, and increased temperatures—across four mining phases: exploring and siting, development, operations, and closure and remediation. In Manitoba, 37 vulnerabilities and 48 adaptation actions were identified, while Saskatchewan identified 44 vulnerabilities and 66 adaptation actions. The findings indicate a lack of policy support for transportation and building-related actions, as well as an inadequate use of foresighting and scenario planning to integrate mitigation measures into mining policies despite significant climate risks.

The document describes a CDKN-START programme that successfully transitioned Gorakhpur's District Disaster Management Plan from a coordination-focused document to a climate-sensitive plan. This was achieved using the 'Shared Learning Dialogue' (SLD) process and the Climate Resilience Framework to bridge gaps in technical capacity and inter-departmental coordination. Key achievements include the use of simplified extreme event analysis over standard regional models to increase government buy-in and the establishment of a mandate for integrating disaster risk reduction into annual development plans.

The document argues that scaling out community-based adaptation (CBA) requires moving beyond isolated pilots to a systemic approach that integrates adaptive capacity, strategic partnerships, and documented evidence. It identifies four key enabling factors: building comprehensive adaptive capacity (assets, institutions, knowledge, innovation, and decision-making), leveraging diverse networks including the private sector, producing rigorous cost-benefit evidence, and utilizing flexible institutional and finance mechanisms. Case studies from Niger, Colombia, Zambia, and Bangladesh illustrate different pathways to scale, ranging from informal farmer networks and municipal government planning to commercial contract farming and international research platforms.

The document argues that while gender mainstreaming is embedded in international policies, a significant gap remains in national and local implementation of disaster risk reduction. It highlights that disasters often result in higher mortality for women and exacerbate existing inequalities, such as the wage gap seen after Hurricane Katrina. However, it also emphasizes that women possess unique capacities and leadership skills in disaster recovery, such as organizing emergency kitchens in Jakarta. The brief warns against treating women as a homogenous vulnerable group and criticizes the assumption in some industrialized nations that existing equality laws automatically ensure gender-sensitive DRR. It recommends that the next international framework (HFA2) utilize an independent institution for monitoring and prioritize the collection of gender-disaggregated data.

The document argues that while international policies have increasingly adopted gender mainstreaming, a significant gap remains in national and local implementation of disaster risk reduction (DRR). It highlights that women are often incorrectly viewed as a homogenous vulnerable group, overlooking their specific capacities and leadership in disaster recovery. The brief provides evidence of gender-differentiated impacts from events like the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and Hurricane Katrina, and recommends that the next international framework include independent monitoring and the systematic collection of gender-disaggregated data.

The research demonstrates that participatory scenario development serves as a critical tool for capacity-building and awareness-raising in developing countries, complementing traditional vulnerability assessments by integrating socioeconomic trends with climate projections. Through case studies in Ghana, Honduras, and Tajikistan, the authors show that PSD can validate and complement donor-driven initiatives and national strategies. The paper emphasizes the need to combine qualitative stakeholder knowledge with quantitative data—such as downscaled global scenarios and crop modeling—to avoid 'myopic traps' and ensure adaptation options are compatible with broader development goals like poverty reduction and food security.

The document examines how marginalized groups—including women, children, the elderly, and people with disabilities—are disproportionately affected by disasters due to systemic vulnerabilities and are frequently excluded from disaster risk reduction (DRR) decision-making. It argues that these groups should be viewed as active agents of change rather than passive victims, leveraging their local and traditional knowledge to enhance community resilience. The authors critique the 'Zero Draft' of the post-2015 DRR framework for lacking enforceable language on social inclusion and recommend that future frameworks mandate disaggregated data collection and the promotion of human rights to address the root causes of vulnerability.

The paper describes a participatory approach using stakeholder mapping and 'barrier cards' to bridge the gap between national climate policies and local implementation in Mauritius. Findings reveal a strong predominance of national government in adaptation planning, with local actors often excluded from information and action flows. In the agriculture sector, the primary barrier is a lack of climate vulnerability data, while the fisheries sector faces institutional barriers related to a lack of accountability. The authors argue that prioritizing 'surmountable' barriers—those addressable with existing national capacities—is the most effective way to build climate resilience.

The CRiSTAL Food Security 2.0 User’s Manual describes a Microsoft Excel-based tool used to systematically assess risks to food security posed by climate variability and change. The tool employs a food systems and resilience approach, analyzing five dimensions: food utilization and consumption, food access, food availability, supporting resources and services, and supporting organizations and policies. It guides users through a six-module process—Introduction, Context, Food System, Resilience, Indicators, and Reports—combining participatory community consultations with secondary research to identify vulnerabilities and develop SMART resilience indicators.

The FIPAT manual describes a structured process for enhancing food system resilience against climate variability. It guides users through two main sections: Section A, which focuses on mapping food systems, identifying climate risks, and developing resilience indicators; and Section B, which assesses how specific public policies support resilience measures, actor capacity, and overall system stability. The tool emphasizes a participatory approach involving government officials and stakeholders to ensure that policy gaps are identified and addressed through a resilience-based lens.

The report finds significant institutional gaps in Trinidad and Tobago's readiness for climate adaptation across food production, coastal zone management, and tourism. While basic climate data is available via the Trinidad and Tobago Meteorological Service, there is a critical lack of sector-specific vulnerability assessments, formal prioritisation processes, and national platforms for information exchange. Coordination is strongest in coastal zone management through a Cabinet-appointed Steering Committee, but overall mainstreaming of adaptation into national planning remains limited, with current efforts led by the Environmental Management Authority to integrate climate priorities into development sectors.

The 'Minimum Standards for local climate-smart disaster risk reduction' guide establishes a framework for integrating future climate-related risks into local disaster risk reduction (DRR) activities. It provides two sets of standards: one for community-level implementation and another for civil society organizations (CSOs) or local government authorities supporting those communities. The guide emphasizes moving beyond 'business as usual' by utilizing weather forecasts, seasonal projections, and vulnerability assessments to create adaptive action plans.

The vulnerability assessment in the Virunga landscape reveals that climate-related disturbances affect different social groups and activities unevenly. While non-Batwa women identified that direct consequences of events like flooding can be mitigated to reduce impacts on income, Batwa groups perceive themselves as more severely affected by destructive disturbances such as strong winds. The Batwa are identified as a particularly vulnerable group due to extreme poverty, high dependency on the park, and displacement resulting from restricted park access, leaving many in poor housing.