Search Climate Insights Directory

The Joint Benefits Authority (JBA) is a proposed governance and finance model based on the Joint Powers Authority (JPA) structure. It aims to overcome the challenges of siloed city departments and tight budgets by pooling resources and using advanced capital planning to deliver multi-purpose, nature-based infrastructure. The JBA focuses on capturing co-benefits, pioneering creative municipal financing, and advancing social equity by prioritizing underserved neighborhoods. The concept is currently being piloted in San Francisco through a partnership between the World Resources Institute, Encourage Capital, the Liquid Assets Project, and the San Francisco Public Utility Commission, with funding from the Kresge Foundation, Spring Point Partners, and the Moore Foundation.

WRI Indonesia's 2025-2032 strategy focuses on three core systems: energy, cities, and food, land and water. The organization aims to support Indonesia's goal of 8% GDP growth and a 43% emissions reduction by 2030 through industrial decarbonization, urban redesign, and ecosystem restoration. Key initiatives include promoting responsible critical mineral extraction, expanding green urban spaces, and securing land rights for Indigenous Peoples to enhance forest protection. WRI Indonesia employs a "count it, change it, scale it" methodology to integrate data-driven research with policy implementation across national and local government levels.

The document identifies the systemic challenges of integrating climate change risks into policy, such as uncertainty, non-linear impacts, and temporal lags. It proposes a research framework for the World Resources 2010 report to identify the conditions and hurdles for creating decision-making processes that are responsive, proactive, flexible, durable, and robust. The methodology includes sectoral case studies, commissioned expert papers, and scenario exercises focusing on developing nations.

The document explains the science of extreme event attribution, which calculates how climate change alters the probability and intensity of specific weather events. It provides a detailed breakdown of how climate change influences heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, blizzards, droughts, and wildfires, while cautioning journalists against three common errors: ignoring climate change, attributing events without evidence, or treating climate change as the sole cause. It emphasizes that while global trends are clear for some phenomena (like heatwaves), others (like blizzards) remain highly uncertain.

The document explains how 'Extreme Event Attribution' research determines the extent to which climate change makes specific weather events more likely or intense. It warns journalists against three common errors: ignoring climate change, attributing events without evidence, or naming it as the sole cause. The guide provides detailed scientific contexts for heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snowfall, droughts, and wildfires, noting that while some links (like heatwaves) are globally certain, others (like droughts or snowfall) are more complex and region-specific.

The document explains 'extreme event attribution'—the scientific method used to determine if and how much climate change influenced a specific weather event. It warns journalists against three common mistakes: ignoring climate change, attributing events without evidence, or citing it as the sole cause. The guide provides detailed analysis for heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snow, droughts, and fires, noting that while heatwaves are unilaterally linked to global warming, other events like droughts and snowfall have more complex, region-specific relationships with climate change. It emphasizes that disasters result from both extreme weather and societal vulnerability.

The document explains the methodology of 'extreme event attribution' to help journalists avoid common errors, such as ignoring climate change or attributing an event to it as a sole cause. It details how scientists use climate models to compare the modern world with a pre-industrial one to determine if an event was more likely or intense due to global warming. The guide provides specific scientific consensus and limitations for heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snowfall, droughts, and wildfires, emphasizing that while some connections are robust (e.g., heatwaves), others are more complex and depend on regional data and human vulnerability.

The document explains the science of extreme event attribution, detailing how researchers use climate models and historical data to determine if climate change made a specific event more likely or intense. It provides specific guidance on reporting various phenomena—heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, snowfall, droughts, and wildfires—highlighting where scientific confidence is high and where uncertainties remain.

The document serves as a style guide for journalists to avoid common errors when attributing extreme weather to climate change. It explains the methodology of event attribution studies—comparing simulated worlds with and without human influence—and provides specific guidance on reporting heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snowfall, droughts, and wildfires. The guide emphasizes that while climate change increases the probability and intensity of many events, it is rarely the sole cause, and social vulnerability often determines whether a weather event becomes a disaster.

The document explains 'event attribution' science, which quantifies how climate change alters the probability and intensity of specific weather events. It provides a detailed breakdown of how climate change affects heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snowfall, droughts, and wildfires, while cautioning journalists against common errors such as treating climate change as the sole cause of a disaster or ignoring it entirely. It emphasizes that while some trends are globally consistent (e.g., heatwaves), others are regionally variable or complex (e.g., droughts and snowfall).

The document explains the methodology of extreme event attribution, which calculates how much climate change has altered the probability and intensity of specific weather events. It warns journalists against three common errors: ignoring climate change, attributing events without evidence, or citing it as the sole cause. The guide provides detailed analysis for heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, snowstorms, droughts, and wildfires, noting that while heatwaves are universally linked to global warming, other events like droughts and floods have more complex, region-specific relationships with climate change. It emphasizes that disasters are the result of both extreme weather and societal vulnerability, such as poor urban planning or water management.

The document explains 'extreme event attribution'—the scientific process of determining how climate change affects the likelihood and intensity of specific weather events. It provides a framework for journalists to avoid common reporting errors, such as ignoring climate change or attributing an event to it without evidence. The guide details the specific influence of global warming on heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snowfall, droughts, and wildfires, noting that while some links (like heatwaves) are globally certain, others (like droughts and floods) vary by region and are influenced by socio-economic vulnerabilities.

The document explains how 'attribution' studies determine if global warming increased the likelihood or intensity of a specific extreme weather event. It warns journalists against three common errors: ignoring climate change, claiming it caused an event without evidence, or treating it as the sole cause. The guide provides specific findings for heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snowfall, droughts, and wildfires, noting that while heatwaves are globally linked to warming, other phenomena like droughts and floods vary significantly by region.

The document serves as a journalistic guide to 'event attribution', the scientific method used to determine if and to what extent climate change influenced a specific extreme weather event. It warns against common reporting errors—such as ignoring climate change, claiming it as the sole cause without evidence, or over-caution in reporting heatwaves—and provides specific scientific guidance on heatwaves, floods, droughts, wildfires, tropical cyclones, and heavy snowfall.

The document explains the methodology of extreme event attribution, which determines how much human-induced climate change has influenced the probability or intensity of a specific weather event. It provides a detailed breakdown of different types of extreme events—heatwaves, floods, tropical storms, snowfall, droughts, and wildfires—outlining where scientific confidence in climate links is high and where it remains uncertain. The guide emphasizes that while climate change influences the likelihood and severity of events, local vulnerabilities and human management often determine whether an event becomes a disaster.

The document explains the science of 'extreme event attribution,' which calculates how much climate change increases the probability or intensity of specific weather events. It warns journalists against three common errors: ignoring climate links, asserting links without evidence, or citing climate change as the sole cause. The guide provides specific scientific consensus and attribution examples for heatwaves, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy snow, droughts, and wildfires, emphasizing that while some events (like heatwaves) have a very strong global link to warming, others (like droughts or cyclones) are more complex and vary by region.

The document distinguishes between climate change mitigation, which focuses on avoiding and reducing greenhouse gas emissions to prevent extreme warming, and climate change adaptation, which involves adjusting behaviors and systems to protect people and the environment from existing and future climate impacts. It emphasizes that while mitigation takes decades to affect temperatures, adaptation is required immediately for changes already occurring. Key mitigation strategies include transitioning to renewable energy and stopping deforestation to reach net-zero emissions, while adaptation involves diversifying crops, strengthening infrastructure, and managing natural resources. The text asserts that both approaches are equally important and time-sensitive.

Free-flowing rivers, defined as those largely unaffected by human-made changes to flow and connectivity, are critical for biodiversity, groundwater recharge, and human survival. Only one-third of the world's 246 longest rivers (those 1,000 km or longer) remain free-flowing, with most remaining in remote, less developed, or politically complex regions. Infrastructure, particularly dams, roads, and buildings, disrupts sediment transfer and animal migration, threatening deltas and fish stocks. WWF aims to protect these systems by opposing harmful dams, promoting protective laws, supporting sustainable energy alternatives to hydropower, and pursuing dam removal.

The guide outlines seven ways individuals can support ocean conservation, including choosing sustainable seafood certified by the MSC and ASC, reducing carbon footprints to combat ocean warming, and eliminating single-use plastics. It also suggests traveling responsibly, educating oneself and others, volunteering for conservation organizations, and advocating for ocean-friendly policies through elected representatives.

The document outlines how the loss of Arctic sea ice—which is declining at nearly 13% per decade—triggers global impacts including more intense heatwaves, sea level rise, food system instability, and the release of methane from thawing permafrost.