Search Climate Insights Directory

The report finds that CDM projects frequently underperform, with only 76% of forecasted CERs actually issued by June 2007. This underperformance is attributed to overestimations by consultants and validators, as well as implementation and monitoring difficulties. Waste projects are the worst performers, while N2O projects often exceed expectations. The study identifies additionality demonstration as the primary cause of project rejection, particularly for large-scale projects and cement blending activities in India and Brazil. Bilateral projects, especially those with European participants, show higher CER issuance rates than unilateral projects. The report also highlights deficiencies in stakeholder consultation and the lack of quantifiable indicators for sustainable development in host countries like China, India, and Brazil.

The paper argues that current irrigation subsidy estimates are inconsistent and lack transparency because they often ignore capital costs, opportunity costs, and environmental externalities. It proposes two primary measurement approaches: a 'net cost to government' method, which subtracts total revenues (including hydropower and fisheries) from gross costs (including depreciation and externalities), and a 'net benefit to recipient' method, which compares the water's economic value to the price paid. The author highlights that irrigation is a major global water consumer, often heavily subsidized, which discourages efficient water use and leads to environmental degradation such as salinization and groundwater depletion.

The document analyzes China's strategy of accessing previously untapped natural resources in Africa, often in ecologically fragile areas with weak governance. It highlights the central role of the China Exim Bank in financing large-scale infrastructure and extractive projects, noting a historical lack of adherence to international environmental standards. Using the Merowe Dam in Sudan as a primary case study, the author illustrates significant social and environmental failures. While the Chinese government has begun introducing social and environmental guidelines and 'green credit' policies, the report warns that stricter domestic regulations may inadvertently encourage the relocation of polluting industries to Africa.

The study finds that CDM projects generally overestimate their emission reduction potential, with actual CER issuance reaching only 76% of the amount predicted at registration. Performance varies significantly by project type, with N2O projects over-performing (129%) and animal waste projects under-performing (28%). The analysis also indicates that in-house project development generally outperforms the use of large external consultancies, and that India showed the best host-country performance (122%) compared to China (55%) and Brazil (90%).

The paper evaluates six Chinese CDM projects (four registered and two in validation) to assess how they perform against their initial designs. It finds that forecasted Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) fluctuate significantly as projects progress, often due to new standardised baseline information from China's Designated National Authority (DNA) and technological barriers. All sampled projects claim investment barriers, but only half provide a complete investment analysis. The study also notes a lack of standardised stakeholder consultation procedures in China, with written surveys being the most common method. While projects often align with stakeholder expectations regarding local employment, sustainability benefits are not described quantitatively in the Project Design Documents (PDDs).

The document examines the environmental implications of booming Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Lao PDR's resource-heavy sectors, noting that while the country is well-positioned to benefit from global demand, the scale of growth is outpacing the government's ability to implement adequate policy and regulatory frameworks.

The policy brief examines China's increasing foreign direct investment (FDI) and trade in the Mekong region, driven by its domestic demand for natural resources. It highlights the role of Chinese state-owned enterprises and financial institutions in filling an investment vacuum left by international financial institutions. While noting the potential for economic growth, the document warns of environmental and social risks due to poor regulatory enforcement and the lack of adherence to international sustainability standards by Chinese firms.

The document analyzes China's strategic drive to secure natural resources in the Mekong region to support its rapid economic growth. It details the role of state-backed financing through entities like China Exim Bank and Sinosure in facilitating investments in mining, hydropower, and agriculture. The brief highlights a pattern of resource extraction where raw materials are exported to China while finished goods are sold back to the region. It also notes the environmental and social risks associated with these projects, such as deforestation and displacement, and the lack of adherence to international sustainability standards like the Equator Principles.

The report examines China's increasing influence in the Mekong region through its 'Going Global' strategy, which drives demand for natural resources. It analyzes how Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI), trade, and official development assistance (ODA) operate in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam, highlighting a shift where Chinese financiers fill the vacuum left by International Financial Institutions. The study finds that while China is a dominant investor in Laos and Cambodia across agribusiness, hydropower, and mining, its role in Vietnam is primarily as a trading partner, with investment concentrated in mining. The report warns that poor implementation of local regulations and a lack of adherence to international social and environmental standards by Chinese state-owned enterprises pose significant risks to the region's ecosystems and communities.

China is rapidly increasing its foreign direct investment (FDI) in the Mekong region to secure natural resources for its industrial growth. Driven by the 'Going Out' strategy, Chinese state-owned enterprises are filling an investment vacuum left by International Financial Institutions in hydropower, mining, and agribusiness. While this provides capital and infrastructure, it poses environmental and social risks due to a lack of compliance with international sustainability standards and poor local regulatory enforcement in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam.

The document evaluates SEI's use of stakeholder engagement, distinguishing between the mere use of participatory methods and a comprehensive participatory approach. Through case studies in East Africa, Vietnam, and the UK, it argues that effective engagement requires careful planning, cultural sensitivity, and a clear purpose to avoid 'extractive' research. The authors recommend that SEI adopt institute-wide guiding principles, invest in facilitation training, and create internal mechanisms for sharing expertise to move from being a practitioner of participation to a theoretical contributor in the field.

The paper analyzes how trade liberalization and increased foreign direct investment (FDI) affect the environment in Lao PDR, focusing on hydropower, mining, and construction materials. It highlights risks such as deforestation, water pollution from mining, and habitat loss, while noting opportunities for 'green' growth and renewable energy exports. The author argues that while the government is committed to sustainable development, institutional capacity for implementing environmental safeguards and coordinating Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) remains insufficient.

The report examines the intersection of foreign investment and environmental sustainability in Lao PDR, focusing on the hydropower, mining, and construction sectors. It highlights a gap between the government's formal environmental policies and actual implementation, noting that large-scale projects often bypass rigorous environmental impact assessments (EIAs). The document specifically discusses the Nam Theun 2 dam as a case study of social and environmental displacement, and it analyzes the role of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and international standards in mitigating industrial damage.

The Rapid Trade and Environment Assessment (RTEA) for Lao PDR examines the intersection of trade liberalization—driven by ASEAN, WTO accession, and GMS integration—and environmental sustainability. The report identifies that while resource-intensive sectors like hydropower, mining, and forestry drive GDP growth, they place significant pressure on forests, water, and biodiversity. Conversely, 'green' niche sectors such as organic agriculture, ecotourism, and silk handicrafts offer sustainable export potential. The assessment emphasizes that the net environmental outcome depends on the government's ability to implement and enforce regulatory frameworks, strengthen institutional capacity, and engage the private sector in corporate social responsibility (CSR).

The House and Senate both proposed significantly higher funding for DOE Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EE/RE) programs for FY 2008 than the Administration's request. The House bill (H.R. 2641) appropriated $1.98 billion, while the Senate bill (S. 1751) appropriated $1.72 billion. Both legislative bodies restored funding for geothermal energy and hydropower, which the Administration had eliminated, and increased budgets for solar, wind, and biomass R&D. Additionally, both the House and Senate increased funding for fossil fuel R&D while appropriating less than the Administration's request for nuclear power.

The document is a series of exchange entries between Amory Lovins, Peter Bradford, and R. Stephen Berry. Lovins argues that nuclear power is a 'market loser' and that 'negawatts' (energy efficiency) and micropower are faster, cheaper, and more effective climate solutions. Bradford supports this view, highlighting the high financial risks, the need for massive taxpayer subsidies, and proliferation concerns. Conversely, Berry argues that energy efficiency alone cannot meet the growing energy demands of developing nations like China and India, and that nuclear power is a necessary, reliable, and potentially cost-competitive option if carbon costs are internalized.

The document assesses how water management impacts poverty in Africa, highlighting a significant gap between political rhetoric and actual investment. It argues that current trends will leave millions of Africans without safe water and sanitation by 2015. The authors propose a conceptual framework focusing on four dimensions of poverty reduction: enhancing livelihood security, reducing health risks, reducing vulnerability, and promoting pro-poor economic growth. The report emphasizes the importance of 'green water' (soil moisture) alongside 'blue water' (rivers and lakes) and calls for Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) that places poverty at its center. Key recommendations include public sector reform, stimulating internal capital investment, and adapting to climate change, which is projected to increase water stress for 75 to 250 million Africans by 2020.

The document outlines three primary methods for companies to obtain green power: retail green power programs, renewable energy certificates (RECs), and on-site generation. It provides a business case for the transition, focusing on GHG reduction, stakeholder relations, and cost stability. The guide also details procurement strategies to minimize premiums, such as energy efficiency upgrades and demand aggregation, and explains the methodology for accounting for carbon benefits in corporate GHG inventories using e-GRID emission factors.

The report warns that California faces significant risks from global warming, with projected temperature increases between 3°F and 10.5°F by the end of the century. These changes threaten to severely reduce Sierra Nevada snowpack, increase the frequency of large wildfires, degrade air quality, and disrupt the state's $30 billion agriculture industry. The document emphasizes that while some changes are unavoidable, the most severe consequences can be avoided by reducing heat-trapping emissions to levels that keep warming within the lower range of 3 to 5.5°F.

The document describes hydropower as a low-cost energy source providing 20 percent of global electricity and 7-9 percent of US electricity. It details three primary technologies—impoundment, diversion, and pumped storage—and notes that nearly 80 percent of US renewable energy comes from hydropower. While it offers pollution prevention and domestic energy security, the sector faces challenges including federal relicensing barriers, drought-related capacity reductions, and negative impacts on aquatic habitats and land use.