Search Climate Insights Directory

The IAI Strategic Planning committee is developing a new 5-10 year institutional agenda to move away from an 'opportunity driven model'. The process identifies a changing context for Global Environmental Change (GEC) science, including the need to integrate human dimensions and move toward solving issues via agent-based modeling. The plan focuses on four themes: GEC Science, Knowledge Dialogs, GEC Governance for IAI, and Cross-cutting Issues, with a synthesis workshop planned for November 2008.

The IAI proposes a capacity building program to bridge the gap between natural and social sciences and across government departments to better address global environmental change. The initiative focuses on fostering mutual trust and co-evolution of science and policy through topical workshops, with initial cooperation involving UNESCO and SCOPE.

The IAI report for the period ending October 31, 2007, reveals a reliance on four major contributors (USA, Brazil, Canada, and Mexico) to maintain operations, with only 53% of approved contributions for FY 2007/2008 collected. While operating expenses were 9.4% below budget, the institute is diversifying its funding through new grants from the MacArthur Foundation and IDRC. Programmatic updates include the closure of Collaborative Research Network I (CRN I) and the implementation of CRN II and the Small Grant Program for the Human Dimensions (SGP-HD).

The 24th SAC Meeting, held in December 2006, focused on transitioning IAI science from individual projects to broader research programs and increasing the societal relevance of global environmental change (GEC) research. The committee identified priorities for 2007-2008, including the development of an overarching strategic plan, the integration of human dimensions research via a US$800K fund, and the need to balance scientific excellence with informed action and policy relevance. The meeting also outlined the criteria for renewing SAC membership to ensure interdisciplinary expertise in areas such as meteorology, biodiversity, urban/energy, and environment/economy.

The External Review Committee (ERC) found that the IAI produces high-quality natural science and has successfully built scientific capacity across the Americas. However, it struggles to translate science into policy action, suffers from a narrow funding base heavily dependent on the United States, and lacks a comprehensive communication strategy and long-term strategic plan.

The IAI Directorate report for 2006-2007 outlines the institute's efforts to integrate global change science with policy, specifically focusing on land-use change in the La Plata Basin and the impacts of biofuels. The report highlights the implementation of Collaborative Research Networks (CRN I and II), the success of Training Institute Seed Grants (TISG) in fostering multidisciplinary networks across 19 countries, and new strategic partnerships with organizations like IDRC, NCAR, and the Asia-Pacific Network. It also details capacity-building efforts through summer schools and internships, and fundraising initiatives targeting the MacArthur Foundation for biodiversity research in the Andes.

The Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) requests a core budget of US$ 1,014,931 for fiscal year 2007/2008, a level consistent with the previous two years. The budget supports the Directorate's operations, including the management of the CRN II Program, the implementation of the Small Grants Program for the Human Dimensions (SGP-HD), and the development of a new IAI Strategic Plan. A significant portion of the budget is allocated to salaries and benefits, with proposed adjustments to compensate for the loss of purchasing power of the US dollar against the Brazilian Real. The budget is funded by contributions from member countries, with the United States providing the largest share at US$ 595,000.

The document argues that effective responses to global environmental change (GEC) require a non-linear, iterative dialogue between scientists, policy-makers, and society. Based on an assessment of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) and the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE), it identifies key attributes for making science policy-relevant: credibility, practicality, usefulness, accessibility, and acceptability. The brief emphasizes that trust is the foundation of societal credibility and suggests that early engagement, interdisciplinary cooperation, and the involvement of social scientists are essential to bridge the gap between scientific research and concrete policy actions in the Americas.

The 23rd SAC meeting focused on evolving the IAI's mission to better bridge the gap between scientific research and policy application. Key discussions centered on a new strategic plan, the integration of social and natural sciences, and the development of a human subject research policy. The committee also reviewed the allocation of approximately USD 1.0 million in remaining CRN II funds and established performance metrics to evaluate the SAC's mandate regarding integrated science, collaboration, and informed actions.

The 23rd SAC meeting in Toronto focused on evolving the IAI's mission to better bridge the gap between global environmental change science and policy. Key discussions included the need for a 10-year strategic plan, the integration of social and natural sciences, and the importance of ecosystem services as a unifying theme. The committee also addressed ethical frameworks for human research, the allocation of approximately USD 1 million in remaining CRN II funds, and the transition of leadership to Michael Brklacich as the new SAC President.

The 12th IAI CoP meeting focused on institutional governance, financial planning for the 2005-2006 fiscal year, and the selection of new leadership. Key outcomes included the election of Dr. Holm Tiessen as Executive Director and the approval of a basic budget of $1,012,405. The meeting also reviewed the progress of the Collaborative Research Network (CRN) and Small Grants Programs, and discussed the integration of scientific research with policy-making. Additionally, the CoP approved amendments to its voting regulations and the affiliation of CPTEC/INPE as an IAI institution.

The IAI Directorate report for May–August 2005 outlines personnel changes, including the appointment of Dr. Holm Tiessen as Director and Mrs. Ione Anderson as Program Manager. Key scientific activities include the peer-review of 37 proposals for the Collaborative Research Network (CRN II) and the planning of a synthesis meeting in Brazil to bridge the gap between science and governance. The report also details the organization of training institutes on climate variability in Paraguay and climate and health in Jamaica, as well as administrative progress such as the approval of employee and project management manuals and efforts to obtain observer status with the UNFCCC.

The IAI report details its efforts to bridge the gap between scientific research and regional policy implementation in the Americas. Key activities include the conclusion of the first Cooperative Research Networks (CRN-I) cycle, the launch of CRN-II with 39 proposals received, and the execution of training institutes in Mexico and Costa Rica. The institute also focused on administrative restructuring, including new project management manuals and the development of a new Data and Information System (DIS) with Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

The CRN program, initiated in 1999 with an initial investment of US$10 million, established 14 international research networks to investigate global environmental change in the Americas. The program successfully leveraged over US$20 million in supplemental funding by June 2004 and supported 429 students. Key scientific outputs include research on soil degradation in Brazil and Argentina, dendrochronological reconstructions of climate variability, the drivers of deforestation in the Amazon, and the impacts of UV-B radiation and ENSO on ecosystems and human health. The program emphasized capacity building through the training of graduate students and the creation of regional data portals and research stations.

The IAI's 2004/2005 annual program focuses on institutional sustainability, the implementation of scientific research networks (CRN-I and CRN-II), capacity building through specialized institutes, and the improvement of its data and information systems via the Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

The report details the evolution of the IAI, from its establishment by 11 countries in 1992 to its operational phase in Brazil. It outlines the institute's mission to build scientific capacity and collaborative research networks to understand global environmental changes in the Americas. The document tracks the progression of the IAI Science Agenda, the implementation of various funding mechanisms such as Start-up Grants, Initial Science Programs (ISP), and the Collaborative Research Network (CRN) program, and the results of these initiatives in terms of publications, student training, and policy-relevant findings.

The IAI Directorate report details the progress of six major strategies aimed at consolidating Core Research Networks (CRNs), enhancing capacity building in scientifically weak member countries, and improving the dissemination of global change research. Key activities included the delivery of three Summer Institutes on land use, climate vulnerability, and global warming, as well as the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding with the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP). The report also addresses financial challenges, specifically outstanding member contributions, and provides status updates on specific CRN projects, including the recommended termination of CRN-038 and management adjustments for CRN-062 and CRN-031.

The Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) has updated its Scientific Agenda to better reflect regional interests and the evolution of global change research. The agenda is organized into four broad themes: understanding climate variability in the Americas, conducting comparative studies of ecosystems and biodiversity, analyzing changes in the composition of the atmosphere and waters, and investigating the human dimensions and policy implications of global change. The IAI aims to promote cooperative research and information exchange to understand the integrated impact of past, present, and future global change on regional and continental environments in the Americas.

The 18th SAC meeting focused on reviewing the IAI's scientific agenda, managing Core Research Network (CRN) projects, and planning future funding calls. Key outcomes included the formation of working groups to rewrite the scientific agenda, the recommendation of a new Small Grants Program (SGP) with a US $600,000 budget, and the appointment of Walter Fernández as the new SAC President. The committee also discussed collaborations with the Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research (APN) and the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP).

The document analyzes how specific design choices in global environmental reporting—such as framing, governance, participation, and communication—influence the effectiveness of these systems, measured by saliency, credibility, legitimacy, and awareness. Using the Global Environment Outlook (GEO) as a case study, the author argues that while GEO is a successful model for integrating environmental and development data across scales, its effectiveness can be further enhanced through more substantive early stakeholder participation, rigorous anonymous peer review, and long-term capacity development strategies for collaborating centers, particularly in developing regions.