Search Climate Insights Directory

The document examines the motivations and activities of US government agencies and private organisations in promoting stability in Africa. It argues that while the US has a profound humanitarian impulse and a stated interest in regional stability, its policy is primarily reactive and lacks a coherent, long-term strategy. The report details the roles of the Department of State, Department of Defense, and USAID, alongside the influence of the US Congress and various NGOs. Key initiatives of the Clinton era are analysed, including the African Crisis Response Initiative (ACRI) and the African Growth and Opportunity Act, while providing strategic advice to African leaders on how to effectively engage with the fragmented US policy apparatus.

The document argues that security and development are mutually reinforcing and that a 'secure community' requires a people-centered approach to both. It critiques the dominance of neoliberal economic paradigms in Southern Africa, particularly in Namibia and South Africa, asserting that these frameworks often marginalize women and prioritize economic growth over human security. Through case studies and theoretical exploration, the authors advocate for a gendered approach to development that addresses both practical and strategic needs to achieve genuine emancipation.

The Heartland Hydrogen Hub is projected to create 3,880 direct jobs, including 3,067 in construction and 703 permanent positions. The initiative involves two major projects and is led by the University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) as the prime contractor, with industry sponsors including Atlas Agro North America Corp. and Xcel Energy Services Inc.

The HyVelocity Hydrogen Hub is projected to create 45,000 direct jobs, including 35,000 in construction and 10,000 permanent positions. The initiative involves seven major projects located in areas such as the Golden Triangle, Corpus Christi, and Louisiana. The hub is supported by a wide consortium of industry sponsors, including AES Corporation, Air Liquide, Chevron New Energies, ExxonMobil Low Carbon Solutions, MHI Hydrogen Infrastructure (MHI H2I), and Orsted, with GTI Energy serving as the prime consortium representative and administrator.

The Pacific Northwest Hydrogen Hub is projected to create 11,550 direct jobs, including 8,050 in construction and 350 permanent positions, through eight major projects in Washington, Oregon, and Montana. The initiative involves a wide array of partners from government, academia, and the private sector, including entities such as Amazon, Puget Sound Energy, and the Washington State Department of Commerce.

Tariq Banuri, Director of the Division for Sustainable Development at the UN, argues that integrating climate and development goals requires making renewable energy affordable and competitive. He asserts that reducing the cost of renewables is the only way to ensure global economic growth and poverty reduction while lowering emissions.

The report examines the draft investment chapter of the FTAA, highlighting its reliance on the NAFTA model. It identifies several critical areas where the draft threatens democratic governance and environmental protection, specifically through investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms, broad definitions of expropriation, and restrictions on capital controls and performance requirements.

The report advocates for the creation of a 'Comanche Energy Park' in Pueblo, Colorado, to replace the retiring Comanche coal plant by 2031. This strategy involves a diversified portfolio of wind, solar, and battery storage paired with 'flexible' industrial technologies like thermal batteries and hydrogen electrolyzers. The goal is to provide a reliable, clean electricity supply while stimulating local economic growth and maintaining property tax revenues without placing the full financial burden on Xcel Energy customers.

The report establishes a positive correlation between inclusive governance—measured by Voice & Accountability (VA) scores—and broad-based development, measured by the Human Development Index (HDI), across global, continental, and regional scales. It argues that accountable governance fosters political stability and consistent policymaking, which in turn sustains economic dynamism. Using Angola as a case study, the document illustrates how the repression of participation and human rights abuses can lead to the stagnation or reversal of human development outcomes. The report concludes that private sector companies have a financial and reputational incentive to support inclusive governance, anti-corruption policies, and civil society capacity building to mitigate 'above-ground risk' and secure long-term investments.

The white paper proposes using cleantech clusters—groups of co-located firms and institutions—to overcome the slow adoption of climate solutions in developing countries. It advocates for the creation of independent, non-profit cluster agencies to coordinate ecosystems, attract investment, and create jobs, citing the success of organizations like GreenCape and Clean in South Africa, Denmark, Brazil, and Colombia.

The toolkit addresses 'green gentrification,' where green infrastructure investments increase property values and spur real estate speculation, leading to the displacement of vulnerable populations. It proposes a multi-layered approach combining tenant protections, land-use regulations, funding alignment, economic opportunity enhancement, community ownership, and inclusive design to ensure that the benefits of urban greening are shared equitably without harming existing residents.

The document outlines three future scenarios for South Africa by 2030: 'Bafana Bafana' (perennial underachievement), 'A Nation Divided' (populist policies and factional politics), and 'Mandela Magic' (a clear economic and developmental vision). It highlights that the 'Mandela Magic' pathway could result in an economy 23 per cent larger than the current 'Bafana Bafana' path and proposes seven strategic interventions to achieve this outcome.

The report examines the Organisation of African Unity (OAU), detailing its origins in 1963 and its initial commitment to sovereignty and non-interference. It analyzes the OAU's shift in the 1990s toward conflict prevention, highlighted by the 1993 establishment of the Mechanism for preventing, managing, and resolving conflicts. The text also discusses the devastating impact of armed conflict on African development, including the destruction of infrastructure, loss of skilled manpower, and environmental degradation, while noting the OAU's challenges with funding and information gathering.

The IDP Roadmap describes the Integrated Development Plan (IDP) as a five-year municipal planning tool designed to ensure sustainable service delivery, social and economic development, and a safe and healthy environment. The process consists of six phases: Pre-Planning (July–August), Needs Analysis (Sept–Nov), Strategy Development (Dec–Jan), Project Identification & Prioritisation (Feb–Mar), Integration (Mar–Apr), and Approval (Apr–May), followed by an annual review. It requires coordinated participation from municipal officials, council, councillors, communities, the private sector, and provincial and national government.

The report examines taxation in Cameroon, Mozambique, and South Africa, analyzing how formal institutional designs and informal state-society relations affect revenue collection and development. It finds that while technical reforms (like VAT and semi-autonomous revenue authorities) have increased some revenues, deep-seated perceptions of taxation as a colonial tool of oppression, combined with widespread corruption and a lack of transparency, severely undermine tax morale and voluntary compliance across all three nations.

The report argues that civil war is 'development in reverse,' creating a 'conflict trap' where poverty and institutional failure increase the risk of war, and war further degrades development. It identifies three rings of adverse effects: internal civilian suffering, regional spillovers (such as arms races and disease), and global costs (including drug trafficking and terrorism). The authors find that civil war is increasingly concentrated in 'marginalized' low-income countries and those in the conflict trap. To combat this, the report proposes a policy package including improved aid timing, transparent natural resource governance, and coordinated military-development sequencing in postconflict decades.

The paper maps the disparate research and practice of 'business-peace' interactions into five core assertions: economic engagement creating a peace dividend, local development building peace capacities, importing international norms for accountability, constraining conflict drivers, and direct corporate diplomacy. While proponents argue these activities foster stability and development, critics warn of neo-colonial exploitation, 'peacewashing', and the risk of exacerbating local inequalities. The author concludes that business contributions are often limited by the willingness of local regimes and the priority of profit over courageous ethical choices in fragile contexts.

The study finds that autocratic regimes are systematically associated with higher levels of industrialization, measured by railway freight, energy consumption, and manufacturing value added. The authors attribute this to three mechanisms: the narrow social bases of autocracies (which benefit industrial elites), heightened security concerns (driving military-industrial capacity), and the availability of coercive policy tools to override opposition to dislocating industrial reforms.

The document examines the 'capitalist peace' thesis, which argues that capitalism—through free trade, investment, and property rights—reduces the likelihood of interstate conflict. It contrasts this with the 'democratic peace' and 'Kantian peace' frameworks, noting that while some scholars argue capitalism is the primary driver of peace, others see it as supplementary to democracy. The authors identify critical gaps in the current literature, specifically the lack of precise micro-foundations linking market attributes to peace and the difficulty in empirically distinguishing capitalist peace from commercial liberalism.

The document examines South Africa's attempt to frame its economic and trade policies within the concept of a 'developmental state,' drawing comparisons with the 'Asian Tigers.' It argues that South Africa's unique socio-political context—specifically its status as a pluralistic democracy and the legacy of apartheid—makes the direct transplantation of authoritarian Asian models impossible. The author highlights tensions within the ruling ANC alliance between pro-poor transformative goals and the need for market-oriented growth and foreign investment. The paper traces the evolution of economic strategy from the early 1990s macroeconomic stabilization (GEAR) to a more recent focus on micro-economic efficiency and industrial policy (ASGI-SA and NIPF). It concludes that South Africa must develop a unique model that combines development with democracy, focusing on human capital, infrastructure, and a professionalized bureaucracy rather than a state-centric, authoritarian approach.