Search Climate Insights Directory

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) proposes a four-phase Results Management Framework (RMF) consisting of result area definition, target setting, implementation and monitoring, and evaluation and learning. The framework emphasizes a 'continuously learning institution' approach, balancing standardized core performance indicators with flexibility for country-driven priorities. For mitigation, the GCF suggests using carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-eq) as a primary metric, while adaptation requires sector-specific measures due to the lack of a unitary quantifiable measure of vulnerability. The document recommends annual reporting and a combination of funding pilot activities and utilizing the experience of other entities to set initial targets. Key performance criteria beyond core indicators include the potential for a paradigm shift, development co-benefits, and cost-effectiveness.

The Durban Declaration on Climate and Health, signed by health professionals from over 30 countries, argues that climate change is the greatest global health threat of the 21st century and that mitigation efforts, specifically transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energy, provide immediate health benefits. The declaration outlines five specific calls to action for COP17 delegations, including the need for greater health sector representation in the UNFCCC, the adoption of a strong second commitment period for the Kyoto Protocol, and the negotiation of a binding agreement by 2015 that prioritizes human health and establishes a fair shares framework for emissions reductions.

The document analyzes the 2012 green and climate finance activities of 15 surveyed DFIs and DBs, who committed approximately USD 18.2 billion. While these institutions play a significant role in financing green economic development, their catalytic potential is hindered by a shortage of bankable projects and the uncertain viability of prototype technologies. The report details the sectoral distribution of funds—favoring mitigation and sustainable transport—and examines the ongoing financing of fossil fuel projects. It concludes by suggesting policy improvements and enhanced transparency through standardized reporting to further scale green investments.

The document details Rwanda's strategic approach to climate-compatible development, highlighting the 2011 Green Growth and Climate Resilience Strategy (GGCRS) and the establishment of FONERWA, the largest demand-based climate fund in Africa. It emphasizes the integration of climate goals into national development plans like Vision 2020 and EDPRS 2, and the importance of national ownership in managing climate finance.

The policy brief highlights that mangroves are among the world's most threatened vegetation types, with over 20% lost in the last 30 years. It emphasizes that in Africa, mangroves often overlap with fossil fuel deposits and infrastructure projects, leading to degradation. The author advocates for the use of ecosystem valuations, integrated coastal zone management, and the inclusion of local communities in decision-making to reconcile economic growth with biodiversity conservation. Proposed interventions include the adoption of 'no net loss' policies, the use of Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs), and the implementation of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) and Blue Carbon trading to provide financial incentives for conservation.

The document advocates for the immediate deployment of fossil-fuel subsidy reform to help UNFCCC Parties meet the goal of limiting global temperature rise to 2°C. It provides five specific recommendations for Parties to advance this reform through the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP), the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA), and the COP 19 ministerial meeting in Warsaw, as well as through the use of Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) and voluntary reporting.

The document assesses the impact of international GHG offsets on global emission-reduction pledges, warning that double-counting reductions could significantly dilute climate ambition.

The case study examines the implementation of REDD+ within the SADC region, highlighting the tension between global carbon sequestration goals and regional needs for sustainable development. It details the SADC FANR Directorate's efforts to provide a 'regional value add' through a support programme, specifically focusing on a measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) project funded by GIZ. The analysis emphasizes that while carbon is the primary global driver, local and regional benefits—such as hydrological services and non-timber forest products—are often more critical to the region's population. The document concludes that SADC's approach to REDD+ pilots balances carbon effectiveness with regional equity to avoid marginalizing countries with lower forest cover.

The document provides a framework for city governments to prioritize greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction actions. It develops a typology of urban-scale technologies and practices, identifies supporting policies, and evaluates their abatement potential for 2020 and 2050, with a particular focus on the transport and buildings sectors.

The authors argue that the lack of integration in resource assessments and policy-making results in inconsistent strategies and inefficient resource use. To remedy this, they introduce the CLEWs (climate, land-use, energy and water strategies) framework, which integrates the assessment of climate, land use, energy, and water strategies, noting that these resources both contribute to and are vulnerable to climate change.

The document argues that strong national climate legislation acts as an enabler for more ambitious international agreements by increasing competitiveness, confidence, and knowledge. It highlights that domestic laws can provide the 'legal force' required for future UNFCCC outcomes and recommends strengthening the role of legislators through capacity building and better engagement with executive negotiators.

A group of European NGOs expresses dismay at the lack of progress within ICAO regarding a global market-based measure (MBM) for aviation emissions. They call on the EU to demand an in-principle decision at the 38th Assembly to implement a global MBM by 2016 at the latest, warning that deferring the issue for another three years would be an "abrogation of ICAO responsibility." The NGOs advocate for a transparent process to define technical aspects and emission reduction unit quality, while supporting specific exemptions for developing countries and a geographical scope based on departing flights.

The report examines industrial policy as a tool for structural economic transformation, contrasting traditional methods—such as import substitution and export promotion—with 'green industrial policy' designed to address environmental externalities. It argues that while market forces are generally preferred, government intervention is justified by market failures like coordination gaps and credit imperfections. The author identifies best practices, including the use of performance-based 'sunset clauses' and close government-industry collaboration. Green industrial policy is presented as a 'second-best' alternative to carbon pricing, requiring larger-scale intervention to stimulate both supply and demand for environmentally friendly technologies.

The report evaluates the 'Doha Gateway' decisions from a human rights perspective, noting that while human rights are not explicitly mentioned in the Doha outcomes, they are referenced via the Cancun Agreements. The analysis covers mitigation ambition, loss and damage mechanisms, REDD+ safeguards, the Clean Development Mechanism's lack of appeals processes, public participation under Article 6, and the adoption of 'gender balance' over 'gender equality'.

The speech emphasizes that climate change is no longer a specialized environmental issue but a cross-sectoral risk affecting national security, health, and infrastructure. It highlights the need to rethink worst-case scenarios as temperature increases may exceed previous estimates, and argues that Canada requires a national adaptation approach to move beyond piecemeal provincial efforts. The author calls for 'climate proofing' infrastructure and using tax policy lessons from the fossil fuel sector to attract private investment into resilience.

A group of health organisations, including the Climate and Health Alliance, wrote to WHO Director-General Dr Margaret Chan to highlight the urgent health risks posed by climate change. They specifically drew attention to the Doha Declaration on Climate, Health and Wellbeing, which calls for health protection to be a central priority in global and national climate policy, increased investment in mitigation and adaptation, and greater engagement of the health sector. The letter urges the WHO to treat these issues as a high priority and to share the Declaration with the Executive Board.

The research paper examines the cognitive dimensions of urban sustainability transitions (UST) in Bilbao, Spain, using the Q method to identify how stakeholder values and perceptions act as barriers or opportunities for decarbonization. The study identifies four distinct discourses among stakeholders: local followers, confidant visionaries, problem-solvers, and workaday sceptics. While there is a general consensus that energy consumption in the Basque Country is too high and fossil fuels are scarce, significant gaps exist between decision-makers and potential drivers of change. The authors argue that for cities to act as 'transition tractors' rather than mere actors, they must establish knowledge, discussion, and communication (KDC) platforms to link pragmatists, visionaries, and policymakers.

The report examines the challenges and mechanisms for attracting private capital to climate finance, noting that private funding is nearly three times larger than public funding but remains difficult to channel toward adaptation in developing countries. It identifies political, project-related, and financing barriers—particularly in Africa—and suggests a combination of policy reforms and financial instruments like loan guarantees and pledge funds to mitigate risk. The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is highlighted as a central vehicle for achieving the $100 billion annual target by 2020, though it must address the funding gap between mitigation and adaptation.

EESI advocates for the continued implementation of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), asserting that it is essential for displacing petroleum-based fuels and fostering the growth of advanced and cellulosic biofuels. The document argues that conventional ethanol provides the necessary infrastructure and economic foundation for the emerging cellulosic industry. EESI contends that factors other than the RFS—such as the 2012 Midwest drought, global meat demand, and commodity market speculation—are the primary drivers of corn and soybean price volatility. The organization highlights the RFS's role in rural economic development, job creation, and the reduction of toxic aromatic emissions in urban areas, while supporting the EPA's 2012 decision to deny a waiver request for the standard.

The report examines Bangladesh's efforts to mainstream climate change adaptation and mitigation into its national planning through a 'building blocks' framework consisting of an enabling environment, policies and planning, and projects and programmes. While the country demonstrates strong political will and has established various funding mechanisms like the Bangladesh Climate Change Trust Fund, it faces significant challenges due to an information gap regarding specific climate impacts and a lack of coordination between sectoral data systems.