Search Climate Insights Directory

The BC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change's annual accounts for 2025 were audited by Forvis Mazars Auditores, S.L.P., which issued an unqualified opinion stating the accounts provide a 'true and fair view' of the entity's financial state. The center reported total income from its own activities of 8,326,518.02 euros, primarily driven by subsidies. The audit highlighted the recognition of these subsidies as a key risk area due to their materiality. The center maintains a diverse workforce of 143 people, including 123 researchers, and achieved significant academic output, including 118 articles in indexed journals. Financially, the entity is exempt from corporate tax on its social purpose activities and reported a total result for the year of 108,996.37 euros.

The document is a financial record of funding for the Basque Centre for Climate Change in 2024, listing various grants and contracts from international, national, and regional bodies. Key funders include the European Commission, the Basque Government (Eusko Jaurlaritza), and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN). The funding supports a wide array of projects focusing on climate science, biodiversity, agri-food systems, and urban transitions, with individual project grants ranging from small amounts to over 2 million euros.

The 2022 annual accounts for the BC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change, audited by Mazars Auditores, S.L.P., show a positive financial result of 3,831.41 euros. The center's activities focus on interdisciplinary climate change research, high-level training, and knowledge transfer, primarily based in Leioa, Bizkaia. Total assets as of December 31, 2022, were 19,415,317.09 euros, with significant funding coming from public and private grants, totaling 4.9 million euros recorded in the profit and loss account for the period. The audit opinion states that the accounts provide a 'true and fair view' of the entity's equity and financial situation.

The study employs a controlled lab experiment with 166 subjects to test the persistence of the RENOVE rebate programme's effect on fridge purchases. Findings indicate that while rebate programmes significantly increase the adoption of energy-efficient (EE) appliances, the 'memory effect' (continued EE preference after the rebate expires) is more likely among individuals with higher education levels and high environmental concern. Conversely, older participants and those in higher social classes are more likely to buy EE appliances regardless of the rebate, suggesting they are less sensitive to such financial incentives. The research also highlights that decision criteria, such as focusing on energy consumption or lifetime energy costs, significantly influence purchasing behavior.

The study finds that visual appeals (photos) significantly lower the acceptable level of risk by triggering emotional and moral reasoning, though this effect is diminished when numeric data is presented as a range rather than a single value. Additionally, participants who experienced simulated damages increased their investment in protection in subsequent rounds, suggesting a reactive 'gut' response to experience that differs from the reflective reasoning triggered by visual cues.

The 2019 annual accounts for the BC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change were audited by MAZARS Auditores, S.L.P., who issued an unqualified opinion stating the accounts provide a 'true and fair view' of the entity's financial position. The center's primary funding comes from public subsidies, with 3,887,613.08 Euros recorded as subsidies, donations, and legacies imputed to the 2019 results. The report details expenditures on personnel (2,816,633.87 Euros) and external services (1,202,957.08 Euros), while noting that the entity is exempt from corporate tax on activities fulfilling its social purpose. The document also acknowledges the potential future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the center's activities.

The document provides a financial audit and summary of the 2018 annual accounts for the BC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change, confirming that the financial statements provide a true and fair view of the entity's assets and financial position. It details the center's funding through public subsidies, its operational expenses, and its core activities in climate change research, education, and knowledge transfer.

The briefing contends that industrial agriculture drives climate change and food insecurity, and that 'climate-smart agriculture' serves as a corporate tool to maintain existing power structures. It proposes agroecology—combining traditional practices and ecological principles—as a superior alternative that increases climate resilience, reduces greenhouse gas emissions, and supports food sovereignty for small-scale producers.

The document is an independent audit report and financial statement for the Asociación BC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change for the 2017 fiscal year. The auditor, MAZARS Auditores, S.L.P., issued an unqualified opinion, stating that the accounts provide a 'true and fair view' of the entity's financial position. The center's activities focus on interdisciplinary climate change research, high-level training, and knowledge transfer. Financially, the entity relies heavily on public subsidies, recording 3,074,214.81 Euros in subsidies, donations, and legacies for the 2017 period. The report includes a detailed balance sheet, profit and loss account, and an inventory of intangible and material assets, such as software and office equipment. It also notes that the association is exempt from Corporate Tax due to its social purpose.

The authors describe the US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement as a historical, economic, and geopolitical error that could slow global progress but may also act as a catalyst for other nations and US subnational entities to maintain climate commitments.

The document asserts that the Paris Agreement's universal and flexible nature allows it to proceed without the United States. It characterizes the U.S. withdrawal as a historical, economic, and geopolitical error that ignores climate science and risks isolating the country. However, it notes that key actors like China, India, and the European Union remain committed, and that internal U.S. resistance from states like California, New York, and Washington, as well as support from major corporations, provides a counterweight to the federal decision.

The document examines sea level fluctuations in the Basque Country across geological timescales, noting a significant acceleration in the 20th century compared to the previous 7,000 years. It contrasts process-based and semi-empirical global models to project future rises, estimating that the Basque coast could see an increase of 41-57 cm by 2100 depending on the emissions scenario.

The document outlines various BC3 research initiatives aimed at improving urban resilience and sustainability. Key examples include flood-risk modeling in Bilbao and Zurich, heat-health warning system evaluations in Madrid, and the socio-economic analysis of energy efficiency plans. It emphasizes the necessity of science-policy collaboration to create cost-efficient, data-driven urban interventions.

The document outlines expected climate impacts in the Basque Country, including rising temperatures, sea-level rise, and altered precipitation, which threaten public health through heat waves, flooding, and increased pollutants. It identifies 26 adaptation measures, highlighting the cost-effectiveness and co-benefits of ecosystem-based solutions like Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) and behavioral changes in transport.

The document examines the intersection of science and urban policy, identifying that while research can provide robust data to validate decision-making and increase citizen trust, significant gaps exist due to differing timeframes, technical languages, and motivations. It argues that co-creating solutions and bridging the gap between researchers and practitioners is essential for the successful implementation of the Basque Declaration's sustainability goals.

The study finds that energy-efficient homes in Spain command a price premium between 5.4% and 9.8% compared to less efficient dwellings. Using a sample of 1,507 homes, the authors determined that homes rated A, B, or C have a 9.8% premium, while those rated A through D have a 5.4% premium. The research also highlights a significant lack of energy efficiency in the Spanish housing stock, with 52% of the sample rated E and nearly 25% rated F or G.

The document emphasizes that urban sustainability is not merely a technological challenge but involves power relations, culture, and social values. It advocates for the use of participatory methods to integrate the 'cognitive dimension'—the knowledge, perceptions, and values of diverse stakeholders—to identify barriers and opportunities in energy transitions. Using a Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) study in Bilbao, the authors demonstrate that social initiatives and changes in lifestyle yield superior results in reducing emissions and improving quality of life compared to purely economic or institutional measures.

The research paper evaluates strategies to decarbonise urban transportation, focusing on modal shifts, fuel switching, and electricity decarbonisation. Using a Spanish urban area as a model, it finds that aggressive measures—including a 50% reduction in car demand, improved fuel economy, and a shift to nuclear or CCS-equipped power—are necessary to significantly lower emissions and health burdens from particulate matter.

The research paper examines the cognitive dimensions of urban sustainability transitions (UST) in Bilbao, Spain, using the Q method to identify how stakeholder values and perceptions act as barriers or opportunities for decarbonization. The study identifies four distinct discourses among stakeholders: local followers, confidant visionaries, problem-solvers, and workaday sceptics. While there is a general consensus that energy consumption in the Basque Country is too high and fossil fuels are scarce, significant gaps exist between decision-makers and potential drivers of change. The authors argue that for cities to act as 'transition tractors' rather than mere actors, they must establish knowledge, discussion, and communication (KDC) platforms to link pragmatists, visionaries, and policymakers.

The research paper employs a lab experiment with 195 subjects to compare public support for taxes and subsidies designed to correct a negative externality. The study finds that subsidies consistently receive higher support than taxes, a gap that is widened when participants have only partial information about how tax revenues are spent or subsidies are funded. While full budgetary information increases support for both instruments, it disproportionately benefits taxes. Interestingly, participants expected taxes to be more effective at reducing the externality than subsidies, despite preferring the latter. The authors conclude that the lack of trust or clarity regarding the use of tax revenues is a primary driver of tax aversion.