Summary
The report examines the challenges and mechanisms for attracting private capital to climate finance, noting that private funding is nearly three times larger than public funding but remains difficult to channel toward adaptation in developing countries. It identifies political, project-related, and financing barriers—particularly in Africa—and suggests a combination of policy reforms and financial instruments like loan guarantees and pledge funds to mitigate risk. The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is highlighted as a central vehicle for achieving the $100 billion annual target by 2020, though it must address the funding gap between mitigation and adaptation.
Key insights
- The scale of investment required to meet climate goals is immense, with the International Energy Agency estimating costs of $220 billion per year between 2010 and 2020, rising to almost $1 trillion per year between 2020 and 2030.
- Private sector finance is significantly larger than public funding, being almost three times greater, yet there are persistent doubts regarding how to effectively mobilise and channel this capital, especially for adaptation in developing countries.
- Africa is particularly vulnerable to climate change and faces a poor investment climate; 32 of the 50 lowest-ranking countries in the World Bank's 2012 Ease of Doing Business rankings are located in Africa.
- Private investment barriers are categorized into three interrelated groups: political/regulatory (e.g., political instability and currency risks), project-related (e.g., technology risks and high initial costs), and financing risks (e.g., technology cost gaps and market distortions from fossil fuel subsidies).
- To attract private capital, governments must create an enabling environment through integrated policy reforms, such as removing fossil fuel subsidies and implementing renewable-energy feed-in tariffs, to ensure low-emission alternatives are competitive.
- Various financial instruments can be used to leverage private investment, including debt-alleviating tools like loan guarantees and policy risk insurances, and equity-leveraging tools such as pledge funds, funds of funds, and subordinated equity.
- The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is intended to be the main global fund for climate finance and a key catalyst for the $100 billion annual target, but it faces the challenge of breaking existing structures where mitigation receives ten times more resources than adaptation.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Ruppel, O. C., & Luedemann, C. (2013). CLIMATE FINANCE. Institute for Security Studies. https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/SitRep2013_6May.pdf
- Chicago
- Ruppel, Oliver C., and Cord Luedemann. CLIMATE FINANCE. Institute for Security Studies, 2013. https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/SitRep2013_6May.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Ruppel |first1=Oliver C. |last2=Luedemann |first2=Cord |title=CLIMATE FINANCE |publisher=Institute for Security Studies |date=May 2013 |url=https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/SitRep2013_6May.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{ruppel2013climate, author = {Ruppel, Oliver C. and Luedemann, Cord}, title = {{CLIMATE FINANCE}}, institution = {Institute for Security Studies}, year = {2013}, month = may, url = {https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/SitRep2013_6May.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated