Search Climate Insights Directory

The research investigates the feasibility of climate compatible development (CCD) by analyzing whether policies can deliver 'triple wins' without generating negative side effects. Using four coastal country case studies, the authors find that while 'no-regrets' triple wins exist—particularly through soft environmental engineering like mangrove restoration—many policies involve trade-offs. Hard-engineering solutions often result in 'regrets' such as habitat destruction or social inequity. The paper concludes that the governance context is critical and warns that a narrow focus on triple wins might divert funding from essential development projects that only offer double wins.

The document details CDKN's efforts in India to enhance climate resilience through technical assistance, research, and policy support. Key initiatives include addressing 'silent disasters' in Ladakh, promoting gender-responsive state action plans, and using community radio for adaptation knowledge. It also analyzes the challenges facing State Action Plans for Climate Change (SAPCCs), noting that the automatic appointment of Forest Departments as nodal agencies often hinders the multi-sectoral coordination required for effective implementation.

The document details CDKN's support for Pakistan's climate action, including the development of a work programme for climate compatible development, the creation of a climate change fund, and specific projects on disaster risk insurance and resilient shelter design. It highlights Pakistan's high vulnerability to climate change despite low global emissions and emphasizes the need to align adaptation planning with national development goals.

The document argues that for the Green Climate Fund to trigger a paradigm shift, it must move from project-by-project funding to programmatic approaches, ensure strong country ownership, and provide clear incentives for ambition. It defines a paradigm shift as a fundamental move away from practices incompatible with climate challenges, such as transitioning from centralized fossil fuel energy systems to decentralized renewable energies. The authors emphasize that country ownership is not contrary to ambition but is a prerequisite for sustainability, suggesting that funding conditions could be improved for countries demonstrating higher levels of ambition within their capabilities.

The National Climate Change Action Plan 2013-2017 provides a strategic roadmap for Kenya to reduce its vulnerability to climate change while maintaining low greenhouse gas emissions. It identifies priority actions across sectors such as agriculture, energy, forestry, and transport, and proposes the establishment of a National Climate Change Council and a Kenya Climate Fund to coordinate governance and finance. The plan emphasizes a 'low carbon climate resilient development pathway' that aligns with Kenya Vision 2030, estimating total investment requirements at approximately KSh 1,085 billion (USD 12.76 billion) for the five-year period.

The document details CDKN's support for Bangladesh in advancing the 'Loss and Damage' agenda within the UNFCCC, including the creation of case studies and training for officials. It also highlights the development of a participatory monitoring and evaluation (M&E) tool for community-based adaptation (CBA) by the ARCAB partnership, which has been scaled up to Somalia and Ethiopia. Additionally, it mentions research on climate-induced displacement in Bangladesh conducted by the University of Sussex and the University of Bangladesh.

The document details CDKN's efforts in India to integrate disaster risk reduction (DRR) with climate change adaptation (CCA), specifically through technical assistance to state governments and research on gender-responsive policies and resilient construction.

The document highlights Fiji's approach to integrating climate change adaptation, disaster risk reduction, and biodiversity conservation into its REDD+ policy and planning process. It argues that while REDD+ is primarily a mitigation mechanism, it can build resilience and support climate compatible development in Pacific Island Countries (PICs), where adaptation is the highest policy priority due to vulnerability to sea-level rise and extreme weather.

The document assesses Kenya's National Climate Change Response Strategy (NCCRS) and its Action Plan (NCCAP) through the lens of Climate Compatible Development (CCD). It highlights that while agriculture is central to Kenya's economy—contributing 26% to GDP—it is highly vulnerable to climate variability, with 80% of land being arid or semi-arid. The study finds a lack of clear synergies between adaptation and mitigation specifically regarding food security, noting that policy actors often struggle to distinguish between the two. It identifies institutional silos and a lack of specialized climate knowledge as primary barriers. Financially, the report notes that while Kenya has attracted significant international funding (e.g., $2.3 billion for various activities), these resources are fragmented, and the agricultural sector receives almost no domestic public climate finance. The document advocates for the establishment of a Climate Change Authority to act as a 'gatekeeper' for funds and the mainstreaming of CCD to build strategic partnerships for food security.

The project investigates how to combine top-down national PES schemes with bottom-up local approaches, specifically Andean Reciprocal watershed Agreements (ARA), to better value ecosystems and promote climate compatible development. It seeks to develop a practical framework and a combined index for adaptation, mitigation, and development objectives, with the goal of influencing national legislation and providing a guide for scaling up locally led ARA.

The solar water heater (SWH) industry in Barbados has achieved significant market penetration through a combination of early entrepreneurial leadership, consistent government fiscal incentives, and strategies to ensure consumer confidence. By 2009, approximately two in five households had installed SWH systems, resulting in substantial energy savings and consumer financial benefits. The document argues that this success provides a foundation for the broader adoption of other renewable energy technologies and can be replicated in other sun-rich countries with high fossil fuel dependence, provided there is long-term regulatory certainty and local sensitivity in implementation.

The report analyzes Bangladesh's approach to integrating climate adaptation and mitigation in agriculture to protect food security. It evaluates the Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan (BCCSAP) and the National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA), highlighting that while adaptation is prioritized, mitigation remains under-addressed. The document identifies specific climate threats to crops, livestock, and fisheries, and recommends integrating climate risks into agricultural policy, increasing R&D for resilient cultivars, and improving international funding access.

The document evaluates Honduras' National Climate Change Strategy (NCCS), highlighting its focus on reducing climatic vulnerability through a participatory framework involving over 60 institutions. While the NCCS identifies agriculture, soil, and food security as a priority sector, stakeholders report that implementation is in its early stages due to institutional, knowledge, and financial barriers. The report emphasizes the need for a territorial approach via Regional Development Councils to better integrate climate-compatible agricultural practices and access international finance.

The document evaluates the British Columbia carbon tax as an effective model for low-carbon development that has reduced emissions without hindering economic growth. It compares BC's approach with other Canadian provincial and federal strategies, highlighting a closing gap in carbon pricing across the country. The briefing identifies key risks to future success, including the expansion of the natural gas sector and the lack of carbon pricing in the United States. IISD recommends retaining the tax and considering integrated mitigation and adaptation strategies.

The CDKN Innovation Fund (Round 2) provides grants of up to GBP 100,000 for a maximum of six months to support 'innovation processes' that result in 'game-changing' project proposals for climate compatible development in Africa. Lead applicants must be African institutions, and the fund prioritizes projects with strong government buy-in and alignment with specific thematic priorities, including clean energy and climate finance. Successful innovation processes may be eligible for subsequent implementation funding of up to GBP 200,000.

The Baseline Report provides a current snapshot of Rwanda and its planned initiatives within the context of climate change to support the future creation of a National Strategy on Climate Change and Low Carbon Development. It covers a broad range of sectors including climate policy, economy, trade, industry, energy, mining, transport, cities, the built environment, agriculture, land, water, and forestry.

The report identifies systemic institutional, financial, and technical barriers to climate-compatible agriculture in Kenya, Bangladesh, and Honduras, emphasizing the need for an integrated approach to adaptation and mitigation.

The document examines Grenada's transition from fragmented, project-by-project climate actions to a comprehensive national strategy called the Strategic Program for Climate Resilience (SPCR). Funded by the Pilot Program for Climate Change Resilience (PPCR) and Climate Investment Funds (CIFs), the SPCR prioritizes climate resilience over emission reductions due to Grenada's high vulnerability and low global emissions. Key initiatives include the Disaster Vulnerability and Climate Risk Reduction Project and the Forest Rehabilitation Project, alongside technical assistance for water and coastal management. The brief highlights the importance of participatory design, regional synergies within the Caribbean, and the necessity of multilateral finance to address projected sea-level rise costs that could reach $801 million by 2050.

Carbon Market Watch outlines its priorities for the high-level panel reviewing the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), emphasizing the need for the panel to assess the mechanism's impact on mitigation and sustainable development, ensure environmental integrity among co-existing market mechanisms, and improve stakeholder involvement.

The document examines Indonesia's 2011 forest moratorium as a tool to meet greenhouse gas emission reduction targets and a catalyst for governance reform.