Search Climate Insights Directory

The Table Mountain Fund, managed by WWF South Africa, has published a manual to facilitate requests for information and the protection of personal data. The document outlines the legal framework, the process for requesting records, the associated fees, and the categories of data processed. It specifies that the Trust's objectives include developing projects aligned with the Cape Action for People and the Environment (C.A.P.E.) and addressing high biodiversity areas, with funding supporting projects in the Cape Peninsula and the wider Cape Floral Kingdom.

The Leslie Hill Succulent Karoo Trust, managed by WWF South Africa, has published this manual to comply with the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) and the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA). It outlines the procedures for requesting records, the fees associated with such requests, the categories of information held by the Trust, and the mechanisms for data subjects to object to the processing of their personal information or request its correction.

The National Parks Trust of South Africa, managed by WWF South Africa, has published a manual to facilitate public access to its records and ensure the protection of personal data. The document outlines the legal framework, the process for requesting information, the associated fees, and the rights of data subjects regarding their personal information.

The WWF Nedbank Green Trust Manual outlines the procedures for requesting information and managing personal data under the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) and the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA). The Trust, founded in October 1990 and managed by WWF South Africa, focuses on community-based conservation and endangered species. It specifies that annual financial statements are available without a formal request, while other records—including administration, financial, and governance documents—require a prescribed application and a request fee of R140.00 for non-personal requesters. The document also details the categories of personal information processed, the conditions for trans-border data flows, and the mechanisms for data subjects to object to processing or request the correction and deletion of their information.

The document outlines the legal framework, request processes, and data processing policies of WWF South Africa to ensure transparency and privacy compliance.

The submission argues that South Africa's draft second NDC lacks sufficient ambition and fails to reflect the 'highest possible ambition' required by the Paris Agreement. It proposes more stringent emission targets—350 Mt CO2e for 2025-2030 and 248 Mt CO2e for 2031-2035—based on 'fair share' calculations and the best available science. The document highlights legal risks under the South African Constitution, the Climate Change Act, and NEMA, while criticizing the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) for a non-transparent process that delayed the release of the underlying technical report. It further calls for a stronger focus on phasing out fossil fuels, enhancing climate adaptation for vulnerable groups, and incorporating climate justice principles from the Presidential Climate Commission's recommendations.

This Request for Proposal (RFP), issued by the GreenCape Sector Development Agency on 29 August 2025, seeks a Professional Service Provider (PSP) to conduct project preparation activities for three infrastructure projects in the Saldanha Bay Municipality. The work is part of the Sustainable Infrastructure Development and Financial Facility (SIDAFF) Programme, which is funded by international donors including the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) and Impact Fund Denmark (IFD). The PSP will guide projects from initiation through to documentation and procurement, ensuring compliance with both South African law and international standards, specifically the International Finance Corporation's (IFC) Performance Standards and World Bank Environmental and Social Standards.

In June 2024, a group of communities and environmental organizations filed petitions with the Constitutional Court of South Africa to appeal a Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) order that permits Shell to perform seismic testing on the Wild Coast.

The report identifies a significant 'take-off' in solar panel imports to Africa, with imports from China rising 60% to 15,032 MW in the 12 months to June 2025. This growth is widespread, with 20 countries setting new import records and 25 countries importing at least 100 MW. The report suggests this surge may be driven by distributed solar, potentially replacing expensive diesel generation and significantly increasing electricity supply in several countries, such as Sierra Leone and Chad.

The fact sheet advocates for Universal Social Protection Floors to ensure global access to basic healthcare and income security. It notes that nearly 29% of the global population faces hunger and over 575 million people are projected to live in extreme poverty by 2030. The text details the G20's history with social protection, including Indonesia's 'adaptive social protection' and Brazil's 'Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty', while positioning South Africa's G20 presidency as an opportunity to integrate social protection with economic and industrial strategies.

The document argues that Africa's energy transition is occurring along two simultaneous tracks: centralised infrastructure and decentralised, bottom-up systems. It contends that current climate finance is too narrow, focusing almost exclusively on sovereign borrowers and large projects while ignoring the retail layer of the transition. To address this, the author proposes a dual mandate that combines infrastructure finance with consumer and trade finance. The document suggests that National Development Banks (NDBs) should act as refinancers and risk aggregators to provide local-currency credit, blended guarantees, and capital recycling mechanisms to support households, MSMEs, and informal trade networks.

The statement contends that current global trade frameworks often undermine the climate ambitions of developing nations through protectionist policies and geopolitical self-interest. It highlights the negative potential of the EU's Carbon-Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and the limitations of the International Maritime Organization's shipping emissions tax. The author advocates for the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA) and regional coalitions as viable alternatives to a 'broken' World Trade Organization (WTO) to foster green industrialization, technology transfer, and climate adaptation, specifically citing Mozambique's vulnerability as a case for adaptation-focused trade policy.

The report examines the role of intellectual property rights (IPR) in accelerating the adoption and development of green technologies across Africa. It highlights that while patents are often prohibitively expensive for African innovators, non-patent mechanisms like utility models, trademarks, and geographical indications (GIs) offer more accessible pathways for incremental innovation and market growth. The document analyzes the IPR landscapes of Kenya, Ghana, and Nigeria, noting that while these countries are emerging as greentech hubs, their legal frameworks often lack explicit provisions for green technology. It further discusses the influence of global agreements like the Paris Agreement and TRIPS, and regional initiatives such as the AfCFTA, arguing that harmonizing IPR systems and reducing registration costs are critical to unlocking Africa's potential in the global green economy.

South Africa's 2025 G20 presidency marks the end of the group's first cycle, occurring amidst a global shift away from multilateralism and consensus. South Africa has focused its presidency on "solidarity, equality, and sustainability," prioritizing disaster resilience, debt sustainability for low-income countries, finance for a just energy transition, and the sustainable use of critical minerals. However, these goals face significant opposition from the second Trump administration, which has rejected the Paris Agreement, the Sustainable Development Goals, and priorities related to climate change and DEI. The document argues that the G20 must evolve its modus operandi to remain relevant in a divided world and ensure that developmental commitments for the Global South are maintained beyond 2026.

The CER argues that the Draft Mineral Resources Development Bill 2025 fails to adequately protect mine-affected communities and the environment. Key concerns include the conflict of interest inherent in the 'One Environmental System' (OES), where the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources manages both mining promotion and environmental authorisations. The CER criticizes the Bill's narrowing of the definition of 'community' and 'interested and affected persons,' which it claims limits public participation. It further highlights gaps in mine closure and rehabilitation, particularly regarding abandoned mines, and calls for the legal incorporation of the Mining Charter to ensure binding transformation and gender parity targets. The CER proposes introducing the principle of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) and improving access to information through mandatory public disclosure of mining authorisations.

The report details a 'Futures Dialogue' held in April 2025 between South Africa and the Netherlands, which used strategic foresight tools to reimagine Africa-Europe climate and energy relations. By employing methods like Causal Layered Analysis and the Three Horizons Framework, participants moved beyond traditional diplomatic scripts to address systemic issues such as extractive trade, energy poverty, and asymmetric finance. The dialogue identified pathways for green industrialisation, transformative climate finance, and a shift toward African leadership in climate governance, ultimately recommending that governments institutionalise 'anticipatory diplomacy' within their foreign ministries.

The policy brief examines the impact of the Trump administration's 'reciprocal tariffs' on Africa, noting that they destabilise global trade and signal the end of preferential market access under AGOA. It proposes a strategic response for African nations based on three pillars: rerouting trade via the AfCFTA and BRICS partners, subverting dependency through import substitution and critical mineral value-addition, and negotiating collectively through the African Union.

The document assesses the failure of South Africa's current free basic services (FBS) framework to provide a meaningful social wage for the millions of households living below the poverty line. It identifies three primary barriers: exclusionary municipal indigent policies, benefit levels (especially electricity) that are too low to meet developmental access needs, and restrictive conditions that hinder productive activities. The brief advocates for a redesign of the FBS and indigent register system that remains compatible with national budget constraints.

The report argues that allowing African exporters to use Article 6 carbon credits to reduce their EU CBAM liabilities would address equity concerns, retain climate finance within Africa, and provide policy flexibility. It notes that current CBAM regulations only permit deductions for explicit carbon prices (taxes or ETS), making Article 6 credits ineligible. The document highlights the significant economic risks CBAM poses to African GDP and the specific challenges African nations face in implementing traditional carbon pricing due to their emissions profiles and administrative constraints. It concludes with recommendations for the EU to amend its regulations to include high-integrity international credits, specifically those from Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Africa, to align with the principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR-RC).

The Global Climate and Health Alliance (GCHA) argues that South Africa's draft NDC should align emissions targets with a 1.5°C trajectory to avoid health hazards and better quantify the health-related costs of air pollution. The submission recommends developing integrated climate-health surveillance systems, expanding the reach of impact-based early warning systems to rural areas, and engaging the Department of Health across sectors to maximize co-benefits. It highlights that PM2.5 air pollution caused an estimated 42,000 deaths in 2023 and costs the economy approximately USD 52 billion annually, suggesting that meeting WHO guidelines could save 30,000 lives per year.