Search Climate Insights Directory

The São Paulo Complete Streets Network, a partnership between WRI and the Bloomberg Initiative for Global Road Safety, supported Brazilian cities in redesigning infrastructure to protect pedestrians, cyclists, and public transit users. Between 2020 and 2023, ten cities in São Paulo implemented measures such as expanded sidewalks, cycle lanes, and reduced speed limits. These efforts contributed to a shift where the crash mortality rate in these cities fell below the state average of São Paulo in 2022, compared to 2021 when it was higher.

The report details the transition of the IAI to a tripartite structure. The Executive Directorate of Integrated Operations and Finance is operational in Montevideo, Uruguay, following a host country agreement that entered into force on December 13, 2013. The Science-Policy Liaison Directorate in Buenos Aires, Argentina, has renovated office space at the Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation, though staffing for the Director and assistants has faced delays. The Science Development Directorate in São José dos Campos, Brazil, remains under negotiation as the IAI seeks to ensure the host country agreement refers to the IAI as a whole rather than just the specific directorate to avoid operational difficulties.

The Implementation Committee reports on the transition to a tripartite structure for the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI). The Integrated Operations and Finance Directorate in Montevideo, Uruguay, is largely operational following the ratification of its host country agreement on December 13, 2013. The Science-Policy Liaison Directorate in Buenos Aires, Argentina, has renovated office space, though staffing for the Director and Assistant Director positions has been delayed by administrative and diploma legalization issues. The establishment of the Science Development Directorate in São José dos Campos, Brazil, remains pending due to ongoing negotiations over the host country agreement, specifically regarding whether the agreement should cover the IAI as a whole or only the specific directorate.

The IAI is implementing a tripartite structure with headquarters operations moving to Montevideo and a strategic office in Buenos Aires. Research priorities include monitoring CRN3 projects, finalizing a MacArthur Foundation project on tropical Andean biodiversity, and leading the Latin American network for Future Earth. Capacity building includes a modeling event in Panama City and the management of seed grants. Policy engagement focuses on contributions to IPBES, the UNFCCC's SBSTA, and planned events for the UNFCCC COP in Lima regarding environmental monitoring and global change governance.

The IAI activities plan for 2014-2015 focuses on institutional restructuring, the monitoring of CRN3 projects, and the leadership of the Latin American Future Earth Network. Key initiatives include a training event in Panama, the closure of a MacArthur Foundation project on Andean biodiversity, and participation in IPBES and UNFCCC processes, including planned events for the CoP in Lima.

The IAI Work Plan for July 2013 to June 2014 focuses on institutional restructuring, including the implementation of a tripartite structure with offices in Montevideo, Buenos Aires, and São José dos Campos. Research priorities include the implementation of CRN3 projects to better integrate natural and human sciences, and the continuation of a MacArthur Foundation project on climate change impacts in the tropical Andes. Capacity-building efforts involve training events in Chile and Guatemala, the development of policy briefs on urban responses to climate change in Latin America, and a capacity development program for interdisciplinary research.

The IAI proposes transitioning to a tripartite governance model to enhance its ability to provide scientific information for public policy and increase public awareness of global change research. Under this structure, the Executive Directorate of Integrated Operations and Finance will be based in Montevideo, Uruguay; the Directorate of Scientific Development in São José dos Campos, Brazil; and the Directorate of Science-Policy Liaison in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The proposal aims to be budget-neutral regarding the IAI's operating budget, with host countries providing infrastructure and partial staffing. The transition was planned for completion by the end of 2012, with a proposed evaluation of the structure's success after one year.

The IAI Executive Council is managing the transition to a tripartite hosting arrangement for its Directorate, involving Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay. While a distributed structure has been proposed—with the Directorate in Montevideo, science development in São José dos Campos, and science-policy liaison in Buenos Aires—the parties have not yet reached a consensus on the detailed integrated proposal. Additionally, the report notes the resignation of EC Chair Dr. Paul Filmer and the appointment of Dr. Carlos Ereño as acting chair.

The document details the efforts of the IAI Executive Council and an ad hoc commission to organize the hosting of the IAI Executive Directorate. Following interest from Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay, a tripartite proposal was developed to distribute functions across these three countries. However, the report notes that consensus was not reached among the parties, resulting in two different options to be resolved by the Conference of the Parties (CoP-20).

The 19th Special CoP of the IAI resolved to transition the IAI Directorate to a distributed model across Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay to address operational challenges and expand science-policy capabilities. The resolution establishes a tripartite structure where Argentina hosts communications and policy, Brazil hosts science development, and Uruguay manages overall coordination and finance. An ad hoc committee comprising Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Uruguay, and the United States was tasked with drafting a detailed proposal for implementation by the end of 2012, ensuring the transition is budget-neutral and consistent with the IAI agreement.

The document outlines the evaluation process and criteria used by an ad hoc committee to assess bids from Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay to host the IAI Directorate. It compares the three candidates across 14 criteria, including hosting experience, facilities, legal immunities, tax status, and communications infrastructure. While Brazil is the current host, the report notes significant operational challenges there, such as deteriorating internet connectivity, power outages, and disputes with tax authorities. Uruguay's proposal is noted for its comprehensive coverage and specific offers of office space and staff, while Argentina's proposal is described as lacking detail on critical legal and fiscal matters.

The FAC report details a May 2008 meeting in Toronto where the committee approved a 15% increase in the 2008/09 core budget, primarily to address inflation and salary adjustments for international and local staff. The committee discussed updating the Host Country Agreement to secure tax exemptions for staff and more office space, and addressed security measures following a February 2008 robbery. Additionally, the report outlines plans for biennial annual reports, semi-annual newsletters, and the procurement of new audit services for the 2009/10 to 2011/12 period.

The Financial and Administrative Committee (FAC) met in May 2007 to review the IAI's financial health and budget. The IAI collected 85% of its 2006/07 budget by March 31, 2007, and expects to collect over 100% by year-end. The proposed 2007/08 budget remains at $1,015K, though the proportion of funds dedicated to salaries and benefits is increasing to 74% due to the declining US dollar/Brazilian real exchange rate. The committee also noted the completion of the Contracting and Procurement Manual and discussed the CRN-2 program and upcoming September 2007 audit.

The audit of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research for the year ended June 30, 2003, resulted in a qualified opinion due to departures from US generally accepted accounting principles. Specifically, the institute recognizes total project expenses and liabilities upon the signing of research grant agreements rather than proportionally to research activity, and it has failed to recognize the fair value of related accounts receivable and payable.

The document proposes changing how outstanding member contributions are recorded, moving from a system that applies payments to the earliest years first to one that applies them to the current fiscal year and then backwards in reverse chronological order.

The document is a participant list for the Ninth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI), which took place in Sao José dos Campos, Brazil, on June 27-28, 2002. It lists representatives from various national agencies, research institutions, and international bodies.

The 14th Meeting of the IAI Executive Council concluded that the "Declaration of Panama" was not approved due to insufficient signatures, though the Council recommended efforts to approve a similar document at the next CoP meeting. Additionally, Brazil was selected to host the 15th Meeting of the EC in São José dos Campos during the week of February 25, 2002.

The 14th Meeting of the IAI Executive Council approved its agenda and the report from the 13th meeting, while establishing deadlines for the selection of Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) members and the IAI Director. The Council requested the development of rules regarding project suspension, termination, and member country contributions, as well as the creation of country-specific reports detailing IAI investments and scientific results.

The report details the President of the Executive Council's activities from September to November 2000, including resolving tax compliance issues with the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service, attending a FAWG meeting and staff interviews in São José dos Campos, participating in a funding agencies meeting in Zurich, and attending a FRWG teleconference.

The document outlines the ethical obligations of IAI proposal reviewers, specifically regarding the non-disclosure of confidential information and the identification of biasing affiliations or relationships. It provides detailed criteria for what constitutes a conflict of interest—including institutional ties, professional partnerships, and family relationships—and requires reviewers to certify their impartiality.