Search Climate Insights Directory

The Act of Montevideo establishes the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) as a regional network of research units. The IAI is designed to coordinate scientific and economic research on the extent, causes, and consequences of global change in the Americas, serving as an interface between science and policy. The agreement emphasizes that scientific interest should drive the implementation of research programs and the development of specialized facilities. To facilitate the transition to operational status, a Implementation Committee composed of representatives from signatory states was created to prepare basic materials until the first meeting of the Conference of the Parties. Signatory nations include Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, the United States, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela.

The Minutes of Montevideo document the May 1992 agreement by several American states to create the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI). The IAI is designed as a regional network of research entities to investigate the extent, causes, and consequences of global changes in the Americas and to bridge the gap between science and policy. The agreement establishes an Implementation Committee to prepare the Institute for operation and notes the intention to inform the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) of the Institute's creation.

The 1992 agreement establishes the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) to coordinate scientific research on global change in the Americas. The IAI is structured as a regional network with four primary organs: the Conference of the Parties (policy-making), the Executive Council (executive), the Scientific Advisory Committee (scientific advice), and the Directorate (administration). Its objectives include promoting interdisciplinary research on earth, ocean, and atmospheric sciences, improving research infrastructure, and providing scientific information to governments for public policy. The initial Scientific Agenda focuses on tropical ecosystems, climate change impacts on biodiversity, El Niño Southern Oscillation, and high latitude processes. Funding is based on voluntary contributions from Parties and Associates, with operational expenses supported by pledges in increments of US$ 5,000.

The 1992 agreement creates the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) to address insufficient scientific knowledge of the Earth system and the impacts of global change. The IAI is structured as a regional network of cooperating entities with a specific scientific agenda focusing on tropical ecosystems, biodiversity, and climate variability. It is governed by a Conference of the Parties, an Executive Council, a Scientific Advisory Committee, and an Executive Directorate. The agreement outlines the criteria for establishing Research Centers, the role of affiliated institutions and associates, and a funding model based on voluntary contributions from member states and external partners.

The Declaration of Montevideo, signed May 12-14, 1992, establishes the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) as a regional network of research entities. The Institute aims to coordinate scientific and economic research on the causes and consequences of global change in the Americas to inform the policy process. To ensure operational readiness, the signatories agreed to create an Implementation Committee and to notify the United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED-92) of the Institute's creation.

The Declaration of Montevideo, signed between May 12 and 14, 1992, establishes the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) as a regional network of research centers. The IAI aims to coordinate scientific and economic research on the causes and consequences of global change in the Americas to bridge the gap between science and policy. The declaration outlines the creation of an Organizing Committee to make the Institute operational and notes the commitment of several American states to support the initiative.

The agreement creates the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) to foster regional cooperation in interdisciplinary research on global changes. It defines the Institute's objectives, including the study of tropical ecosystems and climate variability, and outlines a governance structure consisting of a Conference of Parties, an Executive Council, a Scientific Advisory Committee, and a Directorate. The document also specifies the criteria for establishing Research Centers and the financial framework based on voluntary contributions.

The briefing identifies a structured pattern of wildfire-related disinformation on social media, where 'core' narratives like arson deflection and government mismanagement serve as gateways to more extreme conspiracy theories and climate denial. It highlights how these narratives have spread across different regions, including Chile, Spain, Greece, Canada, and Hawaii, often leveraging the 'attention economy' of Big Tech platforms to undermine the link between climate change and increasing wildfire intensity.

The document highlights that just 1% of Chile's superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 1385 GW of energy capacity, potentially meeting the country's projected 2050 electricity demand and replacing all coal and gas imports used for electricity production. It argues that this energy-dense resource would require significantly less land than other energy sources and support Chile's goal of carbon neutrality by 2050.

The report assesses California's path to a net-zero carbon economy by 2045, specifically examining the necessity of 'clean firm power'—zero-carbon electricity that is available on demand regardless of weather. Using three different optimization models (RESOLVE, urbs, and GenX), the authors find that relying solely on wind, solar, and batteries would require nearly 500 GW of capacity and increase wholesale electricity rates by approximately 65%. In contrast, integrating 25-40 GW of clean firm power—such as nuclear, geothermal, or gas with carbon capture and storage (CCS)—can maintain costs similar to today's levels (around 9 cents/kWh) while significantly reducing the land and transmission infrastructure needed. The report concludes that a diverse portfolio of clean firm resources is the most cost-effective way to ensure grid reliability during extended periods of low renewable output, known as 'dunkelflaute'.

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) argues that the waste sector represents 26% of EU anthropogenic methane emissions and proposes redesigning the EU waste hierarchy to emphasize waste prevention and organic waste treatment. CATF recommends setting separate quantitative recycling targets for municipal bio-waste and requiring Member States to explicitly address methane abatement in their national waste management plans. Additionally, the document calls for a collective EU food waste reduction target of 50% by 2030, noting that combining source separation and treatment of organic waste with food waste prevention could reduce EU waste sector methane emissions by 41% to 55%.

The document highlights that global warming, driven by greenhouse gas emissions, is causing a loss of oxygen and increased acidity in the global ocean, with the Peruvian sea being particularly susceptible due to its high productivity and circulation patterns. It notes that the South East Pacific OMZ has expanded in recent decades, and warns that if these low-oxygen waters reach coastal areas, they could synergize with human-induced pollution (such as agricultural runoff and sewage) to create 'dead zones'. The brief emphasizes that while the global ocean has lost approximately 2% of its oxygen over the last 50 years, the specific temporal variation of the OMZ off the coast of Peru is not yet fully understood. To mitigate these risks, the authors recommend expanding oceanographic monitoring across the Peruvian coastline, strengthening multidisciplinary research to improve climate models, tightening laws on organic waste disposal, and using this data to establish marine protected areas.

The Climate and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN) provides research, technical assistance, and knowledge dissemination to help developing countries integrate low-carbon and resilient growth into their national policies. Funded by the UK's DFID and the Netherlands' DGIS, CDKN focuses on four strategic themes: climate-compatible development plans, improving access to climate finance, disaster risk management, and supporting negotiators from the least developed and most vulnerable countries. The organization operates in over 40 countries across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean, aiming to improve the quality of life for those most affected by climate change through a demand-driven approach.

The Climate and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN) provides research, technical assistance, and advocacy to help developing countries integrate climate resilience and low-carbon growth into their national policies. Operating across Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean, CDKN focuses on four strategic themes: climate compatible development strategies, access to climate finance, disaster risk management, and support for international climate negotiators from vulnerable nations. The network is funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) and the Netherlands Foreign Ministry (DGIS).

The Climate and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN) is an alliance of six organizations providing research, advisory services, and knowledge sharing to help developing countries integrate climate resilience and low-carbon growth into their national policies. The network focuses on four strategic themes: climate-compatible development strategies, improving access to climate finance, disaster risk management, and supporting Least Developed Country (LDC) negotiators. CDKN operates across Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean, implementing projects such as national climate strategies in Rwanda, disaster-resilient reconstruction in Pakistan, and urban adaptation planning in Colombia and Ecuador.

The report argues that the proposed 1.2 GW Karpowership gas power plants are not aligned with a least-cost investment pathway for South Africa. Drawing on a study by Meridian Economics and the CSIR, it finds that the grid should prioritize rapid renewable energy build-out and storage, with new gas capacity not being economically optimal until the mid-2030s. The document concludes that commissioning these plants by 2022 would create an unnecessary economic burden for ratepayers and that the procurement process (RMIPP) was biased against renewable energy options.

South Africa's Critical Minerals and Metals Strategy aims to maximise the economic value of its vast mineral reserves—including PGMs, manganese, and vanadium—by shifting from raw ore exports to local beneficiation and high-tech manufacturing. The strategy identifies a specific list of high, moderate-to-high, and moderate criticality minerals and proposes six pillars of intervention: geoscience mapping, value addition, R&D, infrastructure/energy security, financial instruments, and regulatory harmonisation. It emphasizes the need to overcome domestic bottlenecks in energy and logistics, foster regional integration within Africa, and navigate geopolitical tensions, particularly China's dominance in the supply chain, to secure a role in the global green energy transition.

The report examines the industrial aquaculture sector's dependence on fishmeal and fish oil (FMFO), highlighting how the extraction of forage fish disrupts marine food webs and undermines food security in vulnerable coastal regions. It criticizes the lack of transparency in supply chains and the inadequacy of current certification schemes, while calling for a transition toward herbivorous species and alternative proteins to protect ocean health.

The report finds that Swiss retailers largely fail to ensure sustainable aquaculture supply chains, with none meeting half of the assessed sustainability indicators. It highlights the ecological and social risks of using wild fish for aquaculture feed, the inadequacy of current certification labels, and the poor state of fish welfare in farms. The authors advocate for the decoupling of aquaculture from wild fisheries through alternative feeds and the promotion of herbivorous fish species.

The document provides legal arguments to support a lawsuit against the Panamanian National Environmental Authority (ANAM) regarding the Barro Blanco Hydroelectric Project. It contends that the project's EIA was approved without adequate consultation or the free, prior, and informed consent of the Ngäbe people, violating international human rights and environmental law. The brief highlights specific failures, including a single public forum conducted only in Spanish and the omission of critical data regarding indigenous territories adjacent to the Ngäbe-Buglé Comarca.