Search Climate Insights Directory

A March 2012 survey of 1,008 American adults found that while 56% attempted to reduce family energy consumption in the past year, specific conservation behaviors like setting thermostats to 68°F or using public transport declined since November 2011. Consumer activism remains a significant trend, with 52% intending to reward or punish companies based on their global warming-related behaviors over the next 12 months. However, engagement in citizen behaviors—such as donating to climate organizations or contacting government officials—remains low, with 80% never donating and 87% never contacting officials in the past year.

The report details public opinion in the United States during November 2011, showing broad support for clean energy development and environmental protection. While a majority of Americans view global warming as a priority for federal leadership and support renewable energy research, there is divided support for nuclear power and a majority preference for expanding offshore drilling.

The report analyzes transport-related emissions in Tallinn from 2000 to 2009, noting a significant increase in CO2e emissions driven primarily by private car usage. It evaluates various fiscal and regulatory measures to mitigate these impacts, with a specific focus on municipal service vehicles. The study finds that implementing eco-driving training for municipal fleets could reduce CO2e emissions by 1,330 to 2,660 tons annually and save between 0.5 and 1 million euros in fuel costs. Despite strategic goals for sustainable transport, the report concludes that Tallinn's actual progress is hindered by a continued focus on car-centric infrastructure.

The report finds broad American support for prioritizing global warming and clean energy, with a majority favoring action from corporations, government, and citizens. A significant portion of the population believes environmental protection supports economic growth, and there is strong support for renewable energy research and local sustainability policies, though support for nuclear power remains low, especially at the local level.

The report details the behaviors of 1,010 American adults in May 2011 across household, consumer, and citizen activities. Key findings include a decline in the frequency of setting thermostats to 68 degrees or cooler compared to 2008, while a majority of respondents (53%) report that 'most' or 'all' of their home light bulbs are compact fluorescent lights (CFLs). Consumer activism shows that 56% of respondents 'Never' rewarded companies for reducing global warming through purchases in the past year, though 39% intend to do so 'More frequently' in the next 12 months. Citizen engagement remains low, with 90% of respondents having 'Never' contacted government officials about global warming in the past year.

The report presents survey data from 1,010 American adults on their priorities regarding global warming and clean energy, their views on who should address these issues, and their support for specific policy interventions at national and local levels. It highlights a general preference for clean energy over global warming as a priority and shows strong support for renewable energy research and tax rebates, while revealing significant political polarization on issues like carbon emissions treaties and gasoline taxes.

The report details American adults' behaviors and attitudes toward climate-related actions in November 2011. Key findings include a decline in the percentage of people who 'Always' set their winter thermostat to 68 degrees or cooler compared to 2008, and a high level of confidence (56%) in the ability to replace home light bulbs with CFLs. While a majority of respondents (55%) never rewarded companies for climate-positive steps in the past year, 55% intend to engage in consumer activism in the coming year. The data also shows that 81% of respondents had never volunteered or donated to a global warming organization in the previous 12 months.

The report details a 2011 survey of 1,010 American adults, analyzing how political affiliation and movement membership influence perceptions of climate change. It finds a sharp divide between the Tea Party and other political groups, with Tea Party members significantly more likely to deny global warming, distrust government-led climate policies, and hold strong individualistic values. Conversely, Democrats show the highest levels of concern and support for regulatory climate action.

The document finds that Estonian transport trends are unsustainable, characterized by rapid increases in private car use and road freight, leading to transport fuel use per unit of GDP that is twice the EU average. It argues that current policies are insufficient to meet EU greenhouse gas (GHG) emission limits for 2020 and proposes a combined approach of technical vehicle efficiency improvements and modal shifts to achieve sustainability.

The paper analyzes the drivers of per capita CO2 emissions across U.S. states, noting a wide range from 76.5 mT in Alaska to 12.2 mT in Vermont. It identifies that high transportation emissions are linked to sparse populations, low gasoline prices, and limited public transit. High residential heating emissions are associated with cold climates, high average incomes, and the use of oil for heating. Additionally, high residential electricity emissions are driven by coal-based power generation, hot and humid climates, and low electricity prices. The authors highlight gasoline prices, electricity prices, and public transportation use as key policy variables.

The report details American adults' engagement in conservation activities, such as turning off lights and recycling, and their levels of consumer and citizen activism regarding global warming. It highlights a gap between the perceived importance of these actions and actual behavior, while tracking trends in the adoption of energy-efficient lighting and intentions to increase conservation efforts over the following year.

The document asserts that biofuel production and transport lead to dangerous spills, leaks, and fires that pollute ecosystems and kill aquatic life. It highlights specific incidents in Missouri and Iowa and notes that cleanup procedures for water-soluble fuels like ethanol are underdeveloped. The text advocates for shifting taxpayer funding from corn ethanol toward energy conservation, public transportation, electric cars, and sustainable solar and wind technologies.

The guide emphasizes that avoiding dangerous climate change requires significant emissions reductions below 1990 levels by 2050, necessitating action at all levels of society. It highlights the unique role of local governments in implementing cost-effective community measures and educating the public on sustainable living. The text asserts that climate actions—such as improving energy efficiency, investing in public transit and biking infrastructure, developing renewable energy, and promoting local food production—not only reduce emissions but also lower energy bills, create green jobs, and enhance community resilience against economic downturns and extreme weather events.

The report finds that Estonia's transport system is not developing sustainably, with car use and road freight growing in tandem with the economy, leading to high energy intensity and greenhouse gas emissions. While traffic fatalities have decreased significantly, urban air quality has suffered due to increased particulate matter from cars. The report compares Estonia's performance with EU averages and neighbors (Finland and Latvia), noting that Estonia has some of the least fuel-efficient new cars in Europe. Three scenarios for 2020 are analyzed: a 'BAAS' (baseline) scenario where trends continue, a 'TEHNO' scenario focusing on rapid vehicle efficiency gains, and an 'EFEKT' scenario focusing on mobility management and sustainable transport modes. The authors recommend a combination of both TEHNO and EFEKT measures, including CO2-based vehicle taxation, improved public transport and active mobility infrastructure, and integrated urban planning to decouple economic growth from transport demand.

The report examines the transition from traditional, inefficient bus services to modernized systems, primarily Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), across 13 cities in Latin America and Asia. It highlights that while these systems generally improve travel speed, reduce emissions, and lower capital costs compared to rail, they often suffer from rushed implementation, inadequate user education, and financial instability due to politically determined fares. The analysis emphasizes the importance of high-level political commitment, comprehensive planning, and the use of technical fare-setting to ensure long-term sustainability.

The report projects that Illinois will face significantly hotter summers, increased flash flooding, and severe threats to agriculture if heat-trapping emissions continue to rise. Under a higher-emissions scenario, Chicago could see more than 70 days above 90°F per summer by the end of the century, and corn yields could decline by as much as 50% by mid-century. The document advocates for a transition to clean energy, including renewable electricity standards and a moratorium on new coal plants, alongside federal cap-and-trade legislation to mitigate these risks.

The Climate 2030 Blueprint proposes a combination of an economywide cap-and-trade program and complementary sector-specific policies to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. The analysis argues that these measures can achieve deep carbon cuts while generating significant net savings for consumers and businesses, reducing oil dependence, and maintaining robust economic growth.

Friends of the Earth argues that the U.S. transportation system requires systemic reform to address its contribution to 30 percent of greenhouse gas emissions and nearly 70 percent of oil consumption. The organization emphasizes that the next Secretary of Transportation must update obsolete federal policies and financing mechanisms to support the Obama administration's targets of an 80 percent reduction in greenhouse gases by 2050 and a significant reduction in oil dependence within 10 years.

The document identifies fine particulate matter (PM2.5), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), and benzene as primary pollutants of concern in the Kathmandu Valley, with PM10 and PM2.5 levels exceeding WHO guidelines by 2 to 10 times. Road transport and re-suspended dust are the dominant sources of PM10, contributing approximately 63 percent of emissions. The brief estimates that PM10 exposure causes about 1,600 premature deaths annually, while benzene and PAH exposure increase risks of leukaemia and lung cancer. To combat this, the document recommends the implementation of the Programme for Rapid Evaluation of air Pollution (PREPair) and specific interventions including the transition to Vertical Shaft Brick Kilns, the introduction of Bus Rapid Transport, and the use of low sulphur fuels.

The report projects that Indiana will face significantly hotter summers, increased flooding, and agricultural disruptions if heat-trapping emissions continue to rise. It highlights severe risks to public health from heat waves and poor air quality, and suggests that the state transition from its heavy reliance on coal-fired power to renewable energy and energy efficiency to mitigate these effects.