Search Climate Insights Directory

The briefing highlights a viral video by John Stossel featuring Mark Mills that spreads debunked claims about EV battery mineral requirements and their impact on global oil consumption. It notes the video's high engagement across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, and links the content to funding from Koch foundations. The document counters these claims using data from Argonne National Laboratory, IHS Markit, and the Union of Concerned Scientists to affirm that EVs generally emit less carbon over their lifespan than internal combustion engine vehicles.

The policy brief calculates the environmental costs of aviation in the Single European Sky area, finding that capacity shortfalls in 2018 and 2019 led to approximately 31.86 million nautical miles of additional distance flown. This resulted in 1.06 million tonnes of CO2 emissions, with estimated climate costs ranging from 162 million to 903 million EUR depending on the carbon pricing model and the inclusion of non-CO2 effects. The authors highlight that CO2 represents only about 34% of the sector's effective radiative forcing, with the remainder coming from non-CO2 impacts like contrail cirrus and nitrogen oxides.

The document analyzes a proposed $0.25 per gallon federal gas tax increase, finding it would generate approximately $1.1 trillion in revenue through 2050 and reduce total fuel consumption by over 1.3 billion barrels. The tax would incentivize the adoption of electric vehicles, adding roughly 2.5 million additional EVs to U.S. roads by 2050. Additionally, the report notes that a $0.25 gas tax is equivalent to a carbon tax of $25 to $29 per ton, which exceeds the record high allowance auction prices of the California-Quebec and Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative cap-and-trade systems.

Electric vehicles (EVs) offer significant financial benefits, including lower fueling costs—with savings ranging from several hundred to over $1,000 annually—and reduced maintenance costs of $6,000 to $12,000 over a vehicle's life. Environmentally, EVs produce fewer emissions than conventional cars even on coal-heavy grids, with the potential to reduce US oil use by 1.5 million barrels per day by 2035. Additionally, EVs provide a superior driving experience through instant torque and a low center of gravity, while offering convenience via home charging and simplified mechanical maintenance.

The document analyzes the different approaches the U.S. and China take to overcome barriers to electric vehicle (EV) adoption, such as high upfront costs and limited charging infrastructure. While the U.S. relies on a mix of federal tax credits and varied state-level incentives, China has implemented more aggressive central government subsidies, a 'dual-credit policy' for manufacturers, and significant government fleet mandates. China's approach has led to faster growth in EV registrations and a larger network of charging outlets compared to the U.S.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) argues that the impact of self-driving vehicles depends on policy guidance. To prevent increased vehicle miles traveled and emissions, the UCS recommends pairing autonomous technology with low-carbon vehicles, integrating them with mass transit, and incentivizing shared rides. The brief also emphasizes the need for equitable access, a 'just transition' for displaced workers in trucking and taxi industries, and open data-sharing to inform science-based policy.

The National Program for fuel efficiency and emissions standards is a cornerstone of Connecticut's strategy to reduce transportation emissions, which account for 40 percent of the state's total. The Union of Concerned Scientists estimates that the program has already saved Connecticut drivers $324 million since 2011 and reduced oil consumption by 97 million gallons. By 2030, the program is projected to lower the state's global warming emissions by 4.5 million metric tons per year, save consumers $1.5 billion in gas expenses, and create over 4,000 jobs, increasing the state's GDP by more than $1 billion.

The document assesses the impact of the US National Program's fuel efficiency and emissions standards on Massachusetts, highlighting reductions in oil consumption, consumer cost savings, and greenhouse gas emissions. It warns that a federal midterm review of the 2022–2025 standards could jeopardize these benefits, which include projected GDP growth and job creation by 2030.

The National Program for fuel efficiency and emissions standards is a cornerstone of Maryland's strategy to reduce transportation emissions, which account for 38 percent of statewide emissions. The Union of Concerned Scientists estimates that the program has already saved Maryland drivers $535 million in fuel costs since 2011 and reduced annual transportation-related emissions by 754,000 metric tons. By 2030, the program is projected to lower the state's global warming emissions by 9.1 million metric tons per year, create over 6,000 jobs, and increase the state's GDP by more than $1.3 billion.

The National Program for fuel efficiency and emissions standards is a cornerstone of New Jersey's strategy to reduce transportation emissions, which account for 41 percent of statewide emissions. The program has already reduced annual transportation-related emissions in the state by 935,000 metric tons and saved drivers $648 million in fuel costs since 2011. By 2030, the program is projected to lower New Jersey's global warming emissions by 9.3 million metric tons per year, create over 15,000 jobs, and increase the state's GDP by more than $1.5 billion.

The National Program for fuel efficiency and emissions standards is a cornerstone of New York's strategy to reduce transportation emissions, which account for 33 percent of statewide emissions. The program has already reduced annual transportation-related emissions in New York by 2 million metric tons and saved drivers $1.5 billion in fuel costs since 2011. By 2030, the program is projected to lower the state's global warming emissions by 21 million metric tons per year, save consumers $7 billion in gas expenses, create over 40,000 jobs, and increase the state's GDP by more than $6 billion.

The document assesses the impact of the US National Program's fuel efficiency and emissions standards on Pennsylvania, highlighting reductions in global warming emissions, oil consumption, and consumer costs. It argues that maintaining these standards through 2025 is essential for the state to meet its climate goals and stimulate economic growth through job creation and increased GDP.

The National Program for fuel efficiency and emissions standards is critical for the Northeast, where passenger vehicles account for over 25% of regional emissions. The program has already reduced oil consumption by 1.3 billion gallons since 2011 and is projected to lower global warming pollution by 75 million metric tons per year by 2030. Economically, it is estimated to save the average Northeast household over $2,400 annually by 2030 and create more than 125,000 regional jobs.

The document outlines the environmental, economic, and public health benefits of the fuel efficiency and global warming pollution standards for light-duty vehicles covering model years 2017 to 2025. It highlights significant reductions in oil consumption, consumer cost savings, job creation, and a substantial decrease in global warming emissions by 2030.

The authors find that while all EU Member States have implemented car labeling schemes, they lack uniformity in design and metrics, and often underrate yearly fuel costs by several hundred euro per car. They recommend adopting a uniform label based on the EU energy label, using data that reflects real-world consumer observations, and implementing a scale that differentiates between hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles.

The report argues that smart land use policy is critical for California to meet its 2030 decarbonization goals. Using the RapidFire model and E3 California Pathways data, the study finds that 'More Compact' and 'Infill Focus' scenarios can lead to statewide emissions reductions of 40-41% below 1990 levels when combined with aggressive energy technology deployment. Beyond climate targets, smart growth is projected to deliver significant co-benefits, including billions of dollars in household and infrastructure cost savings, improved public health outcomes through reduced air pollution, and the preservation of greenfield land. The authors recommend that the California Air Resources Board (CARB) strengthen emissions reduction targets under SB 375 and provide substantial funding to support cities and regions in implementing target-compliant land use plans.

The report argues that smart growth—characterized by compact, walkable, and transit-oriented development—is essential for California to meet its 2030 climate targets. By combining aggressive energy technology deployment with 'More Compact' or 'Infill Focus' land use scenarios, the state could achieve statewide emissions reductions of 40-41% below 1990 levels. Beyond carbon mitigation, the study quantifies significant co-benefits, including billions of dollars in household and infrastructure cost savings, improved public health outcomes, and the conservation of hundreds of square miles of land.

The document details the evolution of U.S. vehicle efficiency standards, starting with the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. It highlights the collaboration between the EPA, NHTSA, and auto manufacturers to implement standards for light-duty vehicles and two phases of standards for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. The standards aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, lower oil consumption, and save consumers and vehicle owners billions of dollars by 2027.

The document analyzes proposed US heavy-duty vehicle standards for model years 2018–2029, noting they would reduce oil consumption by 550,000 barrels per day by 2035 and avoid 1 billion metric tons of emissions. However, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) argues that a 40 percent reduction in fuel consumption is achievable by 2025, which would save an additional 200,000 barrels of oil per day and avoid 40 million metric tons of annual emissions compared to the government's 36 percent target for 2027.

The document asserts that the fuel economy of U.S. tractor-trailers has remained stagnant since the 1970s, averaging around 6 miles per gallon. It argues that implementing stronger standards could improve the efficiency of new trucks by 40 percent by 2025, raising average fuel economy from 6.3 mpg to 10.7 mpg. Such improvements would reduce petroleum consumption by over 570,000 barrels of oil per day and prevent over 110 million metric tons of global warming emissions annually. Economically, the report claims these standards would save truck owners $30,000 in fuel costs per vehicle annually and could reduce freight rates by nearly 10 percent, potentially providing households with $135 in annual savings.