Search Climate Insights Directory

The Climate Bonds Resilience Taxonomy (CBRT) provides a structured framework for identifying and qualifying investments that enhance climate resilience. It categorizes investments across seven themes and various sectors, requiring that each investment addresses at least one physical climate hazard. To be eligible, investments must demonstrate a substantial contribution to resilience, manage maladaptation risks, and adhere to 'Do No Significant Harm' (DNSH) principles regarding climate mitigation and environmental protection. The CBRT distinguishes between 'Adapted' and 'Enabling' investments, as well as 'Activities' and 'Measures', and offers different evaluation pathways—automatic, simplified, or process-based—depending on the investment type. The framework is intended for use by government agencies, financial institutions, real-economy sectors, and market stakeholders to support the issuance and verification of resilience-linked bonds and loans.

The Canadian North faces a dual crisis of inadequate existing infrastructure and a climate warming three times faster than the global average. Permafrost thaw, extreme weather, and unpredictable ice and snow conditions are damaging airstrips, roads, and building foundations, while threatening winter road viability and coastal communities. The report argues that simple repairs are insufficient due to historical underinvestment and neglect; instead, it calls for transformational adaptation based on Indigenous self-determination. Key recommendations include restructuring federal funding, improving region-specific climate risk data, prioritizing infrastructure replacement over repair, and updating building codes to account for northern climate complexities.

The document outlines a framework for managing FX risk in EMDEs, detailing commercial and concessional hedging tools such as forwards, swaps, and options. It highlights the role of multilateral development banks (MDBs) and specialized facilities like TCX, Eco Invest Brasil, and the Delta Platform in providing affordable risk mitigation. The guide also specifies the internal, regulatory, and financial market capacity requirements necessary for countries to effectively deploy these instruments, while identifying high costs and tenor mismatches as primary barriers to uptake.

The document outlines a comprehensive Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) framework for Haiti's National Adaptation Plan (NAP), which targets 340 adaptation measures in agriculture, health, infrastructure, and water resources. It defines a multi-level indicator system (contextual, strategic, sectoral, and operational) and proposes a phased implementation roadmap from 2026 to 2030. The framework emphasizes gender and social inclusion (GESI), institutional coordination through the Ministry of Environment and the National Committee on Climate Change, and the use of digital platforms for data management and international reporting to the UNFCCC.

The report provides a comprehensive analysis of climate change projections for Estonia through 2100 and outlines a strategic adaptation plan to 2030. It identifies key vulnerabilities across eight priority sectors—including health, land use, nature, bioeconomy, economy, society, infrastructure, and energy—and proposes specific goals, metrics, and measures to mitigate risks such as sea-level rise, extreme weather, and ecosystem shifts. The plan estimates a total implementation cost of 43.7 million euros between 2017 and 2030.

The document argues that Colombian national development banks, specifically Finagro and Findeter, have a significant opportunity to incorporate climate risk and stranded asset analysis into their existing financial management frameworks. While current regulations from the Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia (SFC) require asset valuation and risk management, they do not explicitly mandate the inclusion of climate variables. The report highlights that in the Global South, stranded assets can extend beyond the energy sector to include agriculture, road infrastructure, and construction. Case studies of Finagro and Findeter reveal that while both comply with SFC standards and report low credit risk, they do not publicly detail how climate-related risks or potential stranded assets are identified or managed, creating a gap in their long-term financial sustainability planning.

The report argues that decentralized solar solutions in India's climate-vulnerable regions must move beyond traditional, siloed implementation models to incorporate climate-risk data, context-specific design, and innovative financing to ensure resilience against extreme weather events.

The paper outlines a collaborative framework for U.S. climate action, arguing that while ambitious federal leadership is necessary to set national targets and international standards, state and local governments should act as 'laboratories of democracy' to pioneer solutions. It advocates for a system where federal standards provide a floor but do not preempt more ambitious subnational actions, emphasizing that land-use, zoning, and infrastructure resilience are best handled at the subnational level, while carbon pricing and clean energy standards should be collaborative efforts.

The document argues that while policymakers are increasingly incorporating climate adaptation into development plans, a significant 'implementation gap' remains where policies do not translate into concrete action. It proposes a framework of five interlocking enabling factors—policy frameworks, leadership, coordination mechanisms, information/tools, and financial processes—to bridge this gap and avoid maladaptation.

The report investigates the May 2022 extreme rainfall event in Eastern Northeast Brazil, which caused 133 deaths and displaced over 25,000 people. Observational analysis indicates that 7-day and 15-day rainfall events of this magnitude are exceptionally rare in the current climate, with return periods of approximately 1-in-500 and 1-in-1000 years, respectively. While climate models exhibited systematic errors in precipitation magnitudes for this specific event, the authors conclude that human-caused climate change is at least partially responsible for increasing the likelihood and intensity of such rainfall. The study further highlights that structural vulnerabilities, including unplanned urbanisation in low-income neighbourhoods and an infrastructure deficit, significantly exacerbated the disaster's impact.

The report investigates the 2022 Pakistan floods, focusing on two event definitions: 60-day maximum rainfall in the Indus basin and 5-day maximum rainfall in Sindh and Balochistan. While observational trends suggest that a 1.2°C warmer climate increased 5-day rainfall intensity by about 75% and 60-day rainfall by 50%, the authors refrain from a precise quantitative attribution due to high rainfall variability and climate model limitations. However, models project that a further 0.8°C of warming (reaching 2°C above pre-industrial levels) will significantly increase the intensity and probability of short-duration extreme rainfall. The study also highlights that the disaster's scale was exacerbated by outdated river management, high poverty, and gender-based vulnerabilities.

The 2022 UK heatwave, which saw temperatures reach 40.3°C in Coningsby, was made at least 10 times more likely by human-caused climate change. Observational analysis indicates such an event would have been about 4°C cooler in pre-industrial times, though climate models systematically underestimate this trend. The event had significant impacts on human health, with projected excess mortality of over 840 people in England and Wales, and exposed critical vulnerabilities in UK infrastructure and urban planning.

The document distinguishes between climate change mitigation, which focuses on avoiding and reducing greenhouse gas emissions to prevent extreme warming, and climate change adaptation, which involves adjusting behaviors and systems to protect people and the environment from existing and future climate impacts. It emphasizes that while mitigation takes decades to affect temperatures, adaptation is required immediately for changes already occurring. Key mitigation strategies include transitioning to renewable energy and stopping deforestation to reach net-zero emissions, while adaptation involves diversifying crops, strengthening infrastructure, and managing natural resources. The text asserts that both approaches are equally important and time-sensitive.