Search Climate Insights Directory

The study utilizes integrated basin-scale models to analyze the water-energy-climate nexus in Sacramento, California. It finds that hot dry years, characterized by a 4C temperature increase and 25% precipitation decrease, would lead to a more than 35% increase in regional electricity imports due to constrained local power production.

The report analyzes Indonesia's transition to a fuel pricing system that passes through international oil price changes to reduce wasteful subsidies, which saved IDR 195 trillion (US$ 15.6 billion) in the 2015 State Budget Revision. It compares Indonesia's historically low fuel prices with those of Southeast Asian nations and BRICS economies, noting that Indonesia's prices were among the lowest globally until recent reforms. The document outlines 'good practice' dimensions for pricing systems—subsidies, pass-through, transparency, and enforcement—and examines specific mechanisms used in China, India, Mexico, the Philippines, South Africa, and Thailand. It suggests that Indonesia manage price volatility not through subsidies, but via variable taxes, targeted social assistance, improved supply efficiency, and reduced energy demand.

The report establishes a business-as-usual emissions baseline for Rwanda from 1990 to 2030, identifying agriculture as the largest non-LULUCF emitting sector. It projects a transition from a significant net carbon sink in 2000 to a net emitter by 2010, with future projections based on GDP growth, population increases, and existing policies. The analysis highlights substantial data gaps and uncertainties, particularly in the LULUCF and agriculture sectors.

The document argues that the 'nexus' of water, energy, and climate requires integrated modeling tools to avoid unwanted policy consequences. To address this, the Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) linked its WEAP and LEAP systems. A California case study simulating the use of desalinated seawater to meet 5% of Southern California's urban water demand by 2049 found that while desalination could reduce water imports by approximately 300 million cubic meters per year in normal years, it would increase the water sector's electricity use by about 3 terawatt-hours and greenhouse gas emissions by 1.4 million tonnes of CO2e per year by 2049.

The report finds that climate change will increase summer cooling demand and decrease winter heating demand in Europe, with the A1B scenario leading to significantly higher costs. While physical energy reductions in heating are larger than cooling increases, the higher cost of electricity for cooling makes the economic impacts more balanced. The study also identifies risks to energy supply, including reduced hydroelectricity generation and lower efficiency for thermal and nuclear power plants due to higher temperatures. Adaptation measures, such as low-energy buildings, are discussed but noted as having a low evidence base for cost-benefit analysis.

The letter advocates for a national programme of energy efficiency and a reduction in overall energy demand to improve energy security. It calls for an increase in the 2020 renewable energy target, a tenfold increase in renewable R&D funding—potentially funded by military budget cuts—and the implementation of a Renewable Heat Incentive. The authors argue against new nuclear build, insisting the industry pay full costs for waste management and insurance without public subsidies, and suggest delaying construction decisions until safety and waste assessments are complete.

The research demonstrates a historical divergence between the cost of energy commodities and the cost of the services they provide. While energy prices often rose due to taxes or shifts to higher-quality fuels, the prices of energy services generally declined since the Industrial Revolution due to technological efficiency gains. The author argues that using energy prices instead of service prices in economic models leads to incorrect estimates of consumer responsiveness and inaccurate forecasts of carbon dioxide emissions.

The report finds that existing climate variability already costs Kenya up to 2% of GDP annually, with future climate change potentially adding a loss of 2.6% of GDP per year by 2030. Adaptation needs are estimated at $500 million per year for 2012, rising to $1-2 billion per year by 2030. The study also identifies significant opportunities for low-carbon growth, noting that over 80% of selected energy-related emission reduction options can be realized at a net negative cost.

The briefing assesses the viability of nuclear power as a solution to global warming, concluding that it is an ineffective strategy compared to energy efficiency. Analysis shows that even under highly optimistic assumptions—such as reduced construction times and costs—massive nuclear investment cannot prevent CO2 growth in high or medium energy demand scenarios. In the United States, the author asserts that investment in electrical efficiency displaces nearly seven times more carbon per dollar than investment in nuclear power. The document emphasizes that the primary driver of future emissions is the level of energy demand, and that efficiency improvements in the commercial, industrial, and transportation sectors offer vast, low-cost opportunities to reduce carbon output.

The study predicts a significant biomass deficit in Uganda from the 2020s onwards, which climate change is expected to exacerbate by reducing domestic wood availability by 5 to 10 percent between 2020 and 2050. Addressing this gap through imported biomass or LPG would require additional expenditures of US$0.6-1.3 billion or US$5-11 billion, respectively. While a potential 26 percent decline in hydropower potential by 2050 could be managed by the government's current expansion programme, this requires an estimated US$83 billion in capital investment for hydro, nuclear, and other generation through 2050. The document recommends prioritizing a switch from traditional biomass to modern energy sources and implementing energy efficiency standards.

Global Witness asserts that tensions between NATO allies in the eastern Mediterranean over fossil gas are futile, as the EU's projected 90 percent reduction in gas demand by 2050 renders these reserves unnecessary. The report highlights that extracting discovered gas in disputed waters would produce carbon emissions comparable to the annual output of France and Spain combined. It specifically calls for the cancellation of the €6 billion EastMed pipeline, which is currently a "Project of Common Interest," arguing that its operation would cause immense environmental damage and further escalate regional conflict.

The document provides technical instructions for creating models in LEAP that combine exogenous and endogenous variables. It details the naming syntax for referencing branches and variables, the process for specifying scaling factors and units, and the use of tag filters to limit summed branches. Additionally, it covers the referencing of fuel characteristics, molecular weight constants, and data from the TED database.

The document defines useful energy demand as the portion of final energy demand available for work after device losses, noting that while typically smaller than final energy demand, it can be larger for devices like heat pumps. It also describes the software settings required to calculate these demands across all branches.

The Results View in LEAP allows users to analyze model outputs using four primary tabs: Chart, Table, Split, and Diagnostics. Users can customize reports by selecting result types (e.g., Energy Demand, Social Costs), dimensions (years, branches, fuels, scenarios), and scaling factors. Advanced features include the use of tags as reporting dimensions, composite dimensions for side-by-side comparisons, and multi-level reports for disaggregated branch analysis. The tool provides extensive formatting options for charts and tables, the ability to save 'Favorite Charts' for quick access, and an auto-refresh toggle for managing large datasets.

The document introduces the LEAP simulation model, which is used for energy demand and supply analysis, forecasting, and impact assessment, particularly in developing countries. It details the model's five modules: demand, transformation, biomass, environment, and evaluation. To provide practical experience, the guide uses a case study of the 'Wood Hills district'—a rural tropical area—to walk users through exercises in organizing energy demand data, calculating charcoal conversion efficiencies, assessing biomass resource accessibility, and developing comparative scenarios to evaluate interventions like improved cookstoves.

The document argues that corporate interests corrupt federal science through research suppression, scientist intimidation, and the manipulation of regulatory processes. It details how these entities shape public perception by promoting false uncertainty and utilizing 'revolving door' officials to capture regulatory agencies. While acknowledging initial steps taken by the Obama administration to improve transparency and ethics, the report calls for comprehensive federal reforms, including stronger whistleblower protections, stricter conflict-of-interest rules for advisory panels, and increased transparency regarding corporate lobbying and funding.

The document argues that India's appliance efficiency standards and labeling (S&L) program, managed by the Bureau of Energy Efficiency since 2006, has not fully realized its potential to reduce electricity demand due to low awareness and limited appliance availability. It recommends strengthening governance through increased transparency in product selection and budgeting, clearer accountability for the BEE and other agencies, broader stakeholder participation in monitoring, and enhanced institutional and technical capacity.

The document highlights the critical dependence of India's thermal power sector on freshwater, noting that 90% of plants rely on it for cooling. It identifies a significant correlation between water stress and reduced plant utilization, while documenting a 43% increase in freshwater consumption between 2011 and 2016. The analysis warns that 70% of thermal plants will face increased water competition by 2030 and notes that water-related shutdowns cost the 20 largest utility companies over INR 91 billion between 2013 and 2016. It suggests that implementing cooling mandates and aggressive renewable targets could reduce freshwater withdrawals by 12.4 billion cubic meters.