Search Climate Insights Directory

The TRopi-dRy research network is establishing a knowledge base on the ecology, diversity, and socio-economic drivers of tropical dry forests (TdFs) in the Americas. Initial findings include the creation of the first-ever map of TdFs in the Americas, which provides a legal basis for conservation monitoring in Costa Rica. Phenology monitoring indicates divergent productivity trends: dry forests are becoming more productive near the equator, with increases noted in Brazil and decreases in Bolivia, while dry seasons are lengthening further north and south.

The United States has increasingly recognized Brazil as a significant regional and global power due to its economic growth, leadership in biofuels, and role in multilateral forums like the G20. While there is mutual interest in cooperating on climate change, energy, and global financial stability, the document argues that a 'special relationship' is hindered by divergent priorities in security, trade disputes over agricultural subsidies and industrial protection, and a lack of dedicated Brazil expertise within the US policy community.

The Caribbean Coastal Scenarios (CCS) project models the flow of water, sediments, and contaminants from inland watersheds to coastal ecosystems in several Caribbean island nations. Initial findings highlight the degradation of water quality due to dams, sewage, and deforestation, specifically noting wastewater treatment gaps in Puerto Rico and agricultural runoff in the Dominican Republic.

The study examines how vegetation-environment interactions define ecotones in Canada and South America, finding that while climate warming can push treelines upward in the Andes, human disturbances and water scarcity often counteract these trends. In the Gran Chaco, deforestation is driven by land use and market demands, and in both Canada and Brazil, the growth-boosting effects of increased CO2 are being offset by decreasing water availability.

The document analyzes the outcomes of COP15 for REDD-plus, highlighting the Copenhagen Accord's role as a political mandate for further action. It details the three-phase implementation approach proposed by the AWG-LCA and examines critical challenges including the definition of 'forest', the integration of REDD into Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMA), and the development of Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) systems based on IPCC guidelines. The report also discusses the necessity of social and environmental safeguards for indigenous peoples and local communities, the role of the Green Climate Fund, and the potential for both grant-based and market-based financing mechanisms.

This fact sheet by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) traces the evolution of the sustainable development movement. It highlights a progression from early environmental warnings, such as Rachel Carson's 1962 book, through the establishment of major international frameworks like the 1992 Rio Earth Summit and the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, to contemporary challenges including the 2008 global financial and food crises and the 2009 Copenhagen climate negotiations.

The document argues that the degradation of ecosystem services—approximately 60 per cent of those examined by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment—poses a significant barrier to eradicating hunger and poverty. It specifically highlights how air pollutants like ground-level ozone threaten crop yields in South Asia, how slow progress in energy access in sub-Saharan Africa and developing Asia may lead to increased forest clearing, and how uncontrolled pesticide use in Southeast Asia risks the health of farmers and the supply of wild foods. The brief recommends integrated pest management, stricter chemical legislation, and pro-poor energy policies to mitigate these environmental pressures.

Brazil possesses a relatively low-carbon energy matrix, but its overall greenhouse gas emissions are dominated by agriculture and deforestation. While deforestation rates have declined, rapid economic growth, increasing energy demand, and the discovery of pre-salt offshore oil fields threaten to increase energy-related emissions. Domestically, climate policy is shifting from a foreign relations issue to a central political topic, with sub-national initiatives—particularly in São Paulo—pushing for more ambitious absolute targets. Internationally, Brazil positions itself as a broker between BASIC countries and Annex I nations, emphasizing its leadership in biofuels and REDD while maintaining a commitment to the sovereign right to development.

The report assesses three primary stressors—air pollution, energy generation, and pesticides—and their capacity to degrade ecosystem services like crop production, pollination, and nutrient cycling. It argues that these pressures create significant barriers to achieving MDG 1, particularly in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. The analysis highlights that while universal modern energy access is financially feasible and would reduce ecosystem pressure, current trends in air pollution and uncontrolled pesticide use pose severe risks to food security and biodiversity.

The document examines the conflict between increasing food production to meet a growing global population and the degradation of ecosystem services. It argues that the current model of enhancing a few food services at the expense of others is unsustainable and risks irreversible tipping points. The authors propose two primary solutions: a risk-assessment tool to integrate climate and ecosystem risks into decision-making, and a three-pronged strategy to reconcile food and conservation by restoring degraded lands, increasing productivity on existing farms, and managing food demand.

The author posits that improved forest management is a "no regrets" strategy that simultaneously addresses immediate vulnerabilities—such as floods and droughts—and long-term climate risks through carbon sequestration. While ecosystem-based adaptation can be a cost-effective alternative to hard infrastructure, the author warns that protecting forests may create trade-offs for local communities. The document suggests using REDD+ mechanisms to finance protection in high-carbon forests while reserving other adaptation funds for low-carbon areas, such as sub-Saharan Africa. Finally, it emphasizes that overcoming poor governance and establishing democratic public participation are essential to implementing these strategies.

Alcoa's Juruti Mining Project in the Brazilian Amazon employs a sustainability model based on three fundamentals: respect for the environment, social responsibility, and economic success. The approach integrates a multi-stakeholder council (CONJUS), a system of sustainability indicators, and a development fund (FUNJUS) to manage local impacts and promote community development. Key initiatives include the 'Positive Agenda' for infrastructure projects and a commitment to revegetate mined areas with native species to minimize the project's footprint in the ecologically sensitive region.

The World Resources Institute (WRI) reported total revenue of $50,079,176 and total expenses of $40,533,012 for the 2010 tax year. The organization focuses on global environmental and development challenges, specifically targeting ecosystem degradation, climate change, and sustainable development. WRI operates globally, providing grants and program services across various regions including East Asia, Europe, North America, South America, and Sub-Saharan Africa. Its financial position at the end of the year included total assets of $65,224,571 and net assets of $59,901,847.

The document analyzes the COP 15 summit, detailing the emission commitments of major economies like the US, China, and the EU, and evaluating the resulting non-binding agreement. It highlights the establishment of the Copenhagen Green Climate Fund and the political consensus on a 2°C temperature limit, while criticizing the lack of specific mitigation targets and the opaque negotiation process.

The executive summary argues that REDD mechanisms are flawed because they focus on reducing emissions rather than stopping deforestation, potentially rewarding polluters and harming Indigenous Peoples. It warns that funding REDD through carbon offsetting undermines climate mitigation in industrialized nations and risks displacing forest-dependent communities. The author advocates for grant-based funding, the exclusion of plantations from forest definitions, and a rights-based approach to forest conservation.

The document examines the technical and political challenges of integrating REDD into global climate policy, focusing on the scope of activities (from REDD to REDD++), financing mechanisms, measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) standards, and institutional governance. It highlights the diversity of national circumstances, particularly in Africa, and the need for a phased implementation approach that balances equity with efficiency.

The document analyzes the systemic failures of forest governance in Africa, highlighting how colonial-era centralized bureaucracies and externally imposed paradigms—such as industrial logging, biodiversity conservation, and REDD—have marginalized local stakeholders. It documents widespread corruption where political elites use logging concessions for personal enrichment or political financing, and notes that while some countries have attempted decentralization, these reforms are often bureaucratic and fail to grant genuine tenure rights to communities.

The report details a systemic failure of governance in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan, where oil palm expansion—driven by EU biofuel targets—has led to widespread illegal land clearing, deforestation of protected forests, and severe social conflicts. It highlights that the Ketapang government issued permits for approximately 40% of the district's land in just three years, often bypassing legal requirements for Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) and forestland release approvals. The document argues that voluntary certification schemes like the RSPO and the EU's Renewable Energy Directive (RED) are insufficient to prevent these abuses, as they lack rigorous legality checks and fail to address 'replacement effects' where certified oil is diverted to energy, pushing the food sector toward unsustainable sources. Socially, the expansion has resulted in land grabs from indigenous communities and precarious labor conditions, including the non-payment of smallholders and chemical poisoning of workers.

The report contends that the Asian Development Bank (ADB) contributes to climate change and increases the vulnerability of communities in the Asia Pacific region. It highlights a contradiction between the ADB's stated climate goals and its continued funding of coal power plants and projects that cause deforestation. Through case studies in Sri Lanka, Indonesia, and Bangladesh, the document demonstrates how ADB-funded infrastructure and aquaculture projects have led to the destruction of mangroves and forests, increased flooding, and the displacement of local populations. The report concludes that the ADB lacks effective climate impact assessments and calls for the institution to recognize its 'climate debt' and stop supporting fossil fuel projects.

The document analyzes the conflict dynamics of the Tuareg in North Africa and the Sahel, arguing that the violence is rooted in the loss of traditional livelihood resources and systemic political exclusion. It examines how post-independence land reforms, severe droughts in the 1970s and 1980s, and the industrial exploitation of uranium and gold have marginalized the Tuareg. The paper details the specific trajectories of conflict in Mali and Niger, the assimilation policies in Algeria, and the destabilizing role of Libya. It concludes that peace requires a comprehensive approach addressing the root causes of poverty and resource inequality rather than treating the Tuareg as terrorists.