Search Climate Insights Directory

The Resilience Knowledge Coalition is a "network of networks" hosted by the Global Resilience Partnership and co-led by SouthSouthNorth and the International Centre for Climate Change and Development. It aims to ensure that the best knowledge and practice on resilience are used to shape policies and investments, particularly in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDS). The coalition operates through three interrelated functions: 'Collaborate' (peer-to-peer learning and capacity building), 'Connect' (virtual knowledge-sharing platforms), and 'Apply' (measurement, incubation, and scaling support). It emphasizes a bottom-up approach, prioritizing Global South demand and expertise to avoid the top-down, donor-driven models of previous knowledge-brokering initiatives.

The report analyzes 308 projects totaling over $3.1 billion in IIJA expenditures across California, Colorado, Florida, New York, and Texas. It finds that while significant funds are reaching these states, investments are heavily skewed toward large-scale infrastructure projects managed by the Army Corps of Engineers, with relatively low funding for public lands and greenspaces. The analysis highlights a gap in orphaned well remediation near Latine communities and notes that carbon capture investments in Texas primarily benefit private industry. However, it identifies successes in fenceline air monitoring and climate pollution planning grants that have reached grassroots organizations and Latine-led initiatives.

The NAP Global Network's South-South Peer Exchange Awards support the exchange of technical expertise on national adaptation planning between developing countries. The program provides funding for travel, accommodation, and logistics for experts to either host or attend exchanges, which can range from one to five days. Eligibility requires registration with the NAP Global Network, residency in a developing country, and a role in the NAP process within government or a key organization. Past exchanges have focused on coastal issues, national budgeting, communication strategies, and stakeholder engagement in countries including Senegal, Togo, Jamaica, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Peru, Saint Lucia, Grenada, and Albania.

The NAP Global Network provides South-South Peer Exchange Awards to support technical exchanges between adaptation planners from developing countries. These awards cover financial costs for flights, accommodation, and meals for experts to either host or attend exchanges lasting between one and five days. Eligible participants must be registered with the Network, originate from a developing country, and work on the NAP process within a government or key organization. Examples of past exchanges include collaborations between Senegal and Togo on coastal issues, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Jamaica on climate budgeting, Peru and Saint Lucia on communication strategies, and Grenada and Albania on NAP assembly planning.

The guidelines propose a dual approach to planning for disaster resilience: examining trade-offs and implementing equitable resilience. The first approach identifies five dimensions of trade-offs—aggregation, participation, equity, time, and risk—that can inadvertently create new vulnerabilities if not addressed. The second approach, equitable resilience, focuses on four elements: recognizing subjectivities, ensuring inclusion and representation, working across multiple scales, and allowing for systemic transformation. The document emphasizes that sustainable development requires confronting power imbalances and prioritizing the needs of marginalized groups to avoid the cycle where development efforts exacerbate disaster risk.

The document outlines a three-phase framework (scoping, analysis, and outreach) for valuing coastal ecosystems in the Caribbean to ensure such studies translate into real-world policy influence. It identifies key enabling conditions for success, such as clear policy questions and strong stakeholder engagement, and addresses gaps in existing valuation tools by providing specific reporting guidelines and best-practice examples for the region.

The document analyzes coastal resilience efforts in Bangladesh, Malabon City (Philippines), and Cartagena (Colombia), highlighting the 'implementation gap' between planning and action. It identifies key success factors, including political will, access to credible climate data, stakeholder coordination, and a mix of domestic and international funding. The paper advocates for a 'whole-of-government approach' and the use of legislative mandates to ensure climate adaptation is integrated into development planning.

The report 'Reefs at Risk' assesses the global status of coral reefs, finding that 58% are potentially threatened by human activities. It identifies overexploitation and coastal development as the primary drivers of risk, with Southeast Asia being the most threatened region. The study utilizes a map-based indicator to flag high-risk areas, particularly biodiversity hot spots, and evaluates the current state of marine protected areas (MPAs).

The report finds that the majority of the world's coral reefs are threatened by human activities and climate change, with projections that nearly all reefs will be threatened by 2050 if current trends continue. While 27% of reefs are in marine protected areas, only 6% are in effectively managed areas. The document emphasizes that reducing local pressures like overfishing and pollution is critical to increasing reef resilience against warming seas and ocean acidification.

The document reports that over 60% of the world's coral reefs are currently threatened by local human activities, with projections suggesting this could rise to nearly 100% by 2050 if left unchecked. It identifies key local stressors as overfishing, destructive fishing, coastal development, and pollution, alongside global threats like coral bleaching and ocean acidification caused by greenhouse gas emissions. The text emphasizes that countries such as the Philippines, Indonesia, Kiribati, Vanuatu, Tanzania, and Haiti are very highly vulnerable to reef loss due to high dependence on reef services and low adaptive capacity.

The project aims to dispel the notion that ocean wealth and ocean health are mutually exclusive by providing science-based recommendations and data tools. It is structured around four components: the production of a landmark report on ocean solutions, the creation of 'Blue Papers' providing thematic deep dives, the development of the 'Ocean Watch' open data platform, and a comprehensive knowledge management strategy. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the project revised its timelines and budget, shifting more resources toward the data platform and knowledge sharing while maintaining the overall budget total of USD 1,980,000. Initial progress includes the completion of four funded Blue Papers and the holding of an inception workshop to define user needs for the Ocean Watch platform.

The report finds that over 60% of global coral reefs are threatened by local human activities, rising to 75% when heat stress is included. In the Coral Triangle, this figure exceeds 85%. The document highlights that while 28% of global reefs are in marine protected areas (MPAs), only 6% are effectively managed. It predicts that by 2050, nearly all reefs in the Coral Triangle will be threatened, with over 90% facing high to critical risks due to the combined effects of local pressures, ocean warming, and acidification.

The document identifies the systemic challenges of integrating climate change risks into policy, such as uncertainty, non-linear impacts, and temporal lags. It proposes a research framework for the World Resources 2010 report to identify the conditions and hurdles for creating decision-making processes that are responsive, proactive, flexible, durable, and robust. The methodology includes sectoral case studies, commissioned expert papers, and scenario exercises focusing on developing nations.

Coral bleaching occurs when corals expel symbiotic algae due to environmental stress, primarily warming oceans caused by climate change. This process threatens marine biodiversity, coastal safety, and human livelihoods, with approximately 84% of tropical coral reefs experiencing severe heat stress between 2023 and 2025. Mitigation requires both individual actions to reduce pollution and global efforts to reduce emissions and transition to renewable energy.

WWF analyzed 25 frameworks across the marine renewables, shipping, tourism, and coastal development sectors, finding that most address ocean health only tangentially or lack sectoral granularity. The report argues for a holistic approach to science-based targets based on three pillars: capabilities, collaboration, and communication, emphasizing the need to move beyond 'do no harm' toward restoration and regeneration.

The ESMF and PF provide a structured approach to managing the environmental and social impacts of expanding seaweed aquaculture in Vietnam's Ninh Thuan and Khanh Hoa provinces. The project, funded by the GEF and implemented by WWF, aims to create sustainable seaweed value chains while ensuring that site-specific risks—such as the entanglement of sea turtles, social tensions over resource access, and the marginalization of women—are mitigated through participatory planning and site-specific management plans.

The report assesses the economic value of the Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System (BBRRS), a UNESCO World Heritage Site, focusing on tourism benefits. It finds that four of the seven MPAs within the BBRRS generate up to US$18.8 million annually from tourism recreation. The document argues that these economic benefits far exceed management costs, providing a strong case for protecting the reef against threats such as offshore oil exploration, unsustainable coastal development, and climate change. It calls on the Belizean government to enact a moratorium on oil exploration and implement stricter land-use regulations to remove the BBRRS from the UNESCO List of World Heritage in Danger.

The Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) for the 'Improving Stewardship and Sustainable Livelihoods' project in Belize outlines a strategy to involve coastal communities, fisher associations, and government entities in climate adaptation. The project aims to benefit approximately 10,646 people, including 3,434 artisanal fishers, by strengthening the adaptive capacity of fisher associations, promoting climate-smart livelihoods, and improving knowledge management. The plan emphasizes gender-responsive approaches to ensure the participation of women and youth, and it establishes a multi-tiered grievance redress mechanism involving the project level, WWF US, and the GEF. Implementation is coordinated through a Project Management Unit (PMU) within a Conservation Trust Fund and aligns with the broader 'Resilient Bold Belize' Project Finance for Permanence initiative.