Search Climate Insights Directory

The paper examines interactions between six specific SDGs (1, 2, 3, 5, 9, and 14) using a seven-point scale to categorize relationships as reinforcing, enabling, or constraining. It finds that positive interactions generally outweigh negative ones, particularly for gender equality, which acts as a lever for multiple other goals. However, it highlights significant institutional barriers to integrated implementation, as most governments operate through sectoral ministries that lack joint agendas. The author argues for the creation of an international open knowledge platform to systematize SDG interaction analysis and suggests that 'mission-oriented innovation' and strategic foresight mechanisms can help overcome short-termism in infrastructure and industrial policy.

The Stockholm Environment Institute U.S. has called on Vanguard to move away from a passive approach to shareholder voting regarding climate risk. The letter argues that the transition to a low-carbon economy, consistent with a 2 degrees C warming limit, poses material risks to the business models of fossil fuel companies like Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips. It highlights that these companies are not systematically disclosing such risks, which could lead to stranded assets and market volatility. Consequently, the institute requests that Vanguard require its invested companies to provide annual disclosures on climate and transition risks.

The document proposes a conceptual framework to improve sustainability in source-to-sea systems, addressing the challenges of fragmented governance and climate-driven alterations to ecosystem flows. The framework provides a taxonomy of key flows, tools for analysis and planning, and a method for developing a theory of change, emphasizing the importance of governance baselines and stakeholder engagement.

The document argues that the EU is not "living within the limits of our planet," significantly exceeding its equal-per-capita fair share of the global safe operating space for climate change and biogeochemical flows. It proposes downscaling global boundaries to regional levels to create benchmarks for both production- and consumption-based performance, highlighting that EU consumption often exerts higher pressure than the global average. While the EU has various policy instruments addressing individual boundaries, the brief notes a lack of integration regarding interlinkages between processes and the EU's international environmental footprint.

The document argues that increasing hazards, such as sea level rise, and ongoing development necessitate a re-evaluation of coastal disaster risk reduction in Europe. It advocates for a combination of prevention, mitigation, and preparedness measures, supported by applied research to enhance forecasting and risk assessment. The RISC-KIT project developed and demonstrated tools across ten European case study sites to identify high-risk areas and evaluate the effectiveness of DRR measures.

The brief explores the application of the Planetary Boundaries framework to EU policy, using an equal-per-capita allocation approach to determine a 'fair share' of the global safe operating space. It finds that the EU significantly exceeds its per capita limits for climate change and biogeochemical flows, and that EU consumption exerts higher pressure on several boundaries than the global average. While existing EU policy instruments offer entry points for integrating these boundaries, they currently fail to address the EU's international environmental footprint or the interactions between different planetary processes.

The MENA region is identified as a climate hot spot facing extreme heat, drought, and aridity. The agricultural sector, which is 70% rain-fed and a primary employer, is highly exposed; in a 2 °C warming scenario, annual water discharge is projected to drop by 15–45%. These biophysical pressures, combined with a population projected to double by 2070, are expected to deteriorate rural livelihoods, increase migration to urban areas, heighten food import dependency, and potentially exacerbate social unrest in politically unstable areas.

The document introduces a multi-sector Harrodian-Kaleckian growth model intended for long-run policy analysis, specifically to address the structural changes needed for the 2030 Agenda's sustainable development goals. The model utilizes a Hicksian dynamic to link productivity growth with functional income distribution and target-return pricing, resulting in constant capital productivity and profit share as long-run tendencies. While currently lacking government, financial, and foreign sectors, the model is capable of generating asymmetric business cycles, structural change, and long waves.

The document explores the emerging field of subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predictions, which bridge the gap between short-range weather forecasts and long-range seasonal outlooks. It identifies a strong demand for these forecasts across sectors such as public health, disaster preparedness, water management, energy, and agriculture, while emphasizing the need to integrate social sciences to improve communication and decision-making.

The document outlines strategies for mainstreaming gender into technical modelling, identifying key barriers such as data gaps and lack of awareness, and offering practical frameworks for inclusive project design and data collection.

The paper examines how subnational governments, with a focus on Washington State, can effectively use carbon tax revenues for greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation. It argues against a narrow focus on the lowest-cost reductions, which often leads to pitfalls such as overpayment, lack of additionality, and long ramp-up periods. Instead, it recommends a strategic approach that targets market failures, promotes social equity, and leverages existing state programs to ensure rapid and effective deployment of funds.

The document details a workshop organized by the Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn Centre as part of the HERON project. It outlines proposed energy efficiency (EE) scenarios for Estonia's buildings and transport sectors, contrasting them with business-as-usual (BAU) paths. Expert panel discussions concluded that the proposed renovation rates for buildings are overly ambitious due to funding and skill shortages, while transport goals require better integration of modes and increased local government authority over cycling and public transport infrastructure.

This research paper proposes a novel approach to joint problem analysis between Sami reindeer herders and Swedish civil servants within permitting authorities for mining, wind energy, and forestry, specifically focusing on the governance of cumulative effects assessment (CEA).

The document highlights the impact of human-induced changes to the global nitrogen cycle, specifically the use of manufactured nitrogen-based fertilisers. It notes that reactive nitrogen levels have tripled in Europe and doubled globally over the last century, leading to ecosystem eutrophication, biodiversity loss, and the exacerbation of climate change.

The study analyzed the social networks of 3,000 Swedish private forest owners to determine how climate change information is shared and acted upon. Findings indicate that social networks currently play a minimal role in sharing climate adaptation knowledge, though a weak positive correlation exists between climate perceptions and network size and heterogeneity. The authors conclude that forestry experts and advisory services are the most critical channels for communicating climate risks and adaptation opportunities, while peers help relate this information to specific forest properties.

The document outlines cross-cutting barriers to energy efficiency in Estonia, categorized as social, cultural, economic, educational, and institutional. It concludes that without additional policy measures, Estonia will fail to meet its 2020 energy efficiency target. While 2020 GHG targets for the non-ETS sector are likely to be met, achieving 2030 targets will require significant interventions, including the renovation of 40% of single-family and 50% of multi-family houses, as well as improved fuel efficiency and spatial planning in the transport sector.

The study examines the legitimacy of climate change adaptation funds in the Asia-Pacific region, identifying that these funds rely on diverse sources of legitimacy such as ethics, transparency, and effectiveness. It finds that while funds are often justified by their benefit to vulnerable groups, they are primarily legitimized to state actors. The emergence of a multi-level financing architecture presents both new legitimacy challenges and opportunities to improve ground-level outcomes through better access for vulnerable communities.

The research finds that land resource managers in Scotland do not directly account for high-end climate change (HECC) scenarios—defined as global temperature increases over 4°C—because they perceive these outcomes as having a low probability of occurrence. Instead, decision-makers prioritise incremental solutions driven by non-climate factors, which are often as or more important than climate change. While general climate uncertainty is not seen as a barrier, there is a stated need for more information regarding specific sectoral and cross-sectoral impacts under HECC scenarios.

The document identifies a gap between the production of adaptation research and its implementation in policy and practice. It argues that the current 'supplier– customer model' of climate services is insufficient because it ignores the complexity of decision-making. To resolve this, the author calls for 'research on adaptation' to investigate why certain decisions are made and what factors lead to successful or unsuccessful outcomes, suggesting that the medical research field could serve as a model for effective knowledge translation.

The report uses service design and customer journey mapping to analyze the mango value chain in Kenya, specifically focusing on women farmers in Tana River and Meru Counties. It identifies that while there is interest in technologies like cold storage and pulping machines to bypass brokers, adoption is hindered by high costs, lack of market access, and a prevailing farming strategy that prioritizes quantity over quality. The study concludes that technology alone is insufficient and must be accompanied by holistic support in business modeling, financing, and market creation.