Search Climate Insights Directory

The authors use the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study to examine the role of governance in societal transformation, arguing against the belief that climate-resilient development can be engineered through purely rational policy decisions. They propose that navigating the 'turbulent nature of transformation' requires solidarity, socially equitable governance, and inclusive politics.

This research paper analyzes the link between income inequality and carbon emissions across 117 countries from 1990 to 2015, noting a 60% increase in annual global emissions during this period and exploring future scenarios for the equitable distribution of the remaining carbon budget.

The Climate Bonds Initiative proposes a framework for 'transition' labels to prevent greenwashing and ensure investments align with the Paris Agreement. The framework establishes five core principles for ambitious transitions: alignment with a 1.5 degree trajectory (net zero by 2050), science-based goals, the exclusion of offsets, the prioritization of technological viability over economic competitiveness, and a requirement for operating metrics over pledges. It categorizes economic activities into five types—Near Zero, Pathway to Zero, No Pathway to Zero, Interim, and Stranded—to determine whether a 'green' or 'transition' label is appropriate. The framework is designed to be flexible, applying to both whole entities (via equity or sustainability-linked bonds) and specific activities (via use-of-proceeds bonds).

The analysis finds that the full implementation of 17 major international cooperative initiatives (ICIs) could reduce global emissions in 2030 by 18 to 21 GtCO2e/year beyond current national policies. This would help align the global emissions trajectory with a 2°C-consistent pathway, although a gap remains for a 1.5°C-consistent pathway. The most significant contributions come from cities, regions, businesses, and forestry initiatives.

The Stockholm Environment Institute developed Aid Atlas to address the complexity of tracking global development finance. While the OECD's Creditor Reporting System provides the most comprehensive data, its design makes it difficult for the public and smaller recipient countries to use. Aid Atlas transforms this data into an intuitive, visual tool to help decision-makers in developing countries understand aid flows and focus on whether funding generates lasting positive impacts.

A joint statement from the Partners for Inclusive Green Economies outlining the need for a just, green, and transformative recovery following the COVID-19 crisis, which the authors state exposed systemic inequalities and fragilities.

The authors argue that pandemic recovery stimulus should not compromise efforts to address climate change and air quality, but should instead use an integrated approach to identify efficient, low-cost solutions that provide multiple near-term benefits for both the economy and the environment.

The paper argues that recovery investments from the COVID-19 crisis should be strategically aligned to build a more resilient, low-carbon economy. It outlines four guiding principles: prioritizing job creation and economic growth, supporting public health and air pollution reduction, enhancing economic and climate resilience, and prioritizing decarbonization to meet Paris Agreement temperature goals.

The document argues that economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic must avoid siloes by integrating development and climate resilience, ensuring that stimulus measures are stress-tested for climate risks, and empowering vulnerable populations through locally led planning. It highlights the need for reforming fossil fuel subsidies, utilizing resilience bonds, and providing debt relief to vulnerable countries to support a sustainable recovery aligned with the SDGs and the Paris Agreement.

The research identifies 61 consumption options with positive mitigation potential by synthesizing 53 studies. The highest potentials are found in transport (car-free living, electric vehicles, reduced flying), housing (renewable electricity, renovation), and food (vegan diets). The top 10 options combined offer an average mitigation potential of 9.2 tCO2eq/cap, which the authors suggest can significantly contribute to 1.5-2°C targets, especially in high-income contexts.

The statement asserts that COVID-19 has exposed the fragility of a global food system where 820 million people were chronically hungry prior to the pandemic. It calls on G20 ministers to protect the rights of peasant farmers and migrant workers, curb financial speculation in agricultural futures to prevent price crises, and transition toward a sustainable food system based on food sovereignty and local production rather than long supply chains and external inputs.

The document argues that the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the fragility of a global food system where 820 million people suffered chronic hunger before the crisis. It calls on G20 governments to protect the rights and health of food producers and migrant workers, restrict financial speculation in agricultural futures to prevent price crises, and rebuild the food system to stop environmental degradation and climate crisis drivers. The authors advocate for a global political response coordinated by the UN Committee on World Food Security, grounded in international human rights instruments and the principle of food sovereignty.

The statement urges G20 ministers to address the vulnerability of food producers and migrant workers during the COVID-19 crisis. It calls for measures to prevent financial speculation on food, the protection of fundamental rights for agricultural workers, and a systemic shift away from industrial food chains toward sustainable, local food sovereignty to mitigate future pandemics and climate crises.

The statement argues that the COVID-19 pandemic has created an urgent need for governments to focus all resources on public health, specifically the procurement of medical supplies, vaccines, and medicines. It calls for the immediate suspension of trade and investment negotiations at the WTO, bilateral, and regional levels, asserting that such activities divert critical resources and personnel. The authors highlight that intellectual property rules under the WTO's TRIPS agreement and free trade agreements may obstruct the affordability and accessibility of life-saving supplies. The document demands the removal of all trade barriers and unilateral sanctions that hinder medical procurement and urges a fundamental rethink of trade rules that encourage monopolies and limit healthcare access.

Friends of the Earth International and a broad coalition of global endorsers call for an immediate cessation of trade and investment treaty negotiations. They argue that governments, particularly in developing and least developed countries, lack the resources to engage in these negotiations while managing the COVID-19 health crisis. The statement demands that trade negotiators focus exclusively on removing obstacles, such as intellectual property rules and unilateral sanctions, that hinder access to affordable vaccines, medicines, and diagnostics.

The Alliance for Renewable Electrification (ARE) and its partners argue that the COVID-19 pandemic has endangered decentralised renewable energy (DRE) projects and the broader sector's future, threatening the achievement of SDG7 and other 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. To prevent the sector's failure, the document proposes five specific interventions: the creation of a 'Global DRE Relief Fund', the fast-tracking of procurement and funding procedures, the establishment of a 'Rural Electrification Stimulus Plan', the formal recognition of the DRE sector as an 'essential service', and increased technical assistance for DRE companies.

This research paper by the Climate Policy Initiative outlines the state of global climate adaptation finance, highlighting the gap between estimated needs and tracked investments, while discussing the importance and challenges of tracking adaptation finance.

Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) have established a framework for Paris alignment but face criticism for slow implementation timelines, vague mitigation criteria, and insufficient guidance on adaptation and resilience. The authors argue that MDBs must set firm dates for ending unaligned financing, publish clear positive and negative investment lists based on science, and adopt standardized reporting metrics to ensure transparency and effectiveness.

Sustainable investing is transitioning from a niche approach to a mainstream financial practice, with global assets under sustainable mandates projected to reach USD 160 trillion by 2036. While adoption is increasing in developed countries, the sector faces challenges regarding capacity at financial institutions and the integration of sustainability into passively managed portfolios. Key future drivers include the centrality of climate risk, the guidance provided by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and the development of innovative financial instruments.

Friends of the Earth International argues that the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must move beyond the failed Aichi targets by adopting a rights-based approach, ensuring accountability, and rejecting corporate-led 'false solutions' like offsetting.