Search Climate Insights Directory

The report examines the impact of improved cookstoves in Central America, noting that while many stoves reduce emissions, they often fail to meet WHO air quality guidelines for personal exposure. It identifies user-centered design, training, and financing as critical for adoption, while highlighting a lack of longitudinal data on sustained use.

The document examines the heightened vulnerability of Myanmar migrant workers in Thailand during the Covid-19 pandemic and previous disasters, such as the 2004 tsunami and 2011 floods. It identifies root causes of this vulnerability, including discriminatory labour laws, precarious living conditions, and limited social protection. While the pandemic saw some pragmatic, inclusive measures—such as universal health access and visa amnesties—the brief argues that these should be institutionalized. It recommends a human-rights-based, multi-hazard approach to DRR that involves migrants in hazard mapping, provides multilingual communication, and streamlines social security access to build broader societal resilience.

The document details a legal challenge by LBH Padang against the Indonesian Ministry of Environment and Forestry (KLHK) for failing to enforce sanctions against the PLTU Ombilin power plant. It highlights severe health issues among local children, high rates of acute respiratory infections (ISPA) in the Talawi district, and repeated pollution incidents involving fly ash and bottom ash (FABA). The briefing asserts that the plant's continued operation hinders Indonesia's emission reduction goals and violates the health rights of the local population.

This report by Trend Asia, CELIOS, and CREA identifies the 20 most toxic coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) in Indonesia, termed the "Toxic Twenty." It analyzes the severe public health, economic, and environmental costs associated with these facilities, arguing that current government retirement roadmaps are insufficient and often delayed by a reliance on unproven technologies like co-firing and CCS/CCUS. The report provides detailed case studies for several plants, documenting widespread respiratory illnesses, loss of traditional livelihoods in fisheries and agriculture, and significant negative impacts on regional GDP.

The report examines the Jawa 9 and 10 coal-fired power plant projects in Cilegon, Banten, highlighting severe risks to public health and the environment. It argues that the projects are economically flawed, citing a Korean Development Institute (KDI) study that predicted a negative Net Present Value (NPV) for KEPCO. The document details the prevalence of acute respiratory infections (ISPA) among children in Cilegon and the broader ecological damage caused by coal transport and mining. It specifically calls for South Korean financiers, such as K-Exim and KDB, to withdraw funding to align with the 'Green New Deal' and global climate goals, noting that Indonesia's emission standards are significantly lower than those in South Korea.

The report examines the Java 9 and 10 Coal Power Plant (CPP) projects in Cilegon, Banten, funded by South Korean institutions including K-Exim, KDB, and K-Sure. It argues the investment is 'forced' and 'unprofitable,' citing a KDI pre-feasibility study showing a negative NPV for KEPCO. The document highlights severe health impacts in Banten, where Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI) is prevalent, and notes that the projects exacerbate air pollution and increase vulnerability to pandemics like Covid-19. It further criticizes the use of Ultra Super Critical (USC) technology as insufficient for carbon reduction and points to the risk of natural disasters, such as tsunamis, given the plants' coastal locations. The report concludes that the investment violates South Korea's 'Green New Deal' and calls for the Indonesian government to cancel the projects in favor of renewable energy.

The report identifies the 'Toxic Twenty' coal-fired power plants in Indonesia, estimating that between 2026 and 2050, they will cause 156,000 premature deaths and USD 109 billion in health-related economic losses. It argues that these plants create a net economic drain, reducing regional GDP and destroying livelihoods in agriculture and fisheries, while criticizing the government's reliance on 'false solutions' like biomass co-firing to extend the life of fossil fuel infrastructure.

The position paper criticizes the Indonesian government's decision to deactivate the BPJS health insurance status of approximately 11–13.5 million PBI (Contribution Assistance Recipients) members starting February 1, 2026. The author contends that this policy, justified as data updating, is a systemic violation of constitutional health rights and a failure of governance. The document highlights a contradiction where the state expands high-risk industries (like coal and nickel) that increase health burdens while simultaneously cutting health safety nets. It further argues that the government prioritizes 'political image' and 'lighthouse programs'—such as energy transition and global peace contributions—over the basic health needs of the poor, as evidenced by budget allocations that far exceed the PBI health budget. The paper concludes with recommendations for a moratorium on deactivations, financing reform, and industrial accountability for health impacts.

The document asserts that the Trump administration has systematically undermined scientific integrity and rolled back environmental and public health protections, exacerbating existing inequities for marginalized communities. It highlights a decrease in EPA criminal enforcement, the suppression of health data, and the erosion of social safety nets as key drivers of increased risk for low-income and minority populations.

The document details the environmental and economic damages in California resulting from climate change, focusing on sea level rise, drought, public health risks, wildfires, and ecosystem decline.

The document examines how climate change, specifically increasing temperatures, creates a 'climate penalty' that elevates ground-level ozone levels despite efforts to reduce precursor emissions. Using the BenMAP model, it estimates the health incidences and economic costs associated with ozone increases of 1 ppb, 2 ppb, and 7 ppb for the years 2020 and 2050 across various U.S. states.

The document argues that the costs of failing to reduce carbon emissions in the United States are prohibitive, citing projected damages to coastal infrastructure, public health, water resources, agriculture, transportation, and energy systems. It highlights that under high-emissions scenarios, the annual economic impact could reach 1.9 percent of GDP by 2100. Specific regional risks include severe sea-level rise in Florida and the Northeast, extreme heat waves in Midwestern cities, water scarcity in the Southwest, and increased wildfire frequency in the West Coast and Rocky Mountain regions. The document advocates for a reduction of carbon emissions by at least 80 percent from 2005 levels by 2050 to avoid the worst consequences.

The report finds that diesel pollution caused an estimated 3,000 premature deaths and $21.5 billion in health costs in California in 2004. While new engine standards help, the majority of pollution comes from existing engines, and the state's Diesel Risk Reduction Plan is at risk of failing due to funding gaps and regulatory delays. The Union of Concerned Scientists argues that investing in incentive programs like the Moyer Program provides high returns, reducing public health costs by $9 to $16 for every dollar invested.

The document argues that corporate interests corrupt federal science through research suppression, scientist intimidation, and the manipulation of regulatory processes. It details how these entities shape public perception by promoting false uncertainty and utilizing 'revolving door' officials to capture regulatory agencies. While acknowledging initial steps taken by the Obama administration to improve transparency and ethics, the report calls for comprehensive federal reforms, including stronger whistleblower protections, stricter conflict-of-interest rules for advisory panels, and increased transparency regarding corporate lobbying and funding.

The San Joaquin Valley faces severe air quality issues, with Bakersfield and Merced identified as the most ozone-polluted cities in the US in 2003. The region failed to meet federal health standards for fine particulate matter by 2004, with agriculture and heavy transport identified as primary emission sources.

The document introduces a data set providing 14 city-relevant climate hazard indicators for 996 large cities, based on NEX-GDDP-CMIP6 downscaled climate simulations. It compares a 1994-2014 historical baseline against three warming scenarios (1.5°C, 2.0°C, and 3.0°C) to assist city decision-makers in strategic planning and risk management. Key findings indicate that at 3.0°C of warming, cities will experience heatwaves that are 28% longer and 25% more frequent on average than at 1.5°C, alongside increased energy demand for cooling and higher transmission risks for arboviruses.

The document assesses the economic benefits of transitioning to a low-carbon economy in the United States, highlighting that clean energy investments create more jobs than fossil fuel spending and that renewable energy is increasingly cost-competitive. It warns that delaying climate action could result in annual GDP losses of 1-10% by 2100, while emphasizing the potential for revitalizing rural communities and boosting the domestic manufacturing sector through cleantech.

Climate change increases human health risks in the U.S. through more intense heat waves, prolonged wildfire seasons, and severe flooding that compromises water quality. Specific examples include the increased likelihood of drought conditions similar to those seen in Texas in 2011 and the lengthening of allergy seasons.

The World Resources Institute (WRI) challenges the Edison Electric Institute's (EEI) claim that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is imposing an unworkable 'onslaught' of new requirements on power plants. WRI asserts that the EEI timeline is misleading because it conflates procedural events, existing obligations, and state-level standards with new compliance requirements. WRI argues that the EPA is pursuing a realistic timeline to bring the industry into compliance with the Clean Air Act and other statutes, providing a necessary pathway for investments in a cleaner electric generation fleet.

The report analyzes dockless bike-sharing in 12 Chinese cities, concluding that these systems serve as effective last-mile mobility solutions that increase public transit connectivity, lower carbon emissions by replacing motorized trips, and improve public health outcomes.