Search Climate Insights Directory

The IAI ad hoc Committee for Relations with Member States met in February 2004 to develop strategies for improving engagement with member countries. Key actions included creating 'Partnership' documents for member states, identifying 3-5 key contacts per country across science implementation, policy, and funding, and sending formal letters to recover overdue budget contributions. The committee prioritised countries that were previously active but are now delinquent or inactive, specifically noting Bolivia for special contact. It also recommended that the next phase of the Cooperative Research Networks (CRN) program be a primary incentive for participation, emphasizing open calls for proposals and a focus on policy relevance.

The IAI Executive Council approved reports on increasing country engagement and the analysis of ad hoc committees, while deferring decisions on the composition of the Financial and Administrative Working Group and the Standing Committee on Rules and Procedures. The council also confirmed the United States as the host for the 17th Executive Council and 10th COP meetings in June 2003, and accepted Costa Rica's offer to host the 18th meeting in late 2003.

This guide by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) examines the challenges of coordinating virtual teams across international knowledge networks, such as the Climate Change Knowledge Network (CCKN). It argues that cultural and organizational boundaries—including national differences, varying institutional norms, and functional clashes—pose greater obstacles to success than technology. The author advocates for a 'fast prototyping' approach to project development and provides practical advice on selecting communication tools based on 'social presence' and 'information richness' to maintain network health and project momentum.

The agreement between the Federative Republic of Brazil and the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) defines the operational status of the IAI headquarters in Brazil. It grants the IAI juridical personality and establishes extensive immunities for its premises, funds, and archives, protecting them from search, requisition, or execution. The Brazilian government provides specific physical facilities at the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), including office space, equipment, and administrative staff. The agreement also outlines diplomatic privileges and immunities for the IAI Director and staff, including tax exemptions and freedom of movement, while requiring the IAI to respect Brazilian laws and cooperate with local authorities.

The document is a directory of delegations, observers, and secretariat staff attending the First Meeting of the Conference of the Parties in September 1994. It lists representatives from various national governments, scientific institutions, and international organizations, including the National Science Foundation and the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research.

The Minutes of Montevideo document the May 1992 agreement by several American states to create the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI). The IAI is designed as a regional network of research entities to investigate the extent, causes, and consequences of global changes in the Americas and to bridge the gap between science and policy. The agreement establishes an Implementation Committee to prepare the Institute for operation and notes the intention to inform the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) of the Institute's creation.

The Declaration of Montevideo, signed between May 12 and 14, 1992, establishes the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) as a regional network of research centers. The IAI aims to coordinate scientific and economic research on the causes and consequences of global change in the Americas to bridge the gap between science and policy. The declaration outlines the creation of an Organizing Committee to make the Institute operational and notes the commitment of several American states to support the initiative.

Climate Strategies argues that the upcoming Just Transition mechanism must overcome the current fragmentation of the UNFCCC architecture by integrating finance, technology, and stakeholder engagement. The submission recommends grounding the mechanism in real-world implementation evidence from the Global South, adopting multi-level and multi-sector governance, and ensuring that participation for marginalized groups translates into meaningful policy influence rather than mere procedural consultation.

The Glasgow Work Programme on Action for Climate Empowerment (ACE) aims to empower society through education, public awareness, training, public participation, public access to information, and international cooperation. While COP30 saw the adoption of a draft decision reaffirming ACE priorities and the planning of a 2026 Dialogue and technical workshops, significant barriers remain. Countries like Sudan and Panama report that "insufficient technical and financial resources" and a "lack of an evaluation index" hinder national implementation. Future efforts are directed toward a 2026 midterm review of the work programme at SB64 to identify gaps and shape a new action plan.

The Ad Hoc Commission for the Implementation of the IAI Tripartite Governance reports that the Montevideo office is operational and the Buenos Aires Science-Policy Liaison Office hired a director in May 2015. Efforts continue to finalize a Host Country Agreement with Brazil for the Scientific Development Office, while three staff members remain in Brazil to handle financial closures and capacity development support.

This briefing, drafted by Brazil for the 26th meeting of the Conference of the Parties of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) in June 2018, proposes that the Brazilian Global Climate Change Research Network (Rede Clima) be invited to become an Associate of the IAI.

The Science Diplomacy Center is an IAI initiative aimed at fostering regional collaboration in the Americas to achieve a peaceful, prosperous, and sustainable continent. It focuses on enhancing the role of science and technology in meeting Sustainable Development Goals through two main pillars: the development of a knowledge center for sharing regional information and the improvement of science diplomacy capacities among scientists and decision-makers.

The report confirms the renewal of the IAI Implementation Committee's term and provides updates on the operational status of the Montevideo office and the Science-Policy liaison office in Buenos Aires, as well as ongoing discussions regarding the Science Development Directorate in Brazil.

The report details the extension of the Ad Hoc Commission for the Implementation of the IAI Tripartite Governance and provides updates on the operational status of the IAI offices in Montevideo and Buenos Aires, as well as ongoing discussions regarding scientific development leadership in Brazil.

The report outlines the implementation of the RLA/92/G34 project, focusing on the deployment of GIS-SPRING 2.0 and METVIEW systems, hardware upgrades for IBM RISC 6000/250 workstations across several Latin American and Caribbean countries, and the establishment of experimental internet nodes in Costa Rica and Uruguay. It also highlights the inclusion of Jamaica in the project and proposes a potential Phase II to support the creation of regional research consortia for biodiversity and climate change.

The Trade Knowledge Network (TKN), launched in 1997 and coordinated by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), works to build long-term capacity to incorporate sustainable development into national, bilateral, regional, and multilateral trade policies. Its primary objectives include producing country- and region-specific research, engaging trade policy-makers, building the capacity of partner organizations through training and cooperative research, and facilitating the global exchange of best practices. The network comprises partners across various developing and developed nations, including organizations in Argentina, Chile, China, India, Bangladesh, Costa Rica, Canada, Vietnam, Mexico, El Salvador, the USA, Pakistan, and South Africa, with funding support from entities such as the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC).

The author advocates for treating gun violence as a public health issue rather than a purely legal or security matter, particularly in Africa. The text explains that firearms act as 'violence multipliers' that increase the lethality of both premeditated and impulsive violence. It identifies critical gaps in mortality and possession data across sub-Saharan Africa and outlines how WHO recommendations and international agreements—such as the UN Programme of Action and regional protocols in West, East, and Southern Africa—can be leveraged by public health professionals to secure funding and government cooperation.

The authors contend that the COVID-19 crisis has revealed a "crisis of confidence" in global institutions, specifically the World Health Organization (WHO), which has been hampered by member state limitations and political polarization. The text highlights the United States' decision to withdraw financial support from the WHO as a sign of retreating from a rules-based global system. To address these gaps, the paper recommends a total overhaul of global governance principles, increased fixed financial contributions to the WHO, the removal of trade barriers for medical equipment, and a redefinition of international peace and security to include global health threats within the UN Security Council's remit. It emphasizes that effective responses require farsighted leadership from the UN, G7, G20, and development finance institutions to ensure scientific collaboration and the provision of affordable medical supplies.

TESS supports the revised draft Ministerial Statement for the WTO Dialogue on Plastics Pollution and Environmentally Sustainable Plastics Trade (DPP), noting its evolution from identifying issues to agreeing on voluntary international cooperation. The statement emphasizes the need for trade-related capacity building for developing members, including LDCs, SVEs, and SIDS, and suggests that the DPP's work should complement the negotiations for a legally binding international instrument on plastic pollution. TESS also promotes its own policy research on standards, single-use plastics, and waste management technologies to inform the dialogue.

The testimony argues that carbon capture and storage (CCS) is essential for mitigating climate change given that coal is responsible for over 40 percent of global CO2 emissions. The author calls for a global network of 15 to 20 demonstrations to move the technology from the 'valley of death' into commercialization, noting that technical understanding is already adequate for large-scale projects. A significant focus is placed on China, where coal-related emissions may reach 51 percent of the world's total by 2030, necessitating joint public-private partnerships and research exchanges. The document highlights existing initiatives like the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum and the Global CCS Institute, while recommending that the U.S. formalize partnerships with the UK, EU, China, and Australia to avoid duplication and share regulatory knowledge.