Search Climate Insights Directory

The document details the work of the RESISTE network in Chiapas, Mexico, which promotes agroecology, seed saving, and soil conservation to counter a national policy favoring export-oriented agribusiness and land privatization. Through horizontal community capacity building, the initiative supports eight family groups in transitioning away from chemical inputs toward sustainable food systems and the defense of territorial rights.

The document assesses the level of federal investment in sustainable agriculture, specifically agroecology, using a five-level classification system. It finds that the vast majority of USDA funding supports incremental efficiency gains rather than transformative agroecological practices. The authors call for increased funding and a shift toward systems-based research that integrates ecological and socioeconomic sustainability.

The Nyéléni Declaration defines agroecology not as a set of technologies, but as a way of life and a political tool for resistance against industrial food systems. It argues that industrial agriculture drives climate and environmental crises, and warns against 'climate-smart agriculture' as a corporate attempt to co-opt agroecology. The document outlines pillars including territorial rights, collective access to commons, and the central role of women and youth, while proposing strategies for territorial policies, knowledge exchange, and local economies to achieve social and ecological transformation.

The document outlines a systems-based approach to measuring food system resilience, moving beyond narrow food availability metrics to include supporting infrastructure and governance. Using the CRiSTAL Food Security tool across 20 communities in Honduras and Nicaragua, the authors identify key resilience drivers such as storage, energy, transport, and water management. It argues that participatory, iterative processes for developing indicators are essential for community buy-in and that these broad indicators should complement existing food security monitoring schemes.

The report examines Urban and Peri-urban Agriculture and Forestry (UPAF), defined as the production of trees, food, and other agricultural products within urban and peri-urban areas. It notes that while UPAF is expected to contribute to climate change adaptation and mitigation, there has been little analysis to determine which specific UPAF models are most effective for different city configurations.

The CRiSTAL Food Security 2.0 User’s Manual describes a Microsoft Excel-based tool used to systematically assess risks to food security posed by climate variability and change. The tool employs a food systems and resilience approach, analyzing five dimensions: food utilization and consumption, food access, food availability, supporting resources and services, and supporting organizations and policies. It guides users through a six-module process—Introduction, Context, Food System, Resilience, Indicators, and Reports—combining participatory community consultations with secondary research to identify vulnerabilities and develop SMART resilience indicators.

The CRiSTAL Food Security 2.0 tool is a decision-support system implemented via Microsoft Excel to analyze the resilience of community food systems against climate threats. It employs a holistic 'food system wheel' framework consisting of five dimensions: food utilization and consumption, access, availability, supporting resources and services, and supporting organizations and policies. The tool guides users through a six-module process: introduction, context analysis (community and climate), food system analysis, resilience analysis, selection of SMART indicators, and automatic report generation. It emphasizes the use of participatory rural appraisal methods, such as livelihood strategies, threat and resource mapping, and vulnerability matrices, to gather primary data from local communities, which is then triangulated with secondary scientific data. The tool aims to identify specific climate vulnerabilities and develop measurable indicators to monitor food system resilience over time.

The FIPAT guidebook outlines a structured analytical process for national and sub-national governments to strengthen food system resilience against climate variability. The tool is divided into two main sections: Section A focuses on mapping the food system, identifying climate risks, and developing resilience indicators; Section B evaluates the capacity of specific public policies to support resilience actions, enhance actor capacity, and maintain system stability. The process emphasizes stakeholder engagement and iterative learning to identify policy gaps and develop tailored recommendations for food security.

The FIPAT manual describes a structured process for enhancing food system resilience against climate variability. It guides users through two main sections: Section A, which focuses on mapping food systems, identifying climate risks, and developing resilience indicators; and Section B, which assesses how specific public policies support resilience measures, actor capacity, and overall system stability. The tool emphasizes a participatory approach involving government officials and stakeholders to ensure that policy gaps are identified and addressed through a resilience-based lens.

The paper introduces a framework to analyze food system resilience to climate change, moving from the household as the locus of food security up to community and national scales. It proposes two 'spinwheel' tools: one for food security analysis and one for resilience analysis, integrating system, agent, and institutional criteria. The framework is applied through the CREFSCA project in Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua, utilizing the CRiSTAL tool for community-level assessments.

The report introduces a framework for assessing climate resilience in food systems, moving from the household level up to national policy. It presents two analytical tools: 'Roulette 1' for food security analysis and 'Roulette 2' for resilience analysis. The framework emphasizes that resilience is an emergent property of system interactions and suggests specific indicators for food utilization, access, availability, and supporting infrastructure. The tools are designed to be applied through participatory processes, such as the CRiSTAL-SAN tool, to help policymakers and local practitioners identify vulnerabilities and develop long-term adaptation strategies in Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua.

The author criticizes the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) as an unequal and unsustainable system that prioritizes industrial production over environmental health and small-scale farming. The text advocates for a shift toward 'sustainable food systems'—defined as those guaranteeing food sovereignty and internalizing environmental costs—and highlights the role of the Greens in Belgium in promoting short supply chains, urban agriculture, and the relocalisation of food production to protect rural social fabrics.

The document advocates for a 'cultural and social revolution' in food systems to replace the industrial agro-industry, which it links to environmental degradation and public health crises. It critiques the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) for favoring large-scale production over small farmers and biodiversity. Through various regional case studies—including France's 'malbouffe' crisis, land-grabbing in Hungary, and organic farming in Spain—it promotes short supply chains, agro-ecology, and the reconnection of consumers with producers. It also highlights specific Green political initiatives in Belgium and Germany aimed at promoting organic and GMO-free agriculture.

The report finds that Oregon's consumption-based emissions footprint in 2005 was 78 million metric tons of CO2e, which is 47 percent greater than the emissions released within state boundaries. The largest contributors to these emissions are personal vehicles, appliances, and food and beverages, which together account for half of the total impact. The analysis highlights that a significant portion of Oregon's emissions (54%) are released outside the state due to international and national supply chains. The authors recommend that Oregon adopt regular consumption-based inventories and set specific emissions-reduction targets for consumption to maximize global climate benefits.

The IAI Directorate reports a strategic transition focusing on 'regional relevance' by bridging the gap between scientific research and policy application. Key achievements include the implementation of training institutes in Mexico and Costa Rica, the development of a new Data and Information System (DIS) with Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the preparation for the second round of Collaborative Research Networks (CRN-II). The report also addresses internal management challenges, including staff salary disputes and the recovery of project funds from CATHALAC.

The IAI report details its efforts to bridge the gap between scientific research and regional policy implementation in the Americas. Key activities include the conclusion of the first Cooperative Research Networks (CRN-I) cycle, the launch of CRN-II with 39 proposals received, and the execution of training institutes in Mexico and Costa Rica. The institute also focused on administrative restructuring, including new project management manuals and the development of a new Data and Information System (DIS) with Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

The IAI's 2004/2005 annual program focuses on institutional sustainability, the implementation of scientific research networks (CRN-I and CRN-II), capacity building through specialized institutes, and the improvement of its data and information systems via the Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

The African Food Systems Transformation Collective is a multi-disciplinary initiative convened by the African Climate Foundation (ACF) and the UNESCO Chair on African Food Systems to address food insecurity and climate vulnerability in Africa. The collective aims to move beyond farm-level reforms toward systemic transformation by coordinating a three-tiered structure of conveners, research bodies (such as CCRED, PLAAS, and the Sam Moyo Institute), and a steering committee of advocacy networks (including AFSA, PELUM, and IPES-Food). Its primary goals are to build a local evidence base, support advocacy, and align philanthropic strategies to fill investment gaps where public and private funding fall short. The initiative focuses on interventions across the entire food value chain, including regenerative agriculture, transport infrastructure, and competition regulation, to support a population where more than a third of the 927 million people facing global food insecurity reside in Africa.

The document examines the trend of 'supermarketisation' in Africa, where large grocery chains act as gatekeepers in food value chains. It highlights how the buyer power of these chains can marginalise small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) through stringent standards and unfair trading terms, which in turn can hinder climate change mitigation investments. The authors propose a 'Sustainability Compact' consisting of behavioural undertakings for fair treatment of suppliers and active investment in supplier development programmes to create more inclusive and sustainable food systems.

The document details how climate-related events disrupt health care delivery in Canada by damaging infrastructure and reducing access to supplies and services. It advocates for the use of resiliency checklists, vulnerability assessments, and stress testing to prepare facilities. To mitigate their own environmental impact, the text suggests reducing high-intensity energy use, phasing out potent inhalation anesthetic gases, and adopting sustainable procurement, as 90% of the health sector's GHGs originate upstream. Specific recommendations include transitioning to plant-based diets, expanding telemedicine to reduce travel emissions, and establishing a sustainability support office based on the English National Health Services model.