Search Climate Insights Directory

The IISD Model International Agreement on Investment for Sustainable Development proposes a new legal framework for foreign investment. It moves away from traditional bilateral investment treaties by introducing binding investor obligations, including mandatory environmental and social impact assessments, anti-corruption requirements, and adherence to human rights and labour standards. The model establishes a structured institutional framework featuring a Conference of the Parties, a permanent Dispute Settlement Body with an appellate division to ensure legal consistency, and a Legal Assistance Centre for developing countries. It explicitly protects the 'inherent rights of states' to regulate for public welfare and sustainable development, while providing a mechanism to abrogate investor rights in cases of corruption or persistent non-compliance.

The report outlines South Africa's strategy to address climate change, emphasizing the need to balance environmental response with national priorities like poverty alleviation and job creation. It identifies high-vulnerability sectors—including health, water resources, and agriculture—and proposes adaptation measures such as improved water management and the development of drought-resistant crops. For mitigation, the strategy focuses on diversifying the energy economy away from coal, promoting renewable energy, and utilizing the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). The document advocates for a coordinated inter-departmental approach, enhanced public awareness, and the integration of greenhouse gas monitoring into national air quality legislation.

The document argues that conventional 'drop-and-store' and 'flush-and-discharge' sanitation systems are unsustainable due to water scarcity, pollution, and nutrient loss. It proposes ecological sanitation (eco-san) as a closed-loop system that treats human urine and faeces as resources. The guide details technical methods for sanitizing excreta—primarily through dehydration and decomposition—and provides diverse examples of eco-toilets from Vietnam, China, Zimbabwe, and Sweden. It emphasizes the agricultural value of recycled nutrients, the management of greywater, and the necessity of community participation and behavioral change for successful implementation. The document concludes with a vision for 'eco-cities' and 'eco-stations' to manage urban waste sustainably.

The Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) has updated its Scientific Agenda to better reflect regional interests and the evolution of global change research. The agenda is organized into four broad themes: understanding climate variability in the Americas, conducting comparative studies of ecosystems and biodiversity, analyzing changes in the composition of the atmosphere and waters, and investigating the human dimensions and policy implications of global change. The IAI aims to promote cooperative research and information exchange to understand the integrated impact of past, present, and future global change on regional and continental environments in the Americas.

The IAI Science Agenda establishes a framework for collaborative research in the Americas, focusing on climate variability, ecosystem comparative studies, chemical composition of the environment, and the human dimensions of global change. It aims to advance understanding of the integrated impact of global change on regional and continental environments to inform public policy and sustainability.

The report argues that international investment agreements do not automatically generate economic benefits and proposes a new approach for the Cotonou Partnership. It advocates for an agreement based on the balance between investor rights and public goods, the distinction between pre- and post-establishment rights, and the creation of a Cotonou Investment Fund. The author emphasizes the need for a transparent, legitimate international dispute settlement mechanism to replace existing systems like ICSID and UNCITRAL, and suggests replacing heterogeneous bilateral investment treaties with a single unified agreement.

The document outlines the conditions under which the IAI may suspend or terminate research grants, such as material failure to comply with terms, mutual agreement, or scientific misconduct. It defines 'suspension' as a temporary withholding of support and 'termination' as the cancellation of a grant. The policy includes a structured process for notification, corrective action, and a formal informal resolution process for disputes handled by the Executive Council Chair. Additionally, it details the definitions and investigative procedures for 'misconduct in science,' emphasizing the primary responsibility of grantees to detect and report such issues.

The document outlines the conditions under which the IAI may suspend or terminate a grant, including material failure to comply with terms, mutual agreement, or scientific misconduct. It details the notification process, the right of beneficiaries to request informal dispute resolution through the Executive Council, and the specific protocols for investigating and penalizing scientific malpractice.

The IAI policy defines conflicts of interest as divided loyalties arising from personal interests, outside affiliations, or favors. It mandates that all personnel, including Directorate staff, the Executive Council (EC), and the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC), disclose potential conflicts. The policy outlines specific disqualifying criteria for proposal reviewers—such as current employment at an applicant institution or collaboration with investigators within the last 36 months—and prohibits Directorate staff from being applicants. It also imposes a one-year disqualification period for staff participating in programs after their service ends.

The report outlines eight key action items to protect marine and coastal biodiversity under the Convention on Biological Diversity, focusing on integrated management, protected areas, sustainable fisheries, and the mitigation of global threats like climate change and pollution.

The 'General Policy Regarding Terrestrial and Marine Protected Areas', published on 9 May 1994 under the Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989, establishes a six-category classification system for protected areas in South Africa. This system shifts away from treating all protected areas as 'sacrosanct wildlife sanctuaries' to incorporate the needs of local communities and align with international trends in nature conservation management.

The General Policy in terms of the Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989 is a South African government statement establishing a framework for environmental management. It defines the principles of sustainable development, assigns accountability to government institutions, and outlines specific policy goals across sectors including land use, pollution control, nature conservation, and energy.

The document outlines a five-category framework for applying Climate Pollution Reduction Grant (CPRG) funds to the industrial sector: critical analysis, regulatory programs, financial incentives, economic and community benefits, and leveraging additional funding. It provides specific examples of actions for each category, such as performing emissions pathway analyses, setting GHG emissions intensity standards, offering tax credits for carbon capture and storage (CCS), and designing community benefits programs.

The document outlines a five-category framework for jurisdictions applying for Climate Pollution Reduction Grants (CPRG) to reduce emissions from medium- and heavy-duty vehicles (MHDVs). It suggests a combination of critical analysis, regulatory programs, financial incentives, community benefits, and the leveraging of other federal funding sources. Specific recommendations include adopting the Advanced Clean Trucks and Advanced Clean Fleets rules, developing Low Carbon Fuel Standards, and establishing workforce training programs with community colleges.

The document describes the Marginal Abatement Cost Curve (MACC) as a graphical tool that ranks greenhouse gas mitigation options by cost and abatement potential to support policy prioritization. It details a four-step construction process involving the calculation of abatement potential and marginal abatement cost (based on Net Present Value), and provides guidance on interpreting negative and positive costs to determine appropriate financing mechanisms. The text also warns that MACCs are static representations that ignore interactions between options, exclude societal co-benefits, and mask the distinction between upfront CAPEX and ongoing OPEX.

The document introduces Minimum Standards for local climate-smart Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) to move beyond 'business as usual' by incorporating changing climate risks into local planning. These standards are designed as practical, achievable goals for communities with limited support, serving as a bridge to national adaptation strategies. The framework is organized into four themes: information flow and capacity development, project planning and implementation, monitoring, evaluation and learning, and awareness raising and policy dialogue. It includes specific roles for civil society organizations (CSOs) and government authorities to create an enabling environment for these standards. Developed through the Partners for Resilience (PfR) programme and consultations in Indonesia, the standards aim to ensure that local DRR contributes meaningfully to climate change adaptation.

This draft strategic document and Terms of Reference (ToR) outlines the establishment and operational framework of the Source Emissions Subcommittee (SC1), a body created by STANSA under the direction of the national department to recommend draft emission standards in accordance with the National Framework for Air Quality Management in the Republic of South Africa (NF).

The 2007 National Framework for Air Quality Management is a regulatory blueprint established by the South African Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism under Section 7(1) of the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act, 2004 (AQA). It provides a medium- to long-term plan to implement the AQA, focusing on pollution prevention at source and impact management to ensure ambient air is not harmful to health or well-being.

The 2012 National Framework for Air Quality Management in the Republic of South Africa is a strategic plan designed to implement the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act, 2004 (AQA). It establishes a comprehensive governance cycle for air quality management, delineating roles across national, provincial, and municipal governments, and sets norms for ambient air quality standards, emission controls, and information management via the South African Air Quality Information System (SAAQIS).

The document contains excerpts from the 2007 and 2012 National Frameworks for Air Quality Management in South Africa. It outlines the identification of pollutants of concern, the process for rating municipalities based on air quality status, and the establishment of national priority areas to address air pollution.