Search Climate Insights Directory

The report details the proceedings of the Regional Forum on Trade and Environment (July 1999), arguing that Central American countries must move beyond passive trade openness to a proactive regional strategy. It identifies the region's high biodiversity and renewable energy potential as competitive advantages that can be leveraged through organic agriculture, certified forestry, and environmental services. The document emphasizes the need for a unified position within the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) to prevent unilateral environmental restrictions and to promote sustainable development. Key recommendations include shifting from traditional agriculture to agroforestry, adopting organic production, and creating a regional certification system.

The document is a participant list for the Sixth Meeting of the IAI Conference of the Parties (CoP) in Ottawa, Canada. It details representatives from member countries, including Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and the USA, as well as observers from Bolivia, Guyana, Honduras, Nicaragua, and various international organizations such as the WMO, OAS, and CARICOM. It also lists IAI staff and Canadian support personnel.

The IAI Executive Committee met in Uruguay to approve 14 research proposals under the Cooperative Research Networks (CRN) program and establish a working group for the Program to Expand Scientific Capabilities in the Americas (PESCA), with the US committing $300,000 annually for five years. The meeting addressed financial challenges, including $83,000 in unpaid member contributions, and the need for better dissemination of scientific results from the ISP I and II projects. The committee also approved terms of reference for funding working groups and discussed future education and training strategies for the hemisphere.

The Fifth Meeting of the IAI Conference of the Parties (CoP) focused on updating the institute's scientific agenda, approving administrative budgets, and expanding financial resources. Key outcomes included the re-election of Director Armando Rabuffetti, the establishment of the Program to Expand Scientific Capacity in the Americas (PESCA), and the approval of a revised scientific agenda covering climate variability, ecosystem studies, atmospheric composition, and integrated assessments. The meeting also saw the election of a new Executive Committee and the signing of funding agreements with Argentina and Brazil.

The fourth meeting of the IAI Conference of the Parties (CoP) resulted in several administrative and strategic approvals, including the adoption of a modified Scientific Agenda, the Phase II Program, and the 1997/98 Basic Budget. The CoP established an indirect cost policy allowing up to 10% overhead and elected four new members to the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC). Additionally, the meeting coordinated future sessions, with the United States agreeing to host the fifth CoP and seventh Executive Council meeting in early 1998.

The IAI's core budget proposal for the 1996/7 fiscal year outlines a total expenditure plan covering personnel, travel, and other operational costs. While a deficit of US$ 125,000 is forecast for Year 2, the IAI intends to cover this using US$ 260,000 in unspent contributions from previous years. The proposal includes requests for a new Budget and Fiscal Policy Working Group and the establishment of a cost-of-living adjustment mechanism for international staff based in Brazil.

The document is a directory of delegations, observers, and secretariat staff attending the First Meeting of the Conference of the Parties in September 1994. It lists representatives from various national governments, scientific institutions, and international organizations, including the National Science Foundation and the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research.

The Act of Montevideo establishes the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) as a regional network of research units. The IAI is designed to coordinate scientific and economic research on the extent, causes, and consequences of global change in the Americas, serving as an interface between science and policy. The agreement emphasizes that scientific interest should drive the implementation of research programs and the development of specialized facilities. To facilitate the transition to operational status, a Implementation Committee composed of representatives from signatory states was created to prepare basic materials until the first meeting of the Conference of the Parties. Signatory nations include Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, the United States, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela.

The Minutes of Montevideo document the May 1992 agreement by several American states to create the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI). The IAI is designed as a regional network of research entities to investigate the extent, causes, and consequences of global changes in the Americas and to bridge the gap between science and policy. The agreement establishes an Implementation Committee to prepare the Institute for operation and notes the intention to inform the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) of the Institute's creation.

The 1992 agreement establishes the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) to coordinate scientific research on global change in the Americas. The IAI is structured as a regional network with four primary organs: the Conference of the Parties (policy-making), the Executive Council (executive), the Scientific Advisory Committee (scientific advice), and the Directorate (administration). Its objectives include promoting interdisciplinary research on earth, ocean, and atmospheric sciences, improving research infrastructure, and providing scientific information to governments for public policy. The initial Scientific Agenda focuses on tropical ecosystems, climate change impacts on biodiversity, El Niño Southern Oscillation, and high latitude processes. Funding is based on voluntary contributions from Parties and Associates, with operational expenses supported by pledges in increments of US$ 5,000.

The 1992 agreement creates the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) to address insufficient scientific knowledge of the Earth system and the impacts of global change. The IAI is structured as a regional network of cooperating entities with a specific scientific agenda focusing on tropical ecosystems, biodiversity, and climate variability. It is governed by a Conference of the Parties, an Executive Council, a Scientific Advisory Committee, and an Executive Directorate. The agreement outlines the criteria for establishing Research Centers, the role of affiliated institutions and associates, and a funding model based on voluntary contributions from member states and external partners.

The Declaration of Montevideo, signed May 12-14, 1992, establishes the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) as a regional network of research entities. The Institute aims to coordinate scientific and economic research on the causes and consequences of global change in the Americas to inform the policy process. To ensure operational readiness, the signatories agreed to create an Implementation Committee and to notify the United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED-92) of the Institute's creation.

The Declaration of Montevideo, signed between May 12 and 14, 1992, establishes the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) as a regional network of research centers. The IAI aims to coordinate scientific and economic research on the causes and consequences of global change in the Americas to bridge the gap between science and policy. The declaration outlines the creation of an Organizing Committee to make the Institute operational and notes the commitment of several American states to support the initiative.

The agreement creates the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) to foster regional cooperation in interdisciplinary research on global changes. It defines the Institute's objectives, including the study of tropical ecosystems and climate variability, and outlines a governance structure consisting of a Conference of Parties, an Executive Council, a Scientific Advisory Committee, and a Directorate. The document also specifies the criteria for establishing Research Centers and the financial framework based on voluntary contributions.

The report finds that while the overall volume of posts using terms like "climate cult" or "eco terrorists" on X has remained stable, the number of replies containing dehumanising language has more than doubled. On Facebook and Instagram, over 68,000 posts used denigrating terms, reaching a cumulative 1.86 million shares. TikTok users employ "coded violence" and "dog whistles" to evade moderation, with comments frequently endorsing police violence, including the use of cattle prods and pepper spray. The report argues that this digital rhetoric creates a "pipeline to violence," citing the 2023 fatal shooting of protesters in Panama and the broader criminalisation of environmental defenders.

The Climate Knowledge Brokers (CKB) Group, supported by a Coordination Hub at REEEP, operates as a community of practice for approximately 400 brokers across 60 countries. Between 2014 and 2017, the group focused on professionalizing the role of climate knowledge brokering through the 2015 Climate Knowledge Brokers Manifesto, peer-learning workshops, and the development of digital tools like Climate Tagger and Climate Search. The group emphasizes collaboration over competition to ensure decision-makers have access to tailored, high-quality climate information.

The document provides legal arguments to support a lawsuit against the Panamanian National Environmental Authority (ANAM) regarding the Barro Blanco Hydroelectric Project. It contends that the project's EIA was approved without adequate consultation or the free, prior, and informed consent of the Ngäbe people, violating international human rights and environmental law. The brief highlights specific failures, including a single public forum conducted only in Spanish and the omission of critical data regarding indigenous territories adjacent to the Ngäbe-Buglé Comarca.

The Human Rights Committee (CCPR) addressed climate change in its 2023 state review procedure through two Concluding Observations and two Lists of Issues. Key focus areas included Brazil's lack of action on climate change and Amazon deforestation, mitigation efforts in Namibia and Pakistan, the rights of Indigenous Peoples in Namibia, Suriname, Brazil, and Jamaica, and the protection of environmental defenders in Panama and Serbia.

The document argues that the export of pesticides prohibited or not approved in Europe (EU, Switzerland, and the UK) to parties of the Bamako Convention in Africa and the Central American Agreement constitutes a violation of international law. It asserts that these substances are classified as hazardous waste under the national laws of importing countries and the terms of these regional agreements, thereby breaching the Basel Convention. Furthermore, the text claims that these exports violate international human rights obligations regarding the right to health. The analysis extends to other exporting nations like Canada, China, and Russia, concluding that all Basel Convention parties must immediately prohibit the export of such hazardous chemicals.

The document argues that exporting pesticides banned in their country of origin to Africa and Central America violates the Bamako Convention, the Central American Agreement, and the Basel Convention, as these substances are defined as hazardous waste by the importing nations. It asserts that European states and other Basel Convention parties (such as Canada, China, and Russia) are failing their international legal and human rights obligations by allowing this trade, which harms health and ecosystems in low- and middle-income countries.