Search Climate Insights Directory

The 2013 SAIIA Young Leaders Declaration outlines youth-led priorities for the global development agenda following the Millennium Development Goals. It calls for the reduction of structural inequalities, the protection of refugees and displaced persons, and the implementation of sustainable environmental practices. Key recommendations include the creation of 'Green Jobs' in Africa, the adoption of renewable energy systems in South African housing, and the establishment of a global disaster relief network. The declaration emphasizes the need for youth participation in governance and the alignment of national policies with the Sustainable Development Goals and South Africa's National Development Plan for 2030.

The document outlines how businesses of all sizes impact biodiversity and can benefit from protecting it. It provides a structured approach to integrating biodiversity into corporate policy using the Deming cycle (Plan-Do-Check-Act) and discusses the economic value of ecosystem services. The guide also offers specific steps for managing biodiversity on company premises and introduces various certification schemes like the European Biodiversity Standard.

Danone Brasil used the five-step Corporate Ecosystem Services Review (ESR) methodology, in partnership with Instituto Ipê, to analyze its production plant in Poços de Caldas and its strawberry and milk supply chains. The process identified critical dependencies on freshwater, pollination, and soil quality, revealing risks such as declining pollinator populations and climate-driven crop losses. To mitigate these, Danone proposed strategies including improved water monitoring, sustainable pasture management, and reforestation to reduce heat stress in cattle and comply with the Brazilian Forest Code.

Walmart Brasil used the five-step Corporate Ecosystem Services Review (ESR) to mitigate risks in its beef supply chain in the Amazon. The assessment identified critical dependencies on soil quality, water purification, climate stability, and freshwater provision. In São Félix do Xingu, the company found that deforestation—driven by poor pasture management and infrastructure-led demand—threatens these services. To meet its 2015 goal of zero-deforestation beef, Walmart Brasil is exploring strategies including a dedicated 'zero-deforestation' brand, investment in monitoring tools for land tenure and the Rural Environmental Registry (CAR), and collaborations with partners like The Nature Conservancy to promote sustainable intensification of cattle ranching.

The report details WWF-South Africa's Graduate Development Programme, which provides structured internships for graduates and matriculants to transition into the environmental sector. Between 2011 and 2013, the programme created 55 internship opportunities, utilizing a network of mentors and partner organisations to enhance professional capacity in areas such as marine resource management, freshwater conservation, and environmental law. It also highlights the 'Groen Sebenza' initiative, a partnership with the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) to create jobs for ecosystems management.

The document assesses Sweden's progress in constructing wetlands to make agriculture more sustainable, noting that the country achieved only 60% of its 12,000-hectare target between 2000 and 2010. It argues for a shift from a narrow focus on nutrient retention toward a multifunctional approach that includes flood control, biodiversity, and irrigation. Key barriers identified include complex water legislation, insufficient financial compensation for farmers, and coordination challenges. Conversely, enabling factors include strong political priority, inter-institutional collaboration, and a robust knowledge base. The paper recommends adopting a water basin approach and involving local actors to foster long-term relationships with landowners.

The document evaluates Honduras' National Climate Change Strategy (NCCS), highlighting its focus on reducing climatic vulnerability through a participatory framework involving over 60 institutions. While the NCCS identifies agriculture, soil, and food security as a priority sector, stakeholders report that implementation is in its early stages due to institutional, knowledge, and financial barriers. The report emphasizes the need for a territorial approach via Regional Development Councils to better integrate climate-compatible agricultural practices and access international finance.

The Green Economy Pocketbook advocates for a systemic shift toward a green economy to combat economic instability and environmental decline. It proposes redefining progress through wellbeing indicators, redirecting financial flows via green public procurement and the removal of subsidies, and investing in high-impact sectors like renewable energy and sustainable agriculture. The guide emphasizes a just transition through education and skills training to reduce poverty and inequality, while warning that current resource-intensive growth is unsustainable. It also highlights the growth of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) and proposes nine guiding principles for a fair and inclusive green economy.

The document examines the 2011 Indonesian forest moratorium, highlighting its role in improving data transparency through the Indicative Moratorium Map and the necessity of private sector buy-in. It identifies critical challenges in monitoring, enforcement, and vertical coordination between national and local governments, while suggesting that the moratorium period be used to reform licensing and spatial planning to balance economic growth with climate goals.

The Union of Concerned Scientists argues that U.S. farm policy disproportionately supports non-perishable commodity crops while hindering 'healthy-food' farms—those growing fruits and vegetables using sustainable or organic practices. Key barriers include planting restrictions in subsidy programs, a lack of accessible whole-farm-revenue insurance, and credit constraints for small-scale or diversified operations. The report recommends eliminating planting restrictions, reforming the Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) insurance pilot to be more flexible and national in scope, removing arbitrary surcharges for organic farmers, and expanding micro-lending programs to support rural economic development.

The Union of Concerned Scientists identifies systemic policy barriers that prevent U.S. farmers from increasing the production of fruits and vegetables. Current federal subsidies favor non-perishable commodity crops, while sustainable and diversified farms struggle with a lack of accessible crop insurance and credit. The report recommends eliminating planting restrictions, improving whole-farm-revenue insurance, and expanding micro-lending to support local food systems and public health.

The WWF Sanlam Living Waters Partnership, launched in August 2007, leveraged R67 million to implement aquatic conservation initiatives in South Africa. Key achievements include the SASSI programme, which influences 60% of the seafood retail market, and the declaration of 120,000 hectares of Marine Protected Areas. The partnership also focused on capacity building, training 2,248 people and creating 332 jobs. Future goals include integrating ecological infrastructure with hard engineering development and improving the social support for inshore Marine Protected Areas.

The Union of Concerned Scientists argues that U.S. agricultural policies currently favor an industrial model that prioritizes corporate profit over health and the environment. The brief highlights a significant disparity in subsidies, noting that corn and soybean growers receive over ten times the support of all fruit and vegetable growers combined. This system is linked to water pollution and high energy consumption, accounting for nearly 16 percent of total U.S. energy use. The authors propose transitioning to agroecology—a science-based approach utilizing crop rotations, cover cropping, and integrated livestock management—to create a more resilient and nutritious food system. Key policy recommendations include increasing investments in local food hubs, providing new incentives for organic production, and requiring conservation standards for farmers receiving federal subsidies.

The paper investigates the trade-offs farmers face between immediate agricultural yields and the long-term maintenance of soil biota. Using optimal control theory, it identifies six bioeconomic states based on ecological interactions (normal vs. nuisance), farmer expectations (sustainable vs. non-sustainable), and technical orientations (natural resource oriented vs. agricultural effort oriented). The analysis reveals that secure property rights and long-term preferences do not automatically lead to conservation; instead, their effect is ambiguous and depends on the specific bioeconomic state of the agroecosystem.

The document provides a comprehensive overview of ecosystem services, categorizing them into supporting, regulating, provisioning, and cultural services. It discusses the economic valuation of these services, contrasting market-based and non-market valuation methods, and argues that assigning monetary value is essential for sustainable policy-making and corporate risk management. The report also introduces 'ecosystem disservices'—negative impacts of nature on human well-being—and provides practical frameworks for local governments and businesses to integrate natural capital into their strategic planning.

Friends of the Earth International (FoEI) documents global campaigns where local and Indigenous communities use collective rights to oppose corporate-led extractive and agricultural projects. The report highlights legal battles against dams in Malaysia and oil pollution in Nigeria, resistance to tar sands in North America, and the promotion of community-based forest governance and food sovereignty in regions such as Indonesia, Cameroon, and Latin America.

The document argues that traditional separations between adaptation, mitigation, and development are insufficient. It proposes 'climate compatible development' as a framework to achieve 'triple win' outcomes: low emissions, high resilience, and sustained human development. It highlights a new development landscape where climate finance, shifting trade patterns, and technological innovation redefine economic growth, particularly for developing nations.

The document argues that policymakers must move beyond treating mitigation, adaptation, and development as separate strategies. It defines 'climate compatible development' as a framework to minimize climate damage while maximizing development opportunities, aiming for 'triple wins' across emissions, resilience, and social growth. The brief highlights the shift in global finance toward the 'polluter pays' principle and provides examples of low-carbon strategies in Guyana and resilience efforts in Bolivia.

The report examines the growth of local and regional food systems in the U.S., highlighting their potential to create tens of thousands of jobs and improve public health and environmental sustainability. It identifies barriers to scaling these systems, such as inadequate infrastructure and safety nets, and recommends increased federal funding and research to support small-scale farmers and low-income consumers.

The document highlights the unsustainability of the current linear phosphorus flow from finite fossil reserves to agriculture, which leads to resource depletion and water pollution. It proposes reducing phosphorus application through optimized land use, improved fertilizer techniques, and modified livestock management, while advocating for policy-driven recycling of phosphorus from organic wastes.