Search Climate Insights Directory

The report assesses the environmental prerequisites for attaining the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), focusing on water for food, sustainable sanitation, and energy access. It argues that achieving MDG 1 (eradicating hunger) requires a 50% increase in freshwater use by 2015, which could lead to severe ecosystem trade-offs unless 'crop per drop' productivity improvements are implemented. In sanitation, the report advocates for ecological sanitation (ecosan) as a cost-effective alternative to conventional sewage systems, particularly for the growing urban target population. Regarding energy, it proposes an 'MDG Energy Vision' to provide basic clean cooking fuels and electricity to the poor, noting that the primary energy requirements for these goals are negligible compared to global consumption but essential for poverty reduction. The report estimates a total annual investment of USD 107 billion from 2005 to 2015 across these three sectors to meet MDG targets sustainably.

The document examines the gap between Burundi's political progress toward democratic elections and the lagging implementation of socio-economic reconstruction outlined in Protocol IV of the Arusha Accords. It highlights critical failures in land tenure reform, the repatriation of refugees, and the support of internally displaced persons (IDPs). The author argues that extreme poverty, unequal resource distribution, and a reliance on short-term humanitarian aid rather than long-term development create a risk of relapse into conflict. Specific challenges include a crippling external debt burden, gender-based violence, and the potential for 'disaster capitalism' to undermine local land rights during the reconstruction process.

The report analyzes the environmental vulnerability of West Africa, focusing on the interplay between poverty, environmental degradation, and natural hazards. It identifies key sensitivities in health, water availability, and food security, while detailing the diverse farming systems and urban livelihoods that shape resilience. The document emphasizes that vulnerability is exacerbated by social inequities, political conflict, and population growth, and argues for integrated poverty reduction strategies that prioritize diversification and adaptive capacity to mitigate the impacts of climate change and resource scarcity.

The document examines the 'entangling crisis' of food insecurity and HIV/AIDS in Southern Africa. It argues that while environmental triggers like drought cause immediate shortages, the severity of these crises is rooted in structural issues, including the removal of agricultural subsidies, the impact of EU agricultural dumping, and the depletion of agricultural labour due to the HIV/AIDS pandemic. The report calls for a shift from reactive food aid to integrated long-term agricultural investment and improved governance to build community resilience.

The document argues that existing 'top-down' global food system scenarios often fail to capture the multi-scale nature of vulnerability and the specific dynamics of local livelihoods. To bridge this gap, the authors propose using 'livelihood systems' as an intermediate scale to link global drivers—such as climate change and market forces—to local food security outcomes. The paper demonstrates this approach through case studies in India and South Africa, using data from the Global Scenario Group's PoleStar system and national food security frameworks. It concludes that a 'bottom-up' participatory approach, which maps the exposure of specific livelihood groups (e.g., nomadic pastoralists or smallholder farmers) to various stressors, provides a more realistic basis for adaptation and policy intervention than aggregated global projections.

The report defines food security as food that is available at all times, accessible to all, nutritionally adequate, and culturally acceptable. It argues that while global food supply has generally kept pace with demand, food insecurity persists due to failures in distribution and individual access. The document evaluates four policy paths: food self-sufficiency (now largely seen as unrealistic), trade liberalization (which offers supply stability but can undermine local producers), food sovereignty (which emphasizes national policy autonomy and peasant rights), and multi-functional agriculture (which integrates environmental sustainability and non-commodity public values into farming). It concludes that a pragmatic, flexible approach is necessary to reconcile economic, social, and ecological objectives.

The report identifies four critically stressed ecosystem services in Kenya: maintenance of biodiversity, food and fibre provision, water supply, purification and regulation, and fuel provision. These stresses are present across nearly all provinces, directly threatening the ability of the population to be adequately nourished, access clean water, obtain energy for cooking and warmth, and earn a livelihood. The document highlights a critical cycle where environmental degradation, such as deforestation and soil fertility loss, exacerbates poverty, particularly for women and children who bear the burden of gathering scarce resources.

The report identifies critical stresses on biodiversity, food and fibre provision, water supply, and fuel provision across Mali, linking these ecological declines to threats in human nourishment, water access, energy, and livelihoods. It highlights the southern regions of Sikasso, Mopti, and Segou as high-priority areas due to the convergence of high population density, poverty, and deteriorating ecosystem services.

The report identifies five critically stressed ecosystem services in Mauritania: biodiversity maintenance, food and fibre provision, water supply and regulation, fuel provision, and carbon sequestration. These stresses directly impact human well-being, specifically the ability to be adequately nourished, access clean water, obtain energy for cooking and warmth, and earn a livelihood. The analysis highlights that while all regions are affected, Assaba, Gorgol, and Guidimaka are high-priority areas due to the combination of stressed services, threatened well-being, and higher population density. Key drivers of degradation include prolonged droughts, over-grazing, over-hunting, and poorly planned infrastructure like the Diama dam.

The report identifies five critical stressed ecosystem services in Mozambique: biodiversity, food and fibre provision, water supply/purification/regulation, fuel provision, and flood regulation. It links these ecological stresses to threats in human well-being, specifically the ability to be nourished, access clean water, obtain energy, earn a livelihood, and remain secure against extreme events. The analysis highlights that Gaza, Manica, Nampula, Sofala, and Tete are the most critical regions where all five ecosystem services and well-being constituents are threatened. High population density in Nampula and Zambezia also makes them priority areas due to severe chronic malnutrition and poor water access.

The report identifies four critically stressed ecosystem services in Rwanda: maintenance of biodiversity, food and fibre provision, water supply, purification and regulation, and fuel provision. These stresses are linked to threats in human well-being, specifically the ability to be adequately nourished, access clean water, obtain energy for warmth and cooking, and earn a livelihood. The analysis highlights Kibungo and Butare as priority areas where multiple ecosystem services and well-being constituents are simultaneously under threat. The report argues that increasing food production through land expansion is unfeasible and recommends agricultural intensification and improved watershed management.

The report identifies four critically stressed ecosystem services in Tanzania: maintenance of biodiversity, food and fibre provision, water supply/purification/regulation, and fuel provision. These ecological declines directly threaten human well-being, specifically the ability to be adequately nourished, access clean water, obtain energy for cooking and warmth, and earn a livelihood. Morogoro is highlighted as a priority region because it experiences stress across all four ecosystem services and well-being constituents. Pervasive water scarcity and income poverty are noted as mutually reinforcing challenges affecting all mainland regions, driven largely by a high reliance on subsistence farming and a population growth rate of five per cent annually.

The report identifies four critically stressed ecosystem services in Uganda: maintenance of biodiversity, food and fibre provision, water supply, purification and regulation, and fuel provision. These stressors are linked to threats in human well-being, specifically the ability to be adequately nourished, access clean water, obtain energy for cooking and warmth, and earn a livelihood. The analysis highlights regional disparities, noting that while all four regions face these stresses, the Northern region suffers from the highest incidence of poverty and food insecurity, while the Western region shows high rates of child stunting.

This report by Friends of the Earth International asserts that environmental rights—including the right to a sustainable lifestyle, a healthy environment, water access, and food security—are integral to human rights. It details specific conflicts, such as the Ava Guarani's struggle for ancestral lands in Argentina, the impact of Shell's pollution in Curaçao, and the fight against GMO contamination in Mexico. The text criticizes neoliberal economic globalization for enabling multinational corporations to operate with impunity, often displacing indigenous populations and degrading ecosystems. It calls for a new ethics of environmental justice and the implementation of legally binding international conventions to protect marginalized communities from environmental aggression.

The document presents a set of recommendations focused on four key areas: science and technology options, the development of research and knowledge institutions, the cultivation of a new generation of agricultural scientists, and the implementation of markets and policies to boost food security in Africa.

The 20th SAC meeting held in Ottawa, Canada, reviewed the progress of SGP I and SGP II projects and the CRN I program. The committee discussed strategies for synthesizing CRN I achievements, including the possibility of an edited book or special sessions at meetings like the IGU. Planning for CRN II and SGP III focused on encouraging applied science and expanding the reviewer database. The SAC also defined required expertise for upcoming member elections and discussed potential partnerships with US organizations such as NOAA for observation and monitoring systems.

The 20th SAC meeting of the IAI, held in April 2004, reviewed the progress of SGP I, SGP II, and CRN I research programs. The committee discussed the synthesis of CRN I results, established evaluation criteria for the upcoming CRN II and SGP III calls for proposals, and defined the necessary areas of expertise for new SAC members. Additionally, the committee sought ways to increase member country engagement and explored potential partnerships with US organizations like NOAA for observation and monitoring systems.

The report assesses the intersection of trade and sustainable development in Central American agriculture, focusing on the constraints imposed by the WTO Agreement on Agriculture and the potential for 'green' preferences. It provides detailed environmental impact matrices for key crops and livestock, highlighting a high reliance on agrochemicals and a lack of state incentives for sustainable conversion. The authors argue that while trade liberalization is a necessary condition, it is insufficient without comprehensive institutional investment, technological innovation, and a strategic shift toward sustainable production to ensure long-term rural development and environmental health.

The report analyzes the implementation of WTO Agreement on Agriculture (URAA) domestic support rules, specifically the 'Green Box' (minimally trade-distorting) measures. It compares the policies of the US, Japan, and the EU with China's approach, noting that while China relies heavily on Green Box measures for infrastructure and food security, it lacks the financial capacity for decoupled income support. The authors argue that WTO rules are biased toward developed nations and propose reforms to provide developing countries more flexibility and stricter criteria for Green Box exemptions to prevent hidden trade distortions.

The report claims that the first ten years of GM crop commercialization were a 'resounding failure', noting that promises of cheaper, higher-quality food and the solution to global hunger have not materialized. It highlights the dominance of Monsanto, the failure of the first GM tomato, and the rise of global opposition due to concerns over genetic contamination, biodiversity loss, and corporate control of seeds.