Search Climate Insights Directory

The assessment calculates a conservative annual economic value of CDN$121.35 to $130.30 million for the Pimachiowin Aki area, with fishing, water treatment, and carbon sequestration as the primary contributors. It distinguishes between values for resident and non-resident populations and highlights that the ecosystem benefits are approximately 28 times greater than the estimated public expenditures for conservation.

The research paper argues for a systemic approach to public health that re-integrates water resources management with health and well-being. It proposes using watersheds as the primary spatial unit for this integration, combining the principles of ecohealth—which views human health as an outcome of effective ecosystem management—with IWRM. The authors highlight how watershed management can buffer against environmental hazards, such as water-related diseases and disasters, while promoting social determinants of health through multi-stakeholder governance and social learning. Using the 'Prism Framework' and case studies like the Taieri River in New Zealand, the document illustrates how managing 'living systems, livelihoods, and lifestyles' can create a 'double-dividend' that improves both environmental sustainability and social equity. It concludes by identifying challenges in governance, spatial-temporal scale, and the 'public health paradox' of attributing health gains to ecosystem actions.

The paper examines the 2006 campaign to save the Mabira Forest in Uganda, where the government proposed giving 7,100 hectares of the reserve to the Mehta Group for sugarcane cultivation. It details how a coalition of civil society, religious institutions, and legal experts used environmental laws and public mobilization to stop the proposal. The author argues that the campaign succeeded by framing the environmental issue as a broader failure of governance and accountability, leveraging the 1995 Constitution's recognition of the right to a healthy environment and the 2005 Access to Information Act.

The IAI is requesting a core budget of US$1,163,462 for FY 2008/2009, a 14.6% increase over the previous year, primarily driven by the devaluation of the US dollar against the Brazilian real and increased operational costs. The budget supports the management of the CRN II and SGP-HD programs, capacity building through training institutes, and strategic planning to strengthen links between science and policy. Key initiatives include a project on the hydroclimate of the La Plata Basin and a MacArthur Foundation-funded study on Andean biodiversity. Funding is sourced from member country contributions, with the United States providing the largest share.

This report by the World Resources Institute establishes a tiered methodology to estimate the economic value of coral reefs in the Caribbean, focusing on three key services: tourism and recreation, fisheries, and shoreline protection. Applying this tool to Tobago and St. Lucia, the study finds that coral reef-associated tourism provides the highest economic impact, contributing approximately 15% of GDP in Tobago and 11% in St. Lucia. Shoreline protection is also highly valued, with annual potentially avoided damages estimated between US$18–33 million for Tobago and US$28–50 million for St. Lucia. While reef-associated fisheries have a smaller direct financial impact, they provide critical social safety nets and cultural value. The report argues that quantifying these benefits is essential for informed coastal management and policy decisions, particularly in the face of threats from overfishing, pollution, and climate change.

The report analyzes how global trends in climate change, energy, and biotechnology affect the competitiveness, social priorities, and risk management of Canadian agriculture. It finds that while warming trends may increase yields and competitive advantage, these gains are offset by increased vulnerability to extreme weather and emerging social demands for sustainable and healthy food systems.

The report applies an Integrated Management of Environmental Assets (IMEA) approach to evaluate the economic value of ecosystem services in southern Manitoba. It compares the current landscape, dominated by agriculture, with three reconstructed pre-settlement scenarios. The analysis finds that restoring natural environments, particularly forests and wetlands, could significantly increase annual ecosystem service values and provide cost-effective alternatives to hard infrastructure for water purification and climate regulation. The study highlights that nonpoint nutrient loading from agricultural runoff is a primary driver of Lake Winnipeg's eutrophication and argues that a balance between productive and natural landscapes is essential for the lake's health.

The report proposes the Natural Capital Approach (NCA) as a method to quantify and value ecosystem services to reconcile economic and environmental imperatives. It evaluates the NCA against other management styles, reviews international and domestic initiatives, and suggests a spatially based informatics architecture. The authors recommend that Environment Canada lead a pilot study in the Red and Assiniboine River system in Manitoba to demonstrate the utility of the Canadian System of Environmental and Resource Accounts (CSERA) and ecosystem service valuation for policy design.

The document examines the critical role of ecosystem services in buffering human populations against environmental disturbances and the risks posed by their decline. It highlights how the combination of climate change, biodiversity loss, and land-use change creates 'vulnerability complexes' that disproportionately affect poor and marginalised groups. The brief warns of 'tipping points' that could lead to catastrophic ecological shifts and massive population displacement, estimating that between 24 million and 700 million people could be environmentally displaced in coming decades. It calls for international climate policy to move beyond mitigation to include the monitoring of ecosystem health and the building of resilience to prevent humanitarian crises.

The assessment estimates the annual monetary value of ecosystem services in the Pimachiowin Aki area, including carbon sequestration, air filtration, and water pollutant removal, to demonstrate that the site's natural value exceeds current economic activity levels.

The World Resources Institute (WRI) reported total revenue of $27,765,582 and total expenses of $28,102,119 for the 2008 tax year. The organization operates three primary program services: the Climate, Energy and Pollution Program, the Institutions and Governance Program, and the People and Ecosystems Program. WRI maintains a global presence with activities and grantmaking in regions including East Asia and the Pacific, Europe, North America, South America, South Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa. As of the end of the year, the organization held total assets of $53,223,660 and total liabilities of $3,795,121.

The report argues that humanity has depleted natural capital to achieve short-term gains, leading to a decline in 15 of 24 evaluated ecosystem services. It proposes a five-part action agenda: developing ecosystem service information, strengthening local community rights, managing across multiple scales, improving accountability, and aligning economic incentives. To implement this, the authors suggest creating new institutions such as Ecosystem Service Districts, Biome Stewardship Councils, a Commission on Macroeconomics and Ecosystem Services for Poverty Reduction, and a global Leaders' Forum.

The IAI is managing the closure of its CRN I program and the implementation of CRN II and Small Grants Program for Human Dimensions (SGP-HD), while seeking new funding from the MacArthur Foundation and IDRC. The institute is expanding its regional network through collaborations with entities like IGBP, IUCN, and CEPAL, and is focusing on capacity building through research internships and specialized training institutes on climate risk, water management, and urban responses. Efforts to secure operational budget contributions from member countries like Guatemala and Uruguay are ongoing.

The report applies a prototype framework to Kenya, finding a simultaneous decline in biodiversity and human well-being. It identifies land-use change, resource consumption, demographics, and economics as primary drivers of ecosystem change. While Kenya's PRSP addresses several social opportunities, it is found to be less effective in addressing demographic drivers and lacks a concrete implementation strategy for environmental regulations.

The 24th SAC meeting, held in December 2006 in Cuernavaca, Mexico, focused on transitioning the IAI from individual projects to broader research programs. The committee emphasized increasing the social relevance of global change research, promoting interdisciplinary work between natural and social sciences, and developing a general strategic plan. The meeting also outlined the criteria for renewing SAC membership to ensure coverage of key areas such as meteorology, biodiversity, urbanization, and economics.

The Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) requests a core budget of US$ 1,014,931 for fiscal year 2007/2008, a level consistent with the previous two years. The budget supports the Directorate's operations, including the management of the CRN II Program, the implementation of the Small Grants Program for the Human Dimensions (SGP-HD), and the development of a new IAI Strategic Plan. A significant portion of the budget is allocated to salaries and benefits, with proposed adjustments to compensate for the loss of purchasing power of the US dollar against the Brazilian Real. The budget is funded by contributions from member countries, with the United States providing the largest share at US$ 595,000.

The World Resources Institute (WRI), an environmental think tank, reported total revenue of $25,345,212 and total expenses of $21,237,532 for the 2005 tax year. The organization operates seven primary programs focusing on climate change, urban mobility, ecosystem protection, and environmental governance. Its largest program expenditure was for the People and Ecosystems Program ($4,443,154), followed by the Institutions and Governance Program ($3,450,686). WRI maintains a staff of over 130 experts and partners with nearly 400 organizations globally.

This fact sheet outlines the evolution of sustainable development through a timeline of milestones. It tracks the emergence of environmental awareness in the 1960s, the establishment of international frameworks like the UN Environment Programme and the Montreal Protocol, and the formalization of the 'sustainable development' concept via the Brundtland Report. The timeline also documents ecological disasters, the rise of environmental NGOs, and the development of climate-specific initiatives such as the IPCC and the Kyoto Protocol.

The document assesses how water management impacts poverty in Africa, highlighting a significant gap between political rhetoric and actual investment. It argues that current trends will leave millions of Africans without safe water and sanitation by 2015. The authors propose a conceptual framework focusing on four dimensions of poverty reduction: enhancing livelihood security, reducing health risks, reducing vulnerability, and promoting pro-poor economic growth. The report emphasizes the importance of 'green water' (soil moisture) alongside 'blue water' (rivers and lakes) and calls for Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) that places poverty at its center. Key recommendations include public sector reform, stimulating internal capital investment, and adapting to climate change, which is projected to increase water stress for 75 to 250 million Africans by 2020.

The document highlights a gap between the scientific consensus on climate change's potential to alter California's hydrologic patterns and the actual integration of such analysis into water management planning. It introduces an integrated hydrology/water management climate change impact assessment framework designed to identify tradeoffs in ecosystem services and evaluate adaptation strategies. Using a '3S' standard (Sensitivity, Significance, and Stakeholder support), the authors rank decision-making processes to identify the three most critical areas where this analytical framework could transition climate research from academia to policy making.