Search Climate Insights Directory

The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) argues that ISO must move beyond a 'business as usual' approach to develop social responsibility (SR) standards that support sustainable development. IISD emphasizes the need for a transparent, multi-stakeholder process that ensures meaningful participation from developing countries and the broader sustainable development community. Key recommendations include establishing a written understanding with the International Labour Organization (ILO) to avoid mandate overlaps, reviewing ISO's internal processes to increase stakeholder representation, and clarifying the specific objective of any proposed SR standard—whether it targets internal management or external audiences—before proceeding to a full membership vote.

The document describes Mali as a stable democracy with strong economic growth, largely driven by a gold boom following the 1991 Mining Code revision. South African investment is concentrated in gold mining and energy, contributing positively to state revenue and job creation, though hindered by poor infrastructure, outdated regulations, and limited local business linkages. While Mali is positioned as a potential regional trade hub via WAEMU and ECOWAS, the report notes a gap between the government's pro-investment policies and the practical difficulties faced by operators.

The author critiques five decades of poverty alleviation strategies, noting that while the percentage of people in absolute poverty fell from 28% in 1987 to 24% in 1998, the absolute number remained stable at 1.23 billion. The text argues that previous approaches—ranging from physical capital investment in the 1950s to the 'Washington consensus' of the 1980s—failed because they confused the means of growth with the end goal of poverty reduction. The author proposes a working model based on sustainable development and Joseph Stiglitz's stakeholder framework, emphasizing the role of social capital and the need for transformation to be driven from within developing countries rather than imposed by external donors.

The report argues that corruption is a global phenomenon that severely impedes development by distorting public spending, undermining efficiency, and discouraging investment. It rejects the notion that corruption can foster development, asserting instead that it kills the 'development spirit'. For South Africa, the authors recommend a combination of economic liberalisation, democratic consolidation, and specific institutional reforms—including tax and procurement overhauls—driven by strong political will to ensure accountable governance.

The report presents a taxonomy of future global scenarios divided into three classes: Conventional Worlds, Barbarization, and Great Transitions. It argues that while current trends in population growth, economic expansion, and technological change drive the system, human agency and policy choices can steer the world away from collapse and toward a sustainable paradigm. The authors contrast 'business-as-usual' trajectories with visionary transitions that prioritize equity and ecological health over material growth.

The document argues that conflicts between free trade policies, which seek efficient resource allocation, and environmental policies, which seek resource maintenance, must be reconciled. It highlights concerns that current economic development is unsustainable and may lead to 'uneconomic growth' where costs exceed benefits. The text specifically examines the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and other trade provisions against international environmental agreements and domestic laws to find ways to reduce legal frictions.

The document argues that adding 1.5 GW of new coal power to South Africa's electricity system is unnecessary for reliability and would increase costs, emissions, and GDP loss while reducing employment compared to a least-cost plan focusing on renewable alternatives.

The document argues that a comprehensive assessment of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) is essential for developing countries to determine if the Uruguay Round delivered promised benefits and to inform future liberalisation negotiations. It suggests moving beyond quantitative trade flow data to include qualitative indicators related to sustainable development, such as access to water, health, and education. The authors recommend that developing countries use written submissions to the Council for Trade in Services (CTS), identify priority sectors like transport and tourism for study, and seek technical and financial assistance to bridge research gaps.

The document outlines how village governments can align the use of Village Funds with regional priorities through the Village Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJM Desa) and the Village Government Work Plan (RKP Desa). It suggests that regional governments can enhance this synchronization by providing clearer technical guidelines, including a 'negative list' of prohibited expenditures, as exemplified by the Bupati of Berau's 2016 circular.

A 2013 survey of 800 Californians reveals high levels of belief in global warming (79%) and its human cause (58%), with significant concern for its impact on the state's wildfires, heat waves, and droughts. While there is strong support for clean energy and government action, many residents remain uncertain about humanity's collective ability to successfully reduce global warming.

The report finds that while a majority of Ohioans believe global warming is happening and support clean energy transitions, there is significant uncertainty regarding scientific consensus and the likelihood of successful collective action. A large portion of the population perceives increased flooding and heat waves in the state and believes that corporations, citizens, and government officials should all do more to address the issue.

The report presents survey data from 2013 across four US states, revealing that while majorities believe global warming is happening, there are significant regional differences in perceived causes, levels of worry, and understanding of scientific consensus. It highlights a general trend where respondents view global warming as a distant threat and believe corporations and individuals should take more responsibility than government officials.

The report analyzes international public opinion on climate change, finding widespread belief that it is happening and a general desire for increased government action, though levels of worry and perceived personal risk vary significantly by country.

The document outlines a VfM framework for FSD programmes based on the 'Four Es' (economy, efficiency, effectiveness, and equity) plus cost-effectiveness. It moves beyond simple indicators to use a combination of quantitative data and qualitative narratives to make judged assessments of performance against predefined standards. The guide integrates with Impact-Oriented Measurement (IOM) and a Compendium of Indicators to help FSDs communicate their performance story and improve resource management.

The analysis examines how US universal and sectoral tariffs affect Latin American countries, noting that while Mexico and Central American nations face higher effective tariff rates, South American nations are more vulnerable to indirect shocks from China. It highlights that China's ability to implement counter-cyclical fiscal and monetary policies to mitigate US tariff impacts will determine the stability of commodity prices and growth in South America.

The IISD argues that trade liberalization and sustainable development are not inherently incompatible, but that the current 'monothematic' approach of the WTO excludes critical environmental and development concerns. The document calls for a shift in the international trade system to place development at the center, rebuild trust with developing nations, and integrate environmental and social equity into trade policy to avoid 'green protectionism' and ensure sustainable growth.

The paper examines how Zambia manages competing public needs through macroeconomic reforms and growth stimulation. It details the transition from state-led economic management to a liberalised system, focusing on GDP growth, inflation control, and interest rate reductions to expand the state's resource envelope.

The document examines the 'guns versus butter' debate, concluding that while African military spending is low by global standards, its economic impact is generally slightly negative and varies based on a country's political stability and economic resources. It argues that security conditions drive spending and that conflict-reduction efforts are more effective for development than simple appeals to reduce military budgets.

The document assesses the Western Cape's education system, highlighting systemic inequalities, high grade repetition, and the impact of inward migration. It proposes the 'Educating Cape' scenario, which combines expanded Early Childhood Development (ECD) and improved pedagogical teacher training to boost primary and secondary survival rates, ultimately aiming to increase GDP and reduce extreme poverty by 2040.

The author replicates and extends the civil war model of Collier & Hoeffler (2002), finding that while natural resources correlate with conflict, the drivers differ by region. In the Middle East, the 'greed' explanation—where rebels fight to seize resources—is less plausible than a 'rentier-state' model, where oil-funded authoritarianism, corruption, and slow growth generate grievances. The study also finds that democracy is significantly and negatively related to civil conflict, a finding absent in the original Collier & Hoeffler analysis.