Search Climate Insights Directory

The Quito Declaration, signed in May 2000, asserts the critical role of Indigenous Peoples in conserving forests and biodiversity while highlighting their exclusion from the negotiation of the 1992 UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol. The document requests that the UNFCCC Secretariat guarantee adequate participation and direct accreditation for Indigenous organizations in COP 6 and related meetings. It specifically calls for an agenda item at COP 6 to examine the impacts of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) on Indigenous lives and territories, emphasizing the need for 'prior and informed free consent' and respect for territorial rights.

The document serves as a 'Survival Guide' for developing country climate negotiators, combining an overview of the international climate regime with strategic advice on negotiating skills. It details the structure of the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol, the role of formal and informal bodies, and the dynamics of negotiating blocs like the G-77. A significant portion of the text is dedicated to the challenges faced by 'handicapped' negotiators—those with limited domestic mandates or resources—and offers specific coping strategies for drafting, speaking, and coalition-building to increase their influence in a process often dominated by developed nations.

Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) advocates for a minimum 20% reduction in CO2 emissions by industrialised countries by 2010, based on IPCC evidence of human influence on the climate. The document warns of catastrophic consequences, including sea-level rise affecting small island states and the potential disruption of the North Atlantic Current. SGR rejects geo-engineering and cost-benefit analysis as inappropriate tools for climate assessment, instead proposing ecological tax reform, renewable energy investment, and a long-term global goal of equal per capita emissions.

The document is a curated bibliography compiled by David Downes for the Center for International Environmental Law in 1992. It lists legal precedents, international directives, and scholarly articles that explore the relationship between human rights and the environment, with a particular focus on indigenous peoples' rights, the role of international development banks, and the emerging concept of a right to a healthy environment.

The paper asserts that most global warming can be abated at negative net cost by replacing inefficient resource use with advanced technologies in energy, farming, and forestry. It details specific potentials for saving electricity and oil, argues for a 'best buys first' investment strategy to avoid opportunity costs, and proposes market-based implementation techniques such as 'feebates' and 'negawatts'. The authors emphasize that these measures support global equity and development, particularly in the USSR and developing nations, while providing significant co-benefits in environmental protection and security.

The document analyzes the political economy of climate finance in Africa, arguing that the system is dominated by the Global North and market-driven logics that privilege mitigation over adaptation. It highlights how the 'financialization' of climate action shifts risk to vulnerable individuals and exacerbates debt crises in African nations. Through case studies of Ghana, Kenya, and Zimbabwe, the paper illustrates the challenges of tracking funds and the limited influence of civil society. It recommends the creation of localized African financing institutions and the use of debt-for-climate swaps to improve sustainability and equity.

The report argues that 'Big Carbon' (fossil fuel and agribusiness) and 'Big Tech' collaborate to create a 'false social reality' that makes the vast majority of people who support climate action feel like a minority. It details a history of obstruction, from the 1959 warnings to oil executives to the 2009 'Climategate' hack-and-leak attack, and analyzes modern digital tactics used to sabotage UN COPs. The document highlights specific disinformation trends in Brazil leading up to COP30, including the use of generative AI to create fake flood imagery. It concludes by proposing structural solutions such as the EU's Digital Services Act, greenwashing laws in France, and the Global Initiative on Information Integrity on Climate Change (GIIICC).

The report details the strategies used by carbon-intensive industries and big tech to obstruct climate policies through disinformation, polarising narratives, and digital 'distortion mirrors'. It highlights specific cases in Brazil, the historical impact of the 'Climagate' scandal, and the systemic role of social media platforms in creating a 'false social reality' that makes the majority of people who support climate action feel like a minority. The document advocates for structural solutions, such as the Global Initiative for Climate Change Information Integrity (GIIICC) and legislative measures like the EU's Digital Services Act, to protect the information environment ahead of COP30.

The document serves as a resource guide for the Canadian education system to counter the influence of corporate interests in climate curricula. It categorizes a wide array of vetted materials across themes such as climate science, Indigenous perspectives, civic engagement, and climate justice. Additionally, it lists advocacy networks, including For Our Kids and the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, which work to remove industry-sponsored materials from schools.

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) has launched the Climate Equity and the Clean Energy Transition Project to address the historical trend of placing clean energy infrastructure in low-income neighborhoods and communities of color, which often exacerbates existing injustices. The project aims to move from adversarial relationships to cooperative engagement between environmental justice communities, the energy sector, and climate advocates. Key activities include on-site community research, analyzing best practices for clean energy siting to protect public health, and developing a roadmap to modernize federal government programs and budgets to make them more accessible to underserved populations. Additionally, CATF is piloting an online capacity-building tool for community engagement and hosting workshops with environmental justice organizations to redefine decision-making processes and address air quality health impacts. The project focuses on various U.S. rural, tribal, and urban locations, including the Navajo Nation and the Ironbound Community, to produce recommendations for equitable project development and federal program implementation.

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) advocates for the use of the Clean Air Act to enforce stringent emissions standards on U.S. power plants. Their goal is to eliminate domestic power sector carbon dioxide emissions by 2050 and reduce air toxics, smog, and soot to protect public health, particularly in vulnerable communities. CATF's strategies include pushing for protective carbon dioxide performance standards, updating the Mercury & Air Toxics Standards (MATS), tightening National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), and enforcing 'Good Neighbor' provisions to prevent upwind states from polluting downwind areas.

The document encourages journalists to link extreme weather events to human-caused climate change, arguing that omitting this connection results in incomplete or inaccurate reporting. It provides specific phrasing for attributing heatwaves and hurricanes to a warming planet and suggests analogies, such as climate change 'stacking the deck' or acting like 'steroids' for weather patterns. The guide addresses common journalistic hesitations regarding activism, deadlines, and scientific attribution, noting that while direct attribution to a single event is complex, the fact that climate change creates conditions making such events more likely is a verifiable fact. It further emphasizes that extreme weather coverage is a key opportunity to educate the public on the urgency of the crisis, particularly in the US, and to highlight how marginalized groups, including Indigenous people and communities of color, are impacted first and worst.

The document consists of personal reflections from CDKN staff and partners on the impact of Professor Saleemul Huq (1952-2023). It highlights his role as a champion of climate justice, his commitment to mentoring young climate professionals, and his advocacy for southern leadership and locally-led adaptation. Contributors emphasize his generosity, his ability to center the voices of the 'majority world' in global climate negotiations, and his instrumental role in creating learning events such as the Community-based Adaptation (CBA) conference and Gobeshona.

The document highlights South Asia's vulnerability to climate change and criticizes developed nations for attempting to shift the burden of mitigation through offsets and Carbon Capture and Storage. It details India's eight national climate missions, including ambitious solar power targets and energy efficiency schemes, while noting that India's dependency on coal could be reduced from a 'business as usual' projection of 69.5% to 57.7% under a low-carbon strategy. The author emphasizes that after 2020, India will exhaust 'low hanging' options, necessitating revolutionary technology and drastic emission reductions in industrialized countries based on the principle of equity.

The document outlines strategies for making National Frameworks for Climate Services inclusive by diversifying institutional workforces, tailoring impact forecasts to different genders and abilities, and engaging grassroots organisations. It emphasizes the need for accessible communication channels—such as braille and sign language—and the consideration of local knowledge and daily schedules to ensure critical weather announcements reach marginalized groups, including women, indigenous people, and people with disabilities.

The document outlines a role-playing exercise featuring a 32-year-old woman of African descent and the main breadwinner for six children. The scenario explores how informal employment, lack of childcare, and domestic instability prevent vulnerable residents from attending neighbourhood meetings about flooding and climate change, while highlighting the potential for volunteer networks to provide safety nets during disasters.

The document presents a character study of a 28-year-old transgender female living in a shanty, designed for a group discussion on disaster management. It highlights how social discrimination, lack of literacy, and precarious housing exacerbate the impacts of floods, including health risks from drain water, food insecurity due to price hikes, and exclusion from public gatherings and official aid.

The paper examines the application of probabilistic event attribution (PEA) to extreme weather in Africa, highlighting that different methodological framings—such as comparing single years versus decades—lead to significantly different risk quantifications. It argues that defining the 'right' attribution question is a stakeholder-driven process rather than a purely scientific one, which is critical for the effective implementation of the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage. The authors emphasize that relying solely on predictable slow-onset events in loss and damage frameworks would exclude many vulnerable African communities affected by unpredictable extremes.

The guide outlines the legal framework for mining in South Africa, emphasizing the rights of affected communities to information, a healthy environment, and consultation. It details the four primary government permissions required for mining—mining/prospecting rights, environmental management plans, water use licences, and environmental authorisations—and provides a roadmap for community members to object to applications, seek compensation, and report environmental crimes.

The Climate Change Bill, tabled in February 2022, aims to empower South Africa to respond to climate risks through the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions and the management of climate adaptation. The document argues that a formal Act is necessary to hold government and emitters accountable, ensure legal certainty for ambitious climate action, and improve access to climate finance. To be effective, the author suggests the Bill must include strong enforcement penalties, science-based emission targets aligned with a 1.5°C limit, and high levels of transparency regarding carbon budgets.