Search Climate Insights Directory

The report examines the integration of sustainable development into Peru's trade policies, noting that external pressures from the EU and the US-Peru FTA drove the adoption of environmental and social clauses. While these clauses were accepted by the state to secure economic liberalization, they are viewed as opportunities by NGOs and labor unions. Implementation is hindered by labor market informality and institutional weakness, while the trade framework now shapes domestic debates on energy and agriculture.

The report analyzes how sustainable development issues enter Argentina's trade and investment agenda, noting that external pressures are significant for environmental and food safety standards but less so for labor and climate change. It highlights Argentina's unique position due to its lack of north-south trade agreements and its low-polluting economic structure, while emphasizing the need for a holistic, coordinated approach to manage future international commitments and unilateral measures.

The fact sheet identifies significant quantities of agricultural production left in fields and waste generated during food processing as viable, non-food-competing biomass for biofuels. It details the causes of crop loss, such as weather and health outbreaks, and highlights existing technologies for recovering value from potato, orange, and corn waste, as well as the potential for anaerobic digestion of wastewater to produce biogas.

The report assesses government support for liquid biofuels in Canada, finding that total transfers between 2006 and 2008 ranged from C$860 million to C$1.02 billion. It argues that these subsidies are an expensive way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and conserve fossil fuels, often providing poor value for money compared to purchasing carbon offsets. While Canada has implemented some effective targeting and caps to limit costs, the report highlights poor transparency, a lack of rigorous environmental evaluation, and the potential for future infrastructure costs driven by blending mandates.

Friends of the Earth opposes bills introduced by Rep. Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin, Senator Thune, and Senator Tester that seek to redefine "Renewable Biomass" in the Renewable Fuels Standard, which the organization claims would roll back environmental safeguards for federal forests and grasslands and potentially increase deforestation-linked greenhouse gas emissions.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) alleges that the International Finance Corporation's (IFC) Agribusiness Department improperly interfered in a Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO) case concerning an IFC-financed ethanol plant and sugarcane fields in Nicaragua. CIEL claims the Department issued inaccurate public statements on January 29, 2009, which mischaracterized the CAO's findings on the link between Nicaragua Sugar Estates Limited (NSEL) and an epidemic of chronic renal insufficiency (CRI). CIEL argues these actions undermine the CAO process and jeopardize sensitive negotiations between local communities and NSEL regarding health services and epidemiological studies. The letter requests a retraction of the response, an inquiry into its preparation, and the appointment of an overseer for the Department's activities in this case.

This report by Friends of the Earth International examines the socio-economic and environmental impacts of GM crops, specifically focusing on the dominance of a few corporations like Monsanto. It argues that GM technology does not solve hunger, as most crops are used for animal feed or biofuels in wealthy nations. The document highlights a trend of increasing pesticide use and the emergence of herbicide-resistant weeds in the US, Argentina, and Brazil. It further claims that GM crops often result in lower yields than conventional varieties and suggests that agroecological and organic farming are more effective alternatives for food security.

The report contends that GM crops fail to alleviate hunger or poverty, instead increasing pesticide use and corporate control over seeds. It highlights that most GM crops are used for animal feed and biofuels in rich nations, while farmers in producer countries face rising costs and herbicide-resistant weeds. The document advocates for agro-ecological and organic farming as sustainable alternatives.

The document examines the bilateral relationship between China and Mozambique, highlighting how Mozambique's reliance on traditional Western donors and the influence of the FRELIMO party have constrained China's influence compared to other African nations. It details Chinese investments in infrastructure, such as the Mpanda Nkua dam, and identifies significant controversies surrounding illegal logging and poaching in the fisheries sector. The report also explores future cooperation in agriculture, biofuels, and the establishment of special economic zones, while noting Mozambique's strategic value as a maritime gateway for landlocked SADC countries.

The policy brief advocates for a Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) as a technology-neutral mechanism to lower the life cycle emissions of transportation fuels. It emphasizes the necessity of 'well-to-wheels' accounting, including indirect land-use changes, to ensure genuine emission reductions. The LCFS is presented as a way to incentivize supply chain improvements, discourage high-carbon fuels like coal-to-liquids, and spur market-driven innovation in low-carbon technologies.

The document analyzes the tension between Brazil's official government opposition to linking trade negotiations with environmental and social standards and the practical reality where Brazilian companies and social actors must adapt to these standards to maintain international competitiveness. It identifies a shift from trade being the primary vector of sustainable development themes in the 1990s to a more complex landscape involving foreign direct investment (FDI), financing, and domestic political arenas. The report highlights the impact of climate change and Amazon deforestation on the agribusiness sector, the role of voluntary and compulsory certifications, and the emergence of 'non-trade concerns' in developed nations as potential barriers to Brazilian exports.

The report analyzes the evolution of Peru's trade policy from the 1990s liberalization to the implementation of the US-Peru FTA. It argues that sustainable development standards were primarily adopted as a 'cost' to maintain open markets rather than from internal priority. The text details the creation of the Ministry of Environment, the impact of Andean Community regulations, and the tensions between agricultural productivity (including GMOs) and biodiversity conservation. It also examines the potential of biocommerce and the transition toward a renewable energy matrix involving biofuels.

The document examines how Mozambique's reliance on food imports and historical underinvestment in agriculture have made it vulnerable to global price spikes, particularly for rice and wheat. It details the transition from state-supported agriculture to neoliberal structural adjustment programmes in the 1990s, which led to a decline in the use of fertilizers and pesticides. To counter current food insecurity, the government has introduced the 'Green Revolution' strategy and the 2008–11 Food Production Action Plan (FPAP), increasing the agricultural budget to 10% of the state budget and reducing import tariffs on staples from 25% to 2.5%. The author argues that long-term success depends on improving infrastructure, resolving land tenure conflicts, and attracting private sector investment.

The document examines the intersection of global trade policy and food security in Southern Africa, arguing that reducing dependence on First World agricultural subsidies and improving domestic production capabilities are critical for long-term stability. It analyzes the potential impacts of the WTO Doha Round, specifically regarding preference erosion for African exports and the disciplining of export restrictions. The author highlights the risks posed by biofuel production and the limitations of current trade models in predicting gains for Africa, suggesting that a 'no deal' outcome at the WTO may not be entirely disadvantageous.

The document analyzes the decline of Zimbabwe's agricultural sector and its resulting food insecurity, identifying structural failures, hyperinflation, and land reform as primary drivers. It evaluates domestic support programs and trade policies, concluding that while Zimbabwe has the potential for self-sufficiency, it requires comprehensive reforms in infrastructure, technology, and regional cooperation to overcome current supply-side constraints.

The report analyzes the complex political economy of Southern African agriculture, identifying governance and external financing as the primary uncertainties affecting the region's future. Through a stakeholder workshop in Harare, four distinct scenarios were developed, ranging from a high-investment, high-policy-quality future ('I believe I can fly') to a state of total failure ('This is the end'). The authors argue that while the region currently sits in a precarious position characterized by poor domestic policy and weak state capacity, there are opportunities to pivot toward growth through improved infrastructure, transparent land tenure management, and the strategic adoption of agricultural technologies like GMOs.

The research examines how sustainable development themes enter Argentina's trade and investment policy. It finds that environmental and food safety standards are heavily influenced by external factors and multilateral agreements, whereas labor standards are primarily driven by domestic actors. The paper also analyzes the impact of 'agriculturization' (specifically soy expansion), large-scale mining, deforestation, overfishing, and the transition toward biofuels within the Argentine economy.

The document examines the shift of South American countries from a defensive posture toward sustainable development in trade to a more nuanced engagement driven by free trade agreements (FTAs) and market demands. It analyzes the specific vulnerabilities of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Peru due to their reliance on natural resource exports and identifies emerging risks such as carbon-intensive foreign direct investment and new technical trade barriers from developed nations.

The report analyzes the shift in South American countries from a defensive posture toward sustainable development in trade to a more integrated approach. It examines four case studies (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Peru), identifying how structural dependencies on natural resources and the influence of developed markets—particularly the US and EU—drive the adoption of environmental and labor standards. While Chile and Peru have integrated these themes through Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), Brazil and Argentina have remained more resistant officially, though private sectors in Brazil are increasingly adapting to international certifications. The document highlights risks such as 'carbon leakage' (the shift of high-emission industries to the region) and new trade barriers related to biofuels and chemical regulations.

The document analyzes the shift in South American countries from a defensive posture toward sustainable development in trade to a more complex engagement driven by free trade agreements (FTAs) and market demands. It highlights how resource-intensive export profiles make these nations vulnerable to unilateral environmental and labor regulations from developed markets, particularly the EU and US. While Chile and Peru have integrated these themes through FTAs, Brazil and Argentina remain officially resistant, though private sectors in Brazil are increasingly adapting to international sustainability standards.