Search Climate Insights Directory

The National Climate Change Action Plan 2013-2017 provides a strategic roadmap for Kenya to reduce its vulnerability to climate change while maintaining low greenhouse gas emissions. It identifies priority actions across sectors such as agriculture, energy, forestry, and transport, and proposes the establishment of a National Climate Change Council and a Kenya Climate Fund to coordinate governance and finance. The plan emphasizes a 'low carbon climate resilient development pathway' that aligns with Kenya Vision 2030, estimating total investment requirements at approximately KSh 1,085 billion (USD 12.76 billion) for the five-year period.

Malawi relies heavily on traditional biomass for energy, leading to deforestation and land degradation. The country faces energy insecurity due to a total dependence on imported refined petroleum. While Malawi has long-term experience with sugarcane ethanol and is exploring Jatropha-based biofuels, production is under-utilized due to weak institutions and infrastructure. Transitioning to modern bioenergy, including cogeneration from agricultural residues and improved cookstoves, is proposed to diversify the energy mix and reduce climate vulnerability.

The document applies the International Institute for Sustainable Development's (IISD) 'quick screen' methodology to identify potential NAMA concepts for Bangladesh. It reviews national socioeconomic data, GHG emission profiles, and government priorities to propose 18 specific mitigation opportunities across six UNFCCC sectors: agriculture, energy, forestry, industry, transport, and waste. The brief emphasizes that mitigation efforts must not compromise economic growth or poverty alleviation, particularly as Bangladesh faces high vulnerability to sea-level rise and extreme weather.

The report analyzes Bangladesh's approach to integrating climate adaptation and mitigation in agriculture to protect food security. It evaluates the Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan (BCCSAP) and the National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA), highlighting that while adaptation is prioritized, mitigation remains under-addressed. The document identifies specific climate threats to crops, livestock, and fisheries, and recommends integrating climate risks into agricultural policy, increasing R&D for resilient cultivars, and improving international funding access.

The document evaluates Honduras' National Climate Change Strategy (NCCS), highlighting its focus on reducing climatic vulnerability through a participatory framework involving over 60 institutions. While the NCCS identifies agriculture, soil, and food security as a priority sector, stakeholders report that implementation is in its early stages due to institutional, knowledge, and financial barriers. The report emphasizes the need for a territorial approach via Regional Development Councils to better integrate climate-compatible agricultural practices and access international finance.

The report argues that tropical wood production can be sustainable if shifted away from primary forest logging toward high-yield plantations on degraded lands. It highlights the role of certification programs like FSC and PEFC, though it notes low adoption rates in high-deforestation regions. The document provides specific recommendations for producers, businesses, consumers, and governments to reduce the environmental impact of wood and paper products.

The CDKN Shubh Kal project conducted two training workshops in September and November 2012 at TARA Gram, Orchha, for reporters from four community radio stations: Radio Bundelkhand, Lalit Lokwaani, Chanderi Ki Awaaz, and Radio Dhadhkan. The training combined theoretical lessons on climate science and journalism with practical field visits to villages and research institutions. Participants learned to bridge the gap between scientific experts, policymakers, and rural farmers by producing simplified, engaging radio content on adaptation and climate risks.

The document explains how scenarios—depicted as maps of land cover or marine habitats—are used in InVEST to compare the delivery of ecosystem services under alternative futures. It outlines characteristics of effective scenarios, such as being plausible, legitimate, and scientifically credible, and provides a framework for converting narrative storylines into quantitative maps. Through case studies in Hawaii, Borneo, Tanzania, and Canada, the primer demonstrates how scenarios can inform integrated spatial plans, green economy policies, carbon project feasibility, and marine spatial planning.

The document describes 'evergreen agriculture' in Zambia, a system combining agro-forestry and conservation farming to address low maize yields, soil degradation, and erratic rainfall caused by climate change. By integrating specific tree species into crop systems, the approach improves soil nutrients, water infiltration, and carbon storage. The text advocates for increased research and the potential integration of these practices into a Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action (NAMA) to secure international support.

The document examines 'evergreen agriculture'—the integration of specific tree species into annual food crop systems—as a solution to low soil fertility and climate vulnerability in Zambia. It highlights two primary systems: maize agroforestry using Faidherbia albida, which significantly increased unfertilised maize yields to 4.1 tonnes per ha in 2008, and conservation agriculture with trees using nitrogen-fixing species like Gliricidia and Tephrosia. The brief argues that these practices improve water retention, reduce erosion, and sequester 2–4 tonnes of carbon per ha per year, with a potential aggregate sequestration of 50 billion tonnes of CO2 over 50 years in Africa. However, scaling up requires increased seed supply, expanded extension services, and supportive policy frameworks. While carbon markets are mentioned as a funding source, the document notes high transaction costs and measurement difficulties, suggesting that Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) may offer a more viable path for financing and implementing low-carbon development strategies.

The document examines the adoption of Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration (FMNR) in Niger, where between a quarter and one half of farmers have adopted the practice across approximately five million hectares. FMNR involves managing tree sprouts from existing stumps rather than planting new seedlings, which reduces implementation costs to approximately $10 per hectare compared to $200 or more for planting schemes. The practice has increased crop yields, food security, and income, with some households in the Zinder Region earning $2,000–3,000 per year from baobab products. Key drivers of success include secure land tenure, the role of farmers as innovators, and the shift from exclusion-based forestry laws to community-based management. The brief also notes potential climate mitigation benefits, estimating carbon storage in Niger's regenerated parklands at 60 million tons.

The report argues that agricultural management practices often provide simultaneous benefits for climate mitigation and adaptation, particularly through soil carbon sequestration. It identifies financial, institutional, and technical barriers to adopting an integrated approach and proposes policy options, including the creation of a dedicated work programme on agriculture under the UNFCCC's Subsidiary Body on Scientific and Technical Advice (SBSTA).

The document argues for a 'triple dividend' approach to agriculture that balances the need to feed a growing global population with the necessity of climate mitigation and adaptation. It highlights that while agriculture is a major emitter of greenhouse gases, it also possesses significant potential for carbon sequestration and resilience building. The report identifies sustainable intensification and soil carbon sequestration as key strategies, though it notes challenges such as high upfront costs, knowledge gaps, and the difficulty of scaling up successful local projects. It emphasizes the need for research and development, improved extension services, and innovative financing to support smallholder farmers, particularly in developing regions.

The report identifies a shift in tropical deforestation from state-initiated to enterprise-driven processes, primarily fueled by global urban and export demand for commodities like beef, soy, palm oil, and timber. While drivers vary by region—cattle and soy in Latin America, palm oil and timber in Southeast Asia, and small-scale farming in Africa—the document highlights that global emissions from land-use change have declined by 39% between 2000 and 2009. It argues that development without deforestation is possible through agricultural intensification, the restoration of abandoned lands, and international mechanisms like REDD+.

The report details a task force meeting in Manila, Philippines, focused on the 'Development Dividend' in REDD—the balance between greenhouse gas reductions (quantity) and sustainable development benefits (quality), such as poverty alleviation and indigenous rights (equity). Key discussions centered on the technical and political challenges of Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV), the implementation of socio-environmental safeguards, and the role of market versus non-market financing. The document also provides updates on national REDD strategies from various countries, including Brazil, Indonesia, and the Philippines, and proposes a research agenda to clarify forest definitions and governance structures for benefit sharing.

The report details a workshop in Douala, Cameroon, focused on the implementation of REDD+ in Africa. Key discussions centered on the need for cost-effective safeguard information systems, the scalability of Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) from subnational to national levels, and the role of agriculture as a driver of deforestation rather than a direct part of REDD+. Participants emphasized the necessity of transparent, equitable financing that prioritizes local experts and the integration of gender and indigenous perspectives to ensure multiple co-benefits beyond carbon sequestration.

The report outlines how tropical forests can be transitioned from net carbon emitters to net sinks through the REDD+ framework. It details specific reforestation, restoration, and sustainable production forestry techniques, while emphasizing the necessity of 'additional' carbon benefits beyond business-as-usual baselines. The authors argue that achieving zero net emissions by 2030 requires a combination of reducing deforestation and scaling up sequestration activities, supported by international financial incentives and national policies that protect biodiversity and the rights of indigenous and local communities.

The report details rainwater harvesting techniques in Niger, categorizing them into individual (Zaï, demi-lunes, manual trenches) and collective (mechanical trenches, banquettes, spreading sills, mini-dams) methods. It assesses the effectiveness of these technologies in increasing crop yields, such as millet and sorghum, and identifies significant barriers to adoption, including extreme poverty and lack of equipment. The document also examines the role of various stakeholders, from state services to NGOs, and briefly discusses ex situ rooftop harvesting, which is less common in Niger than in neighboring Burkina Faso.

The report finds that existing climate variability already costs Kenya up to 2% of GDP annually, with future climate change potentially adding a loss of 2.6% of GDP per year by 2030. Adaptation needs are estimated at $500 million per year for 2012, rising to $1-2 billion per year by 2030. The study also identifies significant opportunities for low-carbon growth, noting that over 80% of selected energy-related emission reduction options can be realized at a net negative cost.

The document examines the technical and political challenges of integrating REDD into global climate policy, focusing on the scope of activities (from REDD to REDD++), financing mechanisms, measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) standards, and institutional governance. It highlights the diversity of national circumstances, particularly in Africa, and the need for a phased implementation approach that balances equity with efficiency.