Search Climate Insights Directory

The document is a comprehensive emergency preparedness guide for South African youth, focusing on building community resilience against climate-related disasters, health crises, and civil unrest.

The 24/7 Carbon-Free Energy Compact, coordinated by Sustainable Energy for All on behalf of UN-Energy, promotes a global effort to ensure every kilowatt-hour of electricity consumption is met with carbon-free sources every hour of every day. The guidebook outlines five core principles: time-matched procurement, local procurement, technology-inclusivity, enabling new generation, and maximizing system impact. It details technical enablers such as Granular Certificates (GCs) for hourly tracking, smart metering, and 24/7 CFE Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). The document also highlights the role of green hydrogen as a storage solution and provides implementation roadmaps for energy buyers, governments, and suppliers, while emphasizing equity considerations for the Global South.

The SEforALL MEL Framework defines a structured approach to monitoring and evaluating the organization's efforts to advance SDG 7. It utilizes a Program Theory and Theory of Action to track a chain of results from inputs and activities to intermediate outcomes—specifically leaders unlocking finance and brokering partnerships—and ultimately to high-level impacts such as universal energy access and increased renewable energy shares. The framework implements a four-level monitoring system ranging from organizational inputs to high-level impacts, supported by annual and intervention-specific reporting cycles and a phased maturity plan extending to 2021.

This fact sheet introduces the Framework for Integrating Rights and Equality (FIRE), developed by the Building Resilience through Inclusive and Climate-adaptive Disaster Risk Reduction in Asia-Pacific (BRDR) Program. The framework provides a six-dimensional approach to integrate human rights and gender equality into disaster risk reduction (DRR) laws, policies, and practices from national to local levels.

The document outlines an integrated approach for SCF2 events that combines a human rights-based approach—divided into substantive and procedural rights—with intersectional gender analysis. It provides guiding questions for event proposals, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation to ensure that marginalized groups are included and that power dynamics are addressed to avoid reinforcing existing inequalities.

This guidebook, published by the Stockholm Environment Institute and authored by Prayas Energy Group, provides a framework for policymakers to design and implement Super-Efficient Equipment Programs (SEEP). Using the experience of India's program for ceiling fans, it outlines a strategy to accelerate market transformation by providing financial incentives to manufacturers to produce appliances significantly more efficient than current local market offerings at comparable prices.

The We Mean Business coalition argues that corporate climate leadership must integrate three pillars: Ambition (setting science-based targets), Action (transforming core business strategies and value chains), and Advocacy (pushing for pro-climate government policies). The report emphasizes that to avoid the sharply growing costs of temperature rises above 1.5°C, global emissions must halve by 2030, and businesses must transition to net-zero by 2050 at the latest. It highlights the necessity of independent verification, executive accountability, and a 'just transition' that considers social equity and workforce reskilling. The framework also stresses the importance of consistency in lobbying, urging companies to ensure their trade associations do not undermine their public climate commitments.

The We Mean Business coalition argues that corporate climate leadership is essential for long-term business success and global economic resilience. It defines leadership as the combination of science-based ambition, transformative business action, and pro-change policy advocacy, emphasizing that current levels of corporate action are insufficient to ensure a sustainable future.

The report highlights the growing vulnerability of the power sector in South and Southeast Asia to water-related risks, noting that 74 GW of existing and planned capacity for major power companies is located in water-scarce or stressed areas. It argues that while regulatory protections have historically shielded shareholders from the financial impact of water-related outages, these protections may become unsustainable as climate change and demographic pressures intensify water shortages. The document also notes a trade-off between water mitigation and carbon emissions, as technologies like dry cooling reduce water dependency but increase carbon emissions per unit of power output.

The document outlines a descriptive narrative framework for Parties to the UNFCCC to communicate the fairness and ambition of their intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs) ahead of COP21. It suggests that countries use a combination of quantitative and qualitative indicators to explain their contributions relative to their emissions responsibility, capabilities, and development needs. The proposed framework consists of five components: an initial framing statement, a description of pre-2020 undertakings, an explanation of fairness and ambition based on national circumstances, an assessment of the contribution toward the Convention's objectives, and additional considerations. The goal is to enhance international transparency, enable peer comparison, and build trust among Parties to motivate collective climate action.

The document defines 'cost parity' as the cost-competitiveness between renewable energy and traditional electricity supply. It outlines specific criteria for determining competitiveness based on the deployment model: behind-the-meter generation is competitive when its average cost equals or is less than the retail price (plus backup savings in developing economies); Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) are competitive when the price is lower than or equal to the retail price; and wholesale generation is competitive in the long-run when its average cost equals average wholesale costs.

The document introduces a framework designed to assist government agencies, regulators, utilities, and other stakeholders in addressing the complexities of economy-wide renewable energy deployment. It identifies key barriers to scaling, specifically the distribution of costs among consumers and investors, and technical hurdles such as grid upgrades and the management of intermittent supply.

The document defines transformative adaptation in agriculture as intentional responses that fundamentally alter production systems, locations, or technologies. It argues that while incremental adaptation is often preferable, severe climate impacts will increasingly necessitate transformative shifts to avoid maladaptation and conflict. The paper proposes the use of 'transformative pathways'—coordinated sequences of short- and medium-term actions—and 'decision windows' based on climate projections and crop models to signal when systemic change is required. It calls for governments to integrate these considerations into national adaptation plans (NAPs) and for international bodies, including the UNFCCC, FAO, UNDP, and UNEP, to align their guidelines and funding to support these systemic transitions, emphasizing that such processes must be inclusive and gender-responsive to prevent inequitable outcomes.

The document argues that investors must factor climate change risk into their decisions as greenhouse gas regulations create both costs and opportunities. It introduces a framework that prioritizes the analysis of competitive dynamics resulting from climate policies, noting that policy design and company responses determine financial impacts. The report asserts that existing financial techniques can be used to discount these potential consequences despite uncertainties, particularly in the United States.

The Corporate Ecosystem Services Review (ESR) is a strategic tool developed by the World Resources Institute, the Meridian Institute, and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development. It provides a five-step methodology for companies to assess how ecosystem degradation—which has seen 15 of 24 evaluated services decline over the last 50 years—affects their bottom line. The ESR identifies five categories of risks and opportunities: operational, regulatory and legal, reputational, market and product, and financing. By 2012, approximately 300 companies had utilized the ESR to move beyond traditional pollution-focused environmental assessments toward a strategy that accounts for ecosystem dependence.

The report argues that traditional 'gray' infrastructure alone is insufficient to meet global development goals and climate adaptation needs. It proposes a 'next generation' approach that combines built solutions with 'green' systems—such as forests, wetlands, and mangroves—to improve water supply, flood management, and hydropower efficiency. The authors provide a framework for evaluating these projects across technical, environmental, social, and economic dimensions, emphasizing that green infrastructure can lower costs, increase resilience, and empower local communities if rigorously designed and supported by enabling policies and innovative financing.

The report argues that combining natural systems—such as forests, wetlands, and mangroves—with built infrastructure can lower costs and increase resilience against climate change. It provides a technical, social, and economic framework for project appraisal and highlights the need for enabling policies and innovative financing to mainstream these 'next generation' infrastructure solutions.

The document identifies the systemic challenges of integrating climate change risks into policy, such as uncertainty, non-linear impacts, and temporal lags. It proposes a research framework for the World Resources 2010 report to identify the conditions and hurdles for creating decision-making processes that are responsive, proactive, flexible, durable, and robust. The methodology includes sectoral case studies, commissioned expert papers, and scenario exercises focusing on developing nations.

The Flood Green Guide, published by WWF International, advocates for an Integrated Flood Management (IFM) approach that prioritizes non-structural methods and combines 'soft' (nature-based) and 'hard' (engineered) structural interventions. It provides a five-stage project cycle—preliminary analysis, method identification, selection and design, operation and monitoring, and project evaluation—to help local managers reduce flood risk. The guide details various techniques, from upper watershed restoration and constructed wetlands to engineered drainage and land-use zoning, while emphasizing the importance of gender analysis, community engagement, and the specific challenges of urban flooding, such as the urban heat island effect and land subsidence.

The document argues that traditional sustainability practices are insufficient for managing the 'risk multiplier' effect of climate change. It advocates for a shift toward 'socio-ecological resilience,' where businesses protect the natural systems and communities they depend on to ensure long-term viability. WWF proposes a four-step methodology: assessing risk through a landscape lens, developing strategies for change using scenario planning, implementing nature-friendly local solutions, and employing adaptive management. Central to this approach are three principles: avoiding harm to nature, using nature to help people, and building resilience for nature itself.