Search Climate Insights Directory

Dr Samuel Morin explains the importance of 'unpacking' the IPCC SROCC's Summary for Policy Makers (SPM) by using concrete, local examples—such as ski tourism, sea level rise, and mountain gravitational hazards—to make global findings relevant to French national policy-makers. He emphasizes that spending significant time clarifying basic climate principles and scenarios is a prerequisite for effectively discussing specific risks and impacts.

Dr Alex C. Ruane, an IPCC author, details his method of translating complex climate data into accessible information for community groups in Manhattan. He emphasizes moving from abstract metrics, such as CO2 concentrations, to tangible impacts on food and cities, and utilizes specific analogies—such as comparing sea level rise to raising a basketball court floor—to make scientific uncertainties and risks more comprehensible to non-experts.

Dr. Intan Suci Nurhati, an author for the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, emphasizes the importance of adapting scientific delivery to the specific needs and language of different audiences. Her approach includes providing strategic support to government negotiators, using financial metaphors for CEOs and influencers, and utilizing social media to reach high school students. She notes that these interactions, particularly with the media, have influenced her own scientific direction.

Dr Masao Ishii, an author for the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, utilizes specific observations from Japan's coastal sites and the western North Pacific—such as sea level rise, sea surface temperature, and acidity—to illustrate the connection between local experiences and the global climate system. He notes that presenting these regional examples helps audiences grasp the complexity and uncertainty of future projections. Furthermore, engaging with a diverse audience, including the general public and climate skeptics via platforms like YouTube and Slido, has prompted him to broaden his own knowledge and consider the varied implications of climate data for different stakeholders.

Dr. Izidine Pinto, an author for the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, conducted a seminar at Eduardo Mondlane University in Quelimane, Mozambique, in March 2020. He used local examples, such as the impacts on Quirimbas National Park and the Primeiras and Segundas Archipelago, to make global climate science resonate with students. The session included discussions on the consequences of Tropical Cyclone Idai and the temporary improvement of air quality during the COVID-19 pandemic due to reduced industrial and transport activity.

Dr Lucas Ruiz emphasizes the importance of presenting oneself as a 'regular person' to reduce the distance between experts and the public. He advocates for tailoring messages to the specific needs of the audience, such as linking glacier shrinkage to water resources for agricultural communities, and using analogies—comparing glaciers to bank accounts—to explain complex processes without relying on scientific jargon. Additionally, he highlights the effectiveness of visual aids like pictures, plots, and short videos to maintain engagement.

Dr Roxy Mathew Koll, an author for the IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, employs a 'global to local' communication approach to bridge the gap between high-level scientific reports and the lived experiences of people in India. He supplements IPCC data with local scientific papers and government reports to link climate change to immediate food, water, and energy security issues. To counter the depressing nature of climate risk assessments, he incorporates success stories of community-led adaptation and mitigation. His engagement methods include the use of comics, newspaper clippings, and 'temproidery'—a creative project using color-coded embroidery to visualize rising temperature spirals.

The document outlines the difficulties small rural communities encounter when attempting to access federal disaster preparedness funding and mapping programs due to limited local government capacity. It highlights specific governance challenges in repairing critical infrastructure, using the Midland dam floods as an example, and discusses the need for workforce development and watershed management to build flood resilience.

The Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Act 2019 establishes a framework for Aotearoa (New Zealand) to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions (excluding biogenic methane) by 2050. The law introduces five-year emissions budgets, an independent Climate Change Commission to provide expert advice and monitoring, and a requirement for the government to produce public action plans and national climate risk assessments every six years. Notably, the Act differentiates between long-lived and short-lived pollutants by setting a separate target for biogenic methane: a 10% reduction from 2017 levels by 2030 and a 24% to 47% reduction by 2050. The legislation also mandates the inclusion of Māori and iwi through consultations, the integration of traditional knowledge, and the recognition of the Treaty of Waitangi in climate planning.

The document analyzes Manitoba's 2018 climate accountability legislation, highlighting its use of a 'carbon savings account' with five-year cumulative emission reduction targets and an independent expert advisory council. While praising the framework's governance and the advantage of cumulative budgets over annual targets, the study notes that the absence of long-term targets and a multi-budget strategy reduces predictability and accountability for investors and policymakers.

The document analyzes the 2019 amendments to British Columbia's Climate Change Accountability Act, detailing its framework for emissions targets, reporting requirements, and the establishment of the Climate Solutions Council. It highlights the integration of climate risk management and clean growth but identifies critical gaps in independent oversight and the lack of a formal mechanism to review long-term emissions targets.

The document examines Manitoba's 2018 climate accountability legislation, highlighting the Carbon Savings Account (CSA) and the role of the Expert Advisory Council. While praising the cumulative emissions budget approach, it notes that the lack of long-term targets and the practice of setting budgets one-at-a-time reduce predictability and accountability.

The report argues that a well-designed climate accountability framework can increase government transparency and coordination across different levels of government to meet 2030 and 2050 targets. Based on international and domestic case studies, it identifies six common elements of such frameworks and proposes a national Canadian model that balances federal leadership with subnational flexibility.

The document examines the 2019 Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Act of Aotearoa New Zealand, highlighting its accountability framework, the role of the Climate Change Commission, and its specific approach to biogenic methane and Indigenous engagement.

The document analyzes the 2019 amendments to British Columbia's Climate Change Accountability Act, which established a broader climate accountability framework. Key features include the requirement for intermediate and sector-specific emission targets, the creation of an independent advisory committee (the Climate Solutions Council), and enhanced reporting obligations for the provincial government and public bodies. While the author notes that regular reporting improves transparency, the study identifies several gaps: a lack of independent oversight to monitor government progress, the absence of formal requirements to actually reduce climate risks, and no codified mechanism for reviewing long-term emission targets, such as the 2050 goal.

The case study in Bilaspur district, India, emphasizes the necessity of combining 25 years of scientific climate data with traditional community knowledge to identify climate impacts and prioritize adaptation interventions. It highlights the role of NGOs in bridging the gap between district-level data and local action, the importance of engaging the Gram Sabha and government officials across all administrative levels to mainstream adaptation into budgets and policies, and the value of creating cross-sectoral networks of stakeholders to align development with climate and Sustainable Development Goals.

The document details the use of the GAPF-EI tool in Côte d’Ivoire, highlighting its ability to capture emission sources specific to low- and middle-income countries, such as biomass cooking and vegetation fires, to support integrated air quality and climate change mitigation strategies.

The report details a study in rural Kenya where community members imagined a future of fully electric cooking and worked backward to identify the necessary steps to achieve it. Participants linked electric cooking to broader development goals, including improved health, gender equality, and infrastructure. The proposed pathway involves a gradual transition from fuelwood to improved stoves and LPG before reaching full electrification, driven by community savings, civic engagement, and government support.

The document outlines a methodology for companies to set water targets based on local catchment contexts rather than just direct operations. Using Cargill as a case study, it details a process of prioritizing value chain sections, assessing risks via the Aqueduct tool suite, and setting proportional targets. Cargill committed to restoring 600 billion liters of water and reducing five million kilograms of pollutants.

The document examines the causes of annual flooding in Accra, Ghana, and advocates for the integration of nature-based solutions, specifically ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA), alongside traditional infrastructure. It highlights the need for coordinated management across municipal and district assemblies to address shared waterways and drainage systems.