Search Climate Insights Directory

Climate change is making heatwaves in Canada more frequent, intense, and prolonged, with the country warming twice as fast as the global average. These events are linked to increased mortality, severe health risks, and the amplification of wildfires, such as the 2021 British Columbia heat dome. The economic burden is significant, with projected annual costs of $3 billion for health-related deaths and quality of life losses by mid-century, alongside billions in infrastructure damage and productivity losses. Adaptation strategies, including indoor cooling and resilient infrastructure, are recommended to mitigate these risks.

Climate change is making heat waves in Canada hotter, longer, and more frequent, with the country warming twice as fast as the global average. These events are linked to increased mortality, severe health issues, and the intensification of wildfires. Economic burdens include billions in healthcare costs, societal losses from premature deaths, and infrastructure damage. Adaptation strategies such as indoor cooling, green infrastructure, and improved urban design are recommended to mitigate these risks.

In June 2026, the United States experienced slightly above-average temperatures, with an average anomaly of 0.7°F across 192 analyzed cities. The Southwest was the warmest region, with temperatures more than 2.9°F above normal, and Flagstaff, Arizona, recorded the most unusual warmth at 4.0°F above normal. Long-term trends show that 189 of the 192 cities have warmed since 1970, with Reno, Nevada, seeing the greatest increase of 10.6°F. Climate attribution analysis using the Climate Shift Index (CSI) indicates that San Juan, Puerto Rico, had 30 days where temperatures were at least two times more likely due to climate change.

The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is calling for public engagement in the consultation of a draft Instrument on International Investment Contracts developed by UNIDROIT and the ICC. The consultation period runs from June 24 to September 15, 2026. IISD emphasizes that the final text must move beyond aspirational language to make sustainability a core operational objective and ensure that investor protections do not undermine the right of states to regulate.

Mighty Earth's CEO argues that the environmental movement must shift from relying on technocratic solutions toward grassroots organizing and direct pressure on the private sector. The organization is specifically targeting companies such as Ahold Delhaize, Hyundai Motor Company, and Jardine Matheson to accelerate their transition to clean energy and plant-based sales, while supporting environmental movements in Australia to combat deforestation.

The document reports that non-fossil sources reached a record 46.2% of the global electricity mix in April, with wind and solar accounting for 21.3%. It discusses how the instability of the Strait of Hormuz has exposed the fragility of fossil fuel supply chains, prompting countries like China, Poland, and the Philippines to accelerate electrification and renewable energy adoption. Despite this, global fossil fuel subsidies are expected to exceed USD 1 trillion this year, and major energy firms like Shell and BP are pivoting back toward traditional oil and gas models. The text also notes the climate risks evidenced by record heatwaves in Europe and record global carbon emissions in 2025.

The document argues that the climate crisis in Latin America is a legal matter of human rights, supported by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the Escazú Agreement. It categorizes climate-related rights violations into three groups: those affected by extreme weather and environmental degradation, those harmed by extractive industries (including transition minerals like lithium and copper), and environmental defenders facing violence. It emphasizes that Latin America is the most dangerous region for environmental activists, with Colombia, Guatemala, Mexico, and Brazil being particularly high-risk. The guide encourages investigative journalism to monitor the application of legal protections for indigenous communities and defenders.

ClientEarth argues that CSDDD guidelines must explicitly include greenhouse gas emissions under 'harmful emissions' and adopt a risk-based approach to environmental due diligence. The submission recommends a strict hierarchy for remediation—prioritising prevention and restoration over offsetting—and suggests the creation of industry-funded remediation funds to address complex value chain harms.

The briefing reports that a majority of citizens in several EU member states support requiring heavy industry to pay for CO2 emissions and favor investing carbon revenues into industrial decarbonisation over the continuation of free allowances. It highlights a contrast between public opinion and lobbying efforts by industry giants and certain member states to weaken EU ETS rules.

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) proposes several amendments to Poland's draft Heating Transformation Strategy to 2040. Key recommendations include a more nuanced approach to nuclear heating—distinguishing between large plants, SMRs for cogeneration, and heat-only SMRs—and the removal of renewable hydrogen as a general heating solution due to inefficiency. CATF also advocates for enhanced risk-sharing mechanisms for geothermal energy, specifically 'Super Hot Rock Energy', and the legal and financial inclusion of energy communities and social ownership models to increase local acceptance and efficiency.

The report proposes optimizing the limited supply of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) by targeting its use at airports with the highest contrail and particulate matter (PM) impacts. Analysis of 16.6 million flights in 2024 reveals that 2% of flights generate 80% of contrail-related warming. In the U.S., JFK, LAX, and O'Hare are identified as primary targets, while Heathrow, Istanbul Airport, and Paris CDG are the top candidates in Europe. The study finds that a 50% SAF blend can reduce LTO particulate emissions by 26-28% and contrail-related warming by 30-40%. While airport-wide targeting is simplest, time-based and flight-based strategies are more fuel-efficient. Implementation faces logistical hurdles, particularly at airports using hydrant fuel systems, but the report suggests these can be overcome through policy incentives and infrastructure investment.

The letter argues that current EU biomethane policies, such as REPowerEU and REDIII, create structural incentives to maintain industrial livestock production by relying on manure as a feedstock. The authors claim this contradicts European Green Deal goals, which may require a 10-15% reduction in livestock production. They highlight risks to rural communities, including increased heavy goods vehicle traffic on narrow roads, water pollution, and methane leaks. The signatories call for an independent EU-wide impact assessment, a restriction of biomethane to hard-to-electrify industrial sectors using unavoidable waste, and a prioritisation of energy efficiency and agroecology.

ClientEarth argues that the European Commission's proposed revision of the EMFAF lacks a necessary Impact Assessment and fails to address the misalignment of public resources. The organization recommends the full transposition of WTO fisheries subsidy prohibitions into EU law, specifically by strengthening inadmissibility criteria for funding. It advocates for a strategic reallocation of funds toward small-scale, low-impact fisheries, which it describes as more economically resilient and employment-efficient than industrial fleets. Additionally, ClientEarth calls for a binding minimum of 25% of national envelopes to be dedicated to biodiversity restoration and the removal of fossil fuel tax exemptions for the fishing sector to support a genuine energy transition.

The report details a 50-year campaign by the natural gas industry to brand its product as "clean energy" and a "bridge fuel." It argues that this was a strategic fraud designed to protect residential markets from electrification and later to facilitate a massive expansion of infrastructure. The document highlights the role of industry-funded research, specifically the Gas Research Institute (GRI), and a flawed 1996 joint study with the EPA that underestimated methane emissions to legitimize gas as a climate solution. It further describes how the industry used voluntary programs like Natural Gas STAR to fend off mandatory regulations and co-opted environmental organizations to lend credibility to its claims.

The provided text consists of appendices to a report by the Center for Climate Integrity. Appendix A lists trade associations, research institutes, and PR firms—such as the American Gas Association (AGA), the Gas Research Institute (GRI), and J. Walter Thompson—that collaborated to promote natural gas. Appendix B outlines a timeline from 1968 to 1996, detailing how the industry was alerted to methane's climate impact as early as 1968, launched a "clean energy" marketing campaign in 1972, and later promoted gas as a "bridge fuel" in 1990 despite internal uncertainties regarding methane leakage rates. It specifically highlights a 1996 GRI/EPA study that reported a 1.4 percent methane emission rate, which the document claims was heavily influenced by the industry and lacked independent technical review by the EPA.

The paper identifies parametric insurance as a critical tool for strengthening the financial resilience of cities in EMDEs, where less than 10% of climate-related losses are currently insured. It highlights a structural collaboration gap between municipalities and insurers, noting that only 5 of 16 mapped programs engage directly with municipal governments. To address this, the authors propose three priority actions: supporting affordable premiums through national and international funding, strengthening municipal capacity for risk-layering, and improving legal and regulatory enabling environments. The document argues that parametric insurance is a particularly effective entry point due to its ability to provide rapid liquidity and simpler product structures compared to traditional indemnity insurance.

The report analyzes six public climate finance interventions—ranging from local adaptation grants in Africa and Asia to a debt-for-nature swap in Ecuador—to test a framework for 'transformational' finance. It argues that high-quality climate finance is not defined by the financial instrument alone but by its ability to build an 'enabling environment' and deliver results across project, market, and system levels. Key findings highlight a persistent tension between the scale of finance and the quality of subnational accessibility, as well as significant data gaps in measuring system-level impacts and the depth of integration of equity and justice dimensions.

The report analyzes the evolution of 'net zero' and 'nature positive' concepts, detailing how they are operationalized through taxonomies and methodologies in the financial sector. It highlights the interdependence of climate and nature crises, arguing for an integrated 'net-zero nature-positive' (NZNP) finance approach to manage compounding risks and leverage synergies, while noting that a unified NZNP definition and measurement protocol do not yet exist.

The analysis finds that if approximately 2,430 large companies (consuming over 100 GWh/year) adopted the RAcc model, the resulting demand would cover about 66% of global commercial and industrial electricity consumption and avoid 5.5 billion tCO2e annually. The report identifies a tipping point where adoption by the top 20% of these companies (~539 organizations) would exceed existing global renewable energy supply, necessitating the construction of new renewable generation capacity.

The document serves as a practical manual for identifying carbon projects within a specific country and evaluating their project documents. It explains the differences between Article 6.2 (decentralised), Article 6.4 (centralised), Voluntary Carbon Markets (VCM), and REDD+ programs. The guide directs users to specific digital tools—such as the UNEP Article 6 pipeline platform, the UC Berkeley Voluntary Registry Offsets Database, and the REDD+ Web Platform—to find project data. It also provides a framework for analysing project documents, focusing on geographic scope, actor roles, timelines, methodologies, and benefit-sharing arrangements, while highlighting industry quality criteria like additionality, leakage, and permanence.