Search Climate Insights Directory

The document analyzes the transition of poverty conceptualization from a moralistic, legal status to a functional, multidimensional experience. It details the influence of Enlightenment optimism, Cold War-era development theories, the neoliberal 'Washington Consensus', and the eventual shift toward human-centric and intersectional frameworks.

The report evaluates how the Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) bridges science and policy to induce sustainable development. It defines policy engagement as interactions leading to changes in agendas, capacities, and decisions. Through 18 case studies, SEI identifies key pathways to impact—such as developing scientific evidence, using decision-support tools (e.g., LEAP and WEAP), and building networks with 'champions'. The analysis categorizes outcomes into changes in awareness/attitudes (Agendas), institutional strengthening (Capacities), and actual policy shifts (Decisions). It concludes that long-term relationships and a focus on solutions are more effective than short-term, output-driven engagement.

The document examines a citizen food assembly in York, UK, highlighting how participatory processes can drive sustainable food system changes, such as relocalising supply and reducing waste through 'food hubs'.

The New Earswick Good Life Initiative (GLI) was an 18-month participatory action research project in York, UK, designed to build community resilience and foster sustainable lifestyles. The project found that successful pro-environmental behavior change requires more than locally relevant ideas; it necessitates time, the transformation of social relationships, and the strengthening of local institutions and power balances. The paper argues that building social capital, leadership skills, and support networks is essential for communities to effectively engage with policy and take local responsibility for their environment.

The Good Life Initiative in New Earswick, York, sought to build community resilience and reduce carbon emissions through a holistic approach to sustainability. The project found that attempts to create groups solely around energy saving were unsuccessful; instead, success was achieved by identifying 'hooks'—local interests such as green spaces and school partnerships—to engage residents. While measurable reductions in household emissions could not be demonstrated, the project successfully raised awareness of low-carbon lifestyles, improved social connections, and enhanced community cohesion.

The report details the 'Good Life' initiative in New Earswick, York, which aimed to increase community resilience and reduce carbon emissions in a low-income area. Initial efforts focusing strictly on carbon footprints failed to engage residents, leading the project to pivot toward 'hooks' like nature and green spaces. This adaptive approach, including a partnership with a local secondary school for the 'Jo-Rio Mini Earth Summit', successfully increased participation and strengthened social networks. While the project could not quantitatively prove a reduction in household emissions, it demonstrated that improving social capital and leveraging trusted community voices are critical for fostering long-term pro-environmental behaviour and resilience in disadvantaged areas.

The research demonstrates that a targeted social marketing approach in York, UK, involving the recruitment of six community teams for a six-month period of mentoring and advice, led to a statistically significant reduction in carbon emissions. Participants achieved an average reduction of 2.0 tonnes of CO2e per year, with the most substantial gains occurring in home energy and shopping behaviors.

The York Green Neighbourhood Challenge was a three-phase initiative conducted between May 2009 and September 2010 in the City of York. The project aimed to reduce household carbon emissions, raise awareness of low-carbon lifestyles, and foster community cohesion. By profiling neighbourhoods based on carbon footprints, environmental attitudes, and infrastructure, the project targeted 'high potential' areas—specifically South Bank Central and Holgate East—and recruited six teams (including neighbourhood, school, and church groups). Participants received personalised carbon footprint assessments and pledged pro-environmental actions over a six-month period, supported by mentors and external experts. The evaluation found that 49 participants achieved an average carbon footprint reduction of 2.0 tonnes of CO2e per year, representing an 11.3% decrease. The most significant reductions occurred in shopping and housing, while transport reductions were not statistically significant. The total projected emission reduction was 98 tonnes of CO2e per year, at a cost of £472.57 per tonne. The report concludes by proposing a model for community engagement that emphasizes quality of life, targets responsive audiences, and utilizes existing community networks.

The SEI Strategy 2010-2014 establishes a framework for the institute to act as a leading provider of systems understanding and policy solutions for sustainable development. The strategy reorganizes research into four multidisciplinary themes: managing environmental systems, reducing climate risk, transforming governance, and rethinking development. SEI aims to increase its institutional core funding to 40% by 2014 to enhance strategic flexibility and independence. The institute leverages a distributed structure of research centres across Africa, Asia, Europe, and the USA to link global expertise with local implementation, specifically targeting the needs of poor regions and the development of leadership capacities in the South.

The study finds that the average York resident has a carbon footprint of 12.58 tonnes of CO2 per year, with housing and transport accounting for 60% of this total. Analysis of Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) reveals significant variation: the highest footprints are found in city centre, rural, and commuter areas, while the lowest are in disadvantaged urban areas or student-heavy neighbourhoods. The report identifies a gap between green attitudes and actual behaviour, noting that some neighbourhoods with strong green attitudes still maintain high footprints. By combining data on emissions, resident attitudes, and local infrastructure, the report identifies specific neighbourhoods with the 'highest potential' for change. For housing, these include Heworth Without Rural and South Bank Central; for transport, the Holgate and Osbaldwick areas are highlighted. The findings support the 'York Green Streets Challenge', a project targeting 100 households to achieve a 10% reduction in their carbon footprint in 2010.

The report investigates the feasibility of reducing transport-related CO2 emissions in Yorkshire and Humber using the REAP model. It tests three scenarios: Business as Usual, Step Change, and Accelerated. Findings indicate that while a combination of practical measures (such as Bus Rapid Transit, teleworking, and rail improvements) can flatten emission growth, they are insufficient to meet the theoretical targets of the Stabilising Carbon Trends scenario. Aviation is identified as a major driver of emissions that remains largely outside regional policy control. The report concludes that the scale of investment required for these reductions is unprecedented and likely unaffordable under current funding mechanisms.

The report identifies that the Leeds City Region must reduce housing-related CO2e emissions by 38 million tonnes by 2026 to align with national 2050 targets. The most impactful measure is the major retrofit of existing homes, which could provide 53.2% of the required reduction. Other essential measures include behavioural change (22%), low and zero carbon technologies (12.4%), and stricter new build standards (9%). The study concludes that a combination of these measures, supplemented by either external wall insulation, additional LZC installations, or selective demolition and rebuild of inefficient properties, is necessary to meet the target.

The document evaluates SEI's use of stakeholder engagement, distinguishing between the mere use of participatory methods and a comprehensive participatory approach. Through case studies in East Africa, Vietnam, and the UK, it argues that effective engagement requires careful planning, cultural sensitivity, and a clear purpose to avoid 'extractive' research. The authors recommend that SEI adopt institute-wide guiding principles, invest in facilitation training, and create internal mechanisms for sharing expertise to move from being a practitioner of participation to a theoretical contributor in the field.

The Intelligent Travel project in York tested personalised travel planning on 5,701 households, resulting in a 16 percentage point reduction in car trips and a 28 per cent reduction in car distances driven among the intervention group. The study found that targeted incentives, particularly free bus passes and pedometers, effectively increased bus and walking trips, while cycling and car-sharing incentives had less impact. The report argues that such 'soft' behavioural interventions are highly cost-effective compared to traditional road-building schemes and can be scaled up to significantly reduce urban congestion and air pollution.

The provided text is a list of publications from the Stockholm Environment Institute. It includes a 2002 technical report titled 'A Material Flow Analysis and Ecological Footprint of York' and summaries of more recent works concerning UK supply chain impacts on deforestation and water stress, the necessity of combining territorial and supply chain metrics for deforestation monitoring, and the communication of ecological citizenship.

The research assesses five case studies—three in Stockholm and two in Yorkshire—to determine if lay citizens can effectively validate technical environmental policies. It finds that while citizens are capable of this, systemic barriers such as inappropriate participatory techniques, lack of managerial skills, and institutional inflexibility often hinder meaningful involvement. The study contrasts government-led initiatives, which often treat participation as a tool for awareness and public assent, with citizen-led initiatives that demonstrate higher levels of control and knowledge generation.

The Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) is an international non-profit research organization that integrates scientific research with policy analysis to promote sustainability. Operating through eight global centers, SEI focuses on climate change, water, air, and land use, while incorporating perspectives on governance, economics, gender, and human health. Its regional centers provide specialized expertise in areas such as sustainable urbanization in Africa, climate adaptation in Asia, and environmental governance in the Baltic region and European Union.