Search Climate Insights Directory

The case of LONDON AND SA EXPLORATION CO v ROULIOT (1890–91) affirmed that land ownership in South Africa includes a natural right to lateral support from adjoining properties. The court ruled that this right is presumed to exist in lease agreements unless explicitly waived and that landowners cannot trespass on adjacent land to remove soil under the guise of necessity, but must instead seek legal remedies such as interdicts.

The Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment of South Africa has set aside a Provisional Atmospheric Emission Licence (PAEL) issued to Thabametsi Power Company (Pty) Ltd on 14 February 2019. The decision was based on the fact that the PAEL was linked to an Environmental Authorisation (EA) for the Thabametsi Coal-Fired Power Plant, which had been set aside and declared null and void by a court agreement on 19 November 2020.

This document is an appeal decision by the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment of South Africa regarding the refusal of an Environmental Authorisation (EA) for Karpowership SA (Pty) Ltd's proposed Gas-to-Power via Powership Project at the Port of Richards Bay. The Minister remits the matter back to the Competent Authority (CA) to address material gaps in information and procedural defects in the public participation process.

This document is an appeal decision by the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment of South Africa regarding the refusal of an Environmental Authorisation (EA) for Karpowership SA (Pty) Ltd's proposed Gas-to-Power via Powership Project at the Port of Saldanha Bay. The Minister dismissed eight grounds of appeal raised by Karpowership and nine other appellants, upholding the finding that the application was deficient due to material gaps in environmental impact data—specifically regarding underwater noise—and procedural failures in public participation. However, rather than confirming the final refusal, the Minister remitted the matter to the Competent Authority for reconsideration, provided the identified gaps and procedural defects are addressed.

The Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment of South Africa decided to remit the appeal regarding the refused Environmental Authorisation for Karpowership's Gas-to-Power project at the Port of Ngqura back to the Competent Authority. The original refusal was based on material gaps in environmental information, particularly regarding underwater noise impacts on marine life and fisheries, and procedural defects in public participation. Despite the project's status as a Strategic Integrated Project (SIP) intended to alleviate the national energy crisis, the Minister ruled that such status does not circumvent the requirements of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA).

This document is an appeal decision issued by the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment of South Africa, dated May 2, 2022. The Minister dismissed a combined appeal by Nseleni Power Corporation Pty (Ltd) and Anchor Energy LNG Pty Ltd against the refusal of Environmental Authorisations (EAs) for the proposed Nseleni Independent Floating Power Plant (NIFPP) and associated infrastructure in the port of Richards Bay. The refusal was upheld based on high negative impacts on the estuarine environment, lack of required landowner consent, and inadequate pre-application monitoring of avifauna.

This case study details a Supreme Court of Appeal decision regarding the interaction between the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 (MPRDA), the Land Use Planning Ordinance 15 of 1985 (LUPO), and the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 (NEMA). The court ruled that the MPRDA does not override municipal land use regulations under LUPO, but it declined to rule on the relationship between the MPRDA and NEMA due to a technicality involving the repeal of specific listing notices.

This document is a letter from Eskom to the South African Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) dated 17 July 2014. It provides additional information to support Eskom's application to postpone compliance with the Minimum Emission Standards (MES) for the Majuba Power Station.

A letter from the South African Department of Environmental Affairs to Eskom regarding the Majuba Power Station's application for the postponement of compliance with the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act 39 of 2004 minimum emission standards.

This report proposes a spatial management system for South Africa's four Marine Planning Areas (Western, Southern, Eastern, and Prince Edward Islands). The system utilizes general and sector-specific development guidelines alongside a comprehensive zoning scheme—categorizing uses as primary, consent, or prohibited—to coordinate human activities, protect biodiversity, and stimulate the ocean economy within South Africa's Exclusive Economic Zone.

This briefing is a letter from Eskom to the South African Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) dated 17 July 2014. It provides additional information regarding Eskom's application to postpone compliance with Minimum Emission Standards (MES) at the Matimba Power Station, detailing current emission limits, planned compliance strategies, and ambient air quality monitoring data from the Marapong station.

This 2006 report by INFOTOX for Eskom reviews international literature to identify risk factors for quantifying health impacts associated with PM, NO2, and SO2 emissions. It highlights the cardiovascular and respiratory risks of particulate matter, identifies highly susceptible subpopulations (children, elderly, and the chronically ill), and notes significant data gaps in South African provincial hospital admission records that hinder precise local risk quantification.

This report reviews risk factors to quantify the potential health impacts of particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5), sulphur dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions from various Eskom operations. It synthesizes global epidemiological data from organizations like the WHO and USEPA to establish risk estimates for mortality and morbidity, while incorporating South African provincial population and health data to support a health risk assessment.

This report, prepared by INFOTOX (Pty) Ltd for Eskom Holdings, evaluates the confidence levels and uncertainties associated with the health risk assessment of particulate matter (PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from Eskom operations. It concludes that risk quantifications based on mortality and particulate matter are more reliable than those based on hospitalisation and gaseous pollutants.

A letter from the South African Department of Environmental Affairs to Eskom regarding the Matimba Power Station's application for postponement of compliance with the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act 39 of 2004 minimum emission standards.

This briefing from Eskom to the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) provides additional information regarding an application to postpone compliance with Minimum Emission Standards (MES) for the Matla Power Station. Eskom outlines its plan to retrofit the station with fabric filter plants and low NOx burners by 2024, while stating it has no plans to upgrade the station to meet the new plant SO2 emission limit. The document also presents ambient air quality monitoring data from the Elandsfontein and Kriel stations, noting non-compliance with particulate matter (PM) standards.

The South African Department of Environmental Affairs granted Eskom postponements for compliance with minimum emission standards at the Matla Power Station. For units 1-4, PM limits are set at 200mg/Nm3 until March 2020, while units 5-6 must maintain 100mg/Nm3. NOx compliance is postponed until March 2020 with a 1200mg/Nm3 limit, and SO2 compliance for new plant is postponed until March 2025 with a 2600mg/Nm3 limit. Eskom must also provide a PM pollution offset plan by 31 March 2016.

This briefing, a letter from Eskom to the South African Department of Environmental Affairs dated 17 July 2014, provides additional information regarding Eskom's application to postpone compliance with Minimum Emission Standards (MES) for the Medupi Power Station.

A letter from the South African Department of Environmental Affairs to Eskom regarding the Medupi Power Station's application for postponement of compliance with the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act 39 of 2004 §21 minimum emission standards.

This guideline outlines the mandatory procedures for renewing a mining right in South Africa under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002. It specifies that applicants must submit Form E to the relevant Regional Manager along with a non-refundable fee, a detailed mining work programme, and reports on environmental compliance and mining results. Renewals are granted if the holder has complied with all legal terms, social and labour plans, and environmental programmes. Each renewal period is capped at 30 years, and the right remains active while a renewal application is pending.